New York
Weinstein Accuser Testifies About Coerced Sex for a Second Time
Miriam Haley, a former television production assistant, on Tuesday afternoon took the stand in a Manhattan courtroom for a second time to begin recounting how she said Harvey Weinstein overpowered and sexually assaulted her in his apartment nearly 20 years ago.
Ms. Haley said she initially met Mr. Weinstein, then a powerful Hollywood producer, at a film premiere in London in 2004. She has said she reconnected with him years later at the Cannes Film Festival as she was looking for an opportunity as a production assistant in New York.
Defense lawyers carefully listened on Tuesday as Ms. Haley spoke, a transcript of what she said during Mr. Weinstein’s first trial five years ago on hand, waiting to pounce on any differences in her retelling.
Ms. Haley’s testimony was one of the most highly anticipated and closely watched moments of Mr. Weinstein’s retrial, which began this month.
In 2020, Mr. Weinstein was convicted in New York of rape and a criminal sexual act based on the complaints of two women, one of them Ms. Haley. He was sentenced to 23 years in prison, but his conviction was overturned last year and a new trial was ordered. In the interim, prosecutors added a new indictment.
On Tuesday, Alvin L. Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, watched as Ms. Haley testified. She was not the first witness to testify for a second time. Ms. Haley’s former roommate told jurors last week about how a “very shaken and distraught and frightened” Ms. Haley hovered around her bedroom door while telling her that Mr. Weinstein had “forcibly put his mouth on her vagina without her consent.”
“I said, ‘Miriam, that sounds like rape,’” the woman, Elizabeth Entin, told the jurors. “‘I think you should call a lawyer.’”
As Ms. Haley began her testimony, a prosecutor, Nicole Blumberg, asked her to identify Mr. Weinstein. In response, she pointed to Mr. Weinstein sitting at the defense table. As she pointed, Mr. Weinstein, facing her with his arm over the back of his wheelchair, looked down at his left lapel.
Ms. Haley began telling her story publicly before the initial trial five years ago. Her accusations surfaced at the dawn of the #MeToo movement, as dozens of women came forward to recount what they said was Mr. Weinstein’s pattern of using his power to coerce women in Hollywood into sexual encounters, propelling the movement and his downfall.
Mr. Weinstein was known throughout his decades-long reign as a producer who could make careers. He was behind award-winning movies like “Pulp Fiction” and “Good Will Hunting,” as well as the reality show “Project Runway,” where Ms. Haley worked briefly as a production assistant.
Mr. Weinstein is also charged with raping Jessica Mann, an aspiring actress who said Mr. Weinstein attacked her in 2013, and Kaja Sokola, a model whom prosecutors say he assaulted in a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
Mr. Weinstein has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers have said that his interactions with all of the women were consensual.
The producer offered his victims scripts and the promise of fame, Shannon Lucey, an assistant district attorney, said in her opening statements — and he “used those dream opportunities as weapons.”
In their opening statements to the jury, Mr. Weinstein’s lawyers said that the women whom prosecutors called victims had entered consensual relationships, because Mr. Weinstein had the key to the doors of fame. Arthur L. Aidala, a defense lawyer, told the jurors that he would help them “watch the whole movie.”
The specifics of the encounters between Ms. Haley and Mr. Weinstein have been laid out in her previous testimony and in prosecutors’ statements.
Ms. Haley, who was raised in Sweden, met Mr. Weinstein at a movie premiere in London in 2004. About two years later, as she was looking for a new position, she saw him at Cannes and asked him if there were any opportunities at the Weinstein Company, his production firm in New York.
While in France, Mr. Weinstein invited her to a hotel for what Ms. Haley believed was a business meeting, she has said. There he commented on her legs, she said, and asked her for a massage.
On Tuesday, Ms. Haley said the interaction had made her feel embarrassed. As she left the hotel, she said, she burst into tears.
“I felt taken aback, I felt humiliated,” she told the jury. “It was a sinking feeling, realizing that he wasn’t taking me seriously at all.”
After Ms. Haley got her post working on “Project Runway,” which was produced by Mr. Weinstein’s company, his advances continued, she has said. She said she had worked on the tail end of a season, about two to three weeks, and had been paid in cash. She did not have authorization to work in the United States, which Mr. Weinstein knew and used against her, according to prosecutors.
Throughout the summer of 2006, as Ms. Haley worked for his company, Mr. Weinstein tried to “elevate” their relationship, Ms. Lucey said, even showing up unannounced on one occasion and aggressively making his way into her apartment to demand that she travel with him to Paris.
Ms. Haley refused, she said on Tuesday, eventually telling him, “I heard about your reputation with women,” in an attempt to get him to leave. Mr. Weinstein departed, she said, seeming “offended” and upset.
After these episodes, Ms. Haley still agreed to travel to a film premiere in Los Angeles. On the day in July 2006 that Mr. Weinstein bought her ticket, he invited her to his apartment in Lower Manhattan, she said.
There, after offering her a drink, he lunged at her, holding her down and pushing her until she fell backward onto a bed, she said. Ms. Haley recalled that she was on her period, which she told Mr. Weinstein, but he pulled the tampon from her body and put his mouth on her genitals.
Ms. Haley’s testimony was scheduled to continue on Wednesday morning.
New York
They Witness Deaths on the Tracks and Then Struggle to Get Help
‘Part of the job’
Edwin Guity was at the controls of a southbound D train last December, rolling through the Bronx, when suddenly someone was on the tracks in front of him.
He jammed on the emergency brake, but it was too late. The man had gone under the wheels.
Stumbling over words, Mr. Guity radioed the dispatcher and then did what the rules require of every train operator involved in such an incident. He got out of the cab and went looking for the person he had struck.
“I didn’t want to do it,” Mr. Guity said later. “But this is a part of the job.”
He found the man pinned beneath the third car. Paramedics pulled him out, but the man died at the hospital. After that, Mr. Guity wrestled with what to do next.
A 32-year-old who had once lived in a family shelter with his parents, he viewed the job as paying well and offering a rare chance at upward mobility. It also helped cover the costs of his family’s groceries and rent in the three-bedroom apartment they shared in Brooklyn.
But striking the man with the train had shaken him more than perhaps any other experience in his life, and the idea of returning to work left him feeling paralyzed.
Edwin Guity was prescribed exposure therapy after his train struck a man on the tracks.
Hundreds of train operators have found themselves in Mr. Guity’s position over the years.
And for just as long, there has been a path through the state workers’ compensation program to receiving substantive treatment to help them cope. But New York’s train operators say that their employer, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, has done too little to make them aware of that option.
After Mr. Guity’s incident, no official told him of that type of assistance, he said. Instead, they gave him the option of going back to work right away.
But Mr. Guity was lucky. He had a friend who had been through the same experience and who coached him on getting help — first through a six-week program and then, with the assistance of a lawyer, through an experienced specialist.
The specialist prescribed a six-month exposure therapy program to gradually reintroduce Mr. Guity to the subway.
His first day back at the controls of a passenger train was on Thanksgiving. Once again, he was driving on the D line — the same route he had been traveling on the day of the fatal accident.
M.T.A. representatives insisted that New York train operators involved in strikes are made aware of all options for getting treatment, but they declined to answer specific questions about how the agency ensures that drivers get the help they need.
In an interview, the president of the M.T.A. division that runs the subway, Demetrius Crichlow, said all train operators are fully briefed on the resources available to them during their job orientation.
“I really have faith in our process,” Mr. Crichlow said.
Still, other transit systems — all of which are smaller than New York’s — appear to do a better job of ensuring that operators like Mr. Guity take advantage of the services available to them, according to records and interviews.
A Times analysis shows that the incidents were on the rise in New York City’s system even as they were falling in all other American transit systems.
An Uptick in Subway Strikes
San Francisco’s system provides 24-hour access to licensed therapists through a third-party provider.
Los Angeles proactively reaches out to its operators on a regular basis to remind them of workers’ compensation options and other resources.
The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority has made it a goal to increase engagement with its employee assistance program.
The M.T.A. says it offers some version of most of these services.
But in interviews with more than two dozen subway operators who have been involved in train strikes, only one said he was aware of all those resources, and state records suggest most drivers of trains that strike people are not taking full advantage of them.
“It’s the M.T.A.’s responsibility to assist the employee both mentally and physically after these horrific events occur,” the president of the union that represents New York City transit workers, John V. Chiarello, said in a statement, “but it is a constant struggle trying to get the M.T.A. to do the right thing.”
New York
Video: Protesters Arrested After Trying to Block a Possible ICE Raid
new video loaded: Protesters Arrested After Trying to Block a Possible ICE Raid
transcript
transcript
Protesters Arrested After Trying to Block a Possible ICE Raid
Nearly 200 protesters tried to block federal agents from leaving a parking garage in Lower Manhattan on Saturday. The confrontation appeared to prevent a possible ICE raid nearby, and led to violent clashes between the police and protesters.
-
[chanting] “ICE out of New York.”
By Jorge Mitssunaga
November 30, 2025
New York
Video: New York City’s Next Super Storm
new video loaded: New York City’s Next Super Storm
By Hilary Howard, Gabriel Blanco, Stephanie Swart and K.K. Rebecca Lai
November 26, 2025
-
Alaska6 days agoHowling Mat-Su winds leave thousands without power
-
Politics1 week agoTrump rips Somali community as federal agents reportedly eye Minnesota enforcement sweep
-
Ohio1 week ago
Who do the Ohio State Buckeyes hire as the next offensive coordinator?
-
Texas6 days agoTexas Tech football vs BYU live updates, start time, TV channel for Big 12 title
-
News1 week agoTrump threatens strikes on any country he claims makes drugs for US
-
World1 week agoHonduras election council member accuses colleague of ‘intimidation’
-
Washington3 days agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa5 days agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire