Rhode Island
A NASA space grant is helping students learn about Rhode Island’s infamous history of trash – The Boston Globe
The National Park Service website said that the restoration of the river has been “remarkable” but “fish consumption” is not advised. The stream is good for canoeing and kayaking but swimming is not recommended.
“I found out that this was one of the most polluted rivers in America,” senior Clover Burke said. “It used to be one of the top 10. And that you should only eat one fish max per year from this river because of the amount of heavy metals. Or else it’s really bad for you.”
In 1971, Audubon magazine said the river was “one of America’s most polluted rivers.” In 1990, the Environmental Protection Agency said the river held “toxic sediments” left by textile and metal industries during the second half of the 19th century, leaving communities to deal with environmental issues.
“It’s awful,” Burke said. “It’s insane that a river that should be for everyone, including all the animals, you can’t even eat from.”
According to the park service, non-point pollution (runoff dispersed from many sources) is now a major threat to the river, including “reckless excavation practices, uncontrolled stormwater runoff, and certain landscaping.”
The NPS said runoff carries nutrients into the cola-colored river, causing harmful algal blooms that muddle the ecosystem. This affects surface and groundwater quality.
Frequent downpours have led to historic flooding in December and January, and recent heavy rains nearly led to the cancellation of the field trip, AP environmental science and biology teacher Amy O’Donnell said.
The trip was funded by the NASA Rhode Island Space Grant, funds that the space agency distributes to every state to engage students in STEM.
Brown University distributes the funds to K-12 schools around the state.

Ralph Milliken, associate professor of Earth, environmental, and planetary sciences at Brown, said O’Donnell’s application was picked because the university felt it was a trip that would leave a lasting impression on the students.
Milliken said that in addition to flinging rockets into space, NASA has a big Earth science program.
“We want to get students outside the classroom beyond the textbooks and internet articles they read about” he said. “So they can understand the interplay on human society and the natural environment.”
In addition to supporting local schools, Brown has offered internships for students at NASA centers, hosted students at on campus for the April total solar eclipse, and partnered with WaterFire for a program on the sea-level rise.
Brown receives $860,000 each year for the statewide program but that number is expected to be cut to $800,000, Milliken said.
Milliken said schools can apply for science education funding by contacting the university with their ideas.
“Now and then we learn about climate change — we’re looking at evidence of climate change here,” O’Donnell said standing on several feet of sand deposited by recent floods. It will make it more difficult for native species to grow.
When the river swells, it also uncovers evidence of the land’s previous use as a dump.
“All this is pretty worrisome, especially being able to go out and see it firsthand,” junior Preston Brown said. “It’s a big issue because we’re going to be the ones that are dealing with it.”
Brown learned about the presence of an invasive plant called Japanese knotweed that also grows in the woods behind his house.
“I want to be able to enjoy the forest, so I’m taking this class to learn how to save it,” he said.

Junior Taejo Chung-Brcak said “mountains of trash” pile up near his yard from street-level pollution after a deluge. Science isn’t his favorite subject, but the field trip was eye-opening for him.
“My teacher makes it interesting and makes nature seem like something worth fighting for,” Chung-Brcak said.
O’Donnell and Diane Siliezar-Shields, teacher and science department chairperson at Barrington High School, modeled the class after environmental activist Rachel Carson, whose 1962 book “Silent Spring” showed the world the danger of forever chemicals — extremely persistent chemicals that last thousands of years — found in the water, and the blood of nearly 97 percent of Americans, according to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Carson’s work led to a ban on DDT (Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) and is credited for the creation of the EPA.
O’Donnell said she is teaching her students to be “problem solvers” who invest in their local environment before they graduate.
“We have a curriculum that is really heavy duty,” she said. “We want to show our young people there is hope. If you leverage your understanding and activate yourself, you build a community around yourself, which I think is perfect. There’s so much time spent on computers now, I wanted them to really be able to see this firsthand.”
O’Donnell said staff at Friends of the Blackstone showed the students how bioremediation can be used to fight pollution naturally.
“We planted willows to be able to clean up the soil,” she said.
John Marsland, president and founder of Friends of the Blackstone, said the willows work to absorb heavy metals in the soil. The willows can also thrive despite the sandy silt left on shore by floodwaters.
“We planted the native willows to re-establish native trees on the flood plain instead of knotweed,” Marsland said. “We mow the knotweed three times a year and plant grass but there’s so much sand from the flooding, it’s almost a foot deep. I don’t think grass will grow. Willow can.”

Students hammered posts 2 feet into the soil and planted rows of willow tree branches.
Burke said she is going to study forestry and environmental science after high school. She wants to help fix the problems caused by people.
“I get to go home and tell my parents random facts and they think I’m so smart,” Burke joked. “But this is, I feel, a class everyone needs to take to know the basics about our environment.”
Junior Sofia Buchanan has been working on a project on microplastic awareness. Sophomore Iris Yang said the class has taught her to be aware of the nature around her. Sophomore Claudia Leonard said she’s learned how to decrease pollution in the environment.
“I see the plastic as kind of a warning of what will persist in the ecosystem 50 years later if we currently don’t come up with solutions because right now we’re already seeing plastic in the rivers. And, we’re seeing the health effects of pollution on the ecosystem and ourselves.
“I think that this is a warning for what pollution could do to humans in the future and other animals.”
Carlos Muñoz can be reached at carlos.munoz@globe.com. Follow him @ReadCarlos and on Instagram @Carlosbrknews.
Rhode Island
New docuseries exploring Rhode Island’s coastal ecosystem premieres Friday – What’s Up Newp
A new documentary series celebrating Rhode Island’s coastal wildlife and conservation efforts premieres Friday on Ocean State Media.
“Ocean State: Rhode Island’s Wild Coast” debuts with its first episode, “Secrets of the Seagrass,” at 8 p.m. Jan. 9 on WSBE. The episode will be followed by a re-run of “Chasing Fins,” a short documentary about the Atlantic Shark Institute’s shark research in Rhode Island.
The premiere episode explores eelgrass meadows, often called the “nurseries of the sea,” which support diverse marine life while playing a critical role in coastal resilience, water quality and climate mitigation.
Filmed across Rhode Island and New England, the episode features species including American lobster, American eel and bay scallops that depend on healthy eelgrass ecosystems. It also highlights scientists and conservationists from Save the Bay and The Nature Conservancy working on habitat restoration.
“Eelgrass meadows are foundational to the health of our coastal waters, yet many people have never seen them or understood their importance,” director Tomas Koeck said. “This episode brings viewers beneath the surface to reveal how interconnected these systems are—and what’s at stake if we lose them.”
The series is produced by Silent Flight Studios in partnership with Ocean State Media.
“Given our strong, shared connection with the bay and our coastline, we’re excited to share this fascinating new series,” Ocean State Media President and CEO Pam Johnston said.
Future episodes will explore landscapes, wildlife and people shaping the region’s natural heritage.


Rhode Island
RI Lottery Mega Millions, Lucky For Life winning numbers for Jan. 6, 2026
The Rhode Island Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big. Here’s a look at Jan. 6, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Mega Millions numbers from Jan. 6 drawing
09-39-47-58-68, Mega Ball: 24
Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Lucky For Life numbers from Jan. 6 drawing
10-13-24-27-31, Lucky Ball: 08
Check Lucky For Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Numbers numbers from Jan. 6 drawing
Midday: 4-0-3-7
Evening: 0-5-5-7
Check Numbers payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Wild Money numbers from Jan. 6 drawing
04-09-22-26-33, Extra: 36
Check Wild Money payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your prize
- Prizes less than $600 can be claimed at any Rhode Island Lottery Retailer. Prizes of $600 and above must be claimed at Lottery Headquarters, 1425 Pontiac Ave., Cranston, Rhode Island 02920.
- Mega Millions and Powerball jackpot winners can decide on cash or annuity payment within 60 days after becoming entitled to the prize. The annuitized prize shall be paid in 30 graduated annual installments.
- Winners of the Lucky for Life top prize of $1,000 a day for life and second prize of $25,000 a year for life can decide to collect the prize for a minimum of 20 years or take a lump sum cash payment.
When are the Rhode Island Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 10:59 p.m. ET on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 11:00 p.m. ET on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky for Life: 10:30 p.m. ET daily.
- Numbers (Midday): 1:30 p.m. ET daily.
- Numbers (Evening): 7:29 p.m. ET daily.
- Wild Money: 7:29 p.m. ET on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Rhode Island editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Rhode Island
Rhode Island weighs new tax on highest earners as Trump policy pressures mount
The proposed new income levy would build on the state’s “Taylor Swift tax,” adding to a growing web of state-level measures impacting affluent households.
Rhode Island is moving closer to a new tax on high earners, adding to a growing patchwork of state measures aimed at the wealthy that advisors will have to keep tabs on for affluent clients with multistate ties.
Governor Dan McKee, who previously resisted calls for higher income taxes, is now signaling openness to a surtax on top earners as federal cuts squeeze the state’s finances.
As reported by Bloomberg, Lawmakers are revisiting a proposal for a 3% surtax on income above $640,000, roughly the top 1% of earners in the state, to help plug a projected deficit of at least $101 million for the fiscal year starting in July. McKee’s office has also floated an income threshold of $1 million for any wealth tax.
“We are in a spot where we’re going to have to address some of those headwinds that are coming our way from DC,” McKee said, pointing to reductions in Medicaid, food assistance and other programs by the federal government under President Donald Trump.
The debate in Providence mirrors a broader shift among Democratic policymakers who are turning to high-income households and owners of luxury property to shore up budgets and address what they see as a K-shaped economy. Neighboring Massachusetts has become a key reference point with its 4% surtax on income above $1 million, approved in 2022, which has reportedly generated billions in additional revenue.
On the West Coast, a billionaire tax proposal in California that would place a one-time 5% levy on all the worldwide assets of billionaires who resided in the state as of January 1 has sparked swift reactions from critics warning of a resultant wealth exodus.
For advisors, Rhode Island is already a test case in using real estate taxes to target the wealthy. A new surcharge on second homes valued at more than $1 million, dubbed the “Taylor Swift tax,” takes effect this summer. For non-primary residences, or properties not occupied more than half the year, the state will charge $2.50 for every $500 in assessed value above the first $1 million, on top of existing property taxes.
Read more: “Fearless” singer Taylor Swift joins billionaires’ club on prestigious women’s rich list
Luxury brokers have warned the levy hits the very people supporting much of the local economy in seasonal communities like Newport and Watch Hill. “These are people who just come here for the summer, spend their money and pay their fair share of taxes,” Donna Krueger-Simmons, a sales agent in Watch Hill, told CNBC when that property tax was unveiled. “They’re getting penalized just because they also live somewhere else.”
Critics say some second-home owners are weighing sales and prospective buyers are pausing purchases or looking to coastal alternatives in nearby Connecticut. That kind of cross-border arbitrage will be familiar territory for advisors whose clients can choose among multiple high-end destinations.
Advocates counter that higher taxes on second homes and top incomes are necessary to keep tourist towns livable for year-round workers who keep service economies running. One commentary by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy argues that wealthy vacation-home owners and high earners can absorb surtaxes that fund housing, infrastructure and local services, and that states should design broad, progressive real estate and income tax systems rather than leaning on middle-income residents.
The proposed income surtax failed to make it into last year’s budget but is expected to be a central flashpoint in the current session. Rhode Island Senate President Valarie Lawson has supported earlier versions, while House Speaker Joe Shekarchi has said he is open to the idea but uncertain where the income line should be drawn.
“You can say tax the rich, but what is the rich?” he said.
-
World1 week agoHamas builds new terror regime in Gaza, recruiting teens amid problematic election
-
News1 week agoFor those who help the poor, 2025 goes down as a year of chaos
-
Science1 week agoWe Asked for Environmental Fixes in Your State. You Sent In Thousands.
-
Business1 week agoA tale of two Ralphs — Lauren and the supermarket — shows the reality of a K-shaped economy
-
Detroit, MI4 days ago2 hospitalized after shooting on Lodge Freeway in Detroit
-
Politics1 week agoCommentary: America tried something new in 2025. It’s not going well
-
Politics1 week agoMarjorie Taylor Greene criticizes Trump’s meetings with Zelenskyy, Netanyahu: ‘Can we just do America?’
-
Health1 week agoRecord-breaking flu numbers reported in New York state, sparking warnings from officials