Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Weed in Pennsylvania – where does the issue stand?

Published

on

Weed in Pennsylvania – where does the issue stand?


Pennsylvania lawmakers have aimed to chip away at the state’s firm stance criminalizing recreational marijuana for nearly a decade as it stands increasingly alone amidst shifts to legalization in neighboring New Jersey, New York, Maryland, Delaware and Ohio.

State House representatives Aaron Kaufer (R-Luzerne) and Emily Kinkead (D-Allegheny) pushed to legalize recreational use Monday in bipartisan proposal House Bill 2500, which cites market competition such as new dispensaries in Ohio after its own recent policy change. The bill would let dispensaries sell to recreational customers and create a board to regulate the industry. 

Advertisement

Governor Josh Shapiro says he also seeks to sign a bill legalizing marijuana in July after arguing the move could generate $250 million in annual state revenue during a February budget address. The budget would add a 20% tax on marijuana sales to Pennsylvania’s existing 6% sales tax. 

Although two-thirds of Pennsylvanians support legal marijuana according to a February poll by Franklin and Marshall College, passing a bill before the June 30 budget deadline could prove challenging for Shapiro. 

Shapiro’s plan has faced pushback in Pennsylvania’s republican-controlled senate, as did former governor Tom Wolf’s efforts to expand the Medical Marijuana Act he signed into law in April 2016 and later his campaign for full legalization. 

Advertisement

As of June 2024, medical cannabis can only be legally purchased at state-approved dispensaries by Pennsylvanians with patient cards who are doctor-certified as having qualifying medical conditions.

However, a three-bill package unanimously passed last June in the Senate Law and Justice Committee would allow doctors to prescribe marijuana for all medical conditions, eliminate the need to annually renew patient cards and let licensed marijuana growers sell directly to patients. 

Advertisement

Pennsylvania’s medical-use laws have changed numerous times since its first dispensary opened in February 2018, such as adding dry leaf and flower to its allowances for pill, oil, vapor, ointment and liquid forms and increasing the sale quantity limit from one month’s worth to three. 

The medical marijuana program has proven lucrative for the state, raising $132 million in sales during its first year and a total of $6 billion as of May 2024, according to the Department of Health.

Possession of nonmedical marijuana, however, is a misdemeanor in the state punishable by up to 30 days in jail and a $500 fine for 30 grams or fewer and a year in jail with $5,000 in fines for more. Notable exceptions Philadelphia and Pittsburgh decriminalized possession of under 30 grams. 

Advertisement

Pennsylvania lawmakers have explored releasing offenders convicted of marijuana possession, with Philadelphia democratic senator Sharif Street joining Dan Laughlin (R-Erie) last July to advocate for a legal marijuana industry led by the Department of Agriculture and expungement of past convictions in Senate Bill 846. 

Wolf also encouraged thousands of Pennsylvanians with low-level marijuana convictions to apply for “one-time, large-scale pardon effort” in September 2022, near the end of his tenure.

Advertisement

Shapiro recently supported the U.S. Drug Enforcement Association’s move to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug, which would not lift the federal ban on cannabis but would recognize its medical uses and relatively low potential for abuse. 



Source link

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania opens door for opioid funds to support overwhelmed public defenders

Published

on

Pennsylvania opens door for opioid funds to support overwhelmed public defenders






Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

UPenn faculty condemn Trump administration’s demand for ‘lists of Jews’

Published

on

UPenn faculty condemn Trump administration’s demand for ‘lists of Jews’


Several faculty groups have denounced the Trump administration’s efforts to obtain information about Jewish professors, staff and students at the University of Pennsylvania – including personal emails, phone numbers and home addresses – as government abuse with “ominous historical overtones”.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is demanding the university turn over names and personal information about Jewish members of the Penn community as part of the administration’s stated goal to combat antisemitism on campuses. But some Jewish faculty and staff have condemned the government’s demand as “a visceral threat to the safety of those who would find themselves identified because compiling and turning over to the government ‘lists of Jews’ conjures a terrifying history”, according to a press release put out by the groups’ lawyers.

The EEOC sued Penn in November over the university’s refusal to fully comply with its demands. On Tuesday, the American Association of University Professors’ national and Penn chapters, the university’s Jewish Law Students Association and its Association of Senior and Emeritus Faculty, and the American Academy of Jewish Research filed a motion in federal court to intervene in the case.

“These requests would require Penn to create and turn over a centralized registry of Jewish students, faculty, and staff – a profoundly invasive and dangerous demand that intrudes deeply into the freedoms of association, religion, speech, and privacy enshrined in the First Amendment,” the groups argued.

Advertisement

“We are entering territory that should shock every single one of us,” said Norm Eisen, co-founder and executive chair of the Democracy Defenders Fund on a press call. The fund is representing the faculty groups along with the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and the firm Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin and Schiller. “That kind of information – however purportedly benign the excuses given for it – can be put to the most dangerous misuse. This is an abuse of government power that drags us back to some of the darkest chapters in our history.”

The EEOC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The University of Pennsylvania was among dozens of US universities to come under federal investigation over alleged antisemitism in the aftermath of the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks and Israel’s subsequent war in Gaza. In response, the university established a taskforce to study antisemitism, implemented a series of measures and shared hundreds of pages of documents to comply with government demands.

But the university refused to comply with the EEOC’s July subpoena for personal information of Jewish faculty, students and staff, or those affiliated with Jewish organizations who had not given their consent, as well as the names of individuals who had participated in confidential listening sessions or received a survey by the university’s antisemitism taskforce. A university spokesperson said in November that “violating their privacy and trust is antithetical to ensuring Penn’s Jewish community feels protected and safe”. Instead, the university offered to inform all its employees of the EEOC investigation, inviting those interested to contact the agency directly.

But that was not enough for the commission, which brought the university to court to seek to enforce the subpoena.

Advertisement

“The EEOC remains steadfast in its commitment to combatting workplace antisemitism and seeks to identify employees who may have experienced antisemitic harassment. Unfortunately, the employer continues to refuse to identify members of its workforce who may have been subjected to this unlawful conduct,” the EEOC chair, Andrea Lucas, said in a statement at the time. “An employer’s obstruction of efforts to identify witnesses and victims undermines the EEOC’s ability to investigate harassment.”

The EEOC request prompted widespread alarm and condemnation among Jewish faculty, and earned rebukes from the university’s Hillel and other Jewish groups.

Steven Weitzman, a professor with Penn’s religious studies department who also served on the university’s antisemitism taskforce, said that the mere request for such lists “instills a sense of vulnerability among Jews” and that the government cannot guarantee that the information it collects won’t fall “into the wrong hands or have unintended consequences”.

“Part of what sets off alarm bells for people like me is a history of people using Jewish lists against Jews,” he said . “The Nazi campaign against Jews depended on institutions like universities handing over information about their Jewish members to the authorities.”

“As Jewish study scholars, we know well the dangers of collecting such information,” said Beth Wenger, who teaches Jewish history at Penn.

Advertisement

It’s not the first time the EEOC’s efforts to fight antisemitism have caused alarm among Jewish faculty. Last spring, the commission texted the personal phones of employees of Barnard College, the women’s school affiliated with Columbia University, linking to a survey that asked respondents whether they identified as Jewish or Israeli.





Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

How Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro’s removal is impacting Pennsylvania

Published

on

How Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro’s removal is impacting Pennsylvania






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending