Connect with us

Northeast

New York halts robotaxi expansion plan

Published

on

New York halts robotaxi expansion plan

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

New York just hit pause on expanding robotaxis beyond New York City. 

Gov. Kathy Hochul has withdrawn her proposal that would have allowed commercial robotaxi services in smaller cities across the state. That means places outside New York City will not see driverless ride services anytime soon.

If you live in Buffalo, Rochester or Albany, that future just got pushed further down the road. Meanwhile, one major player still plans to move forward inside the city.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Advertisement

New York has paused plans to expand robotaxi service beyond New York City, slowing statewide deployment.  (AP Photo/Terry Chea, File)

Waymo moves forward despite New York robotaxi expansion pause

Waymo, the self-driving arm of Alphabet, received its first permit last year to test autonomous vehicles in New York City. However, the permit requires a trained specialist behind the wheel. That testing permit remains in place. So, while statewide expansion is off the table for now, Waymo’s New York City testing program continues. The company already offers paid driverless rides in parts of:

  • The San Francisco Bay Area
  • Los Angeles
  • Phoenix
  • Austin
  • Atlanta

According to company data and state regulators in Arizona and California, Waymo has logged millions of fully autonomous miles. Arizona transportation officials have reported lower crash rates per mile compared with human drivers in certain operational zones. California’s DMV and Public Utilities Commission continue to monitor safety performance and incident reporting.

The company says it hears from thousands of New Yorkers who have ridden in Waymo vehicles elsewhere and want the service at home. Still, expanding beyond the city now faces a political roadblock.

UBER UNVEILS A NEW ROBOTAXI WITH NO DRIVER BEHIND THE WHEEL

Waymo can continue testing autonomous vehicles in NYC with a trained safety specialist behind the wheel. (Waymo)

Advertisement

Why Hochul pulled the New York robotaxi expansion plan

The governor’s office said support was not there in the state Legislature after conversations with stakeholders. That language matters. Self-driving vehicle rules involve state lawmakers, labor groups, local officials, safety advocates and insurance regulators. Expanding robotaxi services into smaller cities likely raised concerns about:

  • Safety oversight
  • Liability rules
  • Local job impact
  • Emergency response coordination

Autonomous vehicle deployment remains under intense scrutiny nationwide. After a high-profile incident involving Cruise in San Francisco in 2023, regulators tightened oversight. Cruise later suspended operations, and General Motors scaled back its robotaxi ambitions. Waymo has not recorded a similar major injury event in public reporting. That distinction has helped it expand in states like Arizona and Texas. Even so, public trust remains fragile.

What this means for you

You might be thinking, “I do not live in New York. Why should I care?” Because state decisions like this often ripple outward. If New York, one of the largest transportation markets in the country, slows expansion outside its biggest city, other states may take note. Lawmakers across the country watch how New York handles new technology.

Here is what this pause signals:

Robotaxi rollouts will stay uneven

Some cities will embrace them quickly. Others will wait for more data and clearer rules.

Politics matter as much as technology

Even if autonomous vehicles prove safer per mile in controlled settings, public policy decides where they operate.

Advertisement

Your city could be next in line

As companies push for expansion in major metros, debates over safety, job liability and infrastructure will follow. If you rely on ride-hailing services, autonomous vehicles could eventually lower costs and increase availability. On the other hand, local drivers and labor groups may push back hard. This tension will play out city by city.

ATLANTA TESTS DRIVERLESS POD TRANSIT LOOP

State lawmakers across the country are watching as New York weighs safety, regulation and the future of driverless rides. (Waymo)

The bigger national picture for robotaxi expansion

Federal agencies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration continue to collect crash data and investigate autonomous vehicle performance. However, states control many of the rules governing commercial operations. That means America may not get one unified robotaxi system. Instead, it may look like a patchwork. Phoenix might move fast. Austin might expand aggressively. Buffalo might wait.

In the meantime, companies like Waymo continue refining software using real-world miles and sensor data. The more data they collect, the stronger their safety case becomes. Yet public perception often hinges on a single viral incident. Technology evolves quickly. Regulation moves more slowly.

Advertisement

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

New York’s decision is not a death blow to robotaxis. It is a reminder that innovation must pass a political test. Waymo still plans to move forward in New York City. Smaller cities across the state will wait. Other states will watch. The question is no longer whether autonomous vehicles will expand. It is how fast and where.

If driverless cars reduce crashes and improve pedestrian safety, should lawmakers speed up approval? Or should they move cautiously and protect existing systems until every risk is understood? What would you want your city to do? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Related Article

Congress moves to set national rules for self-driving cars, overriding states

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement

Maine

Maine justices to decide fate of transgender sports ballot question

Published

on

Maine justices to decide fate of transgender sports ballot question


Maine’s highest court weighed Wednesday whether the state can reject petition signatures collected by out-of-state circulators who did not check a box consenting to Maine’s jurisdiction, a legal dispute that could determine whether Mainers vote on transgender inclusion in sports this November.

The group called “Protect Girls Sports” initially submitted enough signatures to qualify for the ballot, proposing an initiative that would restrict what school sports teams, bathrooms and facilities trans students can access. Secretary of State Shenna Bellows later determined that the campaign had failed to qualify, after thousands of signatures were invalidated. That ruling was upheld by a Superior Court judge in June and the campaign appealed that decision to the Supreme Judicial Court. 

More than 1,500 of the invalidated signatures were collected by four out-of-state circulators who had not checked a box on the form agreeing to Maine’s jurisdiction. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court must now decide whether those signatures were properly invalidated. The initiative is short 500 signatures to qualify. 

Advertisement

The Maine Constitution prohibits out-of-state circulators from submitting petitions, but that ban was declared unenforceable by a federal appeals court in 2022, since it likely violated the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In response to a lawsuit, Maine then entered into a consent agreement, which all citizen-led initiatives still rely on to hire out-of-state circulators to collect signatures. However, they must consent to the state’s jurisdiction. 

Attorney Tim Woodcock, who represented Protect Girls Sports, argued that out-of-state circulators should be treated the same as Maine residents who collect petition signatures, since the consent agreement requires the state to allow them to work on campaigns. Woodcock said the consequences of not reversing the ruling would be dire.

“If this is upheld, it’s essentially a petition that has been pulled off the ballot with 1,520 otherwise valid ballot signatures,” Woodcock said in the Augusta courtroom. “That would be a remarkable result of these circumstances.”

The same argument was made after the May hearing before the Secretary of State’s Office as well as before the Superior Court, but neither accepted it. 

Advertisement

Protect Girls Sports has not pushed back on any other findings showing a pattern of negligence in the signature collecting process, with circulators leaving forms unattended, adding ditto signs on some columns, and other infractions. Rather, Woodcock challenged the secretary’s authority to impose what he said was an unfair burden on out-of-state signature collectors by requiring them to check an additional box to consent to Maine’s jurisdiction. 

Attorney Christopher Dodge from Elias Law Group, the national law firm representing the three Maine residents who initially challenged the petition signatures, said, “We are here today because Protect Girls Sports has essentially reached the bottom of the barrel for its last few arguments to try and dislodge the secretary’s well-reasoned and well-supported findings.” 

“And each of those arguments basically concedes that the initiative violated … Maine law.”

Since the vast majority of the 120 out-of-state circulators complied with the requirements, Dodge said Woodcock could not make a convincing case that the rules were a burden.

“The burden here is they have to complete the circulator affidavit … and they have to check the box, that’s it,” he said. “And most of the non-resident circulators have absolutely no problem complying with it.”

Advertisement

One circulator, Cairo, had initially left the box blank but later checked the box through a corrected affidavit in May, three months after the petition was submitted for validation. Woodcock has previously argued that her signatures should be considered valid because of her corrected form. 

However, her decision to intentionally leave the box blank was a “substantive lack of agreement” to Maine’s jurisdiction, Superior Court Justice Deborah Cashman said in her opinion validating Bellows’ decision on June 11.

Woodcock said in court Wednesday that the “consent agreement says nothing in it about when an out-of-state circulator must consent to jurisdiction,” and that those rules were being imposed by the Secretary of State’s office. 

The Supreme Judicial Court is expected to rule on the appeal before mid-August, before the deadline for the secretary’s office to put a question on the ballot. 

This story was first published by Maine Morning Star and is republished here under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Improving Long-Term Care for Seniors in Massachusetts – Center for Retirement Research

Published

on

Improving Long-Term Care for Seniors in Massachusetts – Center for Retirement Research


Rep. Thomas M. Stanley

In recent years, Massachusetts has taken significant steps to improve care for seniors, most notably the Act to Improve Quality and Oversight of Long-Term Care. In a recent Risking Old Age in America podcast, Rep. Thomas M. Stanley, Co-chair of the Elder Affairs Committee, describes this initiative as well as further steps in the works. These include creating a family caregiver commission, licensing home health agencies, and working towards universal long-term care insurance.

Here are some excerpts from our conversation:

Senior Living Facilities

Risking Old Age in America (ROA): You have been working [to make improvements] across the whole continuum of care from nursing homes [to] assisted living facilities to home healthcare. Please talk about the legislature’s initiatives in these areas.

Advertisement

Rep. Thomas M. Stanley: In 2024, the governor signed the long-term care reform bill into law. This was the first major legislative update of nursing homes and assisted living residences in over 25 years.

It increases transparency and oversight of nursing homes through new suitability standards for owners and operators. It requires a review of the civil and criminal litigation history of owners and operators; and we put in place tools for the Department of Public Health to monitor and take punitive action against facilities, including increased fines and creating the ability to appoint a temporary manager to oversee a struggling facility.

It expands the suitability reviews of management companies including any [firm] with at least a 5-percent stake in a nursing facility. The law also establishes the long-term care workforce and capital fund to help address the workforce crisis in nursing homes. Money from the fund can be used for Certified Nursing Assistant training grants, career ladder grants for Licensed Practical Nurses, and also leadership training.

The law gives assisted living facilities the ability to offer basic health services, like wound care, eye drops, and medication distribution to their residents.

ROA: The Dignity Alliance [a senior advocacy group]…[has said] state supervision and enforcement of nursing facilities is…not tough enough, that there might be fines and other penalties on the books, but nobody’s applying them to nursing homes that don’t meet their obligations. It sounds like the ability to put them into receivership under the new legislation may be the remedy that’s needed.

Advertisement

Stanley: That’s correct. Under the old rules you would end up in the situation of really punishing or fining a nursing home and end up having it going to foreclosure. In that case, where are the residents going to go? The new law allows the Department of Public Health (DPH) to get in earlier and work with them so that they understand what the DPH is looking for in terms of quality of care and so forth. They can take care of the facility and all the residents so they don’t go astray.

ROA: So the DPH might have felt that it was between a rock and a hard place because if they enforced the regulations, they might lose the nursing home.

Stanley: [Yes]…and the nursing homes, by and large, were not letting them know that they were having certain problems. So this allows the DPH to get in earlier, understand what’s going on and help them make adjustments so that they can right the ship.

Long-Term Care Insurance

Stanley: The state of Washington is really in the forefront of looking down the road to provide for some type of revenue stream…for folks to be able to afford their home care or [other] long-term care needs. So we’re modeling our program after theirs and we’re learning from their mistakes and successes.

Advertisement

ROA: That’s the Washington Cares Fund?

Stanley: Yes, exactly. Last session Senator Jehlen and I worked together to get $500,000 in the state budget for the Executive Office of Health and Human Services to hire an independent firm to conduct the actuary study of various public, private and public-private long-term support service financing options. They hired Milliman to conduct the study. [The full study is available here.]

How it would work in a nutshell is that a public…insurance program would be funded via a payroll tax. After individuals pay into the program for a certain number of years, a vesting period, they would become eligible. And as they age and require long-term support services, they can apply for benefits under the program. There are countless ways to design the program, increasing or decreasing the benefit amount or…the vesting period, determining what the benefit can be used for – home care, assisted living or even paying family caregivers. We have filed legislation to establish a commission to discuss the results of the actuary study and the feasibility of a public long-term care financing program in Massachusetts and potentially recommending a model that works.

ROA: It sounds like this would help a lot, but one question I have about it is that if there’s a vesting period where you have to pay in for a number of years before you can become eligible for the benefit, would it only be available for people who are continuing to work during that time?

Stanley: That’s definitely something that has to be discussed by the commission, but everyone has to contribute and the 10-year vesting period is necessary to get enough money into the program to make it sustainable.

Advertisement

Listen to our entire conversation here.

For more from Harry Margolis, check out his Risking Old Age in America blog and podcast.  He also answers consumer estate planning questions at AskHarry.info.  To stay current on the Squared Away blog, join our free email list.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

‘Rugged’ Yurt-Shaped Cabin Perched on 6 Lush Acres in New Hampshire Is Listed for Just $300K

Published

on

‘Rugged’ Yurt-Shaped Cabin Perched on 6 Lush Acres in New Hampshire Is Listed for Just 0K


Tiny homes may be having a moment—but it is rare that one arrives on the market offering not just an opportunity to downsize in a one-of-a-kind cabin, but also a chance to claim a lush 6-acre expanse of land just 90-minutes’ drive from the nearest beach.

Yet that is the exact package currently being offered in New Hampshire, where a unique yurt-shaped abode has recently been listed for the bargain price of $300,000.

Set on more than 6 wooded acres in the picturesque Monadnock Region—known for its hiking trails and classic New England vibes—the two-bedroom dwelling is described as a “private, peaceful retreat with the perfect balance of rustic cabin character and modern convenience.”

Advertisement

The Peterborough, NH, cabin itself features several incredibly unique design features, not least its yurt-inspired shape, which makes it look almost like a UFO from the outside.

Inside, however, that shape helps to create a truly fairy-tale feel, with a lofted bedroom at the heart of the round structure, creating the impression of sleeping in a treehouse.

A unique yurt-shaped abode has recently been listed in New Hampshire for the bargain price of $300,000.Realtor.com
The Peterborough, NH, cabin itself features several incredibly unique design features, not least its yurt-inspired shape, which makes it look almost like a UFO.Realtor.com
Inside, however, that shape helps to create a truly fairy-tale feel, with a lofted bedroom set at the heart of the round structure, creating the impression of sleeping in a treehouse.Realtor.com

The home’s all-wood interior immediately evokes the feeling of a secluded mountain cabin, despite being just a short drive from downtown Peterborough.

Built in 1980 and last sold in 2013, the circular home blends rustic cabin coziness with all the modern comforts. The distinctive wooden yurt-style residence, which is listed with Lisa Stone of Keller Williams Realty, comes with roughly 1,200 square feet of living space designed to take full advantage of its natural surroundings.

Attached to the round yurt-style structure is a more traditionally-shaped addition that houses the property’s only bathroom—with an entryway serving as the connector between these two wings. Sliding glass doors provide instant access to the backyard from this area.

Advertisement

But it is the yurt structure that really shines as the star of the show, with every inch of space utilized to create a true woodland escape that feels totally removed from the bustling town that exists just a few miles away.

At its center, a wood-burning stove anchors the open-concept floor plan, while a sunken living room creates an inviting gathering space beneath timber ceilings.

Directly above the sunken living room is the loft-style primary bedroom, which is accessed via a wooden ladder and features a large circular skylight, perfectly positioned for stargazing from bed.

The primary bedroom space also has multiple windows that open up to the lush surroundings and help to fill it with a blissful breeze, while built-in dressers and closets provide ample storage.

A second, smaller bedroom with an adorable reading nook is tucked just off the kitchen.

Advertisement
A second, smaller bedroom with an adorable reading nook is tucked just off the kitchen.Realtor.com
A freestanding outbuilding provides additional flexibility as an artist’s studio or home office, making the property especially appealing to creatives seeking an inspired place to work.Realtor.com
“The acreage offers distinct spaces to explore and utilize. A short, scenic walk down a wooded path leads directly to Otter Brook running through the backyard woods,” the listing crows. Realtor.com

The open-plan kitchen takes up a large section of the rounded walls and comes complete with a sizable countertop for food preparation, plenty of built-in storage, and a small dining table situated under another skylight.

Another area perched above the sunken living room has been transformed into an office, while the area next to the wood-burning stove is currently being used as an additional seating area.

The idyllic nature retreat extends outdoors, where a brook meanders through the property and natural landscaping reinforces the feeling of being tucked away in a private woodland escape.

“The acreage offers distinct spaces to explore and utilize. A short, scenic walk down a wooded path leads directly to Otter Brook running through the backyard woods,” the listing crows.

A freestanding outbuilding provides additional flexibility as an artist’s studio or home office, making the property especially appealing to creatives seeking an inspired place to work.

Advertisement

While it is currently being used as a residence, the listing notes that the property is rich with potential—whether a buyer is seeking out a “private homestead” or a lucrative rental, highlighting its convenient proximity to nearby Peterborough.

“With its eclectic design and distinct features, this property is an ideal setup for a standout short-term rental destination or a private homestead-all just minutes from downtown Peterborough,” the description notes. “Peterborough is known for its quaint down town full of shops and restaurants and for its arts and music events.”

And it seems the allure of the property was too hard to resist for one eager buyer—with the listing now showing that the home is already “pending” sale, meaning that an offer has been accepted, although the deal has not yet closed.

For the buyer looking for a weekend getaway, an artist’s retreat, or a full-time residence with unmistakable charm, the home’s rare combination of affordability and privacy makes it easy to see why it was scooped up almost as soon as it hit the market.

Get real estate news in your inbox

Advertisement

Larissa Runkle is a seasoned real estate writer, lifestyle journalist, and marketing strategist with over a decade of experience and 2,000+ published articles. Her work covering housing, personal finance, and lifestyle has appeared in major publications like Bankrate, MarketWatch, Yahoo Finance, and New York Post. In 2023, she launched a boutique copywriting studio to partner with land developers and top brokerages, creating strategic content that builds lasting brand authority. When she isn’t writing, Larissa enjoys the outdoors from her home in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado, where she lives with her husband, son, and German shepherd, Yoko.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending