Connect with us

New Hampshire

Breaking with Sununu, Legislature overrides veto on administrative rules process • New Hampshire Bulletin

Published

on

Breaking with Sununu, Legislature overrides veto on administrative rules process • New Hampshire Bulletin


When New Hampshire state agencies seek to pass new administrative rules, they must hold public hearings and hear suggestions. But they aren’t required to follow those suggestions, and if they choose not to, they do not need to give a reason why.

That will soon change when a new law takes effect to require state departments to give a detailed explanation for why they chose to ignore public comments. On Thursday, lawmakers overturned Gov. Chris Sununu’s veto of the legislation, House Bill 1622, ensuring that it will take effect in December. 

It was a rare action, one of only a handful of vetoed bills that lawmakers have overturned in Sununu’s eight years in office.

And it represented a clash between the legislative and executive branch over day-to-day duties, in which both Republican and Democratic lawmakers came together.

Advertisement

Sununu argued in August that House Bill 1622 would create too many burdens on state employees and require increased staff time to meet the new demands. Lawmakers countered that the bill was important to increase accountability by state agencies. 

One expert hailed the decision. Adam Finkel, who spent years as the chief rule writer at the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, said the bill makes long overdue changes. And he rejected Sununu’s argument that it would substantially increase the burden on agencies. 

“On the federal level, we’ve been writing reasoned response documents for decades, and it might be slightly more expensive, but it’s money well spent, because the people deserve to have their bureaucrats explain themselves,” Finkel said in an interview with the Bulletin Thursday. 

The vote was part of “Veto Day,” the day each fall when the Legislature reconvenes to take up any bills vetoed by the governor. This year, Sununu vetoed 15, but HB 1622 was one of only two that garnered the two-thirds support in the House and Senate necessary to overturn it. 

Legislature overrides Sununu’s veto on bill aimed at cyanobacteria blooms

Advertisement

The second bill, House Bill 1293, imposes new restrictions on fertilizers in an effort to curb cyanobacteria in the state. Sununu vetoed it after saying it would be an unfair burden on private property owners who are unwittingly using fertilizers containing phosphorus near storm drains. But House and Senate lawmakers overturned the veto, and the bill will take effect Jan. 1. 

Several other bills came close, clearing the 66 percent threshold in the House for an override but falling short in the Senate. Here’s a breakdown of what happened Thursday. 

A push for transparency

HB 1622 makes a number of changes to a consequential – and often overlooked – component of state government. 

When the Legislature passes laws that establish new programs for executive branch agencies, those agencies must often fill in gaps in the law with rules that cover the minutiae of how to carry out the new directives. Those rules are open to a public comment period and must also be approved by the Joint Legislative Committee on Administrative Rules, or JLCAR, a bipartisan panel of House and Senate lawmakers. 

Already, state agencies must release a report explaining what, if any, changes they make to their proposed rules after the public comment. But HB 1622 requires them to also address the public comments they received in that report.

Advertisement

If the agency incorporates public feedback into their final decision, they must now note that. If it ignores any feedback, it must indicate that it did so, and “provide a detailed explanation that includes the facts, data, interpretations, and policy choices that justify why the adopting agency did not amend the rules.”

The bill also requires each agency’s director of legislative services to publish all of the agency’s final rules on its website, and it establishes new deadlines for agencies to turn around the publishing of the rules.

It will take effect sometime in December, or 60 days after it is formally enrolled this month, according to House Clerk Paul Smith. 

In his veto message, Sununu said the bill “would substantially increase the burden on executive agencies when promulgating rules without providing financial support to do so.”

“Public input is essential to good public policy, however the burdens created by this legislation are overly taxing for a minimal amount of public benefit,” Sununu said.

Advertisement

Neither the House nor Senate lawmakers commented on the bill before voting to override the veto Thursday. But in previous comments in May, Sen. Howard Pearl said the bill “will enable greater transparency in the rulemaking process. It will also enable an easier process for the public to weigh in on pending rules.”

House attempts to save bills

In a few cases, the near-evenly divided House voted to override Sununu’s vetoes, only for the vetoes to be sustained in the Senate. 

In one example, the House overturned Sununu’s veto of House Bill 1415, which would have created liability for PFAS-contaminating facilities. Sununu vetoed that bill because he said it clashed with a different bill that he did sign that creates “strict liability” for PFAS polluters, but that critics said provides fewer protections

“HB 1415 addresses the need to hold PFAS polluters accountable for the immense cost they create,” said Nancy Murphy, a Merrimack Democrat. “In Merrimack alone, we have spent millions of dollars to remove a company’s PFAS from our drinking water. That this financial burden has been placed upon taxpayers who are already bearing the health costs is absolutely unjust, and it should be illegal.” 

Despite the House overriding the veto, the Senate voted to uphold it. 

Advertisement

In another case, the House overrode Sununu’s veto of House Bill 274, which would have required state agencies to pay for attorney’s fees if it enacted a rule illegally, without legislative approval, in the case of any legal action. 

But the Senate quashed the override in an 11-12 vote.

The House flipped Sununu’s veto of House Bill 1581, which would allow alternative treatment centers – therapeutic cannabis dispensaries – to operate additional cultivation locations, including greenhouses, with approval from the Department of Health and Human Services. 

The Senate later upheld that veto, killing the bill.

Advertisement

Many bills fall

It was much more common Thursday for the Legislature to fail to secure enough votes for even a partial override. In some cases, the Senate voted unanimously to pass a bill last spring, only to vote along party lines to sustain Sununu’s veto of that bill on Thursday.

Here are the bills that fell on the first vote. 

  • The House failed to overturn Sununu’s veto of House Bill 194, which would have required the state Division of Historical Resources to publish a list of New Hampshire’s historical markers online, and would have required legislative approval of new historical markers. 
  • The House fell short of overriding the governor’s veto of House Bill 396, which would have rolled back some gender identity anti-discrimination protections established in 2019 and allowed government entities and private businesses to enforce gender separations in bathrooms, locker rooms, prisons, sports teams, and other venues. 
  • The House did not override Sununu’s veto of House Bill 1093, which would have barred school districts from imposing mask mandates. In his veto message, the governor said the legislation infringed on local control. “Big government is never the solution, and neither is a one-size-fits-all approach,” he said.
  • The House voted to sustain Sununu’s veto of House Bill 1187, which would have prohibited municipalities from using lease agreements to fund any building or facility improvements that become permanent fixtures of that building. 
  • The House did not overturn Sununu’s veto of House Bill 1233, which would have allowed animal chiropractors to practice without getting a veterinary license, as long as they obtained a certification from a recognized national animal chiropractic program. 
  • The Senate voted to uphold Sununu’s veto of Senate Bill 63, which would have tweaked the eligible scenarios for towns to make regulations for the protection of public health. Sununu had vetoed it because he said the wording of the bill was confusing and that the bill would inject uncertainty during times of emergency, such as a pandemic. 
  • The Senate voted 23-0 to sustain Sununu’s veto of Senate Bill 318, which sought to make the manufactured housing installations standards board and the board of examiners of nursing home administrators into advisory boards.
  • The Senate failed to override Sununu’s veto of Senate Bill 501, which would have allowed noncitizens who are lawfully present in the U.S. to get New Hampshire driver’s licenses, in a party-line, 10-13 vote.
  • The Senate fell short of overturning the veto of Senate Bill 507, which would have extended the three-year time limit for a convicted person to request a new trial in the case of newly discovered evidence, new or additional forensic testing, or “new scientific understanding that would have been material for the fact finder.” The vote to overturn was 10-13.
  • The Senate also voted against overturning Sununu’s veto of Senate Bill 543, which established a state “environmental adaptation, resilience, and innovation council.” 

Annmarie Timmins contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

Bedford man barred from conducting any securities business in New Hampshire

Published

on

Bedford man barred from conducting any securities business in New Hampshire





Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

New Hampshire employment law in 2026 – NH Business Review

Published

on

New Hampshire employment law in 2026 – NH Business Review


What employers are getting wrong, and how to fix it before it becomes a claim

New Hampshire’s employment law landscape heading into 2026 may not be dramatically different from last year, but the real risks lie in implementation missteps. From the initial setting of wages, to calculating and distributing wages, employers will likely find a specific statute and/or labor regulation governing the transaction. Failure to follow these detailed wage and hour laws can result in significant back wages and other penalties being imposed by the state or federal Department of Labor following an audit. Fortunately, however, this area of employment law is relatively easy to master, once you are familiar with the basics.

Notice compliance

One of the most common pitfalls for employers in New Hampshire is misunderstanding the wage and hour notice requirements under RSA 275 and the related New Hampshire Department of Labor Administrative Rules.

Advertisement

At the time of hire, employers must notify employees in writing of their rate of pay and the day and place of payment. This notice is traditionally delivered to employees by way of an offer letter or some sort of “New Hire Rate of Pay” form. (A sample form is available from the New Hampshire Department of Labor website.) What surprises most employers, however, is that Lab. 803.03(f)(6) also requires employers to request and obtain their employees’ signatures on this written notification of wages, and employers must keep a copy of the signed written notification of wages on file. Further, employers must notify employees in writing during the course of employment of any changes to wages or day of pay prior to such changes taking effect, and the employer must obtain the employee’s signature on this subsequent notification as well. (See RSA 275:49; Lab. 803.03.)

Employers are further required to notify employees in writing, or through a posted notice maintained in a place accessible to employees, of:

• employment practices and policies with regard to vacation pay, sick leave and other fringe benefits.

• deductions made from the employee’s payroll check, for each period such deductions are made.

• information regarding the deductions allowed from wage payments under state law. (RSA 275:49; Lab. 803.03.)

Advertisement

Policies regarding vacation and sick leave should inform employees whether or not the employer will “cash out” unused time at year end or at the end of employment, and if so, under what terms. Again, if any changes are made to vacation pay, sick leave and other fringe benefits during the course of employment (all of which are considered “wages” under New Hampshire law), employers must request and obtain their employees’ signatures on the written notification of the change, and must keep a copy of the signed form on file. (Lab. 803.03.) Importantly, notification by way of pay stub alone is not sufficient, and, these requirements apply to both increases and decreases in pay.

Two-hour minimum (reporting pay)

Another frequently overlooked obligation is New Hampshire’s two-hour minimum reporting pay requirement. Under RSA 275:43-a, non-exempt employees who report to work but are sent home early must generally be paid for at least two hours. Weather-related closures, client cancellations or operational slowdown days can trigger this rule. Employers should also note that the New Hampshire Department of Labor currently applies this law to remote-based employees. Consequently, employees who “report to work” at an employer’s request from a home office may likewise have a right to two hours of pay, depending on the circumstances.

Salaried vs. hourly employees

Misclassification of employees as exempt from overtime remains a significant source of compliance exposure. The position’s job duties — not the titles or label such as “salaried” — determine whether an employee qualifies for an overtime exemption.

Advertisement

Employers, particularly in nonprofits, health care and small businesses, unintentionally misapply exempt classifications to roles such as administrative staff, office managers, executive assistants, program coordinators or hybrid jobs that involve significant non-exempt tasks. Over time, as organizational needs evolve and employees take on broader responsibilities, job duties can drift outside of an exemption’s scope.

Best practice is to periodically review job descriptions and actual job duties to ensure continued compliance with exemption criteria, particularly following any significant restructuring or job redesigns.


Peg O’Brien is chair of McLane Middleton’s Employment Law Practice Group. She can be reached at margaret.o’brien@mclane.com.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

New photo released in unsolved 1997 homicide of a N.H. woman

Published

on

New photo released in unsolved 1997 homicide of a N.H. woman


Local News

“Our family wants to know what happened, who did this and why,” said the family of the victim.

A new photo has been released of the victim in a nearly 30-year-long unsolved murder case, in the hope of finding any new potential witnesses in the cold case, New Hampshire officials said. 

“Our family wants to know what happened, who did this and why,” the family of Rosalie Miller said in a press release. “We miss her and want to give her peace.”

Advertisement

Miller was last seen on December 8, 1996 at her apartment in Manchester. At the time of her disappearance, Miller had plans on meeting friends in the Auburn, New Hampshire area, officials said.

Her body was found on January 20, 1997 in a partially wooded spot on a residential lot along the Londonderry Turnpike in Auburn, officials said in the release.

The autopsy report declared Miller’s death a homicide by asphyxiation due to ligature strangulation, N.H. officials wrote. 

As part of a new effort to garner public help with the case, an “uncirculated” photo of Miller, 36, is being distributed “in hopes it may jog the memory of someone who saw or spoke with her in the winter of 1996,” Attorney General John M. Formella and New Hampshire State Police Colonel Mark B. Hall announced on behalf of the New Hampshire Cold Case Unit in a joint press release.

Investigators are especially hoping to talk to anyone who was in contact with Miller in December of 1996 or anyone “who may have seen her in the vicinity of the Londonderry Turnpike in Auburn during that time,” officials said in the release.

Advertisement
The newly released photo of Rosalie Miller, 36, who was strangled to death nearly 30 years ago. – Attorney General John M. Formella and New Hampshire State Police Colonel Mark B. Hall

“We are releasing this new photograph today because we believe someone out there has information, perhaps a detail they thought was insignificant at the time, that could be the key to solving this case and bringing justice for Rosalie and those who loved her,” Senior Assistant Attorney General R. Christopher Knowles, New Hampshire Cold Case Unit Chief said in the release.

The New Hampshire Cold Case Unit encourages anyone with any amount of information to contact the group at [email protected] or (603) 271-2663.

Sign up for the Today newsletter

Get everything you need to know to start your day, delivered right to your inbox every morning.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending