Yet, the full 10-person panel has not gathered in a meeting since, nor has the commission held a series of legally mandated hearings to gather public input ahead of a Dec. 15 deadline to produce its recommendations.
It appears unlikely the panel actually will do so. A commission spokesperson told the Globe that the panel intends to seek a second extension, and is “aiming” to have its next full commission meeting at some point in December.
“The Seal, Flag and Motto Advisory Commission has been hard at work engaging experts and the public about what they want to see in our state’s symbols,” Alana Davidson, the commission spokesperson, said in a statement. “We believe that more time is needed to ensure robust community engagement.”
Davidson did not respond to a question about how much more time the commission would seek from the Legislature, which wrapped up formal sessions for the year earlier this month.
Advertisement
The panel, similar to the one before it, has been trying to navigate a fraught debate about representation and potential erasure in the iconography the state assigns itself.
The effort to replace the flag dates back decades, but it gained traction in 2020, when the murder of George Floyd sparked a nationwide reexamination of race and historical emblems, including the Massachusetts seal.
Members of the state’s Indigenous community are themselves split on how to replace the state’s current 19th-century emblem, which sits on the state flag and depicts a colonist’s arm holding a sword above the image of a Native American. The image is draped by a Latin motto that roughly translates to: “By the sword we seek peace, but peace only under liberty.”
The design draws on the original seal of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, which featured a Native American man, naked but for some shrubbery around his groin, saying, “Come over and help us.” And the sword depicted once belonged to Myles Standish, a 17th-century military commander for the Plymouth Colony known for his brutality toward the Indigenous population.
The three highest-scoring options for the new Massachusetts state seal released in August by the state Seal, Flag, and Motto Advisory Commission.
When the panel released a set of new designs in August it had culled from public submissions, commission members cautioned that the proposals — which rated the highest during a round of internal scoring — were not the finalists from which a final recommendation would emerge.
Advertisement
In the months since, a group of commissioners have met in subcommittee meetings, during which members lamented moving too quickly to ask for ideas without better educating the public — and commission appointees themselves — about the problematic history of the state’s official emblem.
The commission’s work is also unfolding during a different time than in 2020. Over the last five years, the racial reckoning that helped spur the first commission has largely receded from the public view.
The debate over changing the flag has also since migrated onto the campaign trail, where some of Governor Maura Healey’s Republican opponents — both past appointees of former governor Charlie Baker, who signed the initial measure in January 2021— have cast the state’s effort as an attempt to erase the state’s own history.
“There’s a public misunderstanding about why the current flag is not appropriate,” Kate Fox, the executive director of the state’s Office of Travel and Tourism and the commission’s co-chair, said during a Sept. 9 meeting.
Critics have long said that the placement of a broadsword above the Native American figure is racist imagery and symbolizes the violence inflicted on Native American populations. Still others, both on and off the commission, have warned against eliminating Massachusetts’ Indigenous communities from the seal entirely.
Advertisement
The first iteration of the commission voted unanimously in 2022 for replacing the state’s motto and seal, but it disbanded the next year without offering specific substitutes for either.
Summer Confuorto, a current commission member, said in a late September subcommittee meeting that she’s heard pushback casting the panel’s effort to rethink the flag as a “liberal state that wants to make this change” and that Native Americans themselves aren’t driving it. In fact, she said, Indigenous leaders have been talking for decades about why the imagery needs to change.
“It’s not to waste people’s time and . . . there’s a purpose and intent” behind the commission’s work, said Confuorto, who has Gros Ventre, Cree, Mi’kmaq heritage, according to her employer, the Mass Cultural Council.
In a late October meeting, Rhonda Anderson, an Iñupiaq – Athabascan commission member who also is the Western Massachusetts Commissioner on Indian Affairs, said the advisory panel needs to both educate and reframe its work, including to other Native Americans, that “we’re actually providing something better” with a new emblem.
“When people believe that we’re taking something away, they just really clutch tighter,” Anderson said. “I don’t want to take anything away from anyone, but I do want to do better.”
Advertisement
Efforts to reach Confuorto, Anderson, and other members of the advisory commission for this story were not successful.
John “Jim” Peters, the executive director of the Commission on Indian Affairs and a state seal advisory commission member, said in a phone interview that the panel is tackling a “difficult question” and he himself is at odds with others on a path forward.
He said he’s made his preference clear: The “most effective” option, he said, is to simply remove the disembodied arm and sword from the state, and change the state motto.
Actually changing the seal and flag, however, is “something that the citizens of the state need to be on the same page [for],” he said.
Whenever the panel does submit its recommendations, the governor is required to submit legislation “to codify the new state motto and designs for the seal and flag,” though the law does not dictate when it must be submitted. The Legislature ultimately would then have to approve any changes.
Advertisement
Peters is not among the commission members who’ve sat in on subcommittee meetings in recent months, the last of which fell shortly before Halloween. But told the Globe he was aware that the advisory panel planned to seek an extension.
“Another holdup,” he said.
Matt Stout can be reached at matt.stout@globe.com. Follow him @mattpstout.
“Biotech is way off from a few years ago,” he noted, along with the fact that just one of Forbes’ AI 50 — a list of the hottest, privately held artificial intelligence companies — is based in Massachusetts. More than 30 are in California, such as OpenAI and Anthropic, and a second Boston-area company, OpenEvidence, recently decamped to Miami, leaving only one locally: AI music firm Suno.
Halligan continued: Federal funding cuts have been painful for local research. Boston is super expensive. Plenty of condos in the city stand empty. The so-called millionaires tax is pushing some affluent residents to Florida and other states. And the kicker: Boston is “not ‘cool’ for young folks.”
When it comes to the tech scene, “what Brian is saying is absolutely dead on,” says Bilal Zuberi, an MIT alum and venture capitalist who used to work in Boston but now lives in Silicon Valley. “There’s a real problem.”
The discussion of local tech’s decline has been brewing for years, but the global AI boom (and biotech’s recent dip) has brought it to a head. In 2025, Massachusetts startups raised $16.7 billion in venture capital, a 12 percent increase over 2024. But other states did much better: California’s total jumped 82 percent, and Texas rose 72 percent, closing the gap with Massachusetts.
Advertisement
The investment and job market for life sciences — Boston’s strength for over two decades — has been pretty terrible for the last couple of years. VC funding for local biotechs fell 17 percent in the first half of last year, to the lowest level since 2017. And the federal government’s funding cuts for research at universities has been tough for both science and talent retention.
EntrepreneurWill Manidis saw Halligan’s post almost immediately, and it hit a nerve. About a dozen years after Halligan cofounded HubSpot in 2006, Manidis started building ScienceIO in Boston. By the late 2010s, he argues, the environment for entrepreneurs had substantially deteriorated.
Manidis liked Boston, but he felt he needed a bigger talent pool to help his company succeed. He eventually left for New York and, in 2024, sold ScienceIO to Veradigm for $140 million.
That year, New York overtook Massachusetts as the second-most-successful state in attracting venture capital funding. (California is ahead by leaps and bounds, and in the fourth quarter of 2025, New York City attracted nearly three times as much funding as the Boston area.)
“If you are building an enterprise software — or really any kind of AI or software — company, the fundamental input to that machine is engineers who are willing to work very intensely for a number of years,” Manidis notes.
Advertisement
And he found two hurdles to recruiting these workers in Boston. First, many engineers had partners who were doctors, and they tended to leave when their partner got matched with a far-away hospital. Second, Massachusetts had “incredibly aggressive non-compete and non-solicitation [policies] that are not mirrored anywhere else in the country,” meaning that workers who left a company couldn’t easily — or quickly — join a company doing similar work. (Though noncompetes are now regulated by a 2018 law, they are still enforceable in Massachusetts.)
What we’ve seen, Manidis argues, is a kind of hollowing-out of the Boston tech ecosystem, leaving the city with far less talent than San Francisco or New York.
“ I interview a lot of people coming fresh out of college — from the local schools,” says Mikey Shulman, the chief executive of Suno (the only AI 50 company in Massachusetts). “And more so than ever, people are just dying to move to New York and SF.” He says if Boston “is serious about being a serious hub for tech, that’s a problem that needs to get fixed.”
“More so than ever, people are just dying to move to New York and SF,” said Mikey Shulman, the CEO of Suno.Barry Chin/Globe Staff
Indeed, a report by the Massachusetts High Technology Council found that about 40 percent of graduates of Massachusetts universities in AI-related fields between 2010 and 2023 stayed in the state, versus an estimated 80 percent of their peers in California, New York, and Texas.
A decade ago, Shulman thought Boston was“the second best city for tech. And now I don’t think it’s third . . . My impression is that it’s in decline.” He believes that decline is “fixable,” and he’s grateful that Halligan “said the quiet part out loud.”
Advertisement
“The entrepreneurs in Boston will tell you that Boston is really not a fun place to build a company,” says Zuberi, the California VC. “Not a place where they’re appreciated until they become successful.”
Not having richly valued startups deprives the city of the sorts of companies that can fill offices (vacancies have proved tough on Boston’s budget) and rev up a tax base (right now, the burden is falling to home owners)
“While I am sympathetic to calls to reclaim Boston as a great technology ecosystem — I would love to move back and not deal with New York,” Manidis posted to X on Jan. 6, “I struggle to see how the remaining ecosystem doesn’t enter complete free fall.”
Drew Volpe, the founder of Boston venture capital firm First Star Ventures, knows there’s a lot on the line. “I think there’s a real risk that if we don’t get our mojo back,” says Volpe, who invests in both tech and biotech, “in a decade there’s very little biotech here, and it’s no longer the center of the world. And that most biotech programs are in China or other places.”
Volpe agrees that it’s gotten harder for young people to stay in Boston. The opportunities are often too compelling elsewhere (despite the fact that New York City and San Francisco have even more competitive housing markets).
Advertisement
So what — if anything — can Boston do to pick itself up?
Volpe offers this: “ I think this is an ecosystem that tends to really like pedigree. We tend to like founders who went to MIT or Harvard, are very packaged, and have the right credentials. And I think that hurts. I think one thing the Bay Area does well is worry less about pedigree. And I think there’s a lot of really talented people here who maybe didn’t get a PhD at Harvard, but have done really great research and deserve a chance to go take a big swing.”
Rich Miner, who cofounded Android in Cambridge in 2004 — and sold it to Google for $50 million in 2005 — says there has long been a belief that East Coast investors are “Puritan-Boston-based,” making them “a little bit more conservative than the West Coast firms.”
Mark Zuckerberg’s move to the West Coast in 2004, Miner notes, reflected the difficulty of navigating a tech elite who, at that time, were largely based on Route 128. ”It was probably easier for Zuckerberg to get to Logan and fly to the West Coast and take some VC meetings than it was for him to figure out how to get out to 128 with no mass transit. And people wouldn’t have funded him. Because it’s like: ‘What have you done, kid? You’re from Harvard with this dating app thing? Whatever.”
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., on Feb. 5, 2007.Paul Sakuma
Miner, a serial entrepreneur who has invested in startups, argues that as a tech hub, Boston doesn’t appear to have “materially changed over the past 20 years.” He believes the city is doing a lot of the right things.
Still, there’s a stat he wants to improve: “We only retain somewhere between 5 and 10 percent of the tech grads who are of the ilk that will do startups.” To boost its tech scene, he says, Boston needs to improve those numbers. Lots of internships would allow young workers to “meet people, they build a network. They realize they can raise money here.”
Advertisement
Zuberi says founders have told him that Boston venture capital firms have offered them half of what firms in Silicon Valley have offered: “Boston VCs would just laugh at them.”
Boston has ”a significant resource that we completely ignore,” he notes. “We have an influx of hundreds of thousands of kids from not only around the country, but around the world. And we sort of treat them as: Yeah, whatever.”
A new initiative launched earlier this month seeks to fortify the city’s tech network, offering an array of new in-person events in 2026. Spearheaded by the Boston tech firm Whoop — and joined by other companies as well as the state — the initiative could be a step toward making founders feel more supported.
But the challenge is real and urgent. Though Boston can’t become Silicon Valley, it’s dangerous to let the talent pool thin out, watch up-and-comers relocate, and face the economic ramifications of having the next wave of great tech companies — and big employers — leave us behind.
Kara Miller can be reached at kara.miller@globe.com. Follow Kara on Twitter @karaemiller.
The National Weather Service issued a report at 6:40 p.m. on Monday for snow showers until 11 p.m. for Worcester, Middlesex, Essex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Bristol, Plymouth and Barnstable counties.
“One last area of snow showers moving through Rhode Island and central and eastern Massachusetts this evening will bring a quick inch or two of accumulation. The snow will briefly lower visibility and could quickly produce snow covered roads. Drivers should be aware of slippery road conditions tonight. Plan on extra travel time,” says the weather service.
Advance Local Weather Alerts is a service provided by United Robots, which uses machine learning to compile the latest data from the National Weather Service.
While the heaviest of the snow may be over, Monday will feature more wintry weather.
Plow crews have been working through the night, but roads are still not entirely clear, including in Boston and along major highways.
Hundreds of flights have been cancelled Monday at Logan International Airport.
Several more inches of snow could fall Monday across many areas of New England.
The snowstorm that has swept through the eastern United States brings a second day of impacts to New England on Monday, with more snow on the way and continued travel disruptions.
Our weather team is tracking several more inches of snow expected to fall on Monday, between ocean effect and a final band during the afternoon. That’ll bring the highest totals toward 24 inches.
Travel will still be tough on Monday, and with hundreds of school cancellations across the region — it’s shaping up to be a classic snow day in New England.
NBC10 Boston reporters are scattered around Massachusetts, tracking road conditions and the clean up process. Stay with us throughout the day for full coverage of the rest of the storm and its lingering effects.
