Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Guy Ciarrocchi: McCormick promotes Pennsylvania in a most un-Pennsylvanian way

Published

on

Guy Ciarrocchi: McCormick promotes Pennsylvania in a most un-Pennsylvanian way


It’s a tale of two outlooks. A tale of two different priorities. Of two different types of leaders.

Pennsylvania Senator Dave McCormick invited the President, much of his cabinet and almost 3 dozen of America’s top corporate executives from technology, energy, manufacturing, finance and workforce development to collaborate at his “Pennsylvania Energy & Innovation Summit.”

The focus: America — not China — must win the battle to develop and use artificial intelligence. And Pennsylvania should lead the way to this new economy, with more natural gas energy than Saudi Arabia has oil, technology hubs, nuclear, coal and hydro-powered plants,  and countless universities and trade schools.

Before they left, the President and his cabinet pledged to do everything they could with policies and regulatory support. Executives pledged to work cooperatively and focused on that vision. And over $92 billion was publicly committed for specific technology and energy projects. That’s just the start.

Advertisement

A freshman senator with business, military, and government experience looked at the technology challenges and opportunities facing America and our state, looked at our existing assets and set forth a vision and a plan to do it. America’s best and brightest came to Pittsburgh and said: “yes!”

Contrast this with Harrisburg. For the third time in three years, Pennsylvania doesn’t have a budget on time. For the third year in a row, Governor Shapiro is trying to spend more money than we have in revenue. For the third year in a row, he pushes “fixes” to allow him to spend more than we have: raise taxes, create new taxes and borrow from our savings.

The GOP-led State Senate is opposed to spending more than we have, raising taxes, and borrowing to fill Shapiro’s debt.

That’s the story of the last three years — and, frankly, for far too long. 

A state that’s old and getting older — the fifth highest percentage of seniors. (Florida beats us because seniors actually move there.) A state with a stagnant population. We were third when I was born; now fifth. We were sixth after the 2010 census and only slipped back into fifth because Illinois fails more.

Advertisement

Harrisburg deals in the short-term. Budget by budget. Governors create new taxes to fill the shortfalls because we are old and too poor. And they “have to” offer taxpayer funded assistance to more and more citizens. All too often, governors try to keep or attract companies by giving them money: “how much do we have to bribe you to stay here or come here?”

Pennsylvania elected officials have all too often been short-sighted, miss the bigger picture, and rarely think big.

Under Governor Ed Rendell, it became clear that Pennsylvania was sitting on a huge amount of natural gas — and engineers learned how to get to it. When Governor Tom Corbett arrived, it was crystal clear that “huge” was really huge. Just like discovering oil in Venango County a century earlier, Pennsylvania had the chance to lead and create almost unlimited jobs.

Yet the talk in Harrisburg: “we should create a new tax and make sure ‘we make money’ off of this.” 

Politicians anxious to spend money tried to create a tax for this brand new industry — to raise short-term dollars rather than grow the industry and make billions. (Almost $4 billion last year alone.) Fortunately, Corbett and Lt. Governor Jim Cawley convinced the legislature to avoid strangling that new industry with short-sighted taxes. (Author’s note; I was Cawley’s Chief of Staff.) 

Advertisement

In 2012, word was floating around the capital that Amazon was looking to construct warehouses across Pennsylvania — not only because of the large population, but because we are the “Keystone State” with access to much of America by truck, rail and boat.

What was the response from legislators? Meet with Amazon and see what they needed? Nope. Reach out to local officials to see what locations our state could market to Amazon? Nope!

Legislators introduced a bill to create a “warehouse tax.” 

Shapiro is the chief of short-sightedness. First, he’s pushing to impose a huge tax on video quiz games you find in VFW halls, bars and sandwich shops, and wants to legalize and tax recreational marijuana to “make money.”

Plus, of course, he wants to expand taxpayer funded programs to more and more people who fell behind during the Biden/Harris inflation years.

Advertisement

Shamelessly, Shapiro actually attended the Summit — to get campaign photo-ops.

What he forgot to mention is that he’s fighting before the Supreme Court to unilaterally tax Pennsylvania’s natural gas industry (punishing them for “climate change”), and then take that money to pay consumers back for the inevitably higher gas rates he’ll cause — and subsidize wind-turbines. Plus, he’s slow-rolling permits to build, expand, and modernize our natural gas pipes. As a result, too much gas sits underground or is shipped by rail cars.

That’s short-sightedness coupled with left-wing ideology — and the chutzpah to fly to the Summit for the photo ops.

Two different visions: economic growth — with Pennsylvania leading the nation — versus more taxes, legalized pot, and more handouts.

Two different leadership styles: boldness and collaboration, versus: “get me through this budget so I can go to Iowa and campaign without any headaches.”

Advertisement

McCormick offers a new way for Pennsylvania: for leaders to lead. But much of what was discussed at the Summit needs a Governor and legislature willing to be bold, with commonsense legislation and regulations.

Florida wasn’t always Florida 2025. Nor was North Carolina, nor Austin, Texas. It took leadership and boldness.

Is Harrisburg ready? If not, are we ready to demand it?

Guy Ciarrocchi is a Senior Fellow at the Commonwealth Foundation. The former Chief of Staff to the Chairman of the Marcellus Shale Coalition (Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley), he writes for Broad + Liberty and RealClear Pennsylvania. Follow Guy at @PaSuburbsGuy.

Advertisement



Source link

Pennsylvania

Charles “Yami” Frederick Jamison, New Castle, PA

Published

on

Charles “Yami” Frederick Jamison, New Castle, PA


NEW CASTLE, Pa. (MyValleyTributes) – Charles “Yami” Frederick Jamison, age 83, of New Castle, Pennsylvania, formerly of Warren, Ohio, passed away, surrounded by his family, on Saturday, May 9, 2026, in Haven Convalescent Home.

Mr. Jamison was born December 2, 1942, in New Castle, a son of the late Charles N. and Anna (Callihan) Jamison and was a 1960 graduate of New Castle High School.

Charles worked as an order checker clerk for Packard Electric Company, Warren, Ohio, for 31 years, until his retirement in 1999.

A proud veteran, he served his country in the United States Navy.

Advertisement

He was a member of St. Mary’s Church, Warren, Ohio and also attended Mass at Holy Spirit Parish – St. Mary’s Church.

Charles spent his free time hunting and playing Euchre.

He is survived by his four sisters, Margaret I. Klann, Mary E. DeMarco and Catherine “Kay” A. Houk (Robert), all of New Castle and Susan J. Olson (Donald), Winfield, Illinois; his brother, Richard Jamison (Linda) of New Castle; and numerous nieces and nephews.

Memorial contributions may be directed to the City Rescue Mission, 319 S. Croton Ave., New Castle, PA, 16101, and the Salvation Army, 240 W. Grant St., New Castle, PA, 16101.

The family would like to extend their gratitude and appreciation to the Haven Convalescent Home for the care and support that Charles received over the years.

Advertisement

Calling Hours will be from 5:00 – 7:00 p.m., on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, in J. Bradley McGonigle Funeral Home and Crematory, Inc., 111 W. Falls St., New Castle.

A Mass of Christian Burial will be held on 10:30 a.m., Wednesday May 13, 2026, in Holy Spirit Parish – St. Mary’s Church, 124 N. Beaver St., New Castle, with Rev. Aaron Kriss, as celebrant.

Interment: Castleview Memorial Gardens, Neshannock Twp.

To order memorial trees or send flowers to the family in memory of Charles F. Jamison, please visit our flower store.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Heading to Pennsylvania? New law will cost you if you text and drive

Published

on

Heading to Pennsylvania? New law will cost you if you text and drive


play

Traveling from the First State to the Keystone State soon?

If so, you might want to put your cellphone down while you’re in the car unless you don’t mind coughing up a few extra bucks.

Advertisement

Beginning June 6, drivers caught using an electrical device while driving will be fined $50.

See how the new law works and what devices are legal to use while driving in neighboring Pennsylvania and here in Delaware.

Is it legal to use a cellphone while driving in Pennsylvania?

Pennsylvania law has barred drivers from reading, writing or sending text messages while driving since 2012, but other handheld cellphone uses were permitted.

The new law that takes effect next month expands the ban to all handheld device use while driving.

New law expands cellphone driving ban in PA

The new regulation, dubbed Paul Miller’s Law, defines an interactive mobile device as basically any electronic handheld device that can be used for things such as voice communication, texting, surfing the internet, playing games, taking photos or sharing social media that can be operated using at least one hand or “supporting body part” or requires pressing more than a single button.

Advertisement

Can I text when stopped at a red light in Pennsylvania?

No, the Pennsylvania law defines driving as operating a motor vehicle on a highway, including anytime the vehicle is temporarily stationary because of traffic, a traffic control device or other momentary delay such as a traffic backup. 

What are the penalties for using a cellphone while driving in PA?

  • Prior to the law going into effect, the penalty is a written warning. 
  • Starting June 6, the penalty is a summary offense with a $50 fine, plus court costs and other fees.
  • The law does not authorize the seizure of an interactive wireless device.
  • The violation carries no points against your license and it is not recorded on the driver’s record for noncommercial drivers. It will be recorded on a commercial driver’s record as a non-sanction violation.
  • If a driver is convicted of homicide by vehicle and driving while distracted, they may be sentenced up to an additional five years in prison.

When can you use a mobile device in the car in Pennsylvania?

  • A driver may use an interactive mobile device if the driver moves the vehicle to the side of or off a highway and halts in a location where the vehicle can safely remain stationary
  • The hands-free law allows for an emergency use exception if it is necessary to communicate with a law enforcement official or other emergency service to prevent injury to persons or property. 
  • The texting ban does not include the use of a GPS device or a system or device that is physically or electronically integrated into the vehicle, or a communications device that is affixed to a mass transit vehicle, bus or school bus.

Who is the new law in PA named for?

Paul Miller Jr., 21,  was killed in a head-on motor vehicle accident with a tractor-trailer in 2010 in Monroe County as the result of a distracted driver who reached for their phone while driving. He was a junior at East Stroudsburg University where he was majoring in sociology. 

After his death, his mother, Eileen Miller, has become a national advocate for stronger laws to curb distracted driving. In 2024, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro signed the law prohibiting the use of hand-held devices while driving, making Pennsylvania the 29th state to ban distracted driving. 

Can you use a cellphone while driving in Delaware?

No, it is illegal for drivers to use any hand-held devices while driving in Delaware — and has been for over a decade.  

Advertisement

This ban not only includes cellphones and smartphones, but also laptops, portable computers and tablets.  

Drivers are also barred from reading, writing or sending text messages or emails; using the internet; or talking without a hands-free device at the ready while operating a vehicle. 

Is there a fine for using a cellphone while driving in Delaware?

Any motorist caught using any hand-held device while driving will be fined $100 for their first offense. Any subsequent offense will result in a fine between $200 and $300.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana And Hemp Regulation Bill Sets The State Up For Broader Recreational Legalization, GOP Senator Says – Marijuana Moment

Published

on

Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana And Hemp Regulation Bill Sets The State Up For Broader Recreational Legalization, GOP Senator Says – Marijuana Moment


“This bill does not legalize adult-use cannabis, but eventually we probably will. If we have this board set up ahead of time, they can do it in a professional manner.”

By Ian Karbal, Pennsylvania Capital-Star

A state Senate committee has advanced a bill to create a Cannabis Control Board that would allow more oversight of the existing medical marijuana program. It would also regulate hemp-derived products, which contain intoxicating cannabinoids and are currently sold in head shops and gas stations around the commonwealth.

The bill’s sponsor, Republican Sen. Dan Laughlin (R-Erie), who has advocated for the legalization of recreational marijuana, says it would not legalize adult-use cannabis in Pennsylvania, but he hopes it can serve as a step towards that goal.

Advertisement

“I think we need the board whether we ever legalize adult-use cannabis,” Laughlin said. “But if and when we do legalize adult-use cannabis, this is kind of laying the foundation for that.”

The bill has the support of cannabis industry groups, and has garnered several co-sponsors who have been hesitant on previous efforts to legalize recreational marijuana. It’s also earned opponents who are in favor of a broader legalization effort.

How would the board work?

Senate Bill 49 would take regulatory authority of the existing medical marijuana program from the state Department of Health and transfer it to a new Cannabis Control Board—sort of like how the Gaming Control Board oversees gambling in the commonwealth.

‘While the Department of Health has worked hard within its authority, it was never designed to manage a rapidly growing industry, resulting in a program bogged down by slow responses, inconsistent oversight and a lack of clarity—frustrating patients and legitimate businesses,” Laughlin said in a statement.

The new board, he said, would be able to move more quickly and to make decisions affecting the program without always requiring the approval of the legislature.

Advertisement

“The goal is obviously, if we create this board ahead of time, we can run all things cannabis in Pennsylvania in a professional manner,” Laughlin said. “And if you have a board that is set up, and they are allowed to promulgate regulations, we won’t have to pass a separate bill every time something pops up.”

The panel would also take on the regulation of hemp-derived products like delta-8 THC and other intoxicating cannabinoids.

These products, which are available for sale at stores around Pennsylvania, proliferated after the 2018 federal Farm Bill redefined hemp in an attempt to allow farmers to more easily grow the crop, even when it contains trace amounts of delta-9 THC, the intoxicating substance in marijuana.

But the legal change also opened a loophole, allowing people to process those hemp plants into products with other intoxicating compounds derived from it, like delta-8 THC.

The items are now commonly found in stores across the state, face virtually no regulatory oversight, and are generally not evaluated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Advertisement

The FDA has warned that the proliferation of the products has led to an uptick in calls to poison control centers and reports of so-called adverse events. The agency says the products can be mislabeled or contain potentially harmful chemicals.

And Laughlin says, in some cases, they’re sold to young Pennsylvanians without ID requirements.

The effort to create a cannabis control board in Pennsylvania has earned praise from the pro-cannabis lobbying group, Responsible PA, which represents many cannabis businesses like dispensaries operating under Pennsylvania’s medical program. Their clients’ products face significantly more regulation than over-the-counter hemp-derived products.

“I would say this is a step forward,” said Monica McCafferty, a Responsible PA spokesperson. “We know that about 70 percent of Pennsylvanians do want adult-use legalization, so we as an advocate group are focused on that, but Senate Bill 49 is a step forward.”

She praised the effort to regulate hemp-derived products and also called it a move in the right direction, “in terms of keeping the conversation going and ultimately getting to a place where we have comprehensive cannabis regulation.”

Advertisement

Some sellers of medical cannabis have also embraced the effort.

“While licensed marijuana operators adhere to some of the nation’s strictest safety and testing protocols, 87 percent of Pennsylvanians are unaware that hemp-derived products are not currently held to those same requirements,” said Marcus Peter, the vice president of external affairs for Terrapin, a company that was among the earliest recipients of a marijuana grower/processor licenses through Pennsylvania’s medical program. “By establishing a Cannabis Control Board, we can ensure that every operator—regardless of the product’s origin—meets the same high bar for consumer safety and lab-tested quality.”

Notably, the federal definition of hemp is set to change again in November in an attempt to close what’s known as the “hemp loophole.” The change in law will severely restrict the amount of THC that hemp-derived products sold in stores can contain, and ban synthetic cannabinoids altogether.

Will it lead to legalization?

While Laughlin has stressed that his bill would not legalize recreational cannabis in Pennsylvania, he told reporters that he hopes it will be “a step that’s needed to make that happen.”

“This bill does not legalize adult-use cannabis, but eventually we probably will,” he added. “If we have this board set up ahead of time, they can do it in a professional manner.”

Advertisement

Laughlin has long been a supporter of legalizing cannabis since a time, he said, the stance was “cutting edge” for a Republican.

As it stands, the Republican-controlled Senate remains the largest obstacle to legalizing recreational cannabis.

Gov. Josh Shapiro (D), for his part, has included legalizing cannabis in each of his annual budget proposals since taking office. House Democrats have also expressed support for legalization, and passed a bill to that end last year, which died in the Senate.

But Laughlin is hopeful that times are changing. More Republicans, he said, have expressed openness to legalizing cannabis for recreational use in recent months and years. That’s been especially true since the Trump administration took steps to reclassify cannabis from a Schedule I to Schedule III substance, which acknowledges potential medical benefits and clears the way for more research on its effects.

“Some of our more conservative members are watching the president kind of wade into this, if you will. And times are changing pretty rapidly,” he said.

Advertisement

It’s unclear what practical effects, if any, rescheduling could have in marijuana-related criminal cases, the existing medical market, or how the substance is treated in the commonwealth.

Sen. President Pro Tempore Kim Ward (R-Westmoreland) is one of the bill’s co-sponsors. As Senate president, she plays a key role in deciding which committees bills are sent to, and whether they receive a floor vote in the chamber. In the past, she’s expressed hesitance about efforts to legalize recreational marijuana for adults in Pennsylvania.

A spokesperson for Ward did not respond to questions from the Capital-Star about her support of the bill or where she stands on recreational legalization.

On the other hand, Laughlin’s bill was opposed by all Democrats on the Senate Law & Justice Committee, where it received a 6-5 vote Monday. Sen. Dawn Keefer (R-York) joined every Democrat on the panel in opposing it.

A spokesperson for Senate Democrats said the caucus is in favor of full legalization, but opposes what they see as a stop-gap measure, especially as key figures in the Republican party continue to oppose recreational cannabis.

Advertisement

Their statement cited a recent comment from Republican gubernatorial candidate Stacey Garrity, who told a Philadelphia NBC station, “I don’t support legalizing recreational marijuana… [The legislature is] never going to pass it, not as long as Senate Republicans are in control of the Senate.”

“Senate Democrats have long championed legalizing recreational marijuana as the right and smart move for the Commonwealth,” the spokesperson said. “SB 49 does not move us closer to this goal. Senate Democrats are committed to ensuring that cannabis products are safe and regulated, but SB 49 does not meet our standards.

“Perhaps most importantly, the Republican candidate for Governor made it clear that Senate Republicans are not interested in legalizing adult-use recreational cannabis,” they said. “Pennsylvania is leaving money on the table by entertaining distractions about a regulatory board in the absence of a conversation about legalizing adult-use marijuana.”

A spokesperson for Shapiro did not respond to questions about whether the governor supports the effort.

All of Pennsylvania’s neighboring states, save West Virginia, have legalized recreational marijuana. The Independent Fiscal Office has estimated that regulated recreational marijuana could bring in $140 million in the 2026-2027 fiscal year, which would grow to over $430 million annually by 2031.

Advertisement

Laughlin said he thinks the Cannabis Control Board bill has a “very good chance” of receiving a full Senate vote in June.

This story was first published by Pennsylvania Capital-Star.

Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending