Connect with us

New York

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror Says He ‘Didn’t Lie’ to Get on Jury

Published

on

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror Says He ‘Didn’t Lie’ to Get on Jury

Ms. Maxwell, in navy jail scrubs, sat together with her attorneys throughout the courtroom. Todd A. Spodek, a lawyer for the juror, sat within the jury field.

Mr. Spodek had informed Choose Nathan in a courtroom submitting that Juror 50 deliberate to “invoke his Fifth Modification privilege in opposition to self-incrimination on the listening to.” The workplace of Damian Williams, the U.S. legal professional for the Southern District of New York, then requested the decide for an order compelling the juror to testify in change for immunity from prosecution.

At first of the listening to, Choose Nathan requested Juror 50 if he had answered the query about sexual abuse precisely, and he stated no. She requested him to explain the character of the abuse — he stated a former stepbrother and his pal had abused him on a number of events when he was 9 and 10 years outdated. He informed his mom about it when he was in highschool, and she or he referred to as the police, he stated, however no prices had been introduced.

Juror 50 stated repeatedly stated he didn’t take into consideration the abuse a lot anymore.

“It doesn’t outline me,” he stated. “It’s an expertise that I lived via.” Requested why he had additionally didn’t specify, in a separate part of the questionnaire, that he had been the sufferer of a criminal offense, he stated, “I don’t really feel that I’m a sufferer of a criminal offense.”

Advertisement

He stated he first realized that he had answered the questions inaccurately in the course of the interviews with reporters after the trial.

He made it clear that given the big variety of folks he noticed filling out questionnaires on the day he was referred to as in, he by no means thought he could be chosen for the trial.

When Choose Nathan requested whether or not he had tailor-made his solutions to get onto the jury, he stated no.

Requested if he had hoped to be chosen, he replied: “I didn’t hope to be on this jury. However once more, like should you’re going to serve jury responsibility, it’d in addition to be one thing that’s attention-grabbing. However I didn’t set out to be able to get on this jury.”

Advertisement

New York

Video: Adams’s Former Chief Adviser and Her Son Charged With Corruption

Published

on

Video: Adams’s Former Chief Adviser and Her Son Charged With Corruption

new video loaded: Adams’s Former Chief Adviser and Her Son Charged With Corruption

transcript

transcript

Adams’s Former Chief Adviser and Her Son Charged With Corruption

Ingrid Lewis-Martin, who resigned as Mayor Eric Adams’s chief adviser, and her son, Glenn D. Martin II, were charged with taking $100,000 in bribes from two businessmen in a quid-pro-quo scheme.

We allege that Ingrid Lewis-Martin engaged in a long-running bribery, money laundering and conspiracy scheme by using her position and authority as the chief adviser of — chief adviser to the New York City mayor, the second-highest position in city government — to illegally influence city decisions in exchange for in excess of $100,000 in cash and other benefits for herself and her son, Glenn Martin II. We allege that real estate developers and business owners Raizada “Pinky” Vaid and Mayank Dwivedi paid for access and influence to the tune more than $100,000. Lewis-Martin acted as an on-call consultant for Vaid and Dwivedi, serving at their pleasure to resolve whatever issues they had with D.O.B. on their construction projects, and she did so without regard for security considerations and with utter and complete disregard for D.O.B.’s expertise and the public servants who work there.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in New York

Continue Reading

New York

Read the Criminal Complaint Against Luigi Mangione

Published

on

Read the Criminal Complaint Against Luigi Mangione

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V.
LUIGI NICHOLAS MANGIONE,
Defendant.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ss.:
Original
AUSAS: Dominic A. Gentile,
Jun Xiang, Alexandra Messiter
24 MAG 4375
SEALED COMPLAINT
Violations of
18 U.S.C. §§ 2261A, 2261(b), 924(j), and
924(c)
COUNTY OF OFFENSE:
NEW YORK
GARY W. COBB, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is a Special Agent with the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, and charges as follows:
COUNT ONE
(Stalking – Travel in Interstate Commerce)
1. From at least in or about November 24, 2024 to in or about December 4, 2024, in
the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, LUIGI NICHOLAS MANGIONE, the
defendant, traveled in interstate commerce with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, and place
under surveillance with intent to kill, injure, harass, and intimidate another person, and in the
course of, and as a result of, such travel engaged in conduct that placed that person in reasonable
fear of the death of, and serious bodily injury to, that person, and in the course of engaging in such
conduct caused the death of that person, to wit, MANGIONE, traveled from Georgia to New York,
New York for the purpose of stalking and killing Brian Thompson, and while in New York,
MANGIONE stalked and then shot and killed Thompson in the vicinity of West 54th Street and
Sixth Avenue.
(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2261A(1)(A) and 2261(b)(1).)
COUNT TWO
(Stalking – Use of Interstate Facilities)
2. From at least in or about November 24, 2024 to in or about December 4, 2024, in
the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, LUIGI NICHOLAS MANGIONE, the
defendant, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, intimidate, and place under surveillance with intent
to kill, injure, harass, and intimidate another person, used an electronic communication service and
electronic communication system of interstate commerce, and a facility of interstate or foreign
commerce, to engage in a course of conduct that placed that person in reasonable fear of the death
of and serious bodily injury to that person, and in the course of engaging in such conduct caused
the death of that person, to wit, MANGIONE used a cellphone, interstate wires, interstate

Continue Reading

New York

Video: Luigi Mangione Is Charged With Murder

Published

on

Video: Luigi Mangione Is Charged With Murder

new video loaded: Luigi Mangione Is Charged With Murder

transcript

transcript

Luigi Mangione Is Charged With Murder

The first-degree murder charge branded him a terrorist over the killing of UnitedHealthcare’s chief executive, Brian Thompson.

We are here to announce that Luigi Mangione, the defendant, is charged with one count of murder in the first degree and two counts of murder in the second degree, including one count of murder in the second degree as an act of terrorism for the brazen, targeted and premeditated shooting of Brian Thompson, who, as was as you know, was the C.E.O. of UnitedHealthcare. This was a frightening, well-planned, targeted murder that was intended to cause shock and attention and intimidation. It occurred in one of the most bustling parts of our city, threatening the safety of local residents and tourists alike, commuters and businesspeople just starting out on their day.

Advertisement

Recent episodes in New York

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending