Connect with us

Massachusetts

Massachusetts truck safety regulations spur division in wake of Cambridge cyclist deaths

Published

on

Massachusetts truck safety regulations spur division in wake of Cambridge cyclist deaths


Opposition from a state municipal lobbying group over regulations that look to bolster safety around large trucks has drawn the ire of elected officials in Cambridge, where two cyclists have died after being struck in recent weeks.

All state-contracted trucks must be equipped with side guards, improved mirrors and backup cameras by January 2025, an order the Massachusetts Municipal Association says is “not reasonable for cities and towns.”

The private nonprofit says it understands the need for “reasonable measures to help to reduce injuries and fatalities on our roadways.”

The regulations, however, are “an unreasonable ask and considerable overstep of regulatory authority,” MMA’s executive director and CEO Adam Chapdelaine wrote in testimony to the state Department of Transportation.

Advertisement

A pair of Cambridge city councilors took to social media after listening to MMA’s testimony during a MassDOT hearing on Friday.

“These regulations will save lives,” Vice Mayor Marc McGovern posted on X. “They would have saved the lives of Kim Staley and Minh-Thi Nguyen.”

Councilor Jivan Sobrinho-Wheeler added, “@massmunicipal does not represent Cambridge or plenty of other municipalities on this. When they say they speak for ‘all cities & towns’ in Massachusetts against side guards and other safety features on trucks in municipalities, they don’t speak for us.”

Staley, 55, of Florida, died on June 7 when the driver of a box truck struck her at the intersection of DeWolfe and Mt. Auburn streets, close to Memorial Drive along the Charles River. The truck, which reportedly lacked side guards, turned right as the cyclist traveled straight across, according to authorities.

Two weeks later, on June 21, Nguyen, a third-year physics graduate student at MIT, died at age 24, when a box truck driver struck her at the intersection of Hampshire and Portland streets.

Advertisement

A day before Nguyen’s death, MassDOT sent a guidance memorandum to contractors, subcontractors and municipalities, outlining the so-called “Act to Reduce Traffic Fatalities.”

The law specifically requires “a motor vehicle, trailer, semi-trailer or semi-trailer unit classified as a class 3 or above” to be equipped with a lateral protective device, convex and crossover mirrors, and backup cameras by Jan. 1, 2025.

It will apply to vehicles leased or purchased by the state or operating under a state contract after the new year. Ambulances and other emergency medical vehicles, firetrucks, agricultural tractors and state-owned vehicles leased or purchased before 2023 will be exempt.

Chapdelaine took exception to how the law includes municipal contracts funded with state aid through MassDOT and requires that any providers contracting with municipalities must comply.

Chapdelaine estimated that 90% of each municipal DPW fleet alone would require retrofits that would cost anywhere from $2,500 to $5,000.

Advertisement

“We strongly support making necessary changes to reflect the true intent of the legislation and the legal underpinning of the updated state law,” Chapdelaine added in a statement to the Herald later Friday.

Charlie Baker signed the bill on one of his last days in the governor’s office. It also requires drivers to maintain a four-foot buffer when they pass construction workers, emergency responders, pedestrians and cyclists, and established a process for municipalities to request lower speed limits on state-owned roadways.

So far this year, 11 people have been killed in crashes with large trucks across Massachusetts, according to MassBike. Within the past decade, 28% of fatal bike crashes have involved large trucks, the organization states.

Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Newton, have already enacted similar requirements for their respective municipal agencies and contractors.

Charlotte Fleetwood, a senior transportation planner in Boston, said the ordinance is “not perfect but we believe it has saved lives.” The city recently purchased surround cameras for all of its large fleet vehicles, and officials are working with MassDOT to measure blind zones, she said.

Advertisement

Fleetwood is calling for federal action to require large vehicles be designed to be “inherently safer without these large blind zones and side cavities.”

In late March, a 4-year-old girl, Gracie Gancheva, of Denver, Colorado, died after being struck by a truck driver at an intersection near Boston Children’s Museum. Days later, a cement truck driver collided with and killed a 57-year-old man, Fernando R. Pizzaro, in a wheelchair at another South Boston intersection.

“We need to end this harm, and we can do it,” Fleetwood said.

Owners subject to the law must certify that their motor vehicle is equipped with the required devices, with certification and necessary documentation submitted to the Registry of Motor Vehicles.

Owners may apply for a waiver if their vehicle can’t comply due to the design, operation or other safety considerations.

Advertisement

The regulations have blindsided municipal officials across the state, said Bob Szocik, director of public works in Templeton, a town of roughly 8,000 in northern Worcester County.

“My heart goes out to all of the tragedies that have happened,” he said, “but from the municipality standpoint, we have not been reached out and notified about this change.”

The lack of notification will impact town budgets, Szocik said. Templeton expects to increase its fleet with new trucks in December, he added.

“Can I catch them and have them outfitted?” Szocik asked during MassDOT’s hearing. “Where am I going to get the extra money? It’s not fair to us in a short amount of time.”

Andover resident Eric Olson has turned tragedy into advocacy. His 5-year-old daughter, Sidney Mae, died in May 2023 after being struck by the driver of a tractor-trailer at a busy intersection in Merrimack Valley town.

Advertisement

An investigation into the tragedy found the driver not at fault, Essex County District Attorney Paul Tucker announced last November. The driver did not face any criminal charges.

Olson has been pushing for side guards to be required on all trucks, encouraging MassDOT to provide incentives and grants to business owners to make their vehicles safer.

“Her death shows up as a number – one,” Olson said. “But, its impact is far more rippling. … Every day, we put the livelihood and the well-being of truck drivers at risk by not properly equipping them with safety equipment. One crash can ruin a career and shatter a life.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Massachusetts man plead guilty to threatening to kill jews, bomb synagogues – UPI.com

Published

on

Massachusetts man plead guilty to threatening to kill jews, bomb synagogues – UPI.com


Attorney General Merrick Garland said Monday that John Reardon’s threats to kill Jews came amid “a disturbing increase” in such threats targeting the Jewish community. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo

Nov. 26 (UPI) — A Massachusetts man has pleaded guilty to threatening to kill Jews and bomb synagogues amid an increase in threats directed at the Jewish community over Israel’s war in Gaza.

John Reardon, 59, of Millis, Mass., located about 30 miles southwest of Boston, pleaded guilty Monday to leaving threatening voicemails for Massachusetts synagogues and a Jewish organization early this year, the Justice Department said in a statement.

According to federal prosecutors, Reardon made the phone calls on Jan. 25, first to the Congregation Agudas Achim, an Attleboro synagogue, and then to another unidentified synagogue and a Jewish organization.

Excerpts of the two-minute voicemail that Reardon left for the Congregation Agudas Achim were reproduced in court documents, showing he threatened its members with lethal violence in retaliation for Israel’s war in Palestinian enclave of Gaza.

Advertisement

He told the synagogue, “by supporting genocide, that means it’s OK for people to commit genocide against you,” and that “with supporting the killing of innocent little children, that means it’s OK to kill your children.”

“I supported Jewish people though. Not anymore. A matter of fact, I think we should kill you(s) all,” he said, according to excerpts of the call reproduced by the Justice Department.

“Have a lousy day and, oh, don’t be surprised if there’s pig blood on your steps tomorrow.”

Prosecutors also said that between Oct. 7, 2023 — when the Israel-Hamas war began — and Jan. 29, the day of Reardon’s arrest, he made 98 calls to the Israeli Consulate in Boston, many of which included statements the Justice Department described as “intended to harass or intimidate.”

“This defendant’s threats to bomb synagogues and kill Jewish children stoked fear in the hearts of congregants at a time when Jews are already facing a disturbing increase in threats,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement.

Advertisement

“No person and no community in this country should have to live in fear of hate-fueled violence.”

Reardon made the calls amid spiking threats targeting members of the U.S. Jewish community.

According to the Anti-Defamation League, there were more than 10,000 anti-semitic incidents across the United States during the first 12 months of the war, marking a 200% increase compared to the same period a year earlier.

Of those incidents, more than 8,000 were verbal or written harassment, the U.S.-based Jewish organization said.

A sentencing hearing for Reardon is to be scheduled at a later date. Of the three counts he pleaded guilty to, the obstruction of free exercise of religious beliefs by threat of force carries the most severe penalty, with a potential maximum 20 years in prison.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

What are the consequences for Massachusetts teacher strikes? Lawyer wants unions to pay families

Published

on

What are the consequences for Massachusetts teacher strikes? Lawyer wants unions to pay families


MARBLEHEAD – While Gloucester students went back to school Monday, Beverly and Marblehead kids were out for the 11th and 10th school days, respectively. Both communities are at a standstill in bargaining as the court orders an independent fact finder to help resolve the labor disputes.

Both unions face hundreds of thousands of dollars in court-ordered fines, as a judge held them in contempt after they engaged in an illegal strike. Union leadership says school committees are not negotiating in good faith. Striking teachers are going without pay, as school committee members say it’s illegal to pay an employee who is on strike.

Public employee strikes illegal in Massachusetts

All public employee strikes are illegal in Massachusetts, due to a law introduced in 1973 after a number of strikes across New Bedford and Franklin in which teachers were arrested. Teachers are not arrested in modern day strikes, but rather, their unions face hefty fines.

“I don’t think that a judge wants to put anybody in jail because you don’t necessarily want to make a martyr out of somebody who might not deserve martyr status,” said Glenn Koocher, the Executive Director of the Massachusetts Association of School Committees.

Advertisement

In a press conference Monday afternoon, members of the Marblehead school committee accused the simultaneous strikes in three North Shore communities as being coordinated by the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the statewide educators union.

“In this case it is clear that the statewide MTA is coordinating these strikes,” said Jenn Schaeffner, co-chairperson of the Marblehead School Committee. 

“Well, I don’t believe there’s any evidence that this is part of a statewide conspiracy, but I can tell that it is unusual that three school districts in the same area would all strike at the same time, use some of the same talking points,” Koocher added. “This significantly disrupts the welfare of children of all ages, and it’s never good not to be in school.”

Lawyer wants union to pay parents after strikes

A Chicago-based attorney is currently trying to change to outcome of teachers’ strikes through lawsuits. Daniel Suhr of Hughes and Suhr Law represents multiple Newton parents in a lawsuit against the Newton Teachers Association for individual damages (childcare, work missed, and more) form the winter 2024 strike that lasted 11 days in Newton. He has four other active similar cases across the country.

“I think the lesson the unions took from Newton is, we can break the law and still make a lot of money,” Suhr said. “That if we make a $53 million collective bargaining agreement, but only pay a half a million dollars in fines, well, if we don’t care what the law is, that’s just profit.”

Advertisement

Suhr alleges that making the unions pay penalties to parents would deter future strikes.

“We want to stop this from happening again,” he said. “Clearly the system is broken. These injunctions from judges are not being respected by the unions. And so, our hope is that a real financial disincentive which is paying these parents and students for the damage they’re causing will finally put an end to this.”

If you have a question you’d like us to look into, please email questioneverything@cbsboston.com.  

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Driver captured after wild police chase on I-190, Route 12 in Sterling, Massachusetts

Published

on

Driver captured after wild police chase on I-190, Route 12 in Sterling, Massachusetts


Cars nearly collide on highway in Massachusetts police chase

Advertisement


Cars nearly collide on highway in Massachusetts police chase

14:14

Advertisement

STERLING – A dramatic, high speed police chase in central Massachusetts came to a peaceful end Monday morning when the driver surrendered to officers.

As seen live via helicopter on CBS News Boston, police were pursuing an SUV on Interstate 190 south in Sterling around 11 a.m. when the car nearly collided with another vehicle, then suddenly pulled into the median, swung around into a U-turn and took off on the opposite side of the highway.

chase.jpg
At one point during the chase, the driver cut through the median and did a U-turn onto I-190 north.

CBS Boston


After driving in the northbound lanes for a few miles, with police keeping their distance from the SUV, the driver got off the highway at exit 14 and continued onto Route 12.

Advertisement

Several minutes later, the SUV pulled over to the side of the road near Sterling’s border with West Boylston. Moments later, the car was surrounded by four police cruisers. The driver got out with his hands up, was immediately handcuffed and taken away.

arrest.jpg
The chase ended when the driver pulled over and surrendered to police on Route 12 near the border of Sterling and West Boylston, Massaachusetts.

CBS Boston


The driver has not been identified yet and there’s no word as to why police were pursuing him or the SUV.

There have been no reports of any injuries.

Advertisement

No other information is available at this point in the investigation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending