New York
He Sued the N.Y.P.D. He Advised ‘Homeland.’ Now He’s Mamdani’s Lawyer.
It was a Goldilocks job, one that demanded somebody not too agreeable and not too contrarian. That was essentially what Lina Khan, darling of the antitrust world, realized as she began trying to help hire the chief counsel for Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York City.
She needed a person who wouldn’t turn the legal team into an “Office of No,” a place where Mr. Mamdani’s ambitious agenda items — free child care, city-run grocery stores — went to die. But she also needed somebody who wasn’t a pushover.
What about Ramzi Kassem? He had worked for the Biden administration, where Ms. Khan had led the Federal Trade Commission, and his name kept surfacing in conversations with colleagues, Ms. Khan said.
His appointment, though, given his résumé, would alarm some New Yorkers.
Just over a decade ago, Mr. Kassem, a Columbia Law School graduate, sued the Police Department over surveillance of Muslim New Yorkers. He represented more than a dozen clients detained at Guantánamo Bay and other sites.
He founded a clinic that represented Muslims being targeted under counterterrorism laws and represented Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia graduate who became the face of President Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestinian protesters, in his fight to stay in the country.
Mr. Kassem, 48, alluded to potential blowback during his job interview, accurately predicting a New York Post headline that was close to what was later published: “Zohran Mamdani eyeing lawyer who defended Al Qaeda terrorist.”
If there’s one thing to know about the mayor’s top legal adviser, it’s that he’s not going to skip over the inconveniences; like the blunt relative at the family function, he seems to view himself as the resident truth teller.
“If I mute myself, then I’m really not doing the thing that the mayor, I think, brought me in to do, which is to speak my mind,” said Mr. Kassem. “It doesn’t mean he’s going to agree with me all the time, or most of the time.”
In interviews with more than 30 people who have worked with him, a clear image of Mr. Kassem emerges. He is almost allergic to palatability, unwilling to swallow opinions that might make higher-ups unsettled — qualities that he sometimes seems to share with Mr. Mamdani, though the mayor has proved willing to moderate his views.
As Mr. Mamdani’s chief counsel, Mr. Kassem has weighed in on a near daily basis on the mayor’s decisions. His team has drafted each of the mayor’s more than 60 executive orders. He offered strategic advice before the mayor met with President Trump and has joined crisis briefings between the mayor and his commissioners — raising pointed queries that, at times, have caused the mayor to bristle, according to a source familiar with the interactions.
Inside and outside City Hall, Mr. Kassem has vocal detractors. Members of the Police Department have complained about what they see as his antagonism toward the department, according to one city official. Some Jewish leaders said they worry he is not adequately focused on protecting the Jewish community in New York. Officials have made bets about how long Mr. Kassem will last as chief counsel.
“Their legal compass is now pointed in an activist direction,” said Mark Goldfeder, a lawyer and chief executive of the National Jewish Advocacy Center. “That does send a signal, especially to Jews who need protection.”
Because of Mr. Kassem’s reputation for challenging authority, even some of his friends were surprised to hear he was going to City Hall. But Mr. Kassem said he carries a piece of advice that he believes applies both to serving the president and the mayor and seems to steer his approach to surviving in a politician’s world.
“When you walk into a place like that for work, you have to walk in with the attitude that it’s going to be the last time you walk in there,” Mr. Kassem said, over dinner near his Harlem home at a Senegalese restaurant, where staff members all know his orders. “You have to be willing to leave it all there.”
What Nobody Wanted to Say
Taking the City Hall job was a straightforward choice for Mr. Kassem, who knew he and Mr. Mamdani shared a lot, including a commitment to police reform and a devotion to the Palestinian cause. Many of Mr. Mamdani’s campaign promises hewed closely to Mr. Kassem’s beliefs.
Yet in his first few months, the mayor has often skewed more toward pragmatism than ideological purity. His willingness to cede ground has proved strategically useful, though sometimes disappointing to his left-wing base. Mr. Mamdani has filled out corners of his administration with politically savvy figures: people like Dean Fuleihan, an elder statesman of New York politics, and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch, a concession to moderate supporters who is a star in her own right. Mr. Kassem appears to some City Hall observers as more of an activist.
“There’s a huge difference between being a fierce advocate in the courtroom and being a trusted counselor in the confines of City Hall,” said Randy Mastro, a well-known lawyer who served as a deputy mayor under two mayors, Eric Adams and Rudolph W. Giuliani.
Some of Mr. Kassem’s political fingerprints are already visible. The morning that Mr. Mamdani flew to Washington to meet with President Trump, it was largely Mr. Kassem’s idea to present the president with a list of five Columbia students who had been detained by immigration authorities. That afternoon, ICE released one of them, Ellie Aghayeva.
About a week later, Mr. Kassem helped arrange a dinner at Gracie Mansion for the mayor and Mahmoud Khalil, along with Mr. Khalil’s wife and baby. It was a tense moment in the city, exactly one day since a teenager inspired by ISIS had thrown a homemade bomb outside the mayor’s residence.
It had also been exactly one year since Mr. Khalil was arrested in his Columbia University building. After 104 days in detention, Mr. Khalil was getting a tour of the mansion’s garden and trading Columbia memories with the mayor and his lawyer over plates of salmon.
In a photo that the mayor later posted on Instagram, Mr. Kassem almost appeared to be floating in the background, the scene forming connective tissue between his current New York life and previous ones.
Idealists like to talk about New York City as a refuge, the world’s sponge, absorbing the flow of people who have not been able to make long-term homes anywhere else. For Mr. Kassem, that view of the city was literal.
He spent his childhood living in Beirut, Baghdad, Damascus and Amman, fleeing wartime violence so often that his siblings joked the region’s conflicts were following them. He recalled that when bombs fell in Beirut, his father used to take him and his sisters far from the windows, into the hallway, where he read aloud “The Count of Monte Cristo.”
In Baghdad, as a teenager, Mr. Kassem saw a different kind of shadow from war. When his family talked about politics, they did so cautiously, knowing informants could be listening. When they returned from family vacations, they saw cigarette ashes in their ashtrays, a sign someone had been in their home, which they interpreted to mean they were being tracked.
New York was the first place Mr. Kassem put down roots. He was drawn in by the worldliness of the city, the hole-in-the-wall restaurants in Harlem and Afropunk shows in Fort Greene.
At Columbia Law School, Mr. Kassem became known for unsparing candor. In a legal philosophy class, a classmate recalled that Mr. Kassem emailed the professor to argue that the amount of reading assigned was excessive. He copied the entire class on the email, his classmate said.
“My mouth literally dropped,” recalled the classmate, Gyasi Ross. “All of us thought it, but we weren’t going to say it.”
He was still at Columbia in 2001 when planes struck the World Trade Center on Sept. 11. In the weeks that followed, with the city shellshocked from the terror attacks, Mr. Kassem heard casually Islamophobic remarks on campus. His friend, Mr. Ross, was taken aback when a classmate suggested Mr. Kassem was connected to the attacks, because Mr. Kassem was an outspoken Muslim student on campus.
Mr. Kassem began to feel that his Muslim and Arab classmates were taking one of two paths. “You had to either keep a low profile and avoid anything political and go the corporate route,” Mr. Kassem said. “Or you had folks wrap themselves in the flag and make it their job to prove just how American they were.”
Neither option felt right to Mr. Kassem. He soon pledged himself to an emerging field of law, hoping to represent Muslims who were being targeted because national security concerns had been raised, or held without charges at Guantánamo Bay.
Even in the small, idealistic community of lawyers at Guantánamo, Mr. Kassem stuck out. One morning on the ferry ride to the detention facility, a lawyer asked why Mr. Kassem always wore a suit. Most of the others wore polos in the sticky heat. Another lawyer said that perhaps Mr. Kassem was concerned the guards would mistake him for a detainee.
Mr. Kassem, typically restrained, didn’t launch into a long explanation. The truth was that he wanted the detainees to know he was taking their cases seriously, that this facility wasn’t as far from the dictates of U.S. law as it could feel to people there. He had also learned, in conversation with clients, that they only got two jumpsuits, one of which they kept cleaner for special occasions. The other lawyers, he said, didn’t realize that their clients were dressing up for them, too.
The Outsider Goes to Washington
In 2016, the creator of the show “Homeland” took notice of Mr. Kassem’s work in defending Guantánamo detainees and leading a clinic at the City University of New York that defended Muslims in New York. The show hired him as a consultant to weed out inaccuracies and racist depictions, and Mr. Kassem also became the inspiration for a character on the show, the straight-talking activist lawyer Reda Hashem.
Mr. Kassem was open to being not just a critic but an insider — a stance that took him to Washington in 2022, when he joined the Biden administration as a senior policy adviser for immigration.
Once he was at the White House, Mr. Kassem didn’t hide his outspokenness, as his colleagues discovered in the weeks after Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas militants crossed into Israel and killed some 1,200 people.
Shortly after the war in Gaza began, Mr. Kassem helped gather a group of more than 30 staff members who were particularly interested in the Middle East but had unrelated portfolios for a discussion about the administration’s response. They met in a gold-plated conference room in the executive office building. Surrounded by portraits of U.S. secretaries of state, they talked about grieving over the war and fearing for Gaza’s future.
Mr. Kassem volunteered to request a meeting with the White House’s higher-ups. He wrote an email to Jeff Zients, the White House chief of staff, and Jon Finer, the deputy national security adviser, who happened to be a former student at a Yale Law School clinic taught by Mr. Kassem.
In November, Mr. Kassem, along with more than a dozen staff members, sat for a meeting with Mr. Finer, Mr. Zients and Anita Dunn, a senior adviser to Mr. Biden.
Mr. Kassem and his colleagues each came prepared with a suggestion about the White House’s Israel-Gaza policy, such as a proposal to condition support to Israel on curbing the number of civilian deaths in Gaza. Mr. Kassem and Mr. Finer got into a tense exchange, according to two people who were in the room.
It was unusual for Mr. Kassem, an adviser with no focus on Middle East policy, to be rounding up impassioned staff members to share their views about the war with the chief of staff.
“He wasn’t a flamethrower. I don’t think he did it in a confrontational way,” said Susan Rice, the former director of the Domestic Policy Council and national security adviser, who hired Mr. Kassem but had left the White House by then.
Because of Mr. Kassem’s history of advocacy for Palestinians, some on the right viewed his appointment as the mayor’s chief counsel as an ideological move — surprising, some noted, for a role that is supposed to be lawyering, not policymaking.
“The mayor has called the Palestinian cause the core of his politics,” said Reihan Salam, the president of the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank. “The selection as chief counsel of a lawyer for whom opposition to Israel has been a defining commitment — from his college writings through his legal career, including his representation of Mahmoud Khalil — fits that pattern, and New Yorkers who are uneasy about where this administration is heading have good reason to read it as a statement of priorities.”
The Ear Whisperer
Mr. Kassem’s friends joke that at some point, he will have represented every prominent Muslim in New York. He not only is counsel to Mr. Mamdani, but his client list includes Mr. Khalil and Asad Dandia, who, with Mr. Kassem’s help, sued the Police Department after an informant infiltrated his nonprofit, Muslims Giving Back.
Mr. Mamdani expressed admiration for his chief counsel’s history as an advocate. “He has fought to ensure that justice is extended to everyone and not simply reserved for the powerful,” the mayor said.
For now, Mr. Kassem’s City Hall role means that his days are filled with policy dilemmas ranging beyond those on which he built his career. (Those days are long; he is not married and does not have children.)
On a Friday in April, Mr. Kassem was at Gracie Mansion around 7 a.m., meeting with the mayor to discuss Mr. Mamdani’s first City Council veto. The Council had passed two bills, spearheaded by Speaker Julie Menin, that would potentially limit protests close to houses of worship and educational facilities. Many Jewish leaders supported the legislation, after a volatile protest outside Park East Synagogue in the fall.
The mayor planned to veto the bill related to schools — though in the days and nights before, numerous city officials had encouraged him not to do so. They suggested a veto could further inflame tensions with the Jewish community, according to a city official.
Mr. Mamdani supported the bill restricting protests outside houses of worship, recognizing the constitutional right to pray. But he opposed the schools bill, since he saw no right in tension with the right to free speech.
He wanted to make his thinking clear for ordinary New Yorkers. So, early in the morning at the mayor’s residence, Mr. Mamdani and Mr. Kassem reviewed the script for a video where the mayor would explain his veto.
Mr. Kassem has also waded into policing conversations. Weeks into the new administration, a 22-year-old schizophrenic man in Queens, Jabez Chakraborty, was shot by a police officer responding to a 911 call from the family. Mr. Kassem joined a tense briefing among Mr. Mamdani, Ms. Tisch and a few other key advisers.
The focus was understandably centered on the actions of the responding officers, but the group also discussed what the family had said in the aftermath of the shooting.
The police wanted to know what family members were saying to one another, but Mr. Kassem had questions, according to two people familiar with the interaction: Why did police officials find it relevant to bring up translations of the conversations among the victims’ family members, captured on the officers’ body-worn cameras?
Mr. Kassem’s public appearances, so far, are sparing. He works for a mayor who doubles as an influencer, in an administration adept at using vertical video, yet Mr. Kassem doesn’t use social media.
Recently, at a news conference, Mr. Mamdani called Mr. Kassem up to the podium to answer a question about whether City Hall had been served with search warrants in a federal investigation of New York’s migrant shelter contracts. “I’m going to pass it over to my chief counsel,” Mr. Mamdani said.
Mr. Kassem stepped forward and said: “Not at the moment.” The response was so terse that the crowd burst out laughing, as did the mayor. Mr. Kassem, pointing at the spot off to the side where he’d been standing, added: “Can I go back now?”
New York
Video: Knicks Fans Rejoice After Game 4 Victory
new video loaded: Knicks Fans Rejoice After Game 4 Victory
By Jiawei Wang
June 11, 2026
Watch Today’s Videos
Knicks Stage Historic Game 4 Comeback Against Spurs
1:47
Spurs Snap Knicks’ Playoff Win Streak to Take Game 3 of N.B.A. Finals
1:57
Spurs Beat Knicks, Quieting New York City Crowds
1:01
Trump Booed at Game 3 of N.B.A. Finals
0:22
Watch Parties Canceled as Police Tighten Security at N.B.A. Finals
1:02
The Knicks Have Celebrity Fans. The Spurs Have Nuns.
1:11
Today’s Videos
U.S.
Politics
Immigration
NY Region
Science
Business
Culture
Books
Wellness
World
Africa
Americas
Asia
South Asia
Donald Trump
Middle East Crisis
Russia-Ukraine Crisis
Visual Investigations
Opinion Video
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
New York
This Parking Spot Is Free. Should It Be?
What if the city …
Added More Metered Spots in Busy Neighborhoods
Less than 3 percent of parking spaces on New York City streets have paid meters. That’s only about 80,000 spots.
Most of the meters that do exist are along busy corridors, with higher hourly rates in the core of Manhattan.
Where are NYC’s parking meters?
The placement of meters often feels arbitrary. Much of the East Village, a busy Manhattan neighborhood, has no meters. Nostrand Avenue, a major artery in Brooklyn, has meters over most of a five-mile stretch, but they end abruptly north of Fulton Street.
A busy commercial corridor in Bedford-Stuyvesant lacks meters
Adding more meters in busy neighborhoods could improve turnover for spots, research suggests, and raise revenue for the city.
Seeking alternatives to avoid paying for meters overnight, car owners may choose to move to garages — which can cost $500 per month or more, depending on the neighborhood — park farther afield, or sell their cars. They could also turn to car-share programs, which set aside parking for shared vehicles.
When the city tries to add meters, there is often fierce opposition from neighbors, including on the Upper West Side of Manhattan last year, where residents revolted, the local City Council member complained people had been “blindsided” and the city backed down.
Critics argue that those pushing for reforms “hate people who own cars,” in the words of Vickie Paladino, a City Council member who represents a district in Queens that is home to many car owners.
How realistic is this? The city can add additional meters on its own without needing permission from state lawmakers in Albany. Dean Fuleihan, Mr. Mamdani’s first deputy mayor, gave supporters hope when he said in March that he was open to the idea.
How much could it raise? Parking meters currently generate $278 million in revenue per year. Adding meters to one-fourth of the city’s existing free parking spaces, for example, could produce at least $1.2 billion annually, according to the Center for an Urban Future.
What if the city …
Introduced Residential Parking Permits
Most parking on residential streets is open to all drivers, not just those who live nearby. But many other major U.S. cities, including Los Angeles and Chicago, have permits to reserve street parking for neighborhood residents.
Residential parking permits in New York could cost anywhere from $100 per year to far more than that, experts say, with higher rates potentially prodding some residents to give up their cars. Some spots could be set aside for visitors.
But permits would not necessarily solve the problem of the demand for parking outpacing the supply. And some transit groups oppose the idea, arguing that there are better ways to use the street space and that parking should not be guaranteed.
Rachel Weinberger, a vice president at the Regional Plan Association, an urban planning think tank, said that permits alone would not make parking easier. She also argued they would have to be prohibitively expensive in order to deter ownership.
“A permit would only be a hunting license, meaning that you’re allowed to look for a space,” she said. “It should mean you’re guaranteed a space.”
How much do cities charge for residential parking permits?
Boston
No fee
Chicago
$30
Los Angeles
$34
Washington, D.C.
$55*
Philadelphia
$75
Berkeley, Calif.
$85
San Francisco
$215
Experts say that permits could also be paired with an incentive for drivers: fewer alternate side-parking days for street sweeping. Most drivers are required to move their cars once or twice a week so the streets can be cleaned, and some choose instead to leave them in place and eat the costs of the $65 tickets they receive. Moving to monthly street sweeping could make the prospect of buying a permit more appealing.
How realistic is this? Residential permits would need to be approved by state lawmakers. Momentum for the idea grew after congestion pricing began in Manhattan, over concerns that drivers from outside the city would park outside the zone and take the subway in. It has support from Mark Levine, the city comptroller, and Carmen De La Rosa, a City Council member in northern Manhattan.
How much could it raise? If a permit cost $100 per year and was required in two-thirds of the city, that could raise roughly $200 million per year, minus administrative costs, according to Terrance J. Regan, an adjunct professor at Boston University who focuses on transportation policy. The city’s Independent Budget Office recommended starting with a smaller pilot program that would raise $6 million annually by the third year.
What if the city …
Ended Free Parking and Implemented Dynamic Pricing
Some urban planners want to phase out free parking altogether.
Transportation Alternatives, a street safety group, has pushed for eliminating free parking and argued that the city would benefit if fewer car trips were made.
“If you look around the world, there are many other transit-oriented cities that are safer, more efficient and healthier,” said Ben Furnas, the group’s executive director.
The city could reclaim many miles of streets, which proponents argue could be better used for public spaces, bus lanes, bike lanes, outdoor dining setups and trash containers.
Paid parking spaces could use dynamic pricing, a system where the cost of a spot varies by demand. Right now, parking rates are as low as $1.50 for the first hour.
Critics of such pricing models have argued that higher street-parking costs could hurt lower-income drivers or local businesses that rely on drivers. In 2019, Hoboken, N.J., announced a version of dynamic pricing on high-demand blocks, but the mayor and City Council repealed the plan after some resident opposition.
But the idea has worked elsewhere. In 2018, after a successful pilot, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency implemented demand-based pricing for the 10 percent of the city’s parking spots that are paid spaces, roughly 27,000 in all.
An evaluation of the pilot found that drivers spent 43 percent less time searching for a parking space, which in turn helped reduce car-based pollution. And once parking became easier, sales revenue increased for nearby businesses.
The rates in San Francisco can vary by block, time of day, or day of the week. Meters on the busiest blocks cost $11.75 an hour. The agency regularly reviews parking meter data and occupancy rates and decides whether to raise or lower rates.
Charles Komanoff, an economist and traffic modeler who helped create New York’s congestion pricing program, said dynamic pricing for parking could do even more than the tolls did to improve the flow of traffic here.
“I can’t imagine anything better,” he said.
How realistic is this? The Transportation Department could implement dynamic pricing, but a legislative push would most likely hasten change. Nantasha M. Williams, a City Council member representing Southeast Queens, has proposed a bill that would require a dynamic pricing pilot program in each borough. Eliminating all free parking would be a far more dramatic proposal, though supporters say it could be done in phases over several years.
How much could it raise? Parking reformists said the city could potentially raise billions of dollars a year under a dynamic parking system — money that could be reinvested into the neighborhoods where the fees are collected.
What if the city …
Cracked Down on Rule-Breakers
None of these plans work unless drivers obey the rules.
The city last year issued more than 11.6 million violations for parking and related offenses, according to a report by the Department of Finance, including for failing to move for street sweepers (1.8 million), not displaying a parking receipt (1.2 million), blocking a fire hydrant (674,000) and obstructing a bus stop (565,000).
In 1996, Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani moved the city’s traffic enforcement agents, the unarmed civilians who write tickets for parking and other traffic violations, from the Transportation Department to the Police Department.
Some parking reformers say the shift weakened enforcement efforts, in part because the police have not focused on some of the most flagrant traffic violations.
They say that either the police should start issuing more tickets and collecting more fines, or they should allow the Transportation Department to once again take charge.
Some point to what they view as the city’s lackluster response to placard abuse, the practice of using either official permits issued by city agencies, or fraudulent ones, to park in unauthorized spots.
More than 91,000 complaints have been filed with the city since 2020 about possible placard abuse, but the police took action to fix the problem in just 21 percent of cases, according to a Times review of public data. Only about 12 percent of the complaints led to a driver being issued a summons.
“If you’re just unclogging these streets to have them filled with cars with fake placards, you’re not helping anything,” said Nicole Gelinas, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank.
There has also been a surge in fake, often out-of-state license plates that have made traffic violations harder to track. A perceived lack of consequences worsens the problem, said Jon Orcutt, a former policy director at the city’s Transportation Department.
“The culture has gotten terribly bad,” Mr. Orcutt said about enforcement efforts.
A spokesperson for the Police Department said in a statement that there was “deep collaboration” with the Transportation Department on traffic enforcement, and pointed to some recent initiatives, including issuing 247,000 summonses last year for “ghost vehicles” with fake plates.
Samuel I. Schwartz, the chair of the transportation research program at Hunter College, was New York City’s traffic commissioner under Mayor Edward I. Koch, at a time when the Transportation Department still controlled enforcement.
He said he thought it would be possible to change the behavior of repeat offenders if that agency led the effort and had the support of the police.
“I would go out in the field with an army of tow trucks,” Mr. Schwartz said.
How realistic is this? Mr. Mamdani could restore traffic enforcement powers to the Transportation Department, or instruct the Police Department to step up enforcement.
How much could it raise? The city issued $1.1 billion worth of parking tickets and camera violations in fiscal year 2025, according to the Finance Department, but just $946 million, or 84 percent, was ultimately collected. By ramping up fine collection, the city could raise more revenue.
As Mr. Mamdani weighs how to improve city streets and whether parking regulations should change, almost everyone agrees that the status quo is unacceptable.
Ms. Gelinas said that any of the leading ideas could be an improvement.
“The dumbest thing is just to keep things the way they are,” she said.
New York
For Nearly 150 Years, Parking Has Driven New Yorkers to the Brink
-
Tennessee5 minutes ago
Tennessee law requires proof of citizenship for first-time vehicle registration
-
Texas8 minutes agoTop Playmaker Landen Williams-Callis to Take Texas Official Visit Next Weekend
-
Utah20 minutes agoPopular Angels Landing Trail closed at Zion National Park
-
Vermont22 minutes agoStannard brings Vermont Blues Society ‘mega-show’ to the Manchester on June 20
-
Virginia28 minutes agoListeria outbreak tied to soft cheese kills 1, sickens others across Virginia, several other states, FDA says
-
Wisconsin38 minutes agoPHOTOS: Severe thunderstorms bring damage to northeast Wisconsin
-
West Virginia43 minutes agoMoore says he’s honored being mentioned as possible U.S. Secretary of Labor – WV MetroNews
-
Wyoming50 minutes agoRural WY Hospitals Working On Proposals For New Federal Funding