Connect with us

New Hampshire

Mass. tenants of Brady Sullivan and NH tenant advocates protest outside developer's Manchester HQ | Manchester Ink Link

Published

on

Mass. tenants of Brady Sullivan and NH tenant advocates protest outside developer's Manchester HQ | Manchester Ink Link


A group of protestors led by Granite State Organizing Project rallied outside Brady Sullivan HQ over housing. Photo/Pat Grossmith

MANCHESTER, NH – About three dozen people gathered outside Brady Sullivan Tower Friday afternoon to call attention to tenants of an Ayer, Mass., complex, owned by Brady Sullivan Properties, who are facing the prospect of eviction from what are presently low-priced, affordable apartments.

The protesters held signs calling for an eviction freeze and rent control.  Other signs declared, “Housing is a human right,” and “Don’t Evict Negotiate!” One protester held a silver shield, with a house at its center, with the words, “No one leaves.”

Members of the Granite State Organizing Project, which advocates for tenants and has helped those in New Hampshire being ousted from their apartments through “renovation evictions,” joined the Massachusetts tenants in the protest.

Jessica Margeson noted that Brady Sullivan had done the same thing to tenants of a housing complex on Kennard Road in the city.  In 2020, Brady Sullivan Properties bought the rundown complex, consisting of 23 buildings that included duplexes and garden-style apartment buildings, among others.  The complex was owned by John Vratsenes, who managed it for 50 years.  He died in 2017.

Advertisement

Immediately rents – that were as low as $750 – were increased by a couple of hundred dollars a month.  As tenants moved, apartments were renovated.  Four years later, the apartments rent for $1,700 for a one-bedroom and $3,100 for a three-bedroom.

Brady Sullivan generally followed the same playbook in Ayer, Mass.  The company bought the rundown apartment complex housing 110 families consisting of low-income residents that included bus drivers, child care and retail wokrers, retirees and the disabled.  Like Kennard Road, the complex had been family-owned and operated for 50 years.  Brady Sullivan, however, didn’t increase the rents, which were about $900 a month.  Instead, as tenants left, they renovated the apartments and then hiked up the rents.

IMG 7141 scaled
Attorney Ann Jochnick at a protest outside Brady Sullivan headquarters on Elm Street in Manchester. Photo/Pat Grossmith

The renovated apartments start at $2,200 a month for a one-bedroom.

Attorney Ann Jochnick, who represents the tenant association, said some tenants moved out after Brady Sullivan bought the complex because they knew they would be unable to pay the anticipated higher rents.

Devenscrest Management LLC,  Brady Sullivan’s company which bought the complex, issued a statement on Thursday saying no tenant is being evicted unless they haven’t paid their rent or they committed a serious violation of their lease.

Advertisement

They said the Devenscrest Tenant Association owes more than $30,000 in unpaid rents, but Jochnick said the association doesn’t owe any money at all.  (The organization isn’t a tenant.) Management also said some members have not paid rent for years.

The company said they’ve repeatedly asked residents to meet with them in various forums but they have refused.

“Over the years, we have made multiple proposals to these residents to address their concerns and ensure they could continue to be long-term residents of Devenscrest Village by paying substantially reduced rental rates. They have not responded at all,” management said in a statement.We have also asked the Tenant Association’s representatives to work together with us to connect residents with available resources and services. They have not done so in any way.”

Jochnick said she would love for management to inform them of these available resources and services.  She said what previously was available has dried up and other programs are no longer accepting applications.

Brady Sullivan also said they invested millions of dollars in Devenscrest Village, with renovated apartments having new upgraded electrical systems, all new kitchens and bathrooms, new appliances, new heat and added central air conditional and other major upgrades.

Advertisement

The company maintains the tenant association’s view represents a small minority and that nearly 75% of the original residents of Devenscrest Village “chose to renew their leases at substantially below fair market rates, upgrade to a renovated apartment at a discounted rate or successfully relocate with our financial assistance. It is incredibly unfortunate that the Tenant Association, which does not speak for the majority of residents at Devenscrest Village, seeks to tarnish such a vibrant community of hard-working individuals and families.”

The company said, “Rather than trying to bully us into selling Devenscrest Village, it would be far more productive for the Tenant Association and their representatives to help residents secure financial assistance to remain long-term residents of Devenscrest Village at the reduced rental rates that are still being offered to them.”

“That’s kind of ironic,” said Jochnick of Brady Sullivan’s comment that the tenants were trying to bully it into selling the apartment complex to them.

Jochnick said tenants found a developer who was willing to pay Brady Sullivan $4 million more than it paid for the apartment complex in 2021.

IMG 7136 scaled
Jessica Margeson, tenants’ advocate with the Granite State Organizing Project, uses a bullhorn in addressing the protesters. Ann Jochnick, in the white blouse, is an attorney representing an Ayers, Mass. Tenants association that wants Brady Sullivan to sell its complex to another developer. Photo/Pat Grossmith

“We view this as a win-win situation,” she said.  “Brady Sullivan makes a big profit and the tenants will save their homes.  We think we can make the rents affordable.  Brady Sullivan can walk off with a really good profit and be a good guy.”

Advertisement

She also said the only person from Brady Sullivan who reached out to tenants  was the attorney  hired for the eviction process. The tenant association, in issuing a statement, said half of the 110 residents have left the complex after Brady Sullivan’s purchase because they worried about the threat of eviction or were driven off by the doubling of rents in renovated apartments.  The vast majority of those remaining are up to date on their rents.

What Brady Sullivan means when talking about tenants not reaching out to them, the tenant group said, is that “individual tenants have not been willing to talk about quietly leaving their homes, so that Devenscrest can be turned into a high income community at rents that few existing residents can afford – in order to make enormous profits.”

Tenants formed the Devenscrest Tenant Association because they have nowhere to go because they can’t afford the high rents.“The Devenscrest tenants want what we all want and what we all deserve to have – safe and truly affordable housing,” Maddy August, using a bullhorn, told those gathered on the corner of Elm Street.

August, a GSOP member, said the issue of renovation evictions is not just a Massachusetts issue and, like Margeson, pointed out that Brady Sullivan has done the same thing in Manchester.

What the Devenscrest residents did, however, was organize, she said.

Advertisement

“And organizing is powerful and yes maybe even frightening to some,” she said, pointing at Brady Sullivan Tower.  “Do you wonder why (pointing again at the tower) Brady Sullivan won’t even talk to the Devenscrest tenants?  Could it be fear?  Do you think that Brady Sullivan knows that if people realized the power they have through organization, the world that Brady Sullivan knows could change?  Because change is possible when we work together.  Let’s change the world so that everybody can have safe and truly affordable housing.”

 




Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Hampshire

Disputed verdict draws both sides back to court in New Hampshire youth detention center abuse case – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Disputed verdict draws both sides back to court in New Hampshire youth detention center abuse case – The Boston Globe


Brentwood, N.H. — Both sides in a landmark trial over abuse at New Hampshire’s youth detention center returned to the courtroom Monday, seven weeks after jurors delivered what remains an unsettled verdict.

A jury awarded $38 million to David Meehan in May but found the state liable for only one “incident” of abuse at the Youth Development Center in Manchester. Jurors weren’t told that state law caps claims against the state at $475,000 per “incident,” and some later said they wrote “one” on the verdict form to reflect a single case of post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from more than 100 episodes of physical, sexual and emotional abuse.

Meehan’s lawyers have asked Judge Andrew Schulman to set aside just the portion of the verdict where jurors wrote one incident, allowing the $38 million to stand, or to order a new trial focused only on determining the number of incidents. The state, meanwhile, has asked him to impose the cap. Schulman has yet to rule on those motions, and at a hearing Monday, attorneys said more paperwork is coming.

Advertisement

In a May 24 order, Schulman said imposing the cap would be an “unconscionable miscarriage of justice.” He didn’t go that far Monday, but said there was a disconnect between the award and the finding of one incident.

“We don’t know exactly what the jury was thinking,” he said. “But $38 million doesn’t square with a single incident.”

Although they didn’t argue as such at trial, lawyers for the state said jurors appeared to have defined incident as “a single harmful condition” to which the plaintiff was exposed, and as such, the verdict should stand. David Vicinanzo, one of Meehan’s attorneys, characterized that position as “The state is essentially saying, yeah, 100 rapes, 200 rapes, it all equals one rape.”

“What reasonable person thinks that?” he said.

Meehan, 42, went to police in 2017 to report the abuse and sued the state three years later. Since then, 11 former state workers have been arrested although charges against one of them were dropped after the man, now in his early 80s, was found incompetent to stand trial.

Advertisement

Over the four-week trial, Meehan’s attorneys argued that the state encouraged a culture of abuse marked by pervasive brutality, corruption and a code of silence. The state, which portrayed Meehan as a violent child, troublemaking teenager and delusional adult, argued that he waited too long to sue and that it shouldn’t be held liable for the actions of “rogue” employees.

Schulman already rejected what he called the two worst options: reconvening the jury or questioning them about their decision. Other options would be ordering a new trial or adjusting the number of incidents on the verdict form. That latter would be something akin to a process by which a judge can add damages to an original amount awarded by the jury if a defendant waives a new trial. While Monday’s discussion included possible outcomes such as appeals to the state Supreme Court, Schulman said he was trying not to focus on such speculation.

“My job is to rule on the motions in front of me and not necessarily to figure out everybody’s subsequent moves on the chess board,” he said.





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Elton Sawyer says NASCAR would have called race at New Hampshire early without wet weather tires

Published

on

Elton Sawyer says NASCAR would have called race at New Hampshire early without wet weather tires


It seems like the NASCAR Cup Series was saved by their use of wet weather tires at New Hampshire Motor Speedway on Sunday afternoon.

Mother Nature didn’t want to see NASCAR finish the USA Today 301 in Loudon, but Goodyear allowed the best racers in America to get the job done. That led to a lot of praise for the sport’s decision-makers in general, and NASCAR SVP of Competition Elton Sawyer faced the media afterwards.

Speaking with FOX’s Bob Pockrass following a successful event, Sawyer explained that without the wet weather tires making it possible to get back on the track, the race would’ve been called with 82 laps to go, when the red flag came out for rain.

Advertisement

“Oh, we would’ve,” Sawyer responded, revealing NASCAR would’ve called the race if not for the wet weather tires. “We would’ve been done with 82 laps to go. Again, it gave us an opportunity to get back green. We knew we were up against it, with daylight as well. But kudos to our teams, our drivers, our owners and especially Mr. [Jim] France, for his vision.”

That really puts it all into perspective, as the action we saw following the rain delay was certainly worth it. Continuing, Sawyer explained how the process went down with wet weather tires, and what NASCAR learned following the USA Today 301 in Loudon.

“Well, I think the way we started this whole wet weather tire process was basically, we wanted to get our races started on time, and it really played into our hand (Saturday), to get the Xfinity Series race started on time, and to get our races back to green as quick as possible if we’ve had a delay, which we had (Sunday),” Sawyer elaborated. “So kudos to Goodyear. Again, this was Jim France’s vision, of what wet weather tires could do. We ran 301-plus laps today, because it went into overtime. Our fans that bought a ticket, they got to see some great, exciting racing.

“There’s still some things that we’re learning throughout this process, and in all honesty, we’d like to be out of the tire business. We’d like to just turn that over to the teams. But as we continue to take small steps and we learn, eventually we’ll get there. We just want to do this in the safest way possible.”

Advertisement

Moreover, the race began around 2 p.m. ET on Sunday, and lasted six hours due to the two-hour weather delay. Once the rain cleared, the drivers completed on a damp track with rain tires, the second time in NASCAR history a points-paying race used the newly-developed tires. When the race was all said and done, Christopher Bell came away with the victory. 

“You never know how this thing is going to shake out whenever you change so many things like that and have adverse conditions,” Bell said after the race. “I personally love adverse conditions because you’re always trying to think outside the box.

“When we went back out [on wet weather tires after the red flag delay] I was feeling around and it felt like the normal Loudon groove was really, really slippery so I tried to just run down or up, but [crew chief] Adam [Lambert] really put the tune on this thing and it was running good.”

Christopher Bell might’ve been the most joyous about the experience, but drivers, fans and media members alike have given Elton Sawyer and NASCAR rave reviews for what they pulled off on Sunday. Hopefully it allows the sport to push the envelope some more into the future, as well.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

NASCAR New Hampshire race winners and losers: Josh Berry’s big finish, Kyle Busch’s struggles

Published

on

NASCAR New Hampshire race winners and losers: Josh Berry’s big finish, Kyle Busch’s struggles


play

It was an eventful and very long Sunday in NASCAR’s New Hampshire race’s USA TODAY 301.

Christopher Bell won for the third time this season, and joked that it wasn’t rain-shortened like his win in the Coca-Cola 600 was in May.

Advertisement

NASCAR also broke out the rain tires for the second time this season and finished on them for the first time since they were approved in 2023. The drivers ran the final 82 laps of the race on rain tires.

Here are the winners and losers from the USA TODAY 301 NASCAR Cup Series race at New Hampshire.

USA TODAY 301 RESULTS: Who won NASCAR Cup race in New Hampshire? Norman native Christopher Bell is winner

Winners from NASCAR’S USA TODAY 301

Christopher Bell

Bell is the easy choice here with his race win. But the way he did it by leading 149 total laps and dominating the final laps of the race was just the way he needed to get the job done and earn the win, his second of the season and second in five starts at New Hampshire.

Josh Berry

The Hendersonville native was strong in Sunday’s race and finished third. Berry was running toward the front all day and utilized the hectic nature of the wet-weather tires to push his way up the leaderboard. Berry’s finish on Sunday was tied for his best finish this season at Darlington. Berry now has four top-10s and two top-5s in the last six races.

Advertisement

Chase Briscoe

Briscoe battled hard throughout Sunday’s race to finish second. He fought off Bell at the end of stage one to stay on the lead lap, which helped with pit strategy and track position. Briscoe utilized the rain-soaked restart with 73 laps remaining and moved through the field in a hurry. He had a couple of chances to win the race with the late restarts inside of the final 10 laps, but couldn’t get the jump he needed to pass Bell.

Losers from NASCAR’S USA TODAY 301

Alex Bowman

Bowman suffered an engine failure on lap 142 after the first incident-related caution of Sunday’s race. Bowman was running 17th at the time and was credited with a 36th-place finish in the 36-car field. Bowman entered the day just outside of the playoff cutline, and that is sure to take a big hit after his last-place finish.

Kyle Busch

Busch had all kinds of struggles in Sunday’s race – much like he has all season. Busch overdrove a corner, spun and collected Noah Gragson. Busch had a spin in the backstretch just before the race went into the red flag and spun under caution after the red flag, slapping the wall and ending his day in 35th place.

LOGANO, ELLIOTT CRASH: Joey Logano, Chase Elliott crash in NASCAR Cup race at New Hampshire in USA TODAY 301

Advertisement

HOW IT HAPPENED: NASCAR Cup Series race at New Hampshire: Live updates, highlights, live leaderboard of USA TODAY 301

NASCAR race management

There are a couple of levels to this one. First, NASCAR red-flagged the race too early with the rain coming in. But bringing the wet-weather tires to New Hampshire was a great call to get the race done to even more than its scheduled distance. On top of that, the racing was fantastic with drivers fanning out to find a different line around the racetrack.

However, NASCAR really struggled in its enforcement of the rules after the drivers went back racing with the rain tires. The officials were strict on the non-competitive pit stops and not allowing race teams dictate the strategy was a big miss. This was the second time the wet-weather tires were used in a points race on an oval and the first at the end of a race, so it’ll just take some time and practice to get it right.

If and when the rain tires are needed again, NASCAR should let the teams decide their strategy and how they want to run the race.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending