A body was found in a New Jersey state park just days before the holidays.

On Sunday, Dec. 22, a body was discovered in an abandoned refrigerator in Belleplain State Forest in northern Cape May County, NJ. State Police Sgt. Jeffrey Lebron released information stating that the body was found by troopers shortly before 3 p.m. inside the forest in Dennis Township.

“NJSP are actively investigating a body that was found out in the woods in Belleplain,” Dennis Township Mayor Zeth Matalucci shared in a statement on the official Dennis Township Facebook page. “There’s no threat to the public, and more information will be provided once it’s received,” he continued.

According to its official website, Belleplain State Forest was “established in 1928 for public recreation” and “consists of almost 23,000 acres,” including over a dozen trails for walking/hiking and biking and several campsites. Boating, swimming and fishing are also permitted in the nearby lakes and ponds.

No further details have been shared regarding identification of the body or speculation as to what occurred, as the investigation is ongoing. PEOPLE has reached out to Cape May County Sheriff’s Office, New Jersey State Park Police and Matalucci for comment.

It’s the second body found in eastern New Jersey in as many weeks.

Two weeks ago, a body matching the description of a retired teacher was found in the Galloway Township of New Jersey. Alan Levin, 84, was reported missing by his family on Dec. 7. Remains were discovered two days later along the bank of Nacote Creek, a waterway that leads to the Mullica River about 10 miles north of Atlantic City.

Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE’s free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.

“After an extensive search of the area, a drone team from the Atlantic City Police and Fire Departments located a body matching the description of Mr. Levin deceased along the bank, approximately 3/10 of a mile east of the Port Republic Bridge,” authorities said in a post on Facebook at the time.

Levin’s disappearance remains under investigation by the Galloway Township Police Department and the New Jersey State Police.

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey gambling regulators have handed out $40,000 in fines to two sportsbooks and a tech company for violations that included taking bets on unauthorized events, and on games that had already ended.

In information made public Monday, the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement fined DraftKings $20,000. It also levied $10,000 fines on Rush Street Interactive NJ and the sports betting technology company Kambi.

According to documents released by the state, Rush Street accepted 16 bets worth $1,523 in Nov. 2021 on a college basketball game between the University of North Carolina-Asheville and Tennessee Tech University after the game had already concluded with a UNC victory.

Kambi told the enforcement division that a trader had failed to manually remove that game from its betting markets, saying it had stopped receiving messages from its own sports data provider due to a network connectivity error. Kambi said it has updated its guidelines and retrained its traders to prevent a recurrence.

Kambi, which is based in Malta, did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment Monday. Rush Street declined comment, and DraftKings had no immediate comment Monday. DraftKings stopped using Kambi in 2021.

In March 2022 Rush Street took seven bets totaling just under $2,900 on three Magic City Jai Alai games after the results were already known.

Kambi told the division it experienced a connectivity issue that allowed the bets to be accepted after the games were over. An explanation of what Kambi did to address the situation was blacked out in documents released by the division.

A month earlier Rush Street took 13 wagers worth $8,150 with pre-match odds on a Professional Golf Association match after the event had already begun. In this case, Kambi told the division a newly hired trader failed to enter the correct closing time time for bets on the event. The trader and a supervisor underwent retraining.

DraftKings was fined for taking bets on unapproved events including Russian basketball for nine months in 2020 and 2021. It eventually voided over $61,000 in bets and returned the money to customers after being directed to do so by the state.

In this case, Kambi told the division it misidentified this particular Russian basketball league as one that was approved for wagering in New Jersey. DraftKings told the state it did not catch the error, either.

In 2020, DraftKings accepted 484 wagers on unapproved table tennis matches. Kambi incorrectly enabled the events for wagering without conditions required by the state, the division said.

In Feb. 2022, the division said DraftKings took pre-season NFL bets involving specific players but did not give the state specific information on what information was to be included in the bets, drawing 182 wagers worth nearly $7,000 that were later voided and refunded to customers.

(Copyright 2024 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission)

As a handful of states start adopting California’s sales mandates for zero-emission trucks, dealers in New Jersey are pushing back.

These rules are designed to accelerate the transition to electric vehicles in heavy trucking. They require truck manufacturers to ensure at least 7% of their total sales are zero-emission in the states that are opting in to the regulations.

Currently, 10 other states have chosen to follow these Advanced Clean Truck rules, which are also known as ACT. But a push by dealers in New Jersey to delay implementation of the rules shows the battle lines over these mandates. There’s no indication that the push will succeed; the rules are set to go into effect at the start of the new year, and New Jersey’s governor has indicated support for the current timeline.

But the pressure for delay is a preview of an even bigger fight that’s brewing – one over state EV mandates for passenger vehicles.

Big vehicles with big environmental footprints 

Heavy trucks have an outsized effect on both climate change and human health. Emissions from large diesel vehicles contribute to asthma and other health problems, particularly in communities near warehouses and ports.

California is uniquely positioned to address this problem, because the federal Clean Air Act — recognizing California’s acute pollution problems and history of regulating emissions — allows the state to set its own, stricter standards. Other states can either opt in to California’s rules or stick with the federal ones.

With the Trump administration expected to roll back federal standards, state rules are likely to become more significant. And while the incoming administration is expected to challenge California’s right to set these rules at all, truck makers are currently in a partnership with the state. . They’ve agreed to follow its rules regardless of electoral or legal outcomes.

In exchange for honoring the rules, truck manufacturers have won more flexibility – like getting three years to comply, instead of one.

Truck dealers, however, are not a part of that partnership. And in New Jersey, they’re telling state lawmakers that the rules are unworkable.

A push to delay, or urgency to act?

New Jersey State Assemblyman Clinton Calabrese said a lobbyist for truck dealers inspired him to introduce a bill currently before the legislature that would delay the clean truck rules by two years. The public debate over that bill — which is not scheduled for a full vote — was unusually intense.

At a hearing over the bill earlier this month, there was a clear theme among the truck dealers who showed up to testify.

“We all want a cleaner environment, but we just can’t do it at this point, the way this is written,” said Frank Piazzola.

“I know we all want to do the right thing,” said Jack Licata. “But we just can’t right now.”

“We are not California,” said Spencer Campbell. “We don’t have the size, the capacity, nor have made the investments necessary to make ACT work.”

Dealers are, technically, not regulated by these rules — they apply to manufacturers. But dealers have to actually sell the vehicles. And they say that between high prices, and buyer concerns about charging and range limitations, they just can’t move enough EVs to make up at least 7% of the market. It’s particularly hard for the very largest trucks, which are called class 7 and 8 in industry jargon.

“The challenge here is very simple. There is no demand for EVs for class 7 through 8, especially, which I represent in New Jersey,” said Campbell, who sells both electric and diesel trucks. “That’s all we’re trying to tell you guys here.”

Environmental groups, in turn, said that because of the extra flexibilities built into the rules, they are feasible — and that there’s more at stake than dealership sales.

“We have the policies we need and they are fully achievable,” said Karla Sosa of the Environmental Defense Fund.

Others warned about the dangers of a delay. “There is a real cost in human suffering to waiting to implement these measures,” said Nicky Sheats of the New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance.

“There are people dying in my community from diesel fumes,” said Kelli Koontz-Wilson of the Coalition for Healthy Ports.

Another speaker brought tomatoes from his garden, harvested in December. He called it a sign of climate change, a reminder of the global stakes of this debate.

Where are truck makers in this debate? Well, it’s complicated. They are technically neutral: The Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) and its member companies have agreed to not lobby against states adopting the ACT rules. That’s a requirement of their partnership with California that, in turn, lets them negotiate for flexibilities. Neither the trade group nor any of its members were at the hearing this month.

But the EMA has been in touch with New Jersey and other states to express concerns about parts of the regulations. Jed Mandel, the head of the EMA, said the members of his trade group have invested billions in EVs but worry that the mandates are “too much, too fast.”

Would a sales hit justify a delay? 

Everyone involved in this debate agrees on one thing: There are real challenges to electrifying New Jersey’s fleet, particularly when it comes to the very largest trucks. Not all heavy-duty vehicles are available in zero-emission versions yet. Or those versions aren’t practical for every need, like long-haul trucking. The upfront costs of buying electric vehicles are significantly higher, and switching to electric trucks requires building charging infrastructure. And while 7% might not sound like a lot, as of last year EVs were less than 1% of heavy-duty truck sales in the state, according to Atlas Public Policy.

But regulators and environmental groups say those problems are actively being addressed.

“This program is not just feasible. It’s already well underway,” Shawn M. LaTourette, New Jersey’s commissioner of environmental protection, told NPR in an interview.

Manufacturers have already started to bank credits based on previous year’s sales, which the rules allow. LaTourette said for medium-duty vehicles, the industry as a whole is set to meet the requirements already, before the new year even starts.

The heavy-duty trucks, the class 7 and 8 that Spencer Campbell warned about, are more challenging. But even there, the industry only needs to sell 109 trucks, according to those preliminary numbers. That’s not even counting trucks sold in 2024, which can be counted toward 2025’s total. And there’s government funding to help with costs, including hundreds of millions of dollars for charging for these vehicles specifically.

Dealers say it’s not enough. And some point to California as a cautionary tale. While the percentage of electric trucks sold in the state has risen sharply, total truck sales have fallen since these rules went into effect, starting with trucks manufactured for model year 2024.

In the first 10 months of 2024, sales of medium- and heavy-duty trucks fell 6%, and the largest trucks were down 20%, compared to the previous year, according to S&P Global Mobility data. Nationally, the market dropped 3% over that timeframe. The company’s Greg Genette said several factors are driving that decline, including ACT.

California and the other states embracing ACT are already adjusting the regulations to adapt to market realities. Take Washington state, which has already adopted these rules for trucks manufactured for model year 2025. There, truck makers are also on track for compliance in most vehicle categories. Still, for the biggest trucks, EVs are barely over 1% of sales — far short of the requirement. That’s according to data the state shared with NPR.

Washington state regulators say those rules are currently being adapted to make them more feasible. For example, one policy change under consideration would reduce the EV sales requirements for the biggest trucks by an estimated 90% or more in 2026.

In New Jersey, EV advocate Pam Frank says opposition to the rules has mixed misinformation — like claims that the regulations ban diesel trucks — with genuine challenges, like companies’ charging needs and higher truck prices. For the legitimate problems, she said, “we have answers to each of them.”

“This regulation should be going into effect as planned with all the flexibility in there,” she said, “and we should make sure that the dealers are not getting squeezed unfairly.”

A brewing fight 

Similar debates have played out in other states adopting these rules, like New York and Oregon. So far, they’ve all stuck with their planned timelines.

It looks like that may also happen in New Jersey. Calabrese, the state lawmaker who introduced the bill to delay, said he doesn’t expect it to become law. His transportation committee voted unanimously to advance it, but he’s not expecting similar support from the state senate’s environmental committee – and the legislature is now out of session.

The rules will still go into effect on January 1.

But the fight won’t be over. This debate is over trucks, but another fight is coming.

California is also setting mandates for passenger car sales, with new rules that would ramp up to requiring 100% of the cars sold in the state to be emission-free (including plug-in hybrids). Currently, about 1 in 4 new cars sold in California fit the requirement. The national average is around 10%.

For model year 2026, sales of which begin next year, California will require 35% of new sales to be electric.

Laura Perrotta is the president of NJ CAR, a group representing car and truck dealers. She was at that hearing lobbying for a delay in the truck mandates — and when these EV mandates actually kick in for passenger cars, she said, “it’s going to cause real reckoning with the auto industry across the country.”

About a dozen states are currently planning to follow California’s car standards. Those rules are almost certain to wind up as the subject of a legal battle with the Trump administration. But before they do, they could face political battles closer to home.