Vermont
Amid budget shortfalls, Central Vermont Medical Center to talk with regulators about plans for more psychiatric beds
With the worst of the pandemic within the rearview mirror, state regulators are itching for important progress on plans for a standalone psychiatric unit at Central Vermont Medical Middle in Berlin.
That hospital’s plan for a 25-bed psychiatric unit has been caught within the planning section since 2018. The pandemic delayed progress on the mission, in keeping with regulators, however planning had additionally slowed due to disagreements on the dimensions and value of the mission.
Leaders from The College of Vermont Well being Community, the Berlin hospital’s guardian, are scheduled to go earlier than the Inexperienced Mountain Care Board later this week to debate a path ahead, at the same time as kids and adults with psychological well being wants are ready for days for an inpatient psychiatric mattress.
Earlier than the pandemic, the well being community agreed to make use of $21 million in surplus income for the mission. Since then, there’s been no motion on the difficulty aside from quarterly mission updates.
As of Monday morning, eight adults and 7 kids in disaster had been ready in emergency departments throughout the state, in keeping with the Vermont Division of Psychological Well being.
“Covid put every part on maintain,” stated Kevin Mullin, the Inexperienced Mountain Care Board chair. “Now it’s time to get again and work out how they’re going to spend $21 million on inpatient beds.”
The excess, in the meantime, stays in UVM Well being Community’s coffers, in keeping with community spokesperson Annie Mackin.
However the monetary fallout from coronavirus could delay the mission’s begin date much more.
Only a few weeks in the past, UVM Well being Community executives stated its hospitals in Burlington and Berlin are slated to complete the present fiscal yr with a $44 million shortfall. State regulators allowed the community to extend its service fees by greater than $14 million this yr, however the hospital community stated that wasn’t sufficient to cowl the deficit.
Community leaders responded to the state of affairs by “quickly proscribing” all capital tasks, together with the inpatient psychiatric unit in Berlin, which the community started planning in earnest in 2018.
UVM Well being Community leaders restarted the planning final yr with the purpose of opening the psychiatric unit in 2025. The precise value for the mission has not been specified, however at one time, the community pitched a $150 million price ticket.
Mullin stated he expects community leaders to make significant progress towards increasing entry to inpatient psychiatric beds in Vermont, although the community’s funds points could imply the imaginative and prescient for the unit must be scaled again considerably.
Do not miss a factor. Enroll right here to get VTDigger’s weekly e mail on Vermont hospitals, well being care traits, insurance coverage and state well being care coverage.
720 members left to go
We’re behind our purpose proper now throughout our important Spring Member Drive. As a nonprofit, VTDigger depends on voluntary donations from readers to maintain the information flowing — and free for all who want it. Please contribute in any quantity at present and you will be sustaining our every day investigative reporting, plus 1 donation = 1 kids’s e book by way of our partnership with the Youngsters’s Literacy Basis.
Vermont
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage | Common Dreams
The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute – representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world – are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state’s damage caused by climate change.
The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law – the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River.
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont
(Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont
(Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Vermont
Man Shot Near Central and Vermont: Police and Rescue Respond – ABQ RAW
Albuquerque –
Just after 5:25 PM, a shot rang out in near Central and Vermont. A person reported being shot in the 8310 block of Central Ave NE. Officers from the Albuquerque Police Department were dispatched, but fortunately, the New Mexico State Police happened to be in the vicinity and arrived promptly. Officers promptly rendered life saving measures, while Albuquerque Fire Rescue dispatched a rescue unit from Station 5 to the scene.
The man, who was shot in the leg, will be transported to a local area hospital by AFR. Presently, their condition is not known, but if we learn more, we will update you.
APD’s gun violence reduction unit (GVRU) is being called out to investigate this shooting.
Vermont
U.S. Chamber, Oil Industry Sue Vermont Over Law Requiring Companies To Pay For Climate Change Damage
MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a top oil and gas industry trade group are suing Vermont over its new law requiring that fossil fuel companies pay a share of the damage caused over several decades by climate change.
The federal lawsuit filed Monday asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law, which was passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather. The state is working to estimate the cost of climate change dating back to Jan. 1, 1995.
The lawsuit argues the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the state law is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. It also argues that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the other plaintiff in the lawsuit, the American Petroleum Institute, argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. And because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they argue it is impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a particular location over decades.
“Vermont wants to impose massive retroactive penalties going back 30 years for lawful, out-of-state conduct that was regulated by Congress under the Clean Air Act,” said Tara Morrissey, senior vice president and deputy chief counsel of the Chamber’s litigation center. “That is unlawful and violates the structure of the U.S. Constitution — one state can’t try to regulate a global issue best left to the federal government. Vermont’s penalties will ultimately raise costs for consumers in Vermont and across the country.”
A spokesman for the state’s Agency of Natural Resources said it had not been formally served with this lawsuit.
Anthony Iarrapino, a Vermont-based lobbyist with the Conservation Law Foundation, said the lawsuit was the fossil fuel industry’s way of “trying to avoid accountability for the damage their products have caused in Vermont and beyond.”
“More states are following Vermont’s lead holding Big Oil accountable for the disaster recovery and cleanup costs from severe storms fueled by climate change, ensuring that families and businesses no longer have to foot the entire bill time and time again,” Iarrapino added.
Under the law, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, is to issue a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.
It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as improving stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.
We Need Your Support
Support HuffPost
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
The approach taken by Vermont has drawn interest from other states, including New York, where Gov. Kathy Hochul signed into law a similar bill in December.
The New York law requires companies responsible for substantial greenhouse gas emissions to pay into a state fund for infrastructure projects meant to repair or avoid future damage from climate change. The biggest emitters of greenhouse gases between 2000 and 2018 would be subjected to the fines.
-
Health1 week ago
New Year life lessons from country star: 'Never forget where you came from'
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta’s ‘software update issue’ has been breaking Quest headsets for weeks
-
Business5 days ago
These are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture5 days ago
The 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports5 days ago
The top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics3 days ago
New Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics3 days ago
Carter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics1 day ago
Who Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?