New Hampshire
The nation’s last refuge for affordable homes is in Northeast Ohio • New Hampshire Bulletin
 
																								
												
												
											 
At 43, Sharon Reese is a housing market refugee – forced to return to her Ohio hometown after 18 years in Las Vegas, despite a successful career training dancers for nightclub acts.
“If you don’t have between $600,000 and $800,000, you’re not buying a house out there,” Reese said. “Las Vegas has a lot of opportunity, and it was affordable in 2006, but it’s become unaffordable. We quit our jobs and moved across the country. We’re hoping this is the right decision for us.”
Reese and her family are unpacking at her parents’ Youngstown home, a temporary stop until she and her husband, who was a casino worker in Las Vegas, can find jobs and a house of their own with their young daughter. Youngstown is one of the last two metro areas in the country where a household with nearly any income should be able to find a single-family home they can afford to buy, according to an analysis of April data by the National Association of Realtors.
Before the pandemic, there were 20 states that were considered affordable as a whole under the group’s definition, including the presidential election swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. As of this year, there is none. Even the states with the closest match between income and home prices – Iowa, West Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan – didn’t make the cut.
Since the pandemic, two states, Montana and Idaho, have surpassed California as the most unaffordable states for local homebuyers, according to the analysis. Hawaii and Oregon round out the list of the five least affordable states.
The Realtors’ analysis assigns affordability scores to states and large metro areas on a scale of 0 to 2. A score of 0 means that no household can afford any home on the market.
A score of 1 means that homes on the market are affordable to households in proportion to their position on the income ladder – in other words, 100 percent of families can afford at least some homes on the market. And a score of 2 would mean that all households can afford all homes on the market, but no state or metropolitan area even reached a 1.
The least affordable metro area was Los Angeles, which scored only 0.3, while the metro areas of Youngstown (0.97) and Akron (0.95) in Ohio were rated most affordable.
According to the latest estimates from July by real estate company Redfin, median single-family home sale prices were $175,000 in Youngstown and $239,500 in Akron. That compared with $487,000 in Las Vegas, $490,000 in Boise, and $1 million in the Los Angeles area.
The Las Vegas area, where the Reese family had lived for 18 years, had a score of 0.5 on the Realtors’ scale. No state earned an overall score of 1, though Iowa, West Virginia, and Ohio came close, at nearly 0.9. The least affordable states, Montana, Idaho, California, Hawaii, and Oregon, all had scores around 0.4.
Nationwide, home affordability has evaporated over the past three years as interest rates have gone up, according to a monitoring index maintained by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. It measures affordability more simply than the Realtors’ analysis, focusing solely on the ability of a homebuyer with the median household income to buy the median-priced house.
By that measure, the national affordability percentage was above 100 percent between January 2019 and April 2021. But it fell as low as 67 percent last year and remained below 70 percent in June, meaning a homebuyer with the median income had only two-thirds of the earnings needed to buy the median-priced house.
Home prices have increased by 47 percent nationwide just since 2020, according to a June report by the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. A major factor is that there aren’t many homes for sale: Many current homeowners are reluctant to sell because they’re locked into historically low interest rates. Meanwhile, investors have gobbled up single-family starter homes, reducing the supply.
Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors, said there are signs of more houses coming up for sale. For example, there was a 20 percent increase in houses and condos for sale in July compared with July 2023, according to the association.
“We are still short on inventory, but I think the worst is over,” Yun said. “We have seen mortgage rates begin to decline, so it’s less of a big financial penalty to move and give up a low interest rate. And the second factor is just the passage of time – life-changing events always occur, a death, a divorce, a new child, or just job relocation, and that means changing residence.”
Along with high prices and interest rates, home buyers are getting slammed by higher property taxes and insurance costs, according to the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies.
Home prices in northeast Ohio might be lower because the area has a stable population, curbing competition and bidding wars, said Alison Goebel, executive director of the Greater Ohio Policy Center, a Columbus nonprofit aimed at revitalizing Ohio cities.
“Our population numbers have remained fairly steady in the last several decades, so we don’t have egregious demand and supply issues like you see on the West Coast and other rapidly growing areas,” Goebel said.
Montana and Idaho are the least affordable states: Housing prices are exploding in both, as deep-pocketed newcomers – many of them white-collar employees working in high-wage jobs based out of state – have driven up prices beyond what longtime residents can afford.
The city of Boise scored 0.4 on the Realtors’ affordability scale, on par with the New York City area. Like Montana, Idaho has natural beauty that is attracting people who are cashing out of more expensive areas, said Nicki Hellenkamp, Boise’s director of housing and homelessness policy.
“It’s one of the Zoom boom towns, where it’s beautiful but the wages are low, and the cost of living is low. If you sell your house in Los Angeles and buy two houses here, as my uncle did, then you can have a very different standard of living,” Hellenkamp said.
It’s not just home prices – rents are up 40 percent in Boise since the pandemic began, she added.
“Obviously wages didn’t go up 40 percent, so some people have been displaced,” Hellenkamp said.
The city is working on modest proposals to help with down payments and to create more affordable apartments, she said, but building more affordable housing will mean state and federal cooperation to help solve labor shortages and soaring material costs.
“We can’t do this alone as a city. This issue is a big one,” Hellenkamp said.
A state housing task force in Montana made recommendations in June to streamline construction of houses and apartments statewide and create incentives for cities to loosen zoning and allow denser housing.
A member of the task force, Kendall Cotton, said he personally found it impossible to buy a house in Montana, but was happy to recently purchase half a duplex for his growing family.
“We were thrilled to have that as an option, just to get our foot in the door and start on our journey to homeownership,” Cotton said. “Montana is an in-demand place. We’ve been kind of discovered in the last couple of years.”
Republicans and Democrats have come together to support fighting restrictive zoning, said Cotton, director of the Frontier Institute, a nonprofit policy and educational organization.
“We’re a free-market organization that tends to lead from right of center, but when I was at the governor’s press conference to support these issues, I was standing shoulder to shoulder with a Democratic socialist city council member and we were all united on this,” Cotton said.
Shallon Lester, a YouTube influencer who moved from New York to Montana and paid $1 million for a five-bedroom house in Bozeman in 2022, said she likes both the lower cost of living and the lifestyle there. Locals tend to think she’s an outsider “invading” the area, she said, but “people like me take nothing from this economy – we only give. We spend and spend.”
“People who are remote workers are sick of the cost of living in cities,” Lester added. “There’s a mass return to the concept of the simple life.”
Even in the Youngstown metro area, which includes a slice of Pennsylvania, housing can be a challenge for residents with low incomes. A forthcoming regional housing study has found a 4,000-unit shortage for households making less than $25,000 a year; 7,500 people are on a waiting list for subsidized housing. Black and Hispanic residents are more likely to struggle with housing costs, as are older people, young singles, and families with young children, according to preliminary conclusions discussed in April.
But for many, Youngstown is a rare island of affordability. Jim Johnston, 40, a digital account executive at media company Nexstar in Youngstown, said many of his high school classmates from the area, who now live in places such as Montana, Illinois, and Maryland, envy his decision to stay there and buy a $250,000 house in 2022 when interest rates were lower.
“One of them has a mortgage payment three times mine for the same size house, and a child care bill that’s bigger than my mortgage,” said Johnston. “They could put an extra $50,000 or $60,000 a year in their pockets. Remote work has opened up new possibilities for them, and they’re considering this very seriously.”
This story was originally published by Stateline, which like the New Hampshire Bulletin is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.
 
																	
																															New Hampshire
NH Supreme Court defends $50,000 payout to top Judicial Branch employee
 
Justices on the New Hampshire Supreme Court are defending an irregular personnel maneuver that allowed a top state court employee to collect nearly $50,000 in employment benefits following a layoff that lasted just 48 hours.
The sitting justices — with the exception of Justice Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi — issued a statement Thursday evening saying that Dianne Martin’s removal from her position as the top administrator of the state court system and subsequent hiring into a new role in the Judicial Branch two days later was in line with “standard personnel policies.”
Chief Justice Gordon MacDonald, along with Justices Patrick Donovan, Melissa Countway, and Bryan Gould, issued the statement in response to reporting by New Hampshire Public Radio that described how Martin was able to cash out her unused sick and vacation time before transitioning into her new position, a benefit other state government employees are typically not granted when moving between state jobs.
The state Judicial Branch had earlier declined to respond to a detailed list of questions NHPR sent prior to publication, or respond to a whistleblower’s allegations that MacDonald — who has a long professional relationship with Martin, including when she served as his chief of staff — helped orchestrate the payout.
Late Thursday, however, the justices issued a statement acknowledging “public interest” in the matter.
“The Court remains committed to responsible stewardship of public resources and to maintaining the effective administration of justice across the state,” the four justices wrote.
According to the statement, Martin was removed as director of the Administrative Office of the Courts on March 3 as part of a “reorganization” that called for the elimination of the position. The justices say that realignment was part of a cost-cutting review that began in early 2024.
On the same day Martin was removed from her position, however, the state Supreme Court announced an interim replacement for her in the role of director, calling into question the claim that the position was eliminated. In fact, the administrative director position would remain filled by Judge Chris Keating, Martin’s replacement, until mid-October — a full six months — when the Judicial Branch then formally announced the abolishment of the position. (Keating now holds the title of State Court Administrator, a job that assumes many of the responsibilities of the former administrative director, along with other new responsibilities.)
Justices defend handling of Martin’s transition
Internal personnel records obtained by NHPR showed that Martin was laid off on April 1 but was rehired into a new job as general counsel two days later. That brief gap in state employment cleared the way for Martin to cash out her unused sick and vacation time, which was valued at $43,548. She also received $6,307 in “termination pay,” based on her length of employment at the Judicial Branch.
The justices did not respond to a series of questions from NHPR on Friday about why Martin was laid off for two days, instead of directly transitioning into the new position. The statement from the court Thursday said that the New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services, which oversees personnel policies for other branches of government, “reviewed” the transaction. A lawyer for that agency did not respond to a request for comment on when that review took place, or if it raised any concerns about the transactions involving Martin.
When Martin was rehired by the Judicial Branch on April 4 into a new role overseeing applications to practice law in the state, the job was already filled by a veteran in-house legal counsel, Sherry Hieber. Hieber had previously informed the court about her plans to retire that summer. Martin and Hieber would simultaneously hold the position for five months, with each earning a salary of more than $154,000.
The position is funded entirely through bar admission and application fees, and doesn’t come out of the courts’ general fund budget, the justices said.
In defending the overlap, the justices said they “determined that Ms. Martin should work alongside her predecessor for several months before taking over as General Counsel so that she could absorb the institutional knowledge necessary to the execution of her responsibilities.”
The five-month overlap appears to violate the Judicial Branch’s own personnel rules, however, which state that any dual appointments to the same position cannot last longer than two weeks. A court spokesperson declined to respond Friday as to why the justices appear to have sidestepped their own rules.
The justices’ statement also did not address claims made by a whistleblower who said that moving Martin into the new position was the “chief’s idea,” an apparent reference to MacDonald. Handwritten notes obtained by NHPR through a public records request show that the whistleblower told a state official that “Dianne won’t accept the transfer because she wants the layoff payout $.”
Martin remains employed with the Judicial Branch as a general counsel, and reports directly to MacDonald.
Two of the state’s current five Supreme Court justices were not sitting on the bench when Martin’s job moves took place earlier this year. Gould, who signed onto Thursday’s statement from the court, was only confirmed to his seat on the bench in September, months after Martin’s change in jobs. Hantz Marconi, who did not sign Thursday’s statement, was on administrative leave from the bench earlier this year, as she faced criminal charges related to attempting to meddle into an investigation involving her husband, the state’s port director.
Earlier this week, Gov. Kelly Ayotte declined to comment on if she would support an investigation into the payments to Martin, saying it involved a separate branch of government. She did tell reporters, though, “that everyone in government, every branch, has to follow the laws and the rules. And so I want to make sure that happens.”
On Thursday, top New Hampshire House Republicans said that they were preparing to take action when they return to Concord early next year on a range of issues involving the judiciary.
“I think we’re going to see a number of cases come up over the next few months where the legislature uses our authority to hold the justices, the judicial branch, accountable,” said Rep. Joe Sweeney, the House’s deputy majority leader.
Sweeney declined to say which judicial officials or what conduct he sought to review.
“I think as we continue to uncover certain things that are happening behind the scenes, we’ll then come out with different plans for different judges,” he said.
New Hampshire
N.H. Dems criticize Ayotte for not joining suit over SNAP benefits
 
														 
New Hampshire
Obituary for Lisa Dore at Rivet Funeral Home & Crematorium Inc.
 
														 
- 
																	   New York1 week ago New York1 week agoVideo: How Mamdani Has Evolved in the Mayoral Race 
- 
																	   News1 week ago News1 week agoVideo: Driver Crashes Car Into Security Gate Near White House 
- 
																	   News1 week ago News1 week agoVideo: Inside Our Reporter’s Collection of Guantánamo Portraits 
- 
																	   World1 week ago World1 week agoTrump to host NATO chief at White House as Putin meeting collapses 
- 
																	   Politics1 week ago Politics1 week agoJack Smith defends subpoenaing Republican senators’ phone records: ‘Entirely proper’ 
- 
																	   News1 week ago News1 week agoNew York City ICE raid nets 9 arrests of illegal aliens from West Africa, 4 protesters also arrested 
- 
																	   News4 days ago News4 days agoWith food stamps set to dry up Nov. 1, SNAP recipients say they fear what’s next 
- 
																	   Milwaukee, WI3 days ago Milwaukee, WI3 days agoLongtime anchor Shannon Sims is leaving Milwaukee’s WTMJ-TV (Channel 4) 
 
									 
									 
									 
									 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											 
											