Pennsylvania
U.S. Supreme Court backs Republican in Pennsylvania ballots case
WASHINGTON, Oct 11 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Courtroom on Tuesday sided with an unsuccessful Republican candidate for a judgeship in Pennsylvania and threw out a decrease courtroom’s ruling that had allowed the counting of mail-in ballots within the race that he had sought to exclude as a result of voters uncared for to write down the date on them.
The justices vacated the ruling by the Philadelphia-based third U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals as requested by David Ritter, who misplaced his 2021 bid for a spot on the Lehigh County Courtroom of Frequent Pleas to a Democratic rival by 5 votes after 257 absentee ballots with out date notations have been counted.
The excessive courtroom’s motion signifies that the third Circuit ruling can’t be used as a precedent within the three states coated by this regional federal appellate courtroom – Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware – to permit the counting of ballots with minor flaws such because the voter failing to fill within the date. Vacating the ruling doesn’t change Ritter’s loss in his race.
The third Circuit had dominated that invalidating the undated ballots would violate a provision of a landmark 1964 federal legislation known as the Civil Rights Act aimed toward making certain that minor poll errors don’t deny somebody the fitting to vote.
Underneath Pennsylvania legislation, voters are required to write down the date on the outer envelope of a mail-in poll. The third Circuit discovered that the requirement is “immaterial” to figuring out their {qualifications} as voters.
In his enchantment, Ritter argued that mail-in poll guidelines enhance election administration and deter fraud.
The U.S. Supreme Courtroom in June denied Ritter’s bid to dam the counting of the undated ballots. Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented from that call. Alito wrote that the third Circuit ruling “might properly have an effect on the result” of elections this yr. Voters go to the polls on Nov. 8 in midterm elections wherein Republicans are looking for to grab management of Congress from the Democrats.
Ritter informed the Supreme Courtroom that except the third Circuit ruling was wiped off the books, it could enable undated mail-in ballots to be counted in future elections in Pennsylvania and would “threaten to invalidate numerous laws of mail-in voting” nationwide. Pennsylvania Republican legislators echoed Ritter’s warning.
The Supreme Courtroom has a 6-3 conservative majority.
The Civil Rights Act provision at challenge prohibits officers from disqualifying a voter’s poll for an error that isn’t “materials” to figuring out whether or not the individual was certified to vote, comparable to their age or citizenship. The legislation focused practices widespread in Southern states throughout the period of racial segregation that used minor poll errors to dam Black individuals from voting.
Quite a few Republican-led states have enacted more durable voting guidelines, together with for mail-in ballots, within the wake of Republican Donald Trump’s presidential re-election loss in 2020 to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump has made false claims that the election was stolen from him by way of widespread voting fraud. Extra Democratic voters than Republicans forged votes by mail within the 2020 election.
In Pennsylvania, there’s a intently watched U.S. Senate race between Republican Mehmet Oz and Democrat John Fetterman that might assist decide which occasion controls that chamber.
The Could ruling by the third Circuit got here in a lawsuit by a number of aged Democratic and Republican voters upset that their votes wouldn’t be counted for neglecting to write down the date on the mail-in poll envelope – what they known as a “meaningless technicality.”
Pennsylvania Republican legislators in a submitting to the Supreme Courtroom stated the third Circuit’s ruling threatened an orderly election in November. A variety of conservative teams energetic in voting points additionally urged the justices to vacate the third Circuit’s ruling.
The third Circuit’s rulings additionally apply to the U.S. Virgin Islands territory.
Register now for FREE limitless entry to Reuters.com
Reporting by Andrew Chung; Enhancing by Will Dunham
Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.
Pennsylvania
Democrat Bob Casey concedes Pennsylvania Senate race to Dave McCormick
Pennsylvania Democrat Sen. Bob Casey on Thursday announced he has conceded the race to Republican candidate Dave McCormick more than two weeks after Election Day.
Casey said in a statement that he called McCormick to congratulate him. McCormick’s campaign also independently confirmed the news to Fox News Digital.
“I just called Dave McCormick to congratulate him on his election to represent Pennsylvania in the United States Senate,” Casey said in the statement. “As the first count of ballots is completed, Pennsylvanians can move forward with the knowledge that their voices were heard, whether their vote was the first to be counted or the last.”
“This race was one of the closest in our Commonwealth’s history, decided by less than a quarter of a point. I am grateful to the thousands of people who worked to make sure every eligible vote cast could be counted, including election officials in all 67 counties.”
RNC FILES TWO LAWSUITS IN PENNSYLVANIA AMID SEN BOB CASEY REFUSING TO CONCEDE RACE
The Pennsylvania State Department confirmed that all counties “have completed their initial count of all votes cast, with the exception of ballots under challenge.”
“This is a major step that marks the end of counties’ initial counting processes and signals that counties begin preparing their results for official certification. Thousands of election professionals have been working tirelessly since Nov. 5 to ensure every eligible vote cast by a registered voter is counted accurately. All of Pennsylvania’s election officials deserve our thanks, as well as our continued support while they complete their duties with integrity,” the message said.
The news comes after McCormick edged out Casey by just 17,000 votes to win the Senate seat, according to the most recent unofficial data from the Department of State – putting Casey well within the 0.5% margin of error required under Pennsylvania law to trigger an automatic recount.
That recount began Monday and was slated to end Nov. 26.
The Republican Party blasted Democrats this week for Casey’s refusal to concede the U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania, taking aim at the three-term incumbent for moving ahead with a costly recount effort, despite their assessment that Casey lacked any achievable path to victory.
They have also criticized the cost, noting that the recount will cost taxpayers an estimated $1 million.
In his statement Thursday, Casey praised the democratic process and voters who turned out in the Keystone State.
“When a Pennsylvanian takes the time to cast a legal vote, often waiting in long lines and taking time away from their work and family, they deserve to know that their vote will count,” Casey said. “That’s democracy.”
Later Thursday, Casey took to X to thank his supporters.
“During my time in office, I have been guided by an inscription on the Finance Building in Harrisburg: ‘All public service is a trust, given in faith and accepted in honor.’”
He added: “Thank you for your trust in me all these years, Pennsylvania. It has been the honor of my lifetime.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., said the news “hits me.”
“It’s been a supreme honor to have Bob Casey as a colleague, friend, and mentor,” Fetterman said in a statement. “His legacy is a better Pennsylvania. Unassuming while delivering for PA for nearly two decades, he fought for working Pennsylvanians and unions, rural communities, seniors and people with disabilities—all of us. Bob Casey was, is, and always will be Pennsylvania’s best senator.”
EDITOR’S NOTE: This report has been updated to clarify that the Pennsylvania secretary of state had not announced the end of the recount as of Friday morning.
Pennsylvania
First snow of the season hits Western Pennsylvania
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania bill would incentivize purchase of near-zero-emission large trucks
New legislation at the Pennsylvania statehouse is intended to incentivize purchases of near-zero-emission large trucks.
Sen. Rosemary Brown, R-Monroe, introduced a bill last week that would create a Near-Zero-Emission Truck Incentive Program.
The grant program would be administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. The state Department of Environmental Protection would work in consultation with the highway department to reduce emission from large trucks.
Brown wrote in a memo to state senators that “the federal government took steps to tightly regulate heavy-duty truck emissions between model years 2007 and 2010 by requiring the standardization of selective catalytic reduction and diesel particulate filters.” She added that trucks sold in 2006 emit about 10 times the amount of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter as trucks sold today.
Brown told lawmakers that about 34% of trucks registered in Pennsylvania are pre-2010 model trucks.
“These trucks contribute the majority of emissions from the trucking industry in the state,” she wrote. “The proposed grant program will lead to the replacement of these trucks with newer, much cleaner trucks, resulting in lower emissions from the trucking industry and cleaner air for all.”
Additionally, she said the addition of multiple standard safety technologies by original equipment manufacturers in post-2010 model trucks will save lives in Pennsylvania.
Grant program
Her bill, SB1348, would require the state DOT and Department of Environmental Protection to apply for federal funds available for the purpose of reducing pollution.
The state would use the funds to create a grant program to incentivize the purchase of model year 2010 or newer trucks to be titled and registered in Pennsylvania, if accompanied by a trade-in of a pre-2010 diesel truck that is also titled and registered in the state.
“No other single technology transfer can affect Pennsylvania’s air quality and provide immediate health benefits as much as replacing pre-2010 trucks with post-2010 models,” Brown wrote.
The Pennsylvania Motor Truck Association supports the bill.
Rebecca Oyler, PMTA president, said the federal excise tax acts as a disincentive to companies wishing to update their equipment to the latest technology.
“Providing an incentive program at the state level helps offset this impediment and avoids costly mandates that would cripple the trucking industry,” Oyler said in prepared remarks.
SB1348 is in the Senate Transportation Committee. LL
More Land Line coverage of news from Pennsylvania.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
World1 week ago
Sarah Palin, NY Times Have Explored Settlement, as Judge Sets Defamation Retrial
-
Science3 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology4 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle5 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs