Connect with us

Vermont

As Biden pitches gas tax holiday, Scott considers following suit in Vermont

Published

on

As Biden pitches gas tax holiday, Scott considers following suit in Vermont


As Biden pitches gas tax holiday, Scott considers following suit in Vermont
Site visitors travels alongside Pine Road in Burlington. After President Joe Biden proposed suspending the federal fuel tax, the governor is exploring the method of following go well with in Vermont. File picture by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Amid rising fuel costs nationwide, President Joe Biden on Wednesday pressed Congress to implement a three-month federal fuel tax vacation — and urged states to droop their respective gas taxes as effectively. 

Gov. Phil Scott believes a fuel tax vacation on the state degree is “undoubtedly worthy of consideration,” Scott’s press secretary, Jason Maulucci, stated. 

“(Scott) is all the time supportive of discovering methods to offer tax reduction for Vermonters and Individuals, particularly given the large squeeze the households are feeling because of 40 12 months excessive inflation and report costs on the pump,” Maulucci stated. 

Gas costs have been on the rise since final 12 months and jumped sharply following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February. Final week, fuel costs in Vermont reached a report common excessive of $5.055 per gallon. One 12 months in the past, costs averaged $2.978 per gallon. 

In Vermont, fuel is presently taxed at round 30 cents per gallon, and diesel gas is taxed at 32 cents per gallon. These taxes assist the state Company of Transportation, accounting for 28% of Vermont’s transportation income. The state makes use of that cash to fund development and upkeep on roads, bridges and different infrastructure round Vermont. 

Advertisement

“We would need to see how a few of that cash could be backfilled to guarantee that these vital tasks are funded,” Maulucci stated. 

This isn’t the primary time Vermont has mentioned decreases in state fuel taxes. Suggestions final December by the Vermont Local weather Council known as for 40% of latest car gross sales to be electrical by 2025. Because of this, gas tax income would lower as shoppers shift from fuel to electrical — a difficulty that lawmakers may nonetheless must reckon with sooner or later. 

New York carried out a fuel tax vacation in April as a part of its state price range, taking impact from June 1 to the tip of the calendar 12 months. Three different states — Connecticut, Georgia and Maryland — have suspended their fuel taxes for shorter intervals of time. 

Scott is ready to listen to extra from Washington earlier than coming to a choice, Maulucci stated. The governor’s workplace expects to have extra data within the subsequent week. 

Federally, fuel is taxed at 18.3 cents per gallon, with diesel gas at 24.3 cents per gallon. Vermonters in Congress, and those that hope to be elected come November, have various stances on the efficacy of implementing a fuel tax vacation. 

Advertisement

Some politicians fear that lifting the fuel tax, whereas offering rapid reduction, may result in much more inflation down the road as gas consumption rises.

“Vermonters, and all Individuals, are feeling the ache on the pump, and I’m dedicated to contemplating any proposal that may assist relieve that,” Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., stated in a press release to VTDigger. “Nevertheless, we should ensure that any motion Congress takes doesn’t create extra pressure on center class pocketbooks within the months and years forward.”

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has previously voiced opposition to a fuel tax vacation, tweeting shortly after costs started to spike in March that the plan was “a nasty concept.”

“If we’re severe about offering shoppers reduction on the fuel pump, let’s tackle the greed of huge oil by enacting a windfall earnings tax and ending OPEC’s unlawful price-fixing cartel,” Sanders wrote.

Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., who’s operating for Vermont’s open U.S. Senate seat, advised VTDigger on Wednesday that it might be essential to guarantee that the cash saved from tax cuts would go towards the patron versus oil firms or retailers. 

Advertisement

“Something that’s efficient that reduces costs for the shoppers I assist,” he stated, “however we have got to make sure on this proposal that it is not going to be yet one more windfall for Exxon Mobil and Chevron and large oil. So we have got to see the ultimate language on this invoice to make sure that something that we do may also help us to profit the shoppers.”

In a speech Wednesday afternoon, Biden stated placing shoppers first could be a precedence. 

“I name on the businesses to go each penny of this 18 cents discount to the shoppers,” Biden stated. “There’s no time now for profiteering.”

Democrats within the U.S. Home of Representatives are cut up on their assist for the vacation, with some citing the small quantity of reduction it might present in comparison with the drastic spike in costs. 

“The division actually displays the fact that even with the fuel tax vacation, fuel costs are method too excessive,” Welch stated. “They’re actually hammering households. It is actually going to be brutal once we get into the house heating gas season.”

Advertisement

Candidates operating for Vermont’s open congressional seats stated they acknowledge the need to chop down gas costs nationwide, however have reservations concerning the federal tax vacation as an answer. 

“Sky excessive power costs are crippling Vermont and our nation’s financial system, and politicians in Washington should not getting the job achieved,” Christina Nolan, a former U.S. Lawyer and Republican candidate for U.S. Senate, stated in a press release to VTDigger. “I admire at this time’s effort by the White Home, however imagine it’s a brief time period repair to a long run downside. What we’d like is accountable American power independence.”

“This proposal by President Biden is a step in the precise course to offer pressing and rapid reduction to Vermonters over the approaching months,” Lt. Gov. Molly Grey, who’s operating for Vermont’s open U.S. Home seat, advised VTDigger. “However it’s not the reply to local weather motion that’s wanted to make sure power independence and to strengthen our resilience and transition to renewable power sources.”

Grey’s chief rival within the Democratic U.S. Home major, Vermont Senate President Professional Tempore Becca Balint, D-Windham, stated in a press release that she helps the fuel tax vacation, “nevertheless it isn’t sufficient.”

“Vermonters want reduction from excessive fuel costs, filling up the tank is painful proper now,” Balint stated. “However I’m involved that financial savings from a fuel tax is not going to truly get to Vermonters however as an alternative will go into the pockets of huge oil firms, additional padding their report earnings. President Biden is aware of that extra must be achieved, and I’d assist cracking down on the egregious value gouging that oil and fuel firms are participating in proper now, taxing their large windfall earnings, and giving that cash again to Individuals for some reduction.”

Advertisement

Need to keep on prime of the most recent enterprise information? Join right here to get a weekly e-mail on all of VTDigger’s reporting on native firms and financial traits. And take a look at our new Enterprise part right here.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Scott’s plan to cut school spending worries some educators

Published

on

Scott’s plan to cut school spending worries some educators


MONTPELIER, Vt. (WCAX) – Vermont educators are leery of plans from Gov. Phil Scott to control costs in Vermont’s education system. In Thursday’s inaugural address, Scott pitched sweeping plans to rein in spending which has led to skyrocketing property tax rates.

Last year, one-third of Vemont’s school budgets failed and voters sent more Republicans to Montpelier in years in what some dubbed a tax revolt.

Democrats say everything should be on the table to fix the tax troubles, but some in the education community remain wary.

In his address, the governor outlined a multiyear plan to overhaul how we fund public schools and rein in the cost of spending which has skyrocketed to $2.3 billion.

Advertisement

“In too many districts, teachers aren’t paid enough, administrators are tied up in bureaucracy, schools have too much empty space and many are in disrepair,” said Scott, R-Vermont.

He proposes consolidating dozens of school districts and supervisory unions, putting guardrails on local school spending and completely rewriting the school funding formula with the aim of cutting back on staff and the 80% of school costs that go to wages and benefits.

But some in Vermont’s education community see it another way.

“We have to be clear what is the problem we’re trying to solve. We’re not spending too much money in public education; we’re having a difficult time funding it,” said Don Tinney the executive director of the Vermont NEA.

The Vermont teachers union contends the state has enough taxing capacity to fund schools and students’ complex needs. But they say the state should instead fund schools through state and income tax instead of a property tax.

Advertisement

“We believe the income tax is the fairest way of doing that because people are paying what they can afford to pay,” Tinney said.

As for the funding formula, Scott argues more affluent towns that can afford higher property taxes spend more and approve their local budgets, which drives up costs in the statewide education fund.

“Those higher spenders can actually increase the rates of those districts whose kids and teachers are getting less,” Scott said.

The governor is expected to introduce a formula where districts are paid a flat rate and any additional spending would have to be raised locally.

But some worry that will lead to inequitable opportunities for kids.

Advertisement

“There are states that use foundation formulas to keep poor people poor and drive down public education costs and allow for more opportunities for private schools and school choice schemes. I can’t see Vermont allowing that to happen,” said Jay Nichols of the Vermont Principals’ Association.

Vermonters are still staring down a 6% property tax increase if school budgets as drafted pass on Town Meeting Day.

Scott says in the weeks ahead, he will unveil ideas to hold taxpayers harmless and keep taxes flat.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont expected to get light snow Saturday. Here’s the forecast

Published

on

Vermont expected to get light snow Saturday. Here’s the forecast


Wintry weather spreads across the South

Significant snow and icy precipitation are moving from Texas to the Carolinas.

Following a week of cold temperatures and harsh winds, this weekend will see light snow across New England, including Vermont.

While the snow is expected to cover the entire state of Vermont, this weekend’s snowfall will be calm, with no strong winds to create a storm and only a small amount of accumulation.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know about the timing, location and effects of Saturday’s snowfall in Vermont.

Where in VT will it snow Saturday?

According to the National Weather Service (NWS) of Burlington, light snow is expected throughout the day on Saturday, with the greatest chances of snow in the morning. Most areas of the state will see one inch of snowfall, with two inches possible in the middle region of the state.

While Vermont has seen extremely strong winds over this past week, the wind is expected to die down Friday night and stay mild throughout the snow Saturday. As of right now, the NWS has not issued any hazards or warning for Saturday, as the snowfall is expected to be calm.

Advertisement

VT weather next week

Temperatures will stay in the 20s throughout the weekend, with slightly warmer temperatures coming in next week. Snow showers are expected overnight from Monday to Tuesday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Committee leadership in the Vermont Senate sees major overhaul – VTDigger

Published

on

Committee leadership in the Vermont Senate sees major overhaul – VTDigger


Sen. Chris Mattos, R-Chittenden North, center, speaks with Sen. Andrew Perchlik, D/P-Washington, at the Statehouse in Montpelier on Thursday, Jan. 9. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Nine of the Vermont Senate’s 11 standing committees will have new leaders this biennium and three will be helmed by Republicans, Lt. Gov. John Rodgers announced from the Senate floor Thursday afternoon.

The committee overhaul follows the retirement, death or defeat of a considerable number of veteran chairs last year — and after Republicans picked up six seats in the 30-member body in November’s election. Democrats and Progressives now hold 17 seats, while Republicans control 13.

Unlike the Vermont House, where committee positions are chosen unilaterally by the speaker, Senate assignments are doled out by a three-member panel, the Committee on Committees, which this year includes two new participants: Rodgers, a Republican, and Sen. Ginny Lyons, D-Chittenden Southeast. Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Baruth, D/P-Chittenden Central, returned to the committee. 

The trio had few experienced senators from which to choose, given that — as Baruth noted in his opening remarks to the chamber Wednesday — nearly two-thirds of the Senate’s members joined the body over the past two years. Illustrating the point, newly sworn-in Sen. Seth Bongartz, D-Bennington, was tapped to chair the Senate Education Committee. (Bongartz had previously served in the House since 2021 — and had tours of duty in both the House and Senate in the 1980s.)

Advertisement

Perhaps the most significant appointment went to Sen. Andrew Perchlik, D/P-Washington, who will chair the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee. He succeeds Sen. Jane Kitchel, D-Caledonia, who retired after leading the budget-writing panel for 14 years.  

Sen. Nader Hashim, D-Windham, will helm the Senate Judiciary Committee, following the death last June of veteran Sen. Dick Sears, D-Bennington. 

The Senate Natural Resources & Energy Committee will be led by Sen. Anne Watson, D/P-Washington. Its former chair, Sen. Chris Bray, D-Addison, was defeated in November. 

Republicans flip six seats in the Vermont Senate, shattering Democratic supermajority


Advertisement

Sen. Alison Clarkson, D-Windsor, takes over the Senate Economic Development, Housing & General Affairs Committee from Sen. Kesha Ram Hinsdale, D-Chittenden Southeast. Ram Hinsdale defeated Clarkson for the role of Senate majority leader in November, requiring the former to step down from her committee leadership position and allowing the latter to step up. 

The three Republicans chairing panels are Sen. Richard Westman, R-Lamoille, who will run the Senate Transportation Committee; Sen. Russ Ingalls, R-Essex, who will head the Senate Agriculture Committee; and Sen. Brian Collamore, R-Rutland, who will lead the Senate Government Operations Committee. (Republicans similarly made gains in House leadership positions this year.)

Sen. Wendy Harrison, D-Windham, takes over the Senate Institutions Committee from Ingalls, who chaired it last biennium. 

The sole returning chairs are Lyons, who will continue to lead the Senate Health & Welfare Committee, and Sen. Ann Cummings, D-Washington, who will retain control of the Senate Finance Committee. 

Advertisement

Speaking to reporters Thursday afternoon, Baruth said the Committee on Committees had intentionally sought partisan equilibrium on certain panels. The Senate Education Committee, for example, which is expected to engage in heavy lifting as lawmakers reconsider the state’s education funding scheme, includes three Democrats and three Republicans. For a bill to clear that panel, four members would have to approve.

“What I intended for that committee… to do is to put out bipartisan bills,” Baruth said of Senate Ed. 

Similarly, Baruth called the composition of the tax-writing Senate Finance Committee “very centrist,” with four Democrats and three Republicans. 

“They’re going to have a lot of work to do, hard work, but the one thing I want them to think — to think long and hard about — is any kind of raising taxes or fees,” Baruth said. “The only time I’m looking to do that, if it’s necessary, is if it brings down the property tax.”

Ethan Weinstein contributed reporting.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending