Connect with us

Rhode Island

Bills to de-stigmatize language in state law on alcohol addiction progress in R.I. General Assembly • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Bills to de-stigmatize language in state law on alcohol addiction progress in R.I. General Assembly • Rhode Island Current


What do you call someone who “who habitually lacks self-control as to the use of alcoholic beverages”? 

They’re an “alcoholic,” according to Rhode Island General Law.

But the state’s statutory language surrounding alcohol use and treatment could soon change thanks to the recent passage of bills in both chambers of the General Assembly. 

“We don’t talk that way anymore. We don’t think that way anymore. Yet it’s still codified into our statute,” said Rep. Jennifer Boylan, a Barrington Democrat, during a March 5 hearing of the House Committee on Health and Human Services. 

Advertisement

The bill she introduced that night, H7736, saw successful passage May 7 during a House floor vote. On Thursday, May 9, the Senate unanimously passed Bill S2087 by Sen. Joshua Miller, a Cranston Democrat. The twin bills allow revision of how state law defines alcohol disorders and their treatment. 

“These statutes have not been approached for revision in over 40 years,” Miller said on the Senate floor. “There are many flaws in it, including commitment to public hospitals where the actual commitment doesn’t exist, the beds do not exist. And the language is embarrassing to the departments and those involved as providers.”

Both bills direct the Rhode Island Department of Health and the Department of Behavioral Healthcare, Developmental Disabilities (BHDDH) and Hospitals to coordinate proposed revisions that would align the state’s law books with best practices by Jan. 1, 2025.

Miller previously worked on the Governor’s Overdose Commission and has sponsored other bills relating to substance use in the past. This is Boylan’s first bill relating to substance use. 

“I challenge you to find someone who doesn’t know anyone who has this problem (alcohol use disorder),” Boylan said in a recent phone interview. “It’s a problem that a lot of people struggle with, and I think our statutes should be updated to be more modernized.” 

Advertisement

Person-first language

Many doctors and advocates consider terms like “alcoholic” stigmatizing and loaded. Both the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest using “person with alcohol use disorder” in keeping with a person-first approach to language use.

The notion of self-control as the main motivating factor in one’s drinking is contrary to clinical understanding, which sees alcohol use disorder as a more complex pattern. 

“Yes, there is an element of choice when a person first starts drinking. For some people, however, a mix of genetic and environmental factors facilitates a transition, often without full recognition, to increasingly heavier drinking,” according to a core resource document from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. 

It’s a problem that a lot of people struggle with, and I think our statutes should be updated to be more modernized.

Advertisement

– Rep. Jennifer Boylan, a Barrington Democrat

Now the bills have to pass in opposite chambers, said Larry Berman, a House spokesperson, in an email: “In other words, the House now has to pass Sen. Miller’s bill and the Senate now has to pass Rep. Boylan’s bill. Once each bill passes in both chambers, they will be transmitted to the Governor.”

Boylan said on the phone that she’s “very hopeful” the bill will land on the governor’s desk this year. And on the Senate floor, Miller said the simultaneous OK is an improvement over previous years. In the 2023 legislative session, Miller’s bill secured Senate approval. But its momentum ended when it was referred to the House Committee on Health and Human Services.  

Advertisement

“I’ve had this bill for several years without any action on it on the House side,” Miller said. “The House passed it a few days ago, which will be a great relief to those involved in deciding in June what passes and doesn’t pass, [who] won’t have to hear from me about ‘Why didn’t this bill pass?’ Because it’s so simple and so important.”

The identical bills add only six sentences to existing statutes. Miller’s bill generated no discussion on the Senate floor. In the House, Minority Leader Mike Chippendale wondered if Boylan’s legislation would also change other instances of outdated language buried in state law.

“There are other sections in the law…where we use the term ‘habitual drunkard,’” Chippendale said. “I think obviously that sounds a little bit more offensive than ‘alcoholic.’” 

Laws on taverns, cookshops and oyster houses, for example, lump together “Drunkards, wastrels, and minors” as prohibited from entry into these businesses. Business owners face possible fines if they count among their customers “any common drunkard or person addicted to the intemperate use of spirituous or intoxicating liquors.” The section was first written in 1896 and most recently updated a century later in 1996. 

“Would this also change that or would that be something that we perhaps overlooked and will change later?” Chippendale asked Rep. Susan Donovan, who chairs the House Committee on Health and Human Services and presented Boylan’s bill.   

Advertisement

“I’d have to refer to counsel. I would hope that it would change all of those terms,” Donovan said.

Last year, Gov. Dan McKee signed into law legislation sponsored by Sen. Jonathan Acosta that replaced terms like “mentally retarded,” “alcoholic,” and “drug abuser” with less stigmatizing language. That legislation targeted different sections of state law, however. Boylan said her bill hones in on a very specific section of state law. 

Statutes that. include a definition for alcohol disorders and treatment have not been considered for revision in over 40 years. (Alexander Castro/Rhode Island Current)

Because circumstances can change

Beth Lamarre, executive director of the Rhode Island chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness, wrote via email how stigmatizing words like “alcoholic” can hold “a negative connotation, because of how alcoholism/alcohol use disorder has been viewed throughout time.”

“It also spotlights the issue, as though it is that person’s only characteristic,” Lamarre said. “Describing someone as having an alcohol use disorder, on the other hand, describes a circumstance or a situation, one that can be changed.”  

Other states have also begun to read the fine print surrounding spirits. “It’s hard to say how many states have replaced their language entirely, but we have noticed more states using AUD (alcohol use disorder) in current legislation,” said Karmen Hanson, a senior fellow in the National Conference of State Legislatures’ health program, via email.

Advertisement

Legislatures where similar legislation has been introduced include Connecticut, Maryland, Colorado, Massachusetts, New Jersey and the Virgin Islands, but Hanson noted “that’s not a reflection of everything that may be out there.”

Global opinions differ on people-first language, although what words are used also owes much to the disability being described. England’s national health agency, for example, prefers “disabled people” to “people with a disability” — a choice underlined by an argument that society makes barriers for people with disabilities, rather than the disabilities themselves. This alternative, known as identity-first language, is also common among autistic and deaf people in the United States, according to the National Institutes of Health.

Regardless of what language one uses, disability advocates seem to agree that the overall idea is ensuring people feel comfortable speaking up about their struggles.

“Words matter, and how we talk about someone’s health (including and especially behavioral health) can make the difference in whether they feel supported in getting the treatment and help they need,” Lamarre said. 

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Rhode Island

A new safety role at Rhode Island College comes into sharper focus after Brown shooting – The Boston Globe

Published

on

A new safety role at Rhode Island College comes into sharper focus after Brown shooting – The Boston Globe


Lawrence was recently named RIC’s first emergency management director, a role college leaders had been planning before the December mass shooting across town at Brown University, but which took on new urgency after the tragedy.

Few resumes are better suited to the job.

A 20-year career in the New York Police Department. Commanding officer of the NYPD’s Employee Assistance Unit. A master’s degree from Harvard.

Lawrence got to Rhode Island the way a lot of people do: through someone who grew up here and never really left, at least not in spirit. Her husband, Brooke Lawrence, grew up in West Greenwich, and is director of the town’s emergency management agency.

Advertisement

“I couldn’t imagine retiring in my 40s,” Lawrence told me. “And I couldn’t imagine not giving back to my community.”

Public service has been part of Lawrence’s life for as long as she can remember. A New Jersey native, she dreamed of following in the footsteps of her mentor, a longtime FBI agent. She graduated from Monmouth University and earned a master’s degree in forensic psychology from John Jay College in 2001, shortly before the Sept. 11 attacks.

There was high demand for police in New York at the time, so Lawrence raised her hand to serve. She worked her way up the ranks from patrol to lieutenant, eventually taking charge of the department’s Employee Assistance Unit, a peer support program that helps rank-and-file officers navigate the most traumatic parts of the job. She later earned a second master’s degree from Harvard’s Kennedy School.

Advertisement

“It’s making sure our officers are getting through their career in the same mental capacity as they came on the job,” Lawrence said.

There’s a version of Lawrence’s new job that feels routine, especially at a quiet commuter campus like Rhode Island College. And when Lawrence was initially hired part-time last fall, it probably was.

Then the shooting at Brown University changed the stakes almost overnight.

On Dec. 13, Claudio Manuel Neves Valente, a Portuguese national and one-time student at Brown, opened fire inside the Barus and Holley building, killing two students and injuring nine others. Neves Valente also killed an MIT professor before he was found dead in a New Hampshire storage unit of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.

In eerie videos recorded in the storage unit, Neves Valente admitted that he stalked the Brown campus for weeks prior to his attack. He largely went unnoticed by campus security, which led the university’s police chief to be placed on leave and essentially replaced by former Providence Police Chief Colonel Hugh Clements.

Advertisement

Lawrence assisted with the response at Brown. She leads the trauma response team for the Rhode Island Behavioral Health Medical Reserve Corps, which staffed the family reunification center in the hours after the shooting.

RIC’s campus is more enclosed than Brown’s — there are only two major entryways to the college — but there are unique challenges.

For one, it’s technically located in both Providence and North Providence, which requires coordination between multiple public safety departments in both communities.

More specifically, Lawrence noted that every building on campus has the same address, which can present a challenge in an emergency. Lawrence has worked with RIC leadership and local public safety to assign an address to each building.

Lawrence stressed that she doesn’t want RIC to overreact to the tragedy at Brown, and she said campus leaders are committed to keeping the tight-knit community intact.

Advertisement

But she admits that the shooting remains top of mind.

“Every campus community sees what happened at Brown and says ‘please don’t let that happen to us,’” Lawrence said.

Lawrence said everyone at RIC feels a deep sense of responsibility to keep students safe during their time on campus.

And she already feels right at home.

“I want to come home from work every day and feel like I made a difference,” she said.

Advertisement

Dan McGowan can be reached at dan.mcgowan@globe.com. Follow him @danmcgowan.





Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Tying The Knot In RI? Online Casino Doesn’t Think So

Published

on

Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Tying The Knot In RI? Online Casino Doesn’t Think So


If you thought the smart money was on pop icon Taylor Swift and gridiron star Travis Kelce tying the knot in Rhode Island, an online crypto casino and sportsbook is here to tell you you’re wrong.

The Ocean State was the second favorite at +155 and 39.22%, and Pennsylvania and Ohio were together at a distant third at +1,600 and 5.88%.

Tennessee was the fifth choice at +2,000 and 4.76%.

“New York is the favourite because it’s the city most closely tied to Taylor Swift’s public life, with multiple residences, strong emotional branding, and world‑class venues that offer privacy and security for a high‑profile event,” an unidentified spokesperson said in a media release.

Advertisement

Human Remains Found Near Taylor Swift’s Mansion Identified: Report





Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Rent control won’t solve Providence’s steep rental prices – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Rent control won’t solve Providence’s steep rental prices – The Boston Globe


Part of the story is the pandemic-era shift toward smaller cities. But the larger truth is Providence has not built enough housing to keep up with demand. In 2024, Rhode Island ranked 50th in the nation for new housing permits – dead last. That isn’t ideology; it is economics.

As housing experts have said, including HousingWorksRI Executive Director Brenda Clement, we have a basic supply-and-demand problem. Expanding housing supply for everyone should be the focus.

Advertisement

To its credit, Providence has begun to move. Recent efforts by Mayor Brett Smiley, the City Council, nonprofit partners, and private developers have created hundreds of new units. More are in the pipeline. That progress must continue.

As rents rise, pressure for immediate relief has grown. The City Council’s proposed solution is rent control: a cap on annual rent increases at 4 percent. In practice, it fails to solve the underlying problem, and creates new ones.

First, rent control does not make today’s rent affordable, it only limits future increases by creating a cap. Many landlords will raise rents to the cap each year. A $2,000 apartment under a 4 percent cap becomes $2,433 after five years – an increase that renters still feel acutely. That is basic compounding, not a worst-case scenario.

Second, rent control would create a hole in Providence’s budget, as it reduces the taxable value of properties. The Smiley administration examined rent-controlled cities and applied the outcomes to Providence’s tax base. The projected annual revenue loss ranges from $10.3 million to $17.5 million.

When rental property values decline, cities are left with two choices: raise taxes or cut services. Education funding, park improvements, library funding, and basic infrastructure all come under pressure. Experience elsewhere shows this burden does not fall on landlords; it shifts to single-family homeowners. Portland, Maine, saw a 5.4 percent reduction in its tax base after rent control, forcing these tradeoffs. The implementation of rent control will affect all Providence residents, whether they rent or own.

Advertisement

Third, rent control discourages new housing production, the opposite of what Providence needs. Developers are less likely to build in cities where future revenue is capped, financing is harder, and long-term costs are unpredictable. St. Paul, Minnesota, offers a cautionary tale. After voters approved a strict rent cap in 2021, new unit creation dropped by more than 84 percent in the first quarter, forcing city leaders to exempt new construction, which is exempt in the Providence City Council rent control proposal.

When we build more housing at all price points, market pressure eases, as supply catches up with demand.

That does not mean ignoring the pain people feel today. I grew up here, attended our public schools, and bought a modest single-family home in the neighborhood where I was raised. I feel today’s housing pressures firsthand and hear them daily from family and neighbors. After 12 years on the council, including a leadership role in 2011 when Providence was on the brink of bankruptcy, I know our elected officials genuinely want workable solutions.

That is why, as executive director of The Providence Foundation, an organization of 140 private business and nonprofit members from myriad industries, I recommended we commission a study by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council to educate the public on this issue and identify solutions. The report revealed the most effective approach to housing shortages and high costs pairs aggressive housing production with targeted rental assistance for households most at risk of displacement.

Cities across the country have shown what works: modernized zoning, faster permitting, conversion of underused commercial space, and temporary rental assistance to help families stay housed while new supply comes online. These strategies outperform rent control. Overcoming the housing challenge will require all levels of government to play a role.

Advertisement

Reasoned policy will meet Providence’s housing needs and strengthen our economy for a brighter tomorrow.

David Salvatore is the executive director of The Providence Foundation, a nonprofit organization committed to supporting visionary projects downtown, and a former Providence City Council president and member.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending