Connect with us

New Hampshire

Who is this man? Police say child sex assault suspect was living under false identity

Published

on

Who is this man? Police say child sex assault suspect was living under false identity


Police in Manchester, New Hampshire, are seeking the public’s help in determining the identity of a man charged with sexually assaulting a child in the city last year.

Manchester police say the man, who had claimed to be 60-year-old Angel Rivera Laureano, was brought to the attention of their Juvenile Unit in January of 2024 after someone alleged that he had sexually abused a child under the age of 13. He was ultimately arrested and charged with one count of aggravated felonious sexual assault.

During the investigation, police said they learned that the suspect might not be who he said he was. As a result of their investigation, police were able to determine that the man had been living under a false identity for years, and under that name was convicted of numerous crimes in New Hampshire dating back over a decade.

The real Angel Rivera Laureano was positively identified and located living in Puerto Rico, police said.

Advertisement

The suspect in the sexual assault case, who police are now referring to as “John Doe,” now faces an additional charge of identity fraud. At the time of his arrest he was already being held at the Hillsborough County House of Corrections, and he remains there.

Police said the man’s identity is still unknown, and are asking anyone with information about him to call Detective Guy Kozowyk at 603-792-5560 or email him at gkozowyk@manchesternh.gov.



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

The Big Question: What do you hope to accomplish in 2025?

Published

on

The Big Question: What do you hope to accomplish in 2025?


This is NHPR’s The Big Question. In this series, we ask you a question about life in New Hampshire, you submit an answer, and your voice may be featured on air or online.

A new year can mean a fresh start, a new chapter, renewed resolve.

For January’s Big Question, we asked: What do you hope to accomplish in 2025?

Here’s what some of you shared.

Advertisement

Ruth Smith – Canterbury, NH: 2025 is going to be a fun year for me because I’m looking forward to taking on a rather daunting project, but one that’s very exciting. I have quilt squares that were made by my great-grandmother probably over 100 years ago, in the early 1900s, and they were never assembled into a quilt. The quilt squares are actually a style called redwork, which was typical of that time period, and they have images of children and animals. My project this year is to finally assemble them into a quilt and give that quilt to my new great-niece, who was born in June. It’s kind of fun to think about maybe connecting the generations through this quilt.

Cathy Wolff – Kittery, ME: My resolution and my goal for 2025 is to be less judgmental, especially of other people. It’s not the first year I’ve had this as a resolution, but I’m going to try again. Most of my adult life, I’ve prided myself on being able to critically assess just about everything, but last year I realized that I can be too critical, at least too judging. And I really don’t want to be that way anymore. I think the biggest strategy is to remind yourself when your judging is aimed at yourself or at another person, that they’re just a person. So my resolution is to be less judging and more compassionate, less critical and more kind to myself and to others and maybe even the world.

Liz Ryan Cole – Lyme, NH and Thetford, VT: I hope to persuade my little town in Lyme and other towns like it that it’s important to expand our zoning. And I would like to see some more variety in housing. If we had more types of housing, we could make homes for people who work in town and not have our teachers and firefighters have to come in from other towns. I’d love to see Lyme create a housing committee as so many other Upper Valley towns have. I’d love to work with individuals, elected officials [and] appointed officials and show them that multi-unit housing really has a place in our little towns.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Outside/Inbox: Do trees age?

Published

on

Outside/Inbox: Do trees age?


Every other Friday, the Outside/In team here at NHPR answers listener questions about the natural world. Today’s question comes from Will Heap, calling from Coulterville, California, just outside of Yosemite National Park.”

“Driving past a beautiful forest yesterday, I had the realization that I don’t understand how trees age… So my first question is: How does aging work? Is it a breakdown of cells or in the efficacy of cells? And then my second question is: Do non-animal species such as plants, trees in particular, age the same as human cells?… What limits the age of a tree? 

Producer Justine Paradis counted tree rings to see what she could find.

Transcript

Justine Paradis: For many of us, aging is a matter of great concern. But it turns out it’s weirdly tough to define what aging actually is, even in humans.

Advertisement

Deborah Roach: Aging itself is the accumulation of damage and the decline of function with increasing age.

Justine Paradis: This is Deborah Roach, a biologist and professor emeritus at the University of Virginia. In her career, Deborah has studied the evolution of aging in plants. And it’s a topic that defies easy answers. 

Deborah Roach: Disappointingly, I think trees are a difficult species to begin to look at the questions of aging. 

Justine Paradis: Deborah studied a small leafy plant called Plantago lanceolata. She compared the performance of 1-year-old seedlings to 3-year-olds, and she found some differences based on age.

Deborah Roach: Seed size is smaller… germination is smaller. In other words, their offspring are lower quality.

Advertisement

Justine Paradis: But Plantago is a weedy, short-lived plant. It’s more challenging to study trees

Deborah Roach: You want to be able to follow individuals from the time of birth all the way through the time of death… and the trouble is that trees often live to, you know, 80 years, several hundred years, or even other species like the bristlecone pine trees, they live thousands of years. 

Justine Paradis: One measure of aging is a change in ability to reproduce. And in some tree species, scientists do observe a peak and then decline in reproduction as trees increase in size. But other tree species just keep on making babies. There’s a bristlecone pine known as Methusaleh which, at nearly 5000 years old, is the oldest known tree on earth. In the ‘70s, when a US Forest Service employee collected a pine cone from Methuselah, he found that its seeds had a 100 percent germination rate. They all grew into viable and healthy seedlings.

Deborah Roach: It’s not just that they can grow, not just that they can survive… these pine trees… can still make high quality offspring too.

Justine Paradis: Another measure of aging happens  on a cellular level. As human cells replicate, the DNA in our cells is copied, over and over. But over time, all that copying starts to degrade the DNA. When that happens in our stem cells, it’s a big deal. Stem cells are important to regenerate our tissues, blood, and neurons. And when they age, we notice. Our hair gets grey and our skin loses its elasticity. 

Advertisement

In plants, the equivalent to a stem cell is called a meristem. Meristems make new leaves and new branches. But unlike human stem cells, it looks like plant meristems may not age, in at least some species. So, “theoretically, trees can be immortal organisms.”  That’s a direct quote from a scientific review by a couple dendrologists published in 2020, titled “On tree longevity.”

The authors lay out evidence that trees don’t die because of genetically-destined cell decline. Instead, they’re killed by some external event, like a wildfire, insect attack, or the swinging of an ax. 

When it comes to super long-lived trees like Methuselah, they tend to grow very slowly in pretty harsh environments, where not much else can live.

In short, the reason that some trees can live for millennia is simple: they’re really good at surviving.  

If you’d like to submit a question to the Outside/In team, you can record it as a voice memo on your smartphone and send it to outsidein@nhpr.org. You can also leave a message on our hotline, 1-844-GO-OTTER.

Advertisement

Outside/In is a podcast! Subscribe wherever you get yours.





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is in Maine. NH lawmakers want to change that.

Published

on

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard is in Maine. NH lawmakers want to change that.


An aerial view of Seavey Island in the Piscataqua River, home to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, seen from the east in 2001. Kittery is to the right and Portsmouth is in the upper left. The Piscataqua River Bridge carrying I-95 is in the upper right. Gregory Rec/Portland Press Herald file

A New Hampshire legislator has fired the latest round in an on-again, off-again border dispute between Maine and New Hampshire over the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard.

Republican Rep. Joseph Barton, a freshman lawmaker, is the prime sponsor of a resolution that urges Congress to find that the Piscataqua River and Portsmouth Harbor are within New Hampshire and asks President Donald Trump to designate the duty stations of Portsmouth Naval Shipyard personnel as part of Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

Congress would have to redraw the boundaries, but Trump can reassign the duty stations, Barton said.

Advertisement

The tax status of shipyard employees is a big reason for the resolution, he said. New Hampshire does not have a state income tax, and residents of the Granite State who work at the shipyard pay Maine taxes. Shifting the borders to bring the shipyard into New Hampshire would shield New Hampshire residents from Maine income taxes.

“We won’t get more tax revenue,” Barton, who worked as an engineer at the shipyard, said in an interview Thursday. “The citizens will get more tax relief.”

Some Maine income tax revenue would disappear if the more than 3,100 New Hampshire residents who work at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard no longer have state taxes withheld. It wasn’t immediately clear how much revenue Maine would lose. A spokeswoman for the state Department of Administrative and Financial Services said taxpayer confidentiality bars disclosure of information.

Kittery Town Manager Kendra Amaral said New Hampshire would inherit traffic problems if it takes possession of the Naval Station, which has two land-based access points, both of which run through Kittery.

If New Hampshire wants the shipyard it will need to build bridges from Portsmouth to the Naval Station island, “so they can assume all of the traffic congestion and infrastructure impacts Kittery, Maine, shoulders as the host of the (shipyard),” Amaral said.

Advertisement

The issue of who has jurisdiction is not new. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled on a border dispute in Maine’s favor in 2001, dismissing New Hampshire’s claim to the shipyard. The court denied a New Hampshire request to reconsider, ruling that the boundary between the states is the middle of the Piscataqua River.

More than half of the shipyard’s nearly 8,000 employees are Mainers, according to the Seacoast Shipyard Association, an advocacy organization. And 56% of the Portsmouth shipyard’s $716.2 million payroll is for Mainers and 36% is paid to New Hampshire residents. The remainder of the shipyard workers live in Massachusetts and other states.

Its total economic impact in 2023, including purchased goods and services, maintenance and military construction, was more than $1.5 billion.

Barton’s resolution says jurisdiction and control over the Piscataqua River “is and always has been entirely” within New Hampshire’s Rockingham County and “complete dominion and ownership of the tidal waters and submerged lands” of the river, including Portsmouth Harbor, are part of the state.

“This is the boundary. This is where it is,” he said.

Advertisement

The resolution has been the subject of a public hearing and must be voted on by the House and Senate and signed by Gov. Kelly Ayotte. Her office did not respond to an email Thursday asking if she supports the measure.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending