Connect with us

New Jersey

Senator on Trial: Day Twenty-Eight – New Jersey Globe

Published

on

Senator on Trial: Day Twenty-Eight – New Jersey Globe


DAY TWENTY-EIGHT

Lawyers for U.S. Senator Bob Menendez rested their case on Friday after calling four witnesses, with the New Jersey’s senior senator declining to testify in his own defense, which is his right.  Menendez, in his own words, told reporters on his way out of the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Federal Courthouse in Lower Manhattan: “From my perspective, the government has failed to prove every aspect of its case.  And for me to testify and give them another chance to have, in essence, a second summation, go through the whole case again, and then go ahead and have their summation, and then have a rebuttal case at the end, is simply not something that makes any sense to me whatsoever.  So we look forward to the summations, and I expect my lawyers will produce a powerful and convincing summation, deduce how the evidence came out, where they failed across the board, and have a jury render a verdict of not guilty.”

No witnesses were called by co-defendant Fred Daibes’ lawyer, while the attorney representing another co-defendant, Halal meat executive Wael Hana, will call a defense witness when the trial resumes on Monday.

Advertisement

HERE’S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: Jurors are expected to begin deliberating next week.

DAYS SINCE THE INDICTMENT: 284

DAYS SINCE MENENDEZ’S LAST CRIMINAL TRIAL ENDED: 2,419

MISSED VOTES: 34
There have been no votes in the Senate since June 20 and is not expected back in session until next week.

And in case you’re keeping track: it’s been 43 years and 61 days since a United States Senator from New Jersey was last convicted of accepting a bribe.

Advertisement

NEW JERSEY ABSTAINS, COURTEOUSLY
Sen. Menendez rests his defense in federal bribery trial from New Jersey Monitor’s Dana DiFilippo: “Sen. Bob Menendez, in his first words in court since his federal bribery trial started eight weeks ago in Manhattan, told the judge Wednesday that he would not speak in his own defense and rested his case after just two days of witnesses testifying on his behalf. ‘I’m not seeking to take the stand at this time,’ New Jersey’s senior senator told Judge Sidney H. Stein, assuring the jurist he had discussed the matter ‘at length’ with his attorneys … After testimony by the senator’s sister and sister-in-law riveted jurors Monday, Wednesday was an anticlimactic end to the senator’s defense in a trial that was expected to end a week ago. Stein, as well as attorneys for all three defendants, have increasingly expressed concerns about “losing jurors” as the trial has fallen behind …  Stein on Wednesday doubled down on his frequent vows to speed proceedings up, telling Hana’s attorney Lawrence Lustberg that he won’t wait on a witness Lustberg aims to call to the stand Monday — who’s now stuck in Egypt awaiting a visa. “We’re all going to be as efficient as possible in the use of this jury. I’m not going to significantly delay things for that issue,” Stein said. ‘The rule in my court is: If you don’t have a witness, you rest.’”

CRITCHELY: MENENDEZ DIDN’T NEED TO INTERVENE BECAUSE GREWAL HAD “A WEAK CASE”
More from DiFilippo: “Jurors also heard a prerecorded video deposition of attorney Michael Critchley, who represented a trucking company owner in an insurance fraud case filed by the New Jersey Attorney General’s Office/ Prosecutors have said Hana and codefendant Jose Uribe bribed Menendez to derail the office’s prosecution of E&K Trucking owner Elvis Parra … Critchley testified that Menendez called him in March 2019 to complain that Parra’s case was ‘an abuse of prosecution,’ and the men agreed the Attorney General’s Office was being used by insurance companies to collect private debt. Under Weitzman’s questioning, Critchley said the senator did nothing ‘inappropriate or improper’ and that he occasionally talked with Menendez about criminal cases that made the news. Parra eventually agreed to a plea deal with a sentence of noncustodial probation, but Critchley said the plea offer was made because state prosecutors had ‘a weak case’ and not, as prosecutors allege, because Menendez called and met with Gurbir Grewal, then the attorney general, in a deal with Uribe that required the senator to ‘kill and stop all investigation.’

AND NOW, THE END IS NEAR
Menendez Defense Rests Without Senator Testifying from New York Times’ Benjamin Weiser and Tracey Tully: “After calling just four witnesses, lawyers for Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey rested their case late Wednesday afternoon in Manhattan federal court, setting the stage for jurors to begin deliberations in his international bribery conspiracy trial early next week.”

IT’S NOT UNUSUAL TO GO OUT AT ANY TIME
Bob Menendez’s defense rests without New Jersey senator testifying in bribery trial by CBS News’ Caitlin Yilek: “A handful of witnesses testified on his behalf, compared to the 30 witnesses called by the prosecution during the trial, which has so far spanned eight weeks. Menendez’s defense attorneys called his sister and the sister of his wife, Nadine Menendez, to testify on Monday as they sought to show it was not unusual for the couple to keep gold and  large amounts of cash in their home.”

* Sen. Bob Menendez declines to testify in his bribery trial as the defense rests

Advertisement

* Bob Menendez’s lawyers bring in family as they argue his trial defense
* Bob Menendez says he didn’t testify because prosecution failed to prove its bribery case against him

* Senator Bob Menendez rests defense case in federal bribery trial

SENATOR ON TRIAL:  DAY ONE | DAY TWO | DAY THREE | DAY FOUR | DAY FIVE | DAY SIX | DAY SEVEN | DAY EIGHT | DAY NINE | DAY TEN | DAY ELEVEN | DAY TWELVE | DAY THIRTEEN | DAY FOURTEEN | DAY FIFTEEN | DAY SIXTEEN | DAY SEVENTEEN | DAY EIGHTEEN | DAY NINETEEN | DAY NINETEEN (AND A QUARTER) | DAY TWENTY | DAY TWENTY-ONE | DAY TWENTY-TWO | DAY TWENTY-THREE | DAY TWENTY-FOUR | DAY TWENTY-FIVE | DAY TWENTY-SIX | DAY TWENTY-SEVEN



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Jersey

Drones banned in parts of New Jersey for one month unless issued permission

Published

on

Drones banned in parts of New Jersey for one month unless issued permission


The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a one-month ban on drone operations in certain areas of New Jersey, unless operators receive special permission from the government due to “special security reasons”.

This comes as dozens of night-time drone sightings have been reported across New Jersey and other states along the eastern coast of the US over the last several weeks.

The sightings have occurred in residential areas as well as near a military research and manufacturing facility, causing panic among local residents and sparking various conspiracy theories about their origins.

The FBI, Department of Homeland security, and other government agencies and officials have repeatedly said that there is no evidence of a threat to public safety.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the FAA implemented temporary flight restrictions prohibiting drones that have not been authorized by the government in parts of New Jersey. The ban will remain in effect until 17 January and is in effect for areas including Bridgewater, Cedar Grove, North Brunswick, Metuchen, Evesham, Elizabeth, Jersey City and more.

The restrictions state that no unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) are allowed to operate within one nautical mile of the specified airspace, including from the ground up to 400ft above ground level.

Pilots who do not comply with these restrictions may be intercepted, detained, and questioned by law enforcement or security personnel, according to the Notice to Air Mission statement.

The government may also use “deadly force” against the drones if they pose an “imminent security threat” it adds.

Since reports of drones started coming in, the FBI set up a hotline to address the drone sightings, and have said that they are looking into and investigating the reports.

Advertisement

Federal agencies also deployed advanced detection technology to the regions where the drones are being spotted as well as trained visual observers.

Of the over 5,000 reported sightings so far, about 100 required further investigation, the federal bureau said. A Department of Homeland Security official echoed previous statements from federal agencies, stating again this week that there is no evidence of a threat to public safety.

On Tuesday, the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Defense, and Federal Aviation Administration issued a joint statement, stating that after examining “the technical data and tips from concerned citizens” they “assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones”.

The agencies noted there are over one million drones registered with the FAA in the US, and that thousands of commercial, hobbyist and law enforcement drones fly in the sky lawfully on any given day.

“We have not identified anything anomalous and do not assess the activity to date to present a national security or public safety risk over the civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the northeast,” the statement reads.

Advertisement

The agencies also addressed concerns about drone sightings over military facilities, including restricted airspace, which have sparked local worries and stirred up conspiracy theories online.

“Such sightings near or over DoD installations are not new” the agencies said. “DoD takes unauthorized access over its airspace seriously and coordinates closely with federal, state, and local law enforcement authorities, as appropriate.”

“Local commanders are actively engaged to ensure there are appropriate detection and mitigation measures in place,” they stated.

The agencies acknowledged community concerns about drone sightings and pledged to continue to support state and local authorities “with advanced detection technology and support of law enforcement”.

They also urged Congress to enact counter-drone legislation that would “extend and expand existing counter-drone authorities to identify and mitigate any threat that may emerge”.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, the US Senate reportedly rejected a proposal to fast-track a bill, supported by Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Senate majority leader, and others, that Schumer says would expand government authority to conduct drone detection among other things.

Republican Senator Rand Paul blocked the measure, Reuters reported, arguing it would give the government excessive surveillance power and that Congress should not rush into legislation.

This week, Joe Biden addressed public concerns regarding the increase in reports of sightings of drones and other aerial objects in the skies, stating that there was nothing alarming about the increased reports.

“Nothing nefarious apparently, but they’re checking it all out,” the president told reporters. “We’re following this closely, but so far, no sense of danger.”

John Kirby, the White House national security communications adviser, has also said that the drones are not a national security or public safety risk.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

2 porch pirates caught twerking on doorbell camera in New Jersey

Published

on

2 porch pirates caught twerking on doorbell camera in New Jersey


2 porch pirates caught twerking on doorbell camera in New Jersey – CBS Chicago

Watch CBS News


Police said one of the suspects in Gloucester Township returned two days later—apparently upset that the homeowner posted the clip online.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

New Jersey weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime

Published

on

New Jersey weighs making underage gambling no longer a crime


TRENTON (AP) — Should underage gambling no longer be a crime?

New Jersey lawmakers are considering changing the law to make gambling by people under the age of 21 no longer punishable under criminal law, making it subject to a fine.

It also would impose fines on anyone helping an underage person gamble in New Jersey.

The bill changes the penalties for underage gambling from that of a disorderly persons offense to a civil offense. Fines would be $500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second offense, and $2,000 for any subsequent offenses.

Advertisement

The money would be used for prevention, education, and treatment programs for compulsive gambling, such as those provided by the Council on Compulsive Gambling of New Jersey.

Atlantic city waterline aerial

Getty Images/iStockphoto

“The concern I had initially was about reducing the severity of the punishment,” said Assemblyman Don Guardian, a Republican former mayor of Atlantic City. “But the fact that all the money will go to problem gambling treatment programs changed my mind.”

Figures on underage gambling cases were not immediately available Thursday. But numerous people involved in gambling treatment and recovery say a growing number of young people are becoming involved in gambling, particularly sports betting as the activity spreads around the country.

The bill was approved by an Assembly committee and now goes to the full Assembly for a vote. It must pass both houses of the Legislature before going to the desk of the state’s Democratic governor, Phil Murphy.

Advertisement

The council said recently that it conditionally supports the bill but has concerns about it.

SEE ALSO: Hostile takeover of NJ police department is illegal, court rules

Caesars Atlantic City (Google Street View)

Caesars Atlantic City (Google Street View)

Luis Del Orbe, the council’s acting executive director, said he is glad it will provide funding for gambling treatment and education programs. But he said fines alone are not enough without mandating education about problem gambling. He asked that such a requirement be added to the bill.

“When a young person is ‘fined,’ who actually pays the fine?” he asked.

In a statement submitted to the Assembly panel, the council said, “More and more of New Jersey citizens need help due to the ongoing expansion of gambling opportunities, and it is anticipated that the demand will only continue to grow. There is also an urgent need for expanded education and awareness about the harms that can come of gambling, particularly with respect to youth.”

Advertisement

Report a correction 👈 | 👉 Contact our newsroom

21 top spots to take a first-time visitor to New Jersey

Someone from out-of-state, or maybe even out of the country, is visiting New Jersey for the first time. Where do you take them? After grabbing a bagel and before chowing down on a slice of Jersey pizza, be sure to treat your out-of-town guest to a day in the Garden State with some of these places in mind.

Gallery Credit: Jen Ursillo

NJ’s wealthiest ZIP codes in 2024

These are the 10 most expensive ZIP codes in New Jersey, based on the median sale prices of homes, according to PropertyShark.

Gallery Credit: Dino Flammia

Advertisement

Celebrities who vowed to leave the United States after the election

Rumors are flying that Bruce Springsteen has vowed to leave the country if Donald Trump wins the 2024 election. He didn’t say it.

But false promises of leaving the country if a celebrity didn’t get their way has been a real thing and not always said in jest.

Here’s a list of famous people who promised to leave the country if Trump were elected. I hope you didn’t bet money on them leaving since none did.

Gallery Credit: Jeff Deminski





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending