Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania’s Senate approves millions for universities and schools, but rejects House priorities
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — Pennsylvania’s Senate on Wednesday approved hundreds of millions of dollars for universities and schools, but it rejected some House priorities as lawmakers search for agreements on elements of a state budget that have dragged on five months into the fiscal year.
The Republican-controlled Senate passed a pair of budget-related bills, all with support from GOP and Democratic leaders, but both require House approval to get to the desk of Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro.
The bills have an uncertain future in the House because they lack the increases in aid that the chamber’s Democratic majority had sought for the poorest public schools and three major universities: Temple, Pitt and Penn State.
A number of budget items have eluded agreement since House Democrats in June refused to go along with a budget plan supported by Shapiro and Senate Republicans. The sticking point was a new, $100 million program to pay for tuition at private and religious schools.
The resulting $45 billion budget that Shapiro signed in August doesn’t include the tuition voucher program, and as a result Republicans have held up elements that Democrats had supported.
In Wednesday’s floor debate, Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman, a Republican from Indiana County, acknowledged criticism that the legislation lacks extra school aid that Democrats had sought.
Rather, Pittman said it is important to focus on what the Senate was accomplishing in a bipartisan vote.
“I’m proud of the work this institution has put into this legislation,” Pittman said. “I’m proud of the work we are accomplishing on a bipartisan basis to move education in this commonwealth forward.”
The budget that Shapiro signed boosted aid for public school instruction and operations by $600 million, or about 7%. But it didn’t include the extra $100 million in “Level Up” funding Democrats wanted for the poorest public schools — or, for that matter, the billions of extra dollars that public school advocates say is necessary to adequately fund public schools.
The Senate’s bills that passed Wednesday marshal another $150 million, for a total of $555 million for an educational tax credit program that largely subsidizes tuition at private schools.
The program is championed primarily by Republicans. Still, Republicans agreed to provisions sought by Democrats: scaling back the amount of money that middleman administrators keep and putting $48 million more toward schools that serve a large proportion of students from lower-income families.
The legislation also sends $603 million to five institutions, including an increase of about $3 million apiece for Lincoln University and Penn College of Technology. But the bill reflects a continued Republican refusal to increase subsidies for Temple, Pitt and Penn State.
Democrats had sought an increase of 7% for each institution, or $20 million total.
Republicans have insisted that the three universities not increase tuition, which each institution did for this school year. Without state aid, though, the universities say it is difficult to keep tuition flat.
Other provisions in the Senate’s bills allow $100 million in federal aid to flow to school mental health services and create a program to award up to $10,000 to student teachers in an effort to encourage more people to become educators.
The stipends are aimed at easing a hardship for college students finishing up a teaching degree who each must student-teach in schools for 12 weeks without pay.
“We are running out of individuals to educate our children, no matter what school you may be in,” Sen. Vincent Hughes, a Democrat from Philadelphia, said during floor debate. “We are literally running out of teachers.”
Meanwhile, the Senate has not acted on a House bill that would deliver a $1 billion-plus hit to the state’s bank account by increasing subsidies for public transit agencies, cutting business taxes and expanding tax credits for child care costs and lower-earning workers.
In an interview, Pittman said he is “very intrigued” by the bill because it includes such a substantial tax cut. But, he said, his caucus has concerns about the legislation.
“And that’s what we have to evaluate,” Pittman said. “But we’re keeping all of our options open.”
Pennsylvania
Op-ed: Protecting Pennsylvania’s students from gun violence – Metro Philadelphia
Schools in Pennsylvania are back in full swing—students have new classes, new teachers, new material to learn and perhaps even a new school to attend. But with the excitement of school, comes growing concern to ensure our school communities are kept safe from gun violence.
In March, a statewide survey found that nearly half of Pennsylvania parents are more worried about gun violence at school than they are about their children “being behind academically.” When asked about a range of gun safety proposals, an overwhelming number (84%) supported “holding gun owners legally responsible if a firearm is not properly secured in their home and is used by a child…to harm or kill themself or others.”
Other survey findings further suggest the majority of Pennsylvania parents (and in many cases strongly) support the following policies:
- Requiring criminal background checks of individuals on all gun sales;
- Increased funding to enhance the physical safety of school buildings as long as it does not negatively impact the learning environment;
- Raising the minimum age of a person who can own or purchase a semi-automatic weapon from 18 to 21;
- Prohibiting people who have been convicted of domestic abuse from buying or owning a gun; and
- Banning the civilian sale, manufacture, and purchase or transfer of military-grade weapons, such as the AR-15.
It should come as no surprise then that the survey also found Pennsylvania parents overwhelmingly prefer politicians committed to adopting and strengthening these types of gun safety policies. This sentiment may partially explain why this summer, our state legislature passed Act 55 (formerly Senate Bill 700), which increases school safety by requiring all school districts in the state to have at least one school security employee on duty during the school day.
We commend the legislature for acting because providing our students with more safety from gun violence remains a top priority for Pennsylvania parents.
At PTA, we have long demanded that more is done to protect our children and youth from gun violence and save lives. PTA members in Pennsylvania and across the country have played a critical role in advocating for common sense solutions to gun violence. It remains a top priority of our association to prevent and eliminate gun violence, promote the safety and well-being of all children, and ensure every child has every opportunity to reach their full potential.
In the last year, our association has tripled our efforts to make school communities safer from gun violence. In March, our association launched a collaboration with Everytown for Gun Safety to better advocate for gun violence prevention in our school communities. The research cited above was the first product of this collaboration. And in June, PTA nationally adopted an amendment to our association’s Safe Storage of Firearms resolution that calls for our association to support legislation requiring adults to be accountable for storing their firearms safely.
At Pennsylvania PTA specifically, we are focused on the PTA mission – to advocate for all children – which means that improving the safety in all schools in our Commonwealth is a priority for our state association.
Gun violence prevention is a critical priority for all parents, educators, students and community members. Those of us at Pennsylvania PTA and with PTA across the country are working hard to drive common sense gun safety improvements in our school communities. Join us in demanding action and change to protect children and families from gun violence by becoming a member of PTA or taking action on our website at PTA.org/Advocacy
By taking action and working together, we can return to the days where we worried about ‘normal’ things when it comes to school, not whether our child will return home safe each day.
Bonnie Fagan is Secretary of the Pennsylvania PTA.
Pennsylvania
Western Pennsylvania and surrounding regions see little improvement in drought conditions
PITTSBURGH (KDKA) – This past week’s drought monitor continues to show much of Western PA and Northern West Virginia in moderate to severe drought conditions.
In Pennsylvania, 98.71% of the state is in at least abnormally dry conditions. Roughly 44% of the state is in moderate drought or worse, which is the greatest area coverage since late June 2023.
There have only been four other times since 2000 when greater than 98% of the state was abnormally dry or worse: May 2001, July 2002, September 2002, May 2006, and June 2023.
In West Virginia, conditions are much worse statistically speaking with nearly 100% of the state in moderate or worse drought. This year also marked the first time West Virginia has seen exceptional drought conditions—the highest categorization of drought–since the drought monitor emerged in 2000.
During the summer, when this drought emerged, it was categorized as “short-term”, meaning that impacts were primarily limited to grasslands and agriculture. Now, we are categorized with both “short-term” and “long-term” drought which means impacts are extending beyond dried-out plants and soils—we are seeing increasing impacts to hydrology along with ecology.
Recently, water levels in Yough Lake in Somerset County have dropped so low that remains of the town of Somerfield and a bridge that used to run through it have been exposed.
Yough Lake is the only water source that is running well below normal in our region due to the ongoing drought. The entire Youghiogheny River basin from Sutersville, PA, to Friendsville, MD is running much below normal in terms of streamflow with some stream gauge sensors reporting flow in the lowest 10th percentile.
This means that there is only a small percentage of available records lower than what is being observed now. Other creeks and rivers that have reported severely low streamflow in the last two weeks include Loyalhanna Creek from the Loyalhanna Dam to Kingston, PA; the Beaver River from Wampum to Beaver Falls, PA; the Shenango River from Sharpsburg to Transfer, PA; and French Creek from Meadville to Utica, PA. Even the Allegheny and Ohio Rivers have reported below-normal streamflow on average over the last few weeks.
This is a regional-wide drought as much of the East Coast is experiencing its driest fall to date. Philadelphia recorded no measurable rain during the entire month of October making it the driest ever recorded. New York City also recorded its driest October on record which has led to the explosion of severe drought and some wildfires in that area.
The rain that fell on Sunday, November 10, provided some soil moisture but did not help hydrological issues much. Most of Western PA and Northern WV received between 0.5″ to 1″ of rain according to Doppler Radar estimates.
This is a far cry from what is needed to end the drought. Gridded rainfall analysis maps show large swaths south of Pittsburgh receiving only HALF of their normal rainfall since the middle of May and in need of 5-8+” of rain to make up the deficit.
Officially in Pittsburgh, our deficit has increased more so during the fall after some localized rainfall events kept us above average during the summer. Pittsburgh Airport is in need of 3.66″ of rain to make up the fall 2024 deficit.
Looking ahead, there are signs the long-range weather pattern will become more active during the third week of November. This may finally bring a more consistent buy of precipitation to our drought-stricken region.
Pennsylvania
Washington Post editorial board blasts Pennsylvania Democrats in scathing piece about recount efforts
c
The editorial board of the Washington Post published a critical piece about Pennsylvania Democrats Saturday, denouncing politicians who voted in favor of counting invalid ballots during a U.S. Senate race recount.
The piece came as Keystone State Democrats seek to salvage invalid provisional ballots in favor of Democratic Sen. Bob Casey, who lost to Republican Senator-elect Dave McCormick in the Nov. 5 election.
Casey lost by a margin of around 24,000 votes and has not yet conceded the race. Because the margin between the two candidates was less than half a point, an automatic recount was triggered by Pennsylvania law.
State rules dictate that provisional ballots must be signed in two places and that mail-in votes must include correct dates. Democrats in some counties have voted in favor of counting ballots that were deemed invalid, which contradicts a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
TRUMP LAWYER WILLIAM OWEN SCHARF PICKED FOR ‘CRUCIAL’ WHITE HOUSE ASSISTANT ROLE
“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country,” Bucks County Commissioner Diane Ellis-Marseglia, a Democrat, said Thursday.
“People violate laws anytime they want,” she added. “So, for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention. There’s nothing more important than counting votes.”
In a piece titled “Democrats thumb their nose at the rule of law in Pennsylvania,” the WaPo editorial board wrote that election rules “must be applied equally and consistently.”
HERE ARE THE MOST TALKED-ABOUT CANDIDATES FOR TOP POSTS IN TRUMP’S ADMINISTRATION
“Democrats would surely protest if a Republican commissioner made the same statement [as Ellis-Marseglia] to justify tipping the scales for their party’s Senate nominee — and they would be right,” the board said. “Elections need rules, established in advance of the voting, and those rules must be applied equally and consistently.”
The op-ed also predicted that the votes “will almost certainly be overturned on appeal, but the mere attempt to defy judicial rulings is corrosive to democracy and invites similar behavior in future elections.”
“Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court, by the way, includes five justices elected in partisan elections as Democrats and just two elected as Republicans,” the editorial board noted. “Even if that partisan balance were reversed, however, the court’s authority would be equally legitimate.”
The op-ed also flatly states that Casey “almost certainly lost the race,” and called for Democrats to accept the loss gracefully, “especially if they want to continue claiming theirs is the party of democracy.”
“State law also entitles Mr. Casey to a statewide recount because Mr. McCormick’s margin of victory is smaller than half a percentage point, though not by much,” the op-ed said. “A recount is unlikely to change the outcome.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Fox News Digital reached out to the Casey campaign for comment.
Fox News Digital’s Sophia Compton and Chris Pandolfo contributed to this report.
-
Health1 week ago
Lose Weight Without the Gym? Try These Easy Lifestyle Hacks
-
Culture1 week ago
The NFL is heading to Germany – and the country has fallen for American football
-
Business1 week ago
Ref needs glasses? Not anymore. Lasik company offers free procedures for referees
-
Sports1 week ago
All-Free-Agent Team: Closers and corner outfielders aplenty, harder to fill up the middle
-
News6 days ago
Herbert Smith Freehills to merge with US-based law firm Kramer Levin
-
Technology1 week ago
The next Nintendo Direct is all about Super Nintendo World’s Donkey Kong Country
-
Business4 days ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health4 days ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case