Write to us at startingpoint@globe.com. To subscribe, sign up here.
By all outward appearances, Tim McGough has been a fan of President Trump and his immigration agenda for years.
McGough, a Republican state senator who represents Merrimack, N.H., spoke at a Trump campaign rally ahead of the state’s 2024 GOP primary. In 2023, he welcomed Tom Homan, Trump’s former ICE director and current border czar, to New Hampshire for an event about securing America’s borders. And he was in Washington for Trump’s second inauguration, writing on social media that “God Blessed America” with “our 47th President.”
But McGough seems less excited about how Trump’s immigration agenda is unfolding in his own district. Last week he spoke out forcefully against an administration plan to convert a sprawling local warehouse into an ICE processing center for hundreds of detainees. “There are locations across the state and across the country that will willingly accept this type of facility,” McGough said, “and Merrimack is not one of them.”
Advertisement
McGough, who didn’t respond to requests for comment, may be right that other communities would welcome ICE. But in a sign of how the politics of immigration are shifting, he’s part of a growing number of lawmakers and residents pushing back against the administration’s plans to locate potentially dozens of detention or processing facilities in their cities and states.
It wasn’t always this way. Last summer, Florida Republicans proudly partnered with Trump to build a detention facility that became known as “Alligator Alcatraz.” And immigration policy was once a bright spot for Trump, with more voters than not favoring his tough approach.
But the politics have changed. Most Americans now disapprove of Trump’s handling of the issue and say ICE’s tactics have gone too far. Even some Republicans have recoiled, distancing themselves from immigration crackdowns in places like Minnesota.
Merrimack, a closely divided town Trump narrowly lost to Kamala Harris, opposition to the proposed ICE facility has been building for weeks. In December, the Washington Post reported that the administration was eyeing a vacant warehouse there to repurpose. Local Democrats sounded the alarm, hundreds of residents protested, and the town council came out against the plan.
The pushback quickly became bipartisan. In December, McGough first said it was “too early to draw any conclusions” about a possible ICE facility, then said he opposed it. Last month, another local GOP lawmaker called the proposal “federalism run amok” that would give Merrimack “a negative connotation.”
Advertisement
Governor Kelly Ayotte, a Republican who has banned “sanctuary” policies in cities and urged local police to cooperate with ICE, initially said she hadn’t heard anything from the administration about the plans. Yet after the ACLU of New Hampshire published documents confirming them, Ayotte lambasted a state agency she said had known about the proposal since January but hadn’t told her; the head of that department resigned Monday.
New Hampshire is Trumpy only by New England standards, and the private company that owns the Merrimack warehouse hasn’t said whether it plans to sell it to the administration. Yet resistance to local ICE facilities is growing even in places that have long supported him.
In Utah, Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma City, and a New Jersey county Trump won in 2024, residents have rallied against similar plans. A company that owns a warehouse in Virginia’s Hanover County, which backed Trump in 2024, reneged on a handshake deal to sell to the administration after residents and lawmakers protested.
Even so, the administration has paid hundreds of millions of dollars in recent weeks to acquire facilities in Maryland, Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Texas in a bid to vastly expand its capacity to imprison detainees. The proposed Merrimack facility could reportedly hold up to 1,500; plans for one in Hutchins, Texas, call for housing six times more.
Yes, most Republicans still support Trump’s immigration agenda. New Hampshire Republicans blocked a bill that would let municipalities reject permitting for facilities that lack local approval. But for now, the opposition appears to be getting louder — and not just there. As one protester in Merrimack told WMUR, “It’s just not who we are as New Hampshire people. It’s not who we are, I suggest, as Americans.”
Advertisement
🧩 2 Down: Map detail | ☁️ 34° Thawing out
Team USA’s Chloe Kim will compete for a record third halfpipe gold today.Abbie Parr/Associated Press
Winter Olympics: Team USA’s three-time ice dancing world champions fell short this time, losing the gold medal to France. Peek inside the team’s Winter House, where athletes can get away from it all. And here’s what to watch for today.
ICE in Massachusetts: A judge dismissed immigration authorities’ case against Eva Helena Mendes, a Rhode Island green card holder detained at Logan Airport over old shoplifting charges. And a jury found a former Worcester City Councilor guilty of assaulting a police officer during a chaotic clash last May between protesters and immigration agents.
A History Fight: A group that promotes Black Americans’ contributions to Boston history is “throwing up plaques as fast as we can” to combat the Trump administration’s efforts to erase similar markers elsewhere.
I’m on a boat: Why did the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Department launch a harbor patrol in Winthrop, far from the jail it runs?
Advertisement
Up and down: New England colleges and universities keep cutting costs, but their endowments keep going up. At $56.9 billion, Harvard’s is bigger than Iceland’s economy.
Tariffs: Six House Republicans voted with Democrats to end Trump’s import duties on Canadian goods. The measure is unlikely to become law, but Trump threatened to support primary challenges against its Republican backers anyway. (WashPost 🎁)
Oops: The FAA closed El Paso’s airspace for hours after Customs and Border Protection officials used a laser on loan from the Defense Department against what they said was a Mexican cartel drone. It turned out to be a party balloon. (NYT 🎁)
Pam Bondi: During a congressional hearing, Trump’s attorney general yelled at and insulted lawmakers asking about her handling of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and refused to apologize to Epstein victims who were in the room. (Guardian)
Nancy Guthrie: A potential lead fizzled in the disappearance of the “Today” show host’s mom, leaving authorities without a suspect in custody. (AP)
Advertisement
Poll, axed: Gallup, which has tracked US presidents’ popularity since Franklin Roosevelt, will no longer do so. The firm recently found Trump, who has threatened to sue over polls he says portray him negatively, with a 36 percent approval rating. (The Hill)
By David Beard
🦃 Where is Sandwich? Not the food, not the town on the Cape, but the beloved turkey who paced and pecked around a Northampton hospital. There’s a suspected Sandwich snatching — and the turkey hunt is on.
🏠 Home of the Week: Inherited art and antiques transformed and revitalized this drab Milton Colonial. Also, a Sunday River ski home, anyone? And should you even try to sell your home yourself?
🛞 First Person: Kevin Zhang thought it was okay to park in a neighborhood spot. Someone disagreed, he writes in “To the person who slashed my tires.” Plus, an Eastie man was so angry over “space savers” he shoveled the neighborhood himself.
Advertisement
📺 RIP James Van der Beek: The former “Dawson’s Creek” heartthrob, who later mocked his hunky appearance, was 48.
🐅 16 astonishing images: Sit back and enjoy, from the Wildlife Photographer of the Year contest. (Popular Science)
📕 Fran Lebowitz isn’t joking: “This is not kind of like what the Nazis did. This is precisely what the Nazis did,” says the writer, appearing next week at the Emerson Colonial.
🌅 Best/worst states for retirement: New Hampshire makes the 10 best in this survey; Rhode Island the 10 worst (what, someone didn’t like the Cliff Walk?). See the list. (Business Insider)
Thanks for reading Starting Point.
Advertisement
This newsletter was edited by David Beard and produced by Diamond Naga Siu.
❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at startingpoint@globe.com.
✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can sign up for your own copy.
📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at ian.philbrick@globe.com.
Authorities allege Joseph Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a handgun during a robbery at St. Mary’s Bank in Nashua, N.H., on June 12.Boston FBI
A Townsend man was arrested Wednesday night in connection with two armed bank robberies in New Hampshire and New Jersey last month, federal authoritiessaid.
Joseph Sawyer, 52, was arrested by FBI Albany’s SWAT team after the bureau’s Boston office and Nashua, N.H., police learnedhe might bein upstate New York, FBI Boston said in a statement Thursday.
Investigators said thealleged robberies happened at St. Mary’s Bank on Northwest Boulevard in Nashua on June 12 and at a Chase Bank in Boonton, N.J., on June 27.
During both robberies, prosecutors allege Sawyer brandished what appeared to be a black semiautomatic handgun, ordered everyone inside the banks to get on the ground, and demanded their cell phones before stealing cash, according to a criminal complaint filed in New Hampshire federal court.
Advertisement
The complaint alleges Sawyer stole $6,000 from the Nashua bank before fleeing in a Honda minivan. Investigators say he discarded a shopping bag containing the bank manager’s cell phone in a nearby parking lot before driving away.
Investigators linked the two robberies through surveillance footage and license plate reader data, according to court filings. Authorities allege the minivan was driven with stolen New Jersey plates during the Boonton robbery that were later replaced with Massachusetts plates registered to Sawyer’s late father.
Sawyer was charged with one count of bank robbery in New Hampshire, court records show. It was not immediately clear Thursday night if he is being represented by an attorney.
The case is being prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s office for the District of New Hampshire, the FBI said.
Breanne Kovatch can be reached at breanne.kovatch@globe.com. Follow her @breannekovatch.
Fighting the transgender sports ban is ‘utterly misogynistic’: Riley Gaines
Fox News discusses the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold transgender sports bans. Former NCAA All-American Riley Gaines states it’s ‘insane’ to challenge biological sex in sports, asserting boys should not compete in girls’ sports. She calls the opposing movement ‘misogynistic,’ advocating for female athletes’ rights and fair competition, a view echoed by Education Secretary Linda McMahon. This highlights the contentious issue in women’s sports.
A pair of trans athletes in New Hampshire have dismissed their lawsuit to challenge the state law that protects girls’ sports after the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Title IX ruling on June 30.
Advertisement
The trans teenage plaintiffs, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, originally filed the lawsuit in 2024 to challenge a current New Hampshire state law prohibiting trans athletes from participating in girls’ sports. The lawsuit later expanded to add President Donald Trump’s administration to the defendants after Trump signed the “No Men in Women’s Sports” executive order on Feb. 5, 2025.
The lawyers for the trans athletes claimed Trump’s executive order, along with parts of a Jan. 20 executive order that forbids federal money from being used to “promote gender ideology,” subjects the teens and all transgender girls to discrimination in violation of federal equal protection guarantees and their rights under Title IX.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
A transgender athlete and the Supreme Court(Getty Images)
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire then ruled last year that female athletes represented by Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorneys were permitted to intervene in the case to defend the state’s women’s sports law and the administration’s executive orders.
Advertisement
Now, after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling, which protects state laws that ensure only females compete in girls’ sports, there is no room for the trans teens to fight the law in New Hampshire.
“Women and girls deserve privacy, safety, and equal opportunities. That can’t happen when males are competing in women’s sports, taking spots on women’s athletic teams, and winning women’s championships,” ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Litigation Strategy Jonathan Scruggs said in a statement provided to Fox News Digital.
USA POWERLIFTING, ONCE IN TRANS ATHLETE LAWSUIT, SUPPORTS SCOTUS RULING: ‘LAW HAS CAUGHT UP WITH THE SCIENCE’
“President Trump’s executive orders and New Hampshire’s law recognize common sense and track Title IX, the federal law that ensures equal opportunities for women in athletics. We are grateful this case is coming to an end and that New Hampshire is free to protect its female athletes.”
Fox News Digital has reached out to Tirrell and Turmelle’s attorneys at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD) for a response.
Advertisement
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
A protester waves a transgender pride flag outside of the U.S. Supreme Court Building on June 18, 2025 in Washington, DC. Advocates organized a rally in response the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in US v. Skrmetti, in which the justices ruled to uphold state bans on gender-affirming medical care for transgender youth.(Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)
The SCOTUS rulings in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, the high court upheld state laws requiring student-athletes to compete on sports teams that correspond with their biological sex at birth rather than their gender identity, in a 6-3 decision.
However, there are still 23 states, including California, New York and Massachusetts, that don’t have any such laws, and some of those have laws to protect trans athletes in girls’ sports.
Advertisement
Jackson Thompson is a sports reporter for Fox News Digital covering critical political and cultural issues in sports, with an investigative lens. Jackson’s reporting has been cited in federal government actions related to the enforcement of Title IX, and in legacy media outlets including The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Associated Press and ESPN.com.
New Hampshire Governor Kelly Ayotte (Getty Images)
New Hampshire Gov. Kelly Ayotte has signed legislation requiring public school employees to disclose information about transgender students to their parents or legal guardians, reversing a 2024 state Supreme Court ruling that upheld students’ privacy rights in certain circumstances.
Advertisement
Thanks for registering! You can update your email subscriptions at any time in the
My profile section of your account.
Ayotte’s office announced on 2 July that the legislation had been signed into law. Under SB 430, educators must respond to written requests from parents for “material information” about their child, even if a student has asked that the information be kept confidential or fears negative consequences at home.
Supporters of the legislation, such as Republican state Senator Tim Lang, argue the measure strengthens parental rights and enables families to better support children who may be struggling. “If you don’t tell the parent, the parent can’t watch for the signs of self-harm,” Lang told New Hampshire Public Radio.
Educators and LGBTQ+ advocates, however, say the law places teachers in an impossible position by forcing them to choose between complying with the law and protecting vulnerable students. Megan Tuttle, president of NEA-New Hampshire, the state’s largest teachers’ union, said in a statement that the legislation is “vaguely written and risks putting educators in a position of outing a student.” She added that schools should remain places where every student feels “safe, seen, and free to be themselves.”
Aimee Terravechia, executive director of LGBTQ+ advocacy group 603 Equality, warned the law could erode trust between students and educators while speaking with New Hampshire Public Radio. “Schools should be a place of learning… and a place of critical self-examination,” she said. “Placing educators into a role of monitoring and reporting removes the trust necessary for a thriving academic environment.”
Advertisement
The legislation also effectively overturns a 2024 New Hampshire Supreme Court decision, in which justices ruled that keeping a student’s gender identity confidential did not unlawfully interfere with parents’ rights, noting that parents still retained numerous ways to support and communicate with their children outside the classroom.
Share your thoughts! Let us know in the comments below, and remember to keep the conversation respectful.