Connect with us

Pennsylvania

History’s Headlines: Confederate general from Pennsylvania

Published

on

History’s Headlines: Confederate general from Pennsylvania


Wednesday, August 14, 1907, was cooler than most summer season days in New York. Newspaper headlines shouted of a inventory market crash, a strike by telegraph employees, and a pleasant assembly between England’s King Edward VII and his cousin, Germany’s Emperor Kaiser Wilhelm II, on their yachts. That very same day Georgia’s state legislature handed an election regulation which was written in such a manner that will just about deny the state’s Black residents the precise to vote. The governor introduced he would signal it as quickly because it received to his desk.

However for residents of 226 West 78th Avenue the day was marked by a private tragedy, the dying of 82-year-old Martha “Pattie” Thompson Pemberton. For the reason that dying of her husband, Accomplice Common John C. Pemberton, in 1881, Mrs. Pemberton had lived on the Manhattan house of her daughter, Mrs. Patricia Pemberton Berman, and her stockbroker husband. Though an invalid for the earlier eight years, Mrs. Pemberton’s finish had come instantly. The transient obituary famous the funeral would happen on August sixteenth at Philadelphia’s Laurel Hill Cemetery the place she could be interred beside her husband. The prepare carrying her stays was scheduled to reach on the metropolis’s Broad Avenue Station at 3:10 that afternoon.

For a short time within the early 1870s, the Pembertons had lived within the Lehigh Valley. At the moment, the Allentown Iron Works was a booming, bustling, smoky place the place pillars of flame rose in opposition to the evening sky. It was stated that it was potential to learn a newspaper at 3:00 a.m. by the reflection they forged. However through the sunlight hours it might have been a specific employee- a clerk that held himself with a army bearing- that will have drawn a customer’s consideration. With a full beard and carrying a black coat, he may very well be seen counting the rows of pig iron as they piled up within the yard. He would then go into the workplace and write up a report.

Advertisement

His identify was John C. Pemberton and he hailed from an previous Philadelphia household whose roots went again to the colonial period. He had graduated from West Level, served bravely within the Mexican Battle, and seemed to be on his strategy to being acknowledged as one of many distinguished troopers within the U.S. Military. However he had made a fateful choice in 1861 and joined the Accomplice trigger. It was a path that led him to the command of Vicksburg, among the many most vital positions the insurgent authorities needed to supply. Its give up after a protracted siege to Ulysses Grant in 1863 made Pemberton a pariah within the South. Now thought to be a traitor in each North and South, the battle’s finish discovered him and his household for a time in Allentown.

Aloof and formal by his personal admission with an argumentative temperament, Pemberton was not a superb mixer. His thought of stress-free was studying, within the unique Latin, the Aeneid, an epic poem by Virgil, the Roman poet’s story of the Trojan warrior Aeneas who flees the burning metropolis of Troy and, in line with a legend, based what turns into the Roman Empire. Native Union Civil Battle veterans recalled later that Pemberton was considerably, as they put it, “a mite sensitive,” once they tried to argue concerning the struggle. However additionally they recalled he all the time gave nearly as good as he received when the topic got here up. Common Harry C. Trexler, then a younger boy with a ardour for Civil Battle historical past, recalled to associates seeing Pemberton and his household as they went to providers on the metropolis’s Grace Episcopal Church.

John Clifford Pemberton (1814-1881) was born into certainly one of first households of Philadelphia that arrived roughly concurrently William Penn. They held important positions within the early authorities within the seventeenth century in Bucks County when it was created by Penn. Each Northampton County and later Lehigh County had been shaped out of the unique Bucks County. Within the 18th century Israel Pemberton, a Philadelphia service provider, was dubbed “King of the Quakers” resulting from his important position within the political lifetime of the colony. His help for Native Individuals put him at odds with Thomas Penn, William Penn’s son and proprietor of the colony.

Pemberton’s father, additionally a John Pemberton, having fought within the Battle of 1812, apparently didn’t take his Quaker vow of pacifism terribly significantly. Throughout that struggle Pemberton’s father received to know Andrew Jackson. It was via this hyperlink, in 1833, when Jackson was president, that Pemberton’s son was admitted to West Level. Pemberton was not one of the best scholar, and he received demerits for being one thing of a hell-raiser. His roommate was George Gordon Meade, a fellow Philadelphian who would later command the Union forces at Gettysburg.

In keeping with one supply his pursuits had been primarily within the humanities fairly than arithmetic. Pemberton graduated twenty seventh in a category of fifty. His low grades saved him from being admitted to the distinguished engineer corps. However his father’s affect was in a position to get him a fee within the Fourth Artillery. As a younger officer first within the Seminole Battle in Florida and later within the Mexican Battle, Pemberton didn’t shrink from harmful assignments. However he was extra snug in employees positions than he was within the area. “Pemberton had a knack for getting within the graces of high-ranking officers,” notes one supply, “and employees duties appeared higher fitted for his talents than theater actions… he was no coward, however he developed a choice for duties.”

Advertisement

In distinction to his West Level days, Pemberton turned one thing of a spit and polish soldier, a martinet who didn’t like being contradicted. In a single occasion whereas serving in Michigan one corporal with whom he was having an argument tried to shoot him. Writing to his mom Pemberton noticed, “I can’t all the time bear reproach although I deserve it.”

Pemberton didn’t appear to take an lively place on the rising north / south route the nation was taking. He apparently felt that as a military officer, slavery was not a difficulty on which he wanted to take sides. However an affect that compelled him to resolve was his marriage in 1848 to Martha (Pattie) Thompson of Norfolk, Virginia. Her father owned a delivery enterprise and likewise a number of slaves. As a marriage current he gave the couple a Black feminine slave to behave as a cook dinner. Their family additionally included two white servants. To keep away from controversy Pemberton refused to permit the cook dinner to journey with them once they went north of the Mason Dixon line. Pemberton and his spouse had been stated to have 5 kids, three of whom (Patricia, John Clifford and Francis Rawle) survived into maturity. All three are buried at Laurel Hill Cemetery with their mother and father.

With the outbreak of the struggle his spouse, a robust supporter of the South, insisted that he be part of the Accomplice military. “Why do you delay? Jeff Davis has a fee simply ready for you,” she is alleged to have repeated. Historians doubt if this was certainly the case. Pemberton’s household in Philadelphia pleaded with him to not do it. However lastly, they acknowledged that his love for his spouse was stronger than something they may say.

Pemberton was not welcomed with open arms. Confederates without delay suspected him of not being a real believer within the trigger. However as was his nature he quickly attracted the eye of patrons, essentially the most influential of which was the president of the Confederacy. Jefferson Davis discovered one thing to love in Pemberton. Maybe he was flattered to have this prize Philadelphia Yankee and West Pointer within the Accomplice military. The subsequent a number of years discovered Pemberton in a number of posts, maybe crucial designing fortifications for Charleston, South Carolina. A demon for paperwork, Pemberton went at it with a will. However he refused to say that not at all would he ever give up Charleston. This infuriated the residents and politicians within the metropolis who complained to Davis, Robert E. Lee, and anyone else they may consider.

Maybe, as some historians consider, Davis determined it was time to point out his detractors what his protégé might do and gave him command of Vicksburg, Mississippi, one of many key fortress cities of the Confederacy. It was additionally near the place Davis and his brother Joseph had their plantations. Pemberton’s arrival precipitated a stir. The very first thing he did was deliver order out of the chaos that he discovered. Each higher ranges of the army and the civilian authorities had nothing however reward for what he had completed. Besides his previous persona traits had been undoing all the nice Pemberton had completed. His martinet tendencies alienated each his fellow officers and enlisted males. He confirmed little interest in getting out within the area and tried to run every little thing from his workplace desk. And his worst crime of their eyes was one thing he might do nothing about: he was a Yankee from Philadelphia and shared not one of the folkways and values that the boys he commanded had.

Advertisement

On the identical time there was the struggle. Each Grant and Lincoln, being mid-westerners, had an instinctive understanding of how vital management of the Mississippi River could be to the defeat of the South, one thing that Union officers within the East didn’t essentially really feel. So, they made it a focus of a marketing campaign to get management of it. It was additionally vital to Davis, who had a plantation round Vicksburg, as did his older brother, Joseph.

The naval seize of New Orleans happened comparatively early within the battle. Apparently, the army management of the South assumed the town could be attacked by land not sea. However the marketing campaign on the Higher Mississippi was taking longer. In keeping with one supply Pemberton’s officers had been annoyed with the truth that he appeared extra desirous about staying in his workplace in Jackson, the state capital, and doing paper work than main troops within the area.

Pemberton was recognized to Grant from their service collectively within the Mexican Battle. He was later to write down that he knew that Pemberton was a decided, disciplined soldier who would do one of the best he might to defend Vicksburg in any respect prices. Grant, with Common William Tecumseh Sherman and Admiral David Dixon Porter, made a number of makes an attempt to seize the town. However a mix of treacherous panorama, Accomplice tenacity, and the overall challenges of Previous Man River itself made it tough. At the very least as soon as these components labored in favor of the Union forces; due to the peak and angle of the bluffs, Accomplice artillery had been blocked from getting a transparent shot on the fleet.

Lastly, on Could 16, 1863, the battle of Champion Hill, thought of the turning level of the Vicksburg marketing campaign, was reached. Grant would later write that Pemberton “had chosen his place to obtain us, whether or not by chance or design, that was effectively chosen. It is likely one of the highest factors in that part, and commanded all the bottom within the vary.”

Because the Duke of Wellington stated of Waterloo, the battle that adopted was “a fairly close-run factor.” A number of occasions the motion on this or that place would have swung the battle to 1 aspect or the opposite. Armchair strategists nonetheless ponder the case, however by the tip of the day the victory went to Grant opening the siege of Vicksburg. Insurgent troops fought lengthy and arduous over the following month, two weeks and two days, however lastly, practically out of ammunition and meals with a ravenous civilian inhabitants to consider. Pemberton on July 4, 1863, surrendered the identical day because the Union victory at Gettysburg was introduced, spreading pleasure within the North. “The Father of Waters flows unvexed to the ocean,” stated a jubilant Lincoln.

Advertisement

However within the South, there was however one cry: “it’s all Pem’s fault.” Pemberton went 18 months with out receiving a brand new command. When one try was made, army officers round Davis suggested him that it could not be sensible and solely result in hassle. He was lastly appointed inspector of artillery and was captured in Salisbury, North Carolina on April 12, 1865, 5 years to the day of the firing on Fort Sumter.

Pemberton’s post-war life was unsuccessful. Most sources speak of his failed makes an attempt to farm in Warrenton, Virginia, on land given to him by his mom, after which he returned to Pennsylvania. Maybe he left Allentown within the wake of the Panic of 1873 which closed the Allentown Iron Works or a little bit later. The New York Occasions offers his date of return to Philadelphia as 1874.

In Philadelphia, he, his spouse and his household and had been welcomed. On July 13, 1881 Pemberton died at his summer season house at Penllyn, Decrease Gwynedd Township, Montgomery County and was buried in Laurel Hill Cemetery, over the protests of some within the household plot.

The Important Civil Battle web site sums up Pemberton’s dilemma this manner:

“John Pemberton may need made a extra optimistic contribution to the Accomplice trigger if he had been given duties extra appropriate to his persona and expertise…But he nonetheless would have confronted the dilemma in defending Vicksburg.”

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

First snow of the season hits Western Pennsylvania

Published

on

First snow of the season hits Western Pennsylvania


First snow of the season hits Western Pennsylvania – CBS Pittsburgh

Watch CBS News


KDKA-TV’s Ricky Sayer has more on the first snow of the season in the Pittsburgh area.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania bill would incentivize purchase of near-zero-emission large trucks

Published

on

Pennsylvania bill would incentivize purchase of near-zero-emission large trucks


New legislation at the Pennsylvania statehouse is intended to incentivize purchases of near-zero-emission large trucks.

Sen. Rosemary Brown, R-Monroe, introduced a bill last week that would create a Near-Zero-Emission Truck Incentive Program.

The grant program would be administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. The state Department of Environmental Protection would work in consultation with the highway department to reduce emission from large trucks.

Brown wrote in a memo to state senators that “the federal government took steps to tightly regulate heavy-duty truck emissions between model years 2007 and 2010 by requiring the standardization of selective catalytic reduction and diesel particulate filters.” She added that trucks sold in 2006 emit about 10 times the amount of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter as trucks sold today.

Advertisement

Brown told lawmakers that about 34% of trucks registered in Pennsylvania are pre-2010 model trucks.

“These trucks contribute the majority of emissions from the trucking industry in the state,” she wrote. “The proposed grant program will lead to the replacement of these trucks with newer, much cleaner trucks, resulting in lower emissions from the trucking industry and cleaner air for all.”

Additionally, she said the addition of multiple standard safety technologies by original equipment manufacturers in post-2010 model trucks will save lives in Pennsylvania.

Grant program

Her bill, SB1348, would require the state DOT and Department of Environmental Protection to apply for federal funds available for the purpose of reducing pollution.

The state would use the funds to create a grant program to incentivize the purchase of model year 2010 or newer trucks to be titled and registered in Pennsylvania, if accompanied by a trade-in of a pre-2010 diesel truck that is also titled and registered in the state.

Advertisement

“No other single technology transfer can affect Pennsylvania’s air quality and provide immediate health benefits as much as replacing pre-2010 trucks with post-2010 models,” Brown wrote.

The Pennsylvania Motor Truck Association supports the bill.

Rebecca Oyler, PMTA president, said the federal excise tax acts as a disincentive to companies wishing to update their equipment to the latest technology.

“Providing an incentive program at the state level helps offset this impediment and avoids costly mandates that would cripple the trucking industry,” Oyler said in prepared remarks.

SB1348 is in the Senate Transportation Committee. LL

Advertisement

More Land Line coverage of news from Pennsylvania.



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Passes Bitcoin Rights Bill, Proposes Strategic Reserve

Published

on

Pennsylvania Passes Bitcoin Rights Bill, Proposes Strategic Reserve


Pennsylvania is stepping into the digital future with bold legislation aimed at solidifying its role as a leader in the emerging digital asset economy. On October 23, 2024, the Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed House Bill 2481—dubbed the “Bitcoin Rights” bill by Dennis Porter, co-founder of the Satoshi Action Fund—with a decisive 176–26 bipartisan vote. This legislation positions Pennsylvania among states at the forefront of digital asset regulation and underscores its commitment to fostering innovation in the sector while addressing critical issues like economic empowerment and financial inclusion.

House Bill 2481 enshrines the rights of individuals and businesses to self-custody digital assets, operate blockchain nodes, and conduct transactions without interference from restrictive municipal ordinances. Sponsored by Rep. Mike Cabell (R-Luzerne) and supported by bipartisan vote, the bill reflects a growing recognition across party lines of blockchain technology’s transformative potential.

Advertisement

The vote also revealed divisions within the Democratic Party, with all 26 opposing votes coming from Democratic representatives. Nevertheless, prominent members of the Democratic party, including Majority Leader Joanna McClinton (D-Phila/Delaware) and Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta (D-Phila), backed the measure highlighting its potential to stimulate economic growth and expand opportunities for underserved communities. Their support signals a broader acknowledgment of blockchain’s role in empowering marginalized groups through equitable access to financial tools.

Building On Momentum: Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act

Following the passage of HB 2481, Republican Representatives Mike Cabell and Aaron Kaufer introduced HB 2664 (the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act) on November 14, 2024. If enacted, this legislation would enable the state treasurer to allocate up to 10% of Pennsylvania’s General Fund, Rainy Day Fund, and State Investment Fund into bitcoin and crypto-based exchange-traded products (ETPs), as explained in the bill’s legislative memo. This could mean an investment of up to $970 million in bitcoin, leveraging its potential as both a hedge against inflation and a long-term growth asset, as reported by DeCrypt.

The Strategic Bitcoin Reserves Debate

The introduction of Pennsylvania’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act aligns with a broader conversation about government-held cryptocurrency reserves, echoing national debates sparked by Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis and the Trump administration’s proposal for a U.S. strategic bitcoin reserve. The state-level initiative reflects Pennsylvania’s proactive stance, but it has also reignited concerns about the potential risks of investing public funds in bitcoin.

Proponents Highlight Benefits

Proponents argue that bitcoin’s decentralized nature and fixed supply make it a strong hedge against inflation and an asset comparable to gold. As Satoshi Action Fund CEO Dennis Porter noted in a recent CryptoSlate article, “Bitcoin aligns incentives. When incentives align, we all win.” Advocates highlight Bitcoin’s significant appreciation over time and its growing acceptance among financial institutions as a store of value.

Advertisement

Supporters believe the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act could enhance fiscal stability by diversifying the state’s investments. The proposal mirrors broader efforts in states like Wyoming, where Lummis has championed bitcoin’s inclusion in national reserves, describing it as a safeguard against dollar devaluation and economic volatility.

Critics Raise Concerns

Despite its potential benefits, the concept of holding bitcoin in government reserves faces substantial criticism. Skeptics, including financial analysts and environmental advocates, point to the cryptocurrency’s extreme price volatility as a major risk. Bitcoin’s historical price swings—both surging and plummeting within short periods—raise questions about the stability of using it to back state or national funds.

Additionally, critics highlight security vulnerabilities in holding digital assets. High-profile breaches of institutional-grade storage solutions have underscored the risks of cyberattacks, which could make bitcoin reserves a target for bad actors. Environmental concerns related to bitcoin mining’s energy consumption further fuel opposition to public investment in the asset.

These concerns underscore parallels between Pennsylvania’s debate and the national critique of the Trump administration’s rumored executive order to formalize a U.S. bitcoin reserve. Critics have questioned whether introducing bitcoin into government holdings would expose the economy to unnecessary risk and divert resources from more stable investments. The outcome of this legislation could set a precedent, not only for other states but also for shaping the broader discourse on digital assets in fiscal policy.

Bipartisan Innovation In Action

Pennsylvania’s recent actions stand out in a national landscape often marked by federal gridlock and partisan divides on crypto policy. The state’s forward-looking approach mirrors pioneering efforts in Wyoming, Texas, and Florida. The bipartisan support for HB 2481 and subsequent legislative proposals like the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act demonstrate the economic promise lawmakers on both sides of the aisle see in blockchain technology. By codifying the rights of digital asset holders and creating a framework for state-level investment in crypto, Pennsylvania is charting a path that other states can follow.

Advertisement

Why Pennsylvania’s Leadership Matters

Pennsylvania’s legislation arrives at a critical moment for the digital asset ecosystem. With the most pro-crypto presidency and Congress in U.S. history set to take office in 2025, states like Pennsylvania have a unique opportunity to shape national policy from the ground up. The Commonwealth’s decisive actions on HB 2481 and the proposed Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act signal to businesses, investors, and policymakers that Pennsylvania is open for innovation.

HB 2481 is more than a regulatory milestone—it is a strategic move to attract fintech companies, blockchain developers, and digital asset investors. The Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry has expressed strong support, emphasizing that the state’s clear stance on digital assets provides the regulatory certainty businesses need to innovate responsibly.

Beyond its economic implications, the legislation reflects an understanding of blockchain’s potential to drive financial inclusion. Decentralized financial tools can reduce barriers for underbanked communities, empowering individuals and small businesses with access to innovative financial services. Pennsylvania’s proactive approach ensures that these benefits are accessible to all, positioning the state as a model for equitable digital asset adoption.

A New Blueprint For State-Led Innovation

The impact of Pennsylvania’s leadership extends far beyond its borders. In the absence of comprehensive federal regulation, states have emerged as laboratories for blockchain policy, testing innovative approaches to digital asset management. From Wyoming’s recognition of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) to Florida’s integration of digital assets into its regulatory framework, state-led initiatives are shaping the future of the U.S. digital economy.

Pennsylvania’s efforts build on this momentum, offering a clear roadmap for other states. By fostering a crypto-friendly environment, the Commonwealth is not only boosting its own economic competitiveness but also contributing to a broader movement that could influence federal policy. As blockchain technology continues to redefine global finance, states that embrace innovation now will be well-positioned to lead in the years to come.

Advertisement

Stepping Into The Digital Future

Pennsylvania’s recent legislative efforts demonstrate a pragmatic approach to navigating the complexities of blockchain technology and digital assets. The passage of HB 2481 and the introduction of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Act highlight the Commonwealth’s focus on creating a clear regulatory framework while fostering innovation and economic growth.

By addressing both opportunities and challenges in this rapidly evolving space, Pennsylvania offers a practical model for other states to consider. Its actions underscore the growing role of state governments in shaping the future of the digital economy and ensuring its benefits reach residents and businesses alike. As the legislative process continues, Pennsylvania’s leadership may serve as a valuable reference point for balancing innovation with inclusivity and economic resilience.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending