Connect with us

New Hampshire

Parents sue N.H. school district following wristband protest against transgender girl at soccer game

Published

on

Parents sue N.H. school district following wristband protest against transgender girl at soccer game


Local News

A 15-year-old transgender girl is playing on the Plymouth team as she and another teen challenge a New Hampshire ban in court.

Parents wore pink “XX” wristbands at a soccer match in Bow, N.H., on Sept. 17, 2024, to protest the inclusion of transgender athletes in girls’ school sports. Image via federal court records

CONCORD, N.H. (AP) — Three parents and a grandparent have sued a New Hampshire school district, saying their rights were violated when they were barred from school grounds for wearing pink wristbands with “XX,” representing the female chromosome pair, in protest of a transgender girl playing in a girls soccer game.

The lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Concord followed a Sept. 17 match at Bow High School against Plymouth Regional High School. A 15-year-old transgender girl is playing on the Plymouth team as she and another teen challenge a New Hampshire ban in court.

Two of the parents whose daughters play for Bow wore the wristbands during the second half of the game to “silently express their opinion about the importance of reserving women’s sports for biological females,” according to their lawsuit filed by attorneys from the Institute for Free Speech.

The lawsuit said school officials and a local police officer confronted the parents during the game, telling them to remove the wristbands or leave. The plaintiffs refused, citing their First Amendment rights, then said they were threatened with arrest for trespassing.

Advertisement

At one point, the referee stopped the game and said that Bow High School would forfeit if the plaintiffs did not remove their wristbands, the lawsuit said. The wristbands were removed and the game resumed.

Following the game, the two parents received “No Trespass Orders” banning them from school grounds and events, the lawsuit said. One was banned for a week, the other for the fall term.

“Parents don’t shed their First Amendment rights at the entrance to a school’s soccer field. We wore pink wristbands to silently support our daughters and their right to fair competition,” Kyle Fellers, one of the plaintiffs who said he received a no-trespass order, said in a statement. “Instead of fostering open dialogue, school officials responded with threats and bans that have a direct impact on our lives and our children’s lives.”

The lawsuit says it seeks to prevent what it describes as the unconstitutional application of several school policies, including those requiring “mutual respect, civility, and orderly conduct” and prohibiting actions that “injure, threaten, harass, or intimidate” or “impede, delay, disrupt, or otherwise interfere with any school activity or function.”

In addition to the school district, the lawsuit names as defendants district Superintendent Marcy Kelley, Bow High School Principal Matt Fisk, school athletic director Michael Desilets, as well as the police officer and referee.

Advertisement

“At this time, we have no comment,” Kelley said in an email Tuesday when asked if she, other members of the school district, or an attorney representing them, wanted to respond to the lawsuit. Emails sent to the police officer and to the organization representing the referee were not immediately answered.

An email seeking comment from the attorney representing the transgender athlete also was not immediately returned.

Bow School Board chairperson Bryce Larrabee mentioned the lawsuit at a meeting Monday night and said the board would not be commenting on it. Kelley, who attended the meeting, also did not comment on the lawsuit.

Audience members spoke in favor and against the protesters during the public comment period.

“You just silenced someone who had a different opinion,” one man said.

Advertisement

Criticizing those who wore the pink wristbands during the game, the parent of a player on the Bow team said, “This is not the right way to go about doing things.”





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Hampshire

City Of Concord: New Transfer Station Route And Entrance On Saturdays

Published

on

City Of Concord: New Transfer Station Route And Entrance On Saturdays


Starting Saturday, Oct. 5, the Concord Transfer Station will open access gates for a new entrance to be used on Saturdays only.

The new entrance is located south of the current entrance and will be marked with signage. Using a different entrance on Saturdays will ease traffic congestion on Old Turnpike Road. The current entrance will remain active Monday through Friday.



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Another Section Of The Merrimack River Greenway Trail Is Now Open In Concord

Published

on

Another Section Of The Merrimack River Greenway Trail Is Now Open In Concord


CONCORD, NH — Phase 2 of the Merrimack River Greenway Trail on Loudon Road is now open.

Dozens of residents, including city, county, and state officials, bicyclists, walkers, and others, took to the “sunflower section” of the trial after an official ribbing cutting on Friday.

The path runs from 4 Loudon Road to the end of the field. A future boardwalk is planned to connect the trail to Terrill Park.

Here is a video posted when the kiosk was installed at Terrill Park in Concord.

Advertisement

As part of the redesign of Interstate 93, an extension will connect Downtown Concord and parts north, eventually connecting to the Concord-Lake Sunapee Rail Trail and the Northern Rail Trail to Lebanon.

Organizers have been active on the trail for more than 12 years, raising hundreds of thousands of dollars through donations and grants from public and private sources.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

ACLU seeks to block New Hampshire voter identification law

Published

on

ACLU seeks to block New Hampshire voter identification law


The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Hampshire filed a complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief in the US District Court for the District of New Hampshire on Monday challenging the state’s new voter identification law.

The legal action targets legislation requiring proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration and photo identification for casting ballots. The ACLU contends that the law’s strict requirements could disenfranchise numerous eligible voters, particularly those from marginalized communities who may face difficulties obtaining the necessary documentation. Additionally, the plaintiffs cite a 2018 federal court ruling that invalidated a similar law in Kansas, which required proof of citizenship for state and federal elections. That law was found to violate both the US Constitution and the National Voter Registration Act of 1993.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of several organizations including the Coalition for Democracy, League of Voters for New Hampshire, and the Forward Foundation, as well as five individual voters. New Hampshire Attorney General John Formella and Secretary of State David Scanlan are named as defendants, reflecting ongoing debates about the balance between election security measures and ensuring broad access to voting rights.

Henry Klementowicz, deputy legal director for the ACLU of New Hampshire, stated that laws creating “unconstitutional roadblocks to voting” should not be permitted, as they may prevent thousands of eligible individuals from casting their ballots. Meanwhile, the New Hampshire Attorney General’s office has acknowledged receipt of the ACLU’s lawsuit in a statement made to local news but has refrained from further comment.

Advertisement

The lawsuit reflects a larger national trend toward legal challenges to voter ID laws in the US. In March, a federal judge in Arizona upheld two state laws that require voters to provide documentation to prove their citizenship before registering to vote. A conflicting precedent struck down the laws, with the Supreme Court refusing to listen to an appeal in December 2020. At the federal level, Republican lawmakers are pushing for similar legislation, including the proposed SAVE Act, which aims to implement a nationwide proof-of-citizenship requirement for voting. The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for voter identification laws, potentially shaping the landscape of voting rights and electoral participation in future elections.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending