Connect with us

New York

New York Judge Dies by Suicide After Authorities Search His Home

Published

on

A New York State choose whose residence was searched by legislation enforcement authorities final month in opposition to the backdrop of the federal prosecution of considered one of his former purchasers killed himself on Tuesday, considered one of his attorneys stated.

The choose, John L. Michalski, an appearing justice of the State Supreme Courtroom, was discovered useless at his residence in Amherst, N.Y., a Buffalo suburb, shortly earlier than midday, stated the lawyer, Terrence Connors.

“It’s troublesome to elucidate what a tragedy that is,” stated Mr. Connors, a longtime buddy of Justice Michalski’s, including that “it could be troublesome to discover a choose who was extra revered” within the Western New York authorized group.

The Amherst police weren’t in a position to present details about Justice Michalski’s dying late Tuesday. A spokesman for the state courtroom system didn’t reply to a request for remark. Justice Michalski was appointed to the Courtroom of Claims in 2006 and named as an appearing Supreme Courtroom justice the identical yr, in keeping with his official courtroom biography.

Justice Michalski’s dying, at 61, got here just a little greater than a yr after one other obvious suicide try by which, in keeping with police information, he was struck by a freight prepare after mendacity on the tracks in a rail yard close to Buffalo in the course of the evening. He sustained a critical leg damage however was in any other case unharmed, Mr. Connors stated.

Advertisement

The episode prompted him to take a go away from his $210,900-a-year seat on the bench. He returned to work in January after assembly each requirement for doing so and had begun taking over a full caseload, Mr. Connors stated.

However final month, Justice Michalski got here beneath renewed scrutiny, and his circumstances had been as soon as once more reassigned, after federal and state investigators raided his residence. He had not been charged with any crime, however he had drawn the authorities’ consideration due to his ties to Peter Gerace Jr., the proprietor of a strip membership in Cheektowaga, one other Buffalo suburb.

Mr. Gerace was charged in federal courtroom in Florida final yr with intercourse trafficking, drug distribution and bribery of a former Drug Enforcement Administration agent. He denies the fees, and the case has since been transferred to the Western District of New York.

The previous agent, Joseph Bongiovanni, has been charged with bribery, obstruction and conspiracy. An indictment detailing the fees in opposition to the 2 males says that Mr. Bongiovanni’s associates included individuals “he believed to be members of, linked to or related to” organized crime.

One other man recognized within the indictment as having hyperlinks to organized crime is Michael Masecchia, a longtime Buffalo schoolteacher now dealing with as much as life in jail after pleading responsible to gun and drug costs.

Advertisement

The episode by which Justice Michalski was struck by the prepare occurred the identical day that Mr. Gerace was charged.

The connection between the boys went again many years, to when the choose was in non-public apply and did authorized work for Mr. Gerace’s membership, The Buffalo Information reported, citing a lawyer for Justice Michalski.

In 2006, The Information reported, Justice Michalski wrote a letter to a federal choose looking for a lenient sentence for Mr. Gerace, who had been convicted of wire fraud in reference to a sweepstakes telemarketing enterprise. Within the letter, The Information reported, the choose stated he and Mr. Gerace had been mates for a decade.

Mr. Connors stated on Tuesday that Justice Michalski, a city prosecutor in Amherst and an assistant district lawyer in Erie County earlier in his profession, had “conveyed to the authorities repeatedly that he had no data of any of Mr. Gerace’s allegedly unlawful actions.”

“He was a shopper,” Mr. Connors stated of the boys’s relationship. Primarily based on the data within the search warrants executed on Justice Michalski’s residence final month, he added, the investigators seemed to be targeted on a web-based enterprise the choose’s spouse ran from residence promoting garments on consignment.

Advertisement

“If they might have referred to as me and requested for what they had been on the lookout for, we’d have given it to them,” Mr. Connors stated. “We’d have cooperated the identical means we have now cooperated all alongside.”

The choose was additionally the topic of an investigation by the state lawyer basic’s workplace associated to doable corruption, in keeping with an individual accustomed to the matter. No costs had been introduced in opposition to him associated to the inquiry.

Justice Michalski’s skilled and private conduct, together with his psychological state throughout and after the obvious suicide try final yr, was additionally being examined by the state’s Fee on Judicial Conduct, an unbiased company that investigates allegations of misconduct involving New York’s judges.

The fee’s inquiry, in keeping with The Information, targeted on accusations that he had acquired $5,000 for performing Mr. Gerace’s 2014 marriage ceremony — effectively above the $100 allowed by state legislation.

Mr. Connors predicted that Justice Michalski could be broadly mourned within the days forward.

Advertisement

“I can’t let you know what number of calls I’ve gotten in the present day,” he stated. “Persons are simply in shock.”

Kirsten Noyes contributed analysis.

If you’re having ideas of suicide, name the Nationwide Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 (TALK) or go to SpeakingOfSuicide.com/sources for a listing of extra sources. Right here’s what you are able to do when a liked one is severely depressed.

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 30, 2024

-
Jury Deliberation Re-charge
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
-
PART: 59
Χ
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
4909
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 30, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR., ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
GEDALIA STERN, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates, RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

Published

on

Transcript of Trump Manhattan Trial, May 29, 2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRIMINAL TERM
-
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK,
PART: 59
Indict. No.
71543-2023
CHARGE
-against-
DONALD J. TRUMP,
DEFENDANT.
BEFORE:
4815
FALSIFYING BUSINESS
RECORDS 1ST DEGREE
JURY TRIAL
X
100 Centre Street
New York, New York 10013
May 29, 2024
HONORABLE JUAN M. MERCHAN
JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT
APPEARANCES:
FOR THE
PEOPLE:
ALVIN BRAGG, JR.,
ESQ.
DISTRICT ATTORNEY, NEW YORK COUNTY
One Hogan Place
New York, New York 10013
BY:
JOSHUA STEINGLASS, ESQ.
MATTHEW COLANGELO,
ESQ.
SUSAN HOFFINGER, ESQ.
CHRISTOPHER CONROY, ESQ.
BECKY MANGOLD, ESQ.
KATHERINE ELLIS, ESQ.
Assistant District Attorneys
BLANCHE LAW
BY:
TODD BLANCHE, ESQ.
EMIL BOVE, ESQ.
KENDRA WHARTON, ESQ.
NECHELES LAW, LLP
BY: SUSAN NECHELES, ESQ.
Attorneys for the Defendant
SUSAN PEARCE-BATES, RPR, CSR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter
LAURIE EISENBERG, RPR, CSR
LISA KRAMSKY
THERESA MAGNICCARI
Senior Court Reporters
Susan Pearce-Bates,
RPR, CCR, RSA
Principal Court Reporter

Continue Reading

New York

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Published

on

Critics Fault ‘Aggressive’ N.Y.P.D. Response to Pro-Palestinian Rally

Violent confrontations at a pro-Palestinian rally in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn, on Saturday reflected what some local officials and protest organizers called an unexpectedly aggressive Police Department response, with officers flooding the neighborhood and using force against protesters.

At the rally, which drew hundreds of demonstrators, at least two officers wearing the white shirts of commanders were filmed punching three protesters who were prone in the middle of a crosswalk. One officer had pinned a man to the ground and repeatedly punched him in the ribs, a 50-second video clip shows. Another officer punched the left side of a man’s face as he held his head to the asphalt.

The police arrested around 40 people who were “unlawfully blocking roadways,” Kaz Daughtry, the department’s deputy commissioner of operations, said on social media on Sunday.

Mr. Daughtry shared drone footage of one person who climbed on a city bus, “putting himself and others in danger.” The Police Department, he wrote, “proudly protects everyone’s right to protest, but lawlessness will never be tolerated.”

Neither Mr. Daughtry nor the police commented on the use of force by officers. A spokeswoman for Mayor Eric Adams did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the police response. The Police Department’s patrol guide states that officers must use “only the reasonable force necessary to gain control or custody of a subject.”

Advertisement

Bay Ridge has a significant Arab American population and hosts demonstrations in mid-May every year to commemorate what Palestinians call the Nakba, or “catastrophe” — when hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled or were forced from their homes during the war that led to Israel’s founding in 1948.

Andrew Gounardes, a state senator and a Democrat who represents the area, said local politicians had been in touch with the commanding officer of the 68th police precinct before the preplanned protest and said there had been no indication that there would be such a heavy police response. He called the videos he saw of the events “deeply concerning.”

“It certainly seems like the police came ready for a much more aggressive and a much more confrontational demonstration than perhaps they had gotten,” he added.

Justin Brannan, a Democrat who is the city councilman for the area, said the protest was smaller than last year’s but that officers had come from all over the city to police it. He said their approach appeared to be directed by 1 Police Plaza, the department headquarters in Manhattan.

“These were not our local cops. Clearly, there was a zero-tolerance edict sent down from 1PP, which escalated everything and made it worse,” Mr. Brannan said.

Advertisement

“I’m still waiting on information and details about the arrests that were made,” he added, “but from my vantage point, the response appeared pre-emptive, retaliatory and cumulatively aggressive.”

The Republican state assemblyman whose district includes parts of Bay Ridge, Alec Brook-Krasny, had a different perspective. He said an investigation would determine whether the officers’ actions were warranted, but he said some protesters were “breaking the law” by refusing to clear the street.

“I think that those bad apples are really hurting the ability of the other people to express their opinions,” Mr. Brook-Krasny said.

Some local residents supported the police and said they were tired of the protests’ disruptive impact. “Enough is enough,” said Peter Cheris, 52, a 40-year resident of Bay Ridge, who said he had viewed the videos of the protest. “If you’re going to break the law, you deserve it,” he said.

Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, singled out the presence of the Police Department’s Strategic Response Group, a unit that is sometimes deployed to protests and has been the subject of several lawsuits brought by the civil liberties union and other groups.

Advertisement

The police unit’s handling of the demonstration “was a violation of New Yorkers’ right to speak out and risks chilling political expression,” Ms. Lieberman said in a statement. “N.Y.C.L.U. protest monitors witnessed violent arrests, protester injuries, and even arrests of credentialed members of the press.”

She added: “The continual pattern of N.Y.P.D. aggression against pro-Palestine demonstrators raises important questions about the city’s disparate treatment of speakers based on their message.”

Abdullah Akl, an organizer with Within Our Lifetime, the pro-Palestinian group that organized the protests, said the response took organizers aback, particularly for a demonstration that occurs every year in Bay Ridge and is known to be frequented by families with children.

“It was really an unusual and unprecedented response,” Mr. Akl said.

He said he witnessed two men being pushed to the ground. One of them can be seen in a video with blood streaming down the side of his face. Nerdeen Kiswani, chair of Within Our Lifetime, said three protesters — including the two who can be seen being punched — were treated for their injuries at hospitals.

Advertisement

The Police Department has arrested hundreds of demonstrators since street protests began shortly after the Hamas attack on Israel on Oct. 7 and Israel’s subsequent invasion of Gaza. The protests have been largely peaceful, with few injuries or violent clashes.

In a turning point, on April 30 officers cleared Hamilton Hall at Columbia University, which had been occupied by protesters for 17 hours. Many officers showed restraint during the arrests, though a handful were filmed pushing and dragging students as they removed them from the building.

On Sunday, Ms. Lieberman said police response to the protests in Bay Ridge underscored the importance of implementing the terms of a $512,000 settlement the civil liberties union and the Legal Aid Society reached with the city this month. The settlement set new terms for how the Police Department manages protests, creating a tiered system that dictates how many officers can be sent to demonstrations and limits the use of the Strategic Response Group. It will take years to put into practice.

The settlement is one of several that stemmed from the George Floyd racial justice protests in 2020. Last year, the city agreed to pay $13.7 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that claimed unlawful police tactics had violated the rights of demonstrators in Manhattan and Brooklyn. In March, the city agreed to pay $21,500 to each of roughly 300 people who attended another Black Lives Matter protest in 2020 in the Bronx. Those people were penned in by the police, then charged at or beaten with batons, according to a legal settlement.

Andy Newman and Camille Baker contributed reporting.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending