Follow us on social media:
As Rhode Island continues to grapple with a mounting housing crisis, proposed federal tariffs on lumber and other essential building materials could add more pressure to an already strained market. While the policy change is national in scope, its impacts will be felt acutely here at home—especially by homebuyers, builders, and affordable housing developers striving to meet demand in one of the nation’s tightest markets.
The U.S. Department of Commerce recently announced an increase in tariffs on Canadian lumber imports—an essential resource for home construction. According to the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), these tariffs could raise the average cost of building a single-family home in the U.S. by tens of thousands of dollars, and potentially even significantly more.
This is particularly problematic in Rhode Island, where demand continues to outpace housing supply and affordability is increasingly out of reach for many. The bulk of new residential construction in the Ocean State uses wood-frame methods, and wood comprises approximately 75% of the total material in these builds. A 25% increase in the cost of lumber could drive up overall construction costs by as much as 15%, and once you factor in financing and developer overhead, that number could jump to 20% or more. That additional cost almost always gets passed along to buyers and renters.
Local developers are already taking defensive steps. Some affordable housing organizations have begun pre-ordering materials—such as appliances and materials—to get ahead of potential price increases on large-scale projects. But for many builders, especially smaller firms or those working within tight funding parameters or budgets, there’s only so much that can be done to absorb the rising cost of materials.
Across Aquidneck Island and coastal South County—where developable land is limited and permitting processes can be lengthy—even modest cost increases can make or break a project. When costs rise, developers either delay building, scale back their projects, or shelve them altogether. That means fewer homes being built in neighborhoods that desperately need them.
This cost volatility couldn’t come at a worse time. Rhode Island’s median single-family home price has soared to $450,000 this year—up more than 40% since the pandemic. And with interest rates hovering around 7%, many potential buyers are already priced out of the market. An increase in build cost might not mean much to institutional developers, but for a middle-income buyer, it could be the difference between qualifying for a mortgage or not.
According to HousingWorks RI, more than 35% of Rhode Island households are already “cost burdened,” meaning they spend over 30% of their income on housing. With construction costs climbing, the long-term consequences could include an even tighter market, greater competition for limited inventory, and further displacement of working-class families.
For towns like Newport, Middletown, Portsmouth, and Jamestown—where the tourism economy depends heavily on service workers and seasonal staff—the housing crisis is not just a real estate issue. It’s an economic one.
Local builders are already contending with labor shortages, long lead times on materials, and increased regulatory hurdles. The added strain from tariffs on essential materials like lumber and steel could tip the scales further. In some cases, it could push builders out of the market entirely, stalling much-needed housing production and weakening the already fragile pipeline of workforce housing.
Trade policy may seem far removed from the day-to-day realities of the local housing market here in Newport County, but its effects are anything but distant. As federal agencies continue to review and implement new tariff structures, Rhode Islanders, particularly those hoping to buy, rent, or build in the near future, will feel the ripple effects.
It’s now up to state and local officials, along with housing advocates and developers, to make the case for creative solutions. That could include increased public subsidies for affordable housing projects, expedited permitting processes, or state-level programs to help mitigate cost increases due to federal policy changes.
At a time when the state is working to add tens of thousands of new housing units by 2030, the impact of these proposed tariffs on wood-frame construction must be closely monitored. And for Rhode Islanders, this isn’t just a policy issue in Washington. It’s a kitchen-table issue at home.
WARWICK, R.I. (WPRI) — Two people are dead and another person seriously hurt after a crash involving two vehicles on the highway in Warwick Saturday.
Rhode Island State Police said the crash happened around 1:34 p.m. on the ramp from Route 113 West to I-95 South.
According to police, a Hyundai SUV that was driving in the middle lane of the highway started to drift to the right, crossed the first lane, and then crossed onto the on-ramp lane. The car struck the guardrail twice before driving through the grass median.
The Hyundai then struck the driver’s side of a Mercedes SUV that was on the ramp, causing the Mercedes to roll over and come to a rest. The impact sent the Hyundai over the guardrail and down an embankment.
The driver of the Hyundai, a 73-year-old man, and his passenger, a 69-year-old woman, were both pronounced dead at the hospital.
A woman who was in the Mercedes was rushed to Rhode Island Hospital in critical condition.
State police said all lanes of traffic were reopened by 4:30 p.m.
The investigation remains ongoing.
Download the WPRI 12 and Pinpoint Weather 12 apps to get breaking news and weather alerts.
Watch 12 News Now on WPRI.com or with the free WPRI 12+ TV app.
Follow us on social media:
A federal judge on Friday tossed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) lawsuit aiming to force Rhode Island to hand over its voter information as part of the Trump administration’s push to acquire voter data from several states.
Rhode Island U.S. District Court Judge Mary McElroy wrote that federal law does not allow the DOJ “to conduct the kind of fishing expedition it seeks here,” siding with Rhode Island election officials. She added that the DOJ did not provide evidence to suggest that Rhode Island violated election law.
McElroy, a Trump appointee, wrote that she sided with the similar decision in Oregon. That decision ruled that the DOJ was not entitled to unredacted voter registration lists.
“Absent from the demand are any factual allegations suggesting that Rhode Island may be violating the list maintenance requirements,” she said in her ruling.
Rhode Island Secretary of State Gregg Amore (D) praised McElroy’s decision. He said in a statement that the Trump administration “seems to have no problem taking actions that are clear Constitutional overreaches, regularly meddling in responsibilities that are the rights of the states.”
“Today’s decision affirms our position: the United States Department of Justice has no legal right to – or need for – the personally-identifiable information in our voter file,” he said. “Voter list maintenance is a responsibility entrusted to the states, and I remain confident in the steps we take here in Rhode Island to keep our list as accurate as possible.”
The Hill reached out to the DOJ for comment.
The DOJ called for the voter lists as it investigated Rhode Island’s compliance with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which allowed Americans to register to vote when they apply for a driver’s license.
The DOJ sued at least 30 states, as well as Washington, D.C., in December demanding their respective voter data. This data includes birth dates, names and partial Social Security numbers.
At least 12 states have given or said they will give the DOJ their voter registration lists, according to a tracker operated by the Brennan Center for Justice.
The department stated after it lost a similar suit against Massachusetts earlier this month that it had “sweeping powers” to access the voter data and that, if states fail to comply, courts have a “limited, albeit vital, role” in directing election officers on behalf of the administration to produce the records. The DOJ cited the Civil Rights Act as being intended to unearth alleged election law violations.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Chinese robot breaks human world record in Beijing half-marathon
Civil case against Alec Baldwin, ‘Rust’ movie producers advances toward a trial
Karol G at Coachella was a global hit. Yet other foreign acts fear touring the U.S.
L.A.’s unofficial Statue of Liberty is a Fashion Nova billboard off the 10 Freeway
Ordered free, still locked up: Judges fume as Trump administration holds ICE detainees
A renewed threat to JPL as the Trump administration tries again to cut NASA
After 55 years as a broadcaster in L.A., Randy Rosenbloom is leaving town
Bulgaria votes in eighth election in five years