Connect with us

Rhode Island

How you’ll know Dems are serious about dumping Biden • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

How you’ll know Dems are serious about dumping Biden • Rhode Island Current


With former President Donald Trump being rushed off stage after shots were fired at his Pennsylvania rally, the only thing that’s safe to say that nobody knows what’s going to happen next in U.S. politics or the 2024 election.

The events on Saturday are tragic and police have reported that at least one attendee is dead, as is the alleged shooter. It’s hard not to feel like we’re living through particularly unstable times.

For more than two weeks, the news has been dominated by more mundane matters, like growing calls from Democrats, donors and political observers for President Joe Biden to drop out of the presidential race after his shaky first debate performance last month. There’s been a steady trickle of stories about the president’s health declining and concerns whether the 81-year-old is up to the job, as well as some devastating internal polls for Dems in swing states.

Biden tried to allay those fears as he barnstormed through Northville and Detroit on Friday, joking about his age but also delivering a defiant message.

Advertisement

“You made me the nominee,” Biden declared at Renaissance High School in Detroit — where he notably held his last rally in March 2020 before winning Michigan’s critical Democratic primary. “No one else. Not the press; not the pundits; not the insiders; not the donors. You the voters, you decided. No one else, and I’m not going anywhere.”

It’s going to take more than lesser-known lawmakers taking a stand while bigger names fling passive-aggressive comments. It would seem to me that any real effort to get Biden to stand down would have to start with his former running mate, President Barack Obama, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), one of the few people Biden appears to consider an equal.

The crowd was definitely into it, waving “Motown is Joetown” signs and chanting, “Four more years!” and “Don’t give up!”

Advertisement

Biden’s energized performance seemed to calm the jangled nerves of some Democratic leaders and assorted critics, as did his Wednesday press conference after the NATO summit, where he continued to demonstrate his mastery of foreign affairs.

At the moment, it appears that momentum to give the president the old heave-ho from the ticket has stalled, but check back tomorrow, because it doesn’t take much to get Democrats to hit the ol’ panic button.

But even as the dump Biden furor appeared to hit a fever pitch post-debate, I’ve looked for three factors to assess if the president will be the nominee. And so far, I’m not seeing the path to derail the Biden train.

First of all, Biden has made it clear that he’s not leaving willingly, defiantly announcing in an ABC interview that only the “Lord Almighty” could make him quit.

“I’ve got to finish this job,” he proclaimed days later at the NATO press conference. “Because there’s so much at stake.”

Advertisement

If you’re a Biden ally, you’ll probably view this as the president seeing a second term as a moral obligation to the country. He’s long cast himself as an underdog who’s been counted out again and again and now he’s determined to win his last fight.

If you’re in the camp that believes he’s stayed too late at the party, you’re more likely inclined to view this as an exercise in egoism from a man more concerned about his place in history than the nation he’s supposed to be fighting for. Biden has always been stubborn, but this time millions could pay the price if he falls to Trump.

Next, since Biden isn’t planning to leave quietly, that means that Democrats have to have a clear plan in place to broom him from the ticket. So far, more than a dozen members of Congress (and actor George Clooney) have told Biden to withdraw, including vulnerable first-term U.S. Rep. Hillary Scholten (D-Grand Rapids).

Dozens of other leaders have expressed their support for the president, but not-so-subtly left the door open to him dropping out.

While Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer posted on social media last week that Biden “is in it to win it and I’m damn proud to support him,” she also said on CNN that “I don’t think that it would hurt” if both Biden and Trump took cognitive tests. And yes, Whitmer knows how to shut down a question — nobody forced her to say that.

Advertisement

But it’s going to take more than lesser-known lawmakers taking a stand while bigger names fling passive-aggressive comments. It would seem to me that any real effort to get Biden to stand down would have to start with his former running mate, President Barack Obama, and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), one of the few people Biden appears to consider an equal.

President Barack Obama shakes hands with Vice President Joe Biden and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi at the conclusion of his State of the Union address, Jan. 27, 2010. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

While there have been some reports of private discussions, neither Obama nor Pelosi have taken the dramatic step of making a public statement for Biden to step aside. Both are considered to be extremely measured, so it would seem that they’ve yet to assess that such an effort would be successful.

Nobody knows how to count votes like Nancy Pelosi, after all.

Lastly, the anti-Biden forces have yet to unite over an alternative. Most lawmakers’ statements have just focused on Biden withdrawing without wading into what happens next. They’ve only proposed half a plan, which seems obscenely irresponsible, given the stakes.

The logical choice to replace Biden — and indeed, at this late hour, perhaps the only logistically viable one — is Vice President Kamala Harris. After all, she’s been training for the job for the last four years and has emerged as the administration’s clarion voice on Democrats’ best issue: reproductive rights.

Advertisement

Yet there’s a palpable unease from pundits, who have long judged Harris as being too shallow and liberal to run the country. There’s a yearning to bypass to first female, Black American and Asian-American vice president for (white) governors with star power, like Whitmer, California’s Gavin Newsom or Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker.

Naturally, these analysts tend to forget that African-American women are the base of the Democratic Party.

But of course, it can get dumber.

Some analysts are hankering for an open convention that probably would result in boffo ratings, but it’s hard to see how the nonstop “Dems in Disarray” coverage of floor fights and screaming matches would help the party effectively unite around a new nominee and win in November.

Advertisement

Other pine for a “blitz primary,” which would certainly fuel the charges of “rigged” elections we’ve been hearing from extremists since 2016. In something that reads like a fantastical script rejected from the old series “Scandal,” the nation would turn its lonely eyes to Michelle Obama, Oprah Winfrey and Taylor Swift to moderate weekly forums with hopefuls in the runup to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago next month.

Yes, I’m sure that wouldn’t all veer wildly off the rails (and T. Swift would definitely take a break from the European leg of her stunningly successful “Eras Tour” to join that circus).

So as of now, Democrats find themselves in the uneasy position with a weakened nominee who’s dug in, a handful of elected officials calling for him to go while party leaders assess their options, and an endless stream of backbiting, palace intrigue stories dominating the news (at least before the Trump rally shooting on Saturday).

In politics, inertia usually wins out. That could well be enough to save Biden’s nomination — but it remains to be seen if he can demonstrate the forcefulness and fortitude to lead Democrats to another victory in November.

Michigan Advance is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Michigan Advance maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Susan J. Demas for questions: [email protected]. Follow Michigan Advance on Facebook and X.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Rhode Island

How Trump Sweeps Rhode Island and Southern Mass.

Published

on

How Trump Sweeps Rhode Island and Southern Mass.


Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

The recent Supreme Court rulings were pretty shocking. It just goes to show how far “Originalism” goes in defending political parties where subscription to decency, sanity, and the existence of reality itself are optional membership requirements.

Sammy “Ding-Dong” Bell and his “People’s Republic of Providence” Pwogwessive Demoquacks have never impressed me, but that prejudice goes back to the days when my father worked on College Hill dealing with Brown University Bolsheviks. The spectacle of Aaron Regunberg trying to get Biden to “Pass the Torch” is a glory to behold, as grandiose as Cecil B DeMille’s TEN COMMANDMENTS and as ridiculous as PT Barnum. We can only hope that they will knock off the juvenile theatrics before it backfires in ways that the College Comintern has not contemplated thoroughly.

My ultimate fear is a massive protest vote against Biden or replacement Democrat promoted not by Sammy Ding-Dong but by Ken Block. As soon as they get the Orange Oaf to say “Washington Bridge” at a RI GOP campaign stop, you have a serious opportunity for the East Bay to vote for Trump purely in the name of federal intervention for a new bridge.

Advertisement

And since the president of the Teamsters has made the idiotic decision to speak at both conventions, that means that Trump could promise the entire Building and Trades a federal job program to replace the Washington Bridge.

Just imagine it, Trump running to left of Biden on Southern New England infrastructure. Hell, throw in the “school building renovations” bit (even though he will conveniently leave out the part where renovation funds are contingent upon privatization of the school building, aka charter school expansion promoted with direct federal funding). The RI Building and Trades, not to mention contractors and firms that compose the private element of our glorious public sector construction industry, would be rabidly foaming at the mouth in a manner reminiscent of Cujo.

Let’s be clear, Ken Block is a very conservative opportunist who seems like he cut a dirty back-room deal with the RI GOP and Mike Stenhouse’s Center for Economic Freedom and Prosperity (and whatever else Koch-financed Nazi bullshit comes into Sten’s goblin brain). Block has played the intermediary role mandated by the Citizens United decision. Legally, the scenario laid out in that inglorious SCOTUS ruling requires a non-party member who is not running for office to operate in the manner akin to a 501-c-3 or 501-c-4 organization, dedicated solely to public education without endorsement or coordination with a political party, in order for the non-party member to take boat-loads of dark money from the Koch brothers and other Super PACs (of Nazi werewolves).

(Does anyone honestly believe anyone with a personality and face like Ken Block is actually capable of self-financing this media blitz around the Washington Bridge he has been operating since last year?)

The fact Block has all the charisma of a Bazooka Joe comic and a scowl matching a chewed piece of that pink goo doesn’t change the fact that the Ocean State construction unions have been infamous in the last decade for endorsing any project, no matter how fiscally regressive or harmful to surrounding communities, as soon as they were given the job number projections.

Advertisement

So Block is basically the warm-up act for Trump and his candidates, who are all straight out of Mordor and rolling with Project 2025 platinum. Nobody imagines that a Chaffee is going to make a stand against the state GOP. (The liberal element of the GOP officially resigned last fall when former Warwick Mayor Scott Avedesian’s drunk ass rear ended a woman transporting an infant in the vehicle.) The RI Democratic Party, meanwhile, shambles around this fall like Baby Huey. Gov. McKee absolutely bungled the RfP for the Washington Bridge reconstruction. (For those just tuning in, the Washington Bridge was a central artery for commuters on our highway system, servicing thousands of drivers per hour, that has to be completely demolished and replaced owing to jaw-dropping incompetence and lack of proper oversight during its extremely recent construction because of that gorgeous nexus between the unions and the utterly corrupt private sector construction industry, the only reliable permanent public sector employer for those lacking a high school diploma). That project is going to be a gargantuan mess because of environmental remediation mandates and the delays are going to drag this out longer than the I-Way project, which spanned nearly a decade.

Secretary of Transportation Buttigieg is a holy disciple of McKinsey & Company, a neoliberal mega-consulting and policy firm that specializes in helping foreign governments privatize public assets, with a Greatest Hits album that included the magnificent post-Saddam administration of Baghdad following the US invasion (for those who forget, which admittedly means 99% of my fellow countrymen, the privatization of the Iraqi state and infrastructure meant thousands upon thousands of public sector workers were instantly fired by the largest employer in the country, causing a massive civil war that inadvertently created Daesh, aka the “Islamic” State). Washington is not coming to save the day via the Transportation Department, instead people are going to be sitting in Washington Bridge traffic for at least two more Christmas seasons.

That isn’t an arbitrary calendar marker laced with my own stunning wit, instead it’s the highest-grossing season for retailers in a state economy whose non-union jobs primarily exist in the sales, services, food, and education sectors. The detrimental impact of the Washington Bridge during the Holiday Season 2024 is still difficult to gauge. But considering how many retailers are still trying to extra themselves from the COVID recession, it is not impossible to imagine a large chorus of small business owners, properly arranged like a grade school chorus on stage at a Christmas pageant by the Chamber of Commerce, singing the solemn song of how the Washington Bridge was the kiss of death for their “mom and pop” shop.

So there’s the construction industry and the nonunion service industries.

Then there’s the religious vote. Don’t doubt how hard the Catholic Diocese and the various Evangelical/Pentecostal churches will bang on the reproductive rights, gender, and sexuality drum. The Pwogwessive Demoquacks claimed the state-level legalization of abortion under Governor Raimon as a victory with a certain justification…but the reality is that liberals truly overestimate the security of their victories and their security, case-and-point that loopy belief within the third party movement that Roe v Wade was a permanent ruling that could never be overturned. It’s just a matter of time before RI outlaws abortion rights.

Advertisement

Like would be the case if Mike Stenhouse’s goblins finally get away with their long-standing scheme to force a State Constitutional Convention. The Center for Freedom and Prosperity has been pushing that mad scheme for years and it would be simply a matter of the GOP swaying the right municipalities toward Trump, a two-sided sword linking a federal infrastructure package with false promises to revise the state Constitution in order to promote fiscal transparency in a State General Fund that is notorious black hole of taxpayer money. “The Trump administration is demanding that the General Fund is made more accountable and transparent via State Constitutional mandate before we can initiate a fede reconstruction plan for the Wash Bridge.” Oh golly gee, how many State Pensioners can sing you a song about those accountability and transparency?

Which of course leads to the absolute possibility that Regunberg might inadvertently cause, a fabulous bungle that would stand forever in the dictionary as the picture example of “blow-back.” Look, Aaron and his ilk are all Berniecrats and the purpose of this stunt absolutely has to include a Draft Bernie campaign, at least in the wildest fantasies of the organizers.

Meanwhile on Planet Earth, it’s all but confirmed by the local and national media that one serious contender for replacing Biden is Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo.

Does anyone imagine Raimondo winning Rhode Island in a contest against Donald Trump? My sources indicated years ago that it basically was a massive relief for the RI Dems to be able to unload Gina onto the Biden administration and wash their hands of her after a solid decade of little more than gaslighting and political blackmailing by the most bothersome of Clintonite wunderkinds hatched by the hedge fund industry. Raimondo was elected to Treasury and proceeded to force the General Assembly to invest the pension into hedge funds owned by her campaign financiers, with refusal to comply being valid reason to refer all former State Treasurers and half the Democratic Party to the Attorney General’s office for colossal fiduciary irresponsibility and corruption in a period perhaps spanning back to the Jurassic period. Sure, let’s run her against Trump!

And by the way, I did the survey with Wikipedia in 2012, no one has won the Presidency while losing their home state in more than a century. It’s as reliable a predictor as any other.

Advertisement

Frankly I see things in terms that focus on reducing Trump vote totals as opposed to reducing third party vote totals. The Green Party is a mess. There are a few socialists running for office but it’s possible to say that their vote tally, distributed across the state voting district map, makes it easy to say confidently that the neo-Communist Party of Socialism and Liberation will not, in fact, be the reason either Providence or Coventry swing to Trump. I might be wrong, especially because they have been very visible in the Palestine solidarity movement, but the true foil for this and any other political forecaster is the very tangible and understandable decision to simply stay home rather than going to the polls. How many Muslim voters just going to stay home in November? It could significantly affect the outcome in Michigan but not in Rhode Island.

The real task, therefore, is to get labor solidified with political education so that they are certainly inoculated against whatever phony promises Trump will throw at the crowd from the campaign stage. We all know Darth Cheeto literally will say ANYTHING, he is a like a carnival barker version of Scrooge McDuck after downing a pint of tequila while watching Leni Riefenstahl’s favorite clips.

It’s not saying “Vote for Biden,” it’s “Don’t Believe Trump’s Lies about Construction Jobs.”

Bigly difference.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Three Rhode Islanders were taken in Monday’s MLB draft. Who were they? Some aces with familiar faces.

Published

on

Three Rhode Islanders were taken in Monday’s MLB draft. Who were they? Some aces with familiar faces.


Day 2 of the Major League Baseball draft doesn’t quite draw the attention that Day 1 does, but Monday ended up being a special one for three Rhode Island pitchers.

Middletown’s Ryan Andrade, North Providence’s Nick Conte and Coventry’s Jayden Voelker were all selected out of their respective colleges on Monday afternoon between picks 216 and 246, giving them a chance to chase a goal every baseball player dreams about.

Andrade, a 6-foot-2 right-hander, was first off the board, being drafted in the seventh round by the Tampa Bay Rays with the 216th overall pick.

After helping lead Middletown to the 2021 Division II title — earning first-team All-State honors along the way — Andrade went on to pitch at the University of Rhode Island for two years. He entered the transfer portal and was heavily recruited by power five conferences before ending up at the University of Pittsburgh.

Advertisement

Andrade was the Panthers’ top pitcher this past spring and earned an invite to the MLB Combine, where he shined in front of scouts. Baseball America reported his fastball averaged 93 mph and topped at 95 and had a high spin rate on his pitches as well.

Ten picks after Andrade was drafted, Conte — also a pitcher — was taken, snatched up by the Kansas City Royals with the second pick of the eighth round.

Conte, a 5-10 righthander, starred at North Providence and after a terrific junior season. He was primed for an All-State season in his senior year but COVID robbed him of the chance to play his final year for the Cougars.

Advertisement

The summer prior to his senior year, Conte added 25 pounds to his frame and went from throwing high 80s to the mid-90s. His recruiting went big time after some showcase performances and he went to Duke University. There, he ended up being the closer for the Blue Devils and helped them win the ACC championship his freshman season in 2021.

Conte continued to shine as a reliever at Duke. This past spring he appeared in 20 games, throwing 18⅓ innings while striking out 23. Over his Duke career, Conte held opponents to a .209 batting average.

Later in the eighth round, it was Voelker’s turn, drafted by the Rays with the 246th overall pick.

Voelker didn’t waste time in creating a name for himself at Coventry. He was one of the state’s best pitchers during his freshman season, earning first-team All-State honors in 2018. After making the second team during his sophomore year — then missing junior year after COVID wiped out the season — Voelker earned another first-team selection for his work as a first baseman for the Oakers.

Advertisement

Voelker, a 6-foot-5 righthander, went to Northern Essex Community College and immediately dominated. His first season he posted a 5-1 record with a 1.80 ERA, striking out 49 batters in 30 innings. A wrist injury cost him his 2023 season, but he bounced back with a wildly impressive season to put himself on MLB teams’ radars.

This past spring Voelker was named the 2024 NJCAA Division III Baseball Pitcher of the Year. He went 8-2, striking out 126 batters in only 61 innings of work. His 126 Ks and 18.69 strikeouts per game led the country.



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

RI judge sides with beachfront homeowner in court fight. What does it mean for public beach access?

Published

on

RI judge sides with beachfront homeowner in court fight. What does it mean for public beach access?


play

A Superior Court judge has issued an initial decision siding with a beachfront homeowner who argued that Rhode Island’s 2023 shoreline access law amounted to an unconstitutional taking of private property.

Advertisement

On Friday, Superior Court Judge Sarah Taft-Carter denied the state’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed on behalf of Stilts, LLC, which is owned by David Welch of South Kingstown. A final opinion is expected in the coming weeks, according to the Pacific Legal Foundation, which is representing Welch in court.

More: Rhode Island’s beaches are public. Here’s a quick guide to what you can and can’t do.

What the decision says

In 2023, the Rhode Island General Assembly passed a law establishing that the public has the right to use the shoreline up to 10 feet landward of the recognizable high tide line, also known as the “wrack line.”

Welch sued the state in October, noting that the four parcels of land on Charlestown Beach that belong to Stilts, LLC have varying deeds indicating that he owns out to the “high water mark,” “Atlantic Ocean,” “high water line,” and “mean high water mark.”

Advertisement

The Rhode Island Attorney General’s office filed a motion to dismiss Stilts, LLC’s lawsuit, which was converted into a motion for summary judgment.

After hearing arguments on both sides, Taft-Carter issued a decision on Friday saying that the 2023 law was “clearly” a taking of private property.

Taft-Carter noted that a controversial Rhode Island Supreme Court case, State v. Ibbison, defined the boundary between public and private at the mean high tide line, which is scientifically calculated and invisible to the eye.

The 2023 law “reset” the division between public and private, and “extended the point of public access over the plaintiff’s private property,” she wrote.

Advertisement

Breaking down the ruling

Taft-Carter agreed to dismiss one count of Stilts, LLC’s lawsuit, which argued that the shoreline access law translated to an unreasonable seizure of private property and violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

But she rejected the state’s attempt to dismiss the other two counts, which alleged that the law was an unconstitutional taking that violates the Fifth Amendment, and that it amounted to inverse condemnation.

The decision does not spell out how Stilts, LLC, should be compensated, or what happens next.

“Our clients are gratified that the court agreed with what they have said from the start—the beach access law violates their rights,” Pacific Legal Foundation Senior Attorney J. David Breemer said in a statement. “As the court recognized, the beach access law infringed on our client’s property rights by moving the existing public beach boundary line ten feet landward, effectively confiscating our client’s property, which is an unconstitutional taking.” 

The foundation described the decision as “a major victory for those who own coastal property.”

Advertisement

The Attorney General’s Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Coastal property owners previously filed a lawsuit challenging the shoreline access law in federal court, but that suit was dismissed in September.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending