Connect with us

Massachusetts

Howie Carr: Tom Brady the GOAT vs Tom Brady the Massachusetts hack’s hack

Published

on

Howie Carr: Tom Brady the GOAT vs Tom Brady the Massachusetts hack’s hack


I’ll admit that putting a photo of Tom Brady next to this column is a bit of a bait-and-switch, but the fact is that this story really is about a guy named Tom Brady.

And there is nothing like that name or photograph to drive traffic, or ratings, or eyeballs to the site.

Of course, the subject of this piece is not the #12 you’re most familiar with, but a different Tom Brady GOAT.

For the real Tom Brady, GOAT means Greatest of All Time.

Advertisement

For this Tom Brady, GOAT means Greediest of All Time.

The Greediest of All Time Tom Brady is a hack’s hack from Norfolk County, the Ground Zero of the hackerama in Massachusetts.

Brady is currently jammed up with the State Ethics Commission. He was busted for violating the state’s conflict-of-interest law when he had some of his underlings at the jail do free plumbing work for him, often on county time.

He’s now facing tens of thousands of dollars for acting like every other hack in Norfolk County.

It’s one thing to feed at the trough. Tom Brady has been licking the plate. And it’s not like he’s exactly destitute. He comes from one of the grabbing-est, pocket-stuffing-est hack families in Norfolk County.

Advertisement

Yet somehow Brady considered it his right to commandeer jailhouse plumbers and electricians and order them to go to his house in Norwood to repair his shower head, a basement water heater, a boiler and finally a circulator pump because, sadly, “Brady did not have heat in his bedroom.”

Oh no! After that repair job, #12 spoke to the plumber and “advised him that he did not have to return to the (Norfolk County) Jail to complete his shift.”

In other words, as the jailhouse starting QB, Brady called an audible at the line of scrimmage. At the lock-up, they call that a “no show and go.”

In their day, both Tom Bradys were masters at “managing the clock.” TB from Foxboro managed the clock to beat the other team. TB from the jail managed the clock to beat the taxpayers.

February is Super Bowl month. TB of the jail had his greatest February victory in 2022. That day got off to a bad start — like the Pats’ 28-3 deficit against the Falcons in February 2017 — when the water heater ruptured and flooded his basement.

Advertisement

But GOAT of the hackerama activated a jail plumber off the inactive list. He had him drive out to Norwood and remove the broken heater. He then ordered his lackey to take the broken fixture to the local Home Depot, where it was still under warranty, and pick up a new one.

Then the plumber brought the new water heater back to TB’s mansion and replaced it — all while on the county clock.

Surely, one of the greatest February comebacks of all time!

Brady’s pay as assistant superintendent of operations at the jail is $138,432 a year, plus he works all those paid details.

Tom Brady particularly enjoys clocking in on Pats’ game days in Foxboro, because wouldn’t you? It is after all the scene of some of #12’s greatest triumphs over the decades.

Advertisement

The other Mrs. Tom Brady is not named Gisele. She’s Jennifer Brady, and she has an even softer job as a payroll patriot than GOAT — chief probation officer for $158,993 a year.

Hackerama is contagious, and thus we have Mrs. #12’s brother, Brian K. Walsh. He’s the judge at Stoughton District Court for $207,855 a year.

Judge Walsh has a ringside seat for the clown show that is Norfolk County law enforcement. He’s currently presiding over one of the Rubber Ducky cases, involving a local grandfather who after a six-month, five-search-warrant investigation by the Canton PD, has been charged with, among other heinous crimes, six counts of littering.

If convicted next week, the rubber-ducky kingpin could conceivably end up in the Norfolk County House of Correction where the most infamous inmate right now is named, wait for it, Brian Walshe, charged with murdering and dismembering his wife in Cohasset in January 2023.

Do you begin to detect a pattern here? Everybody seems to have pretty much the same names, whether they’re related or not.

Advertisement

Here’s another funny coincidence of the kind you so often see in Norfolk County.

Brady’s meteoric rise in the hack hierarchy began in 2018, when he slobberingly attached his lips to the backside of a candidate for sheriff named Pat McDermott.

TB, for many years a guard on the graveyard shift, began his courtship slowly, first slipping McDermott $200 in 2018, then $800 in 2019. As McDermott ran in 2020, TB duked him a grand, followed by another $1,000 after his installation as High Sheriff.

In an amazing coincidence, as he funneled McDermott $3,500 in cash, TB’s own salary skyrocketed from $103,000 in 2020 to his current $138,432 (plus all the detail pay).

Of course there was a risk for TB in getting behind a challenger for sheriff when he was already on the jail payroll. The incumbent sheriff was a Republican appointed by Gov. Charlie Baker. His name was Jerry McDermott.

Advertisement

Yes, you read that correctly — J. McDermott was running against P. McDermott.

Yet another pair of guys in Norfolk County with the same name — Sheriff McDermott.

But just as TB of the Pats also had multiple options downfield as he stood in the pocket, so did TB of the jail. As he was passing dough to P. McDermott, his brother-in-law Brian Walsh was duking hundreds more to the incumbent J. McDermott.

It’s called hedging your bets.

Of course Brian Walsh (the judge, not the accused wife-killer) had his own ulterior motives. As a failed lawyer (and all state judges are failed lawyers) he was desperately trying to curry favor with the RINO governor who would soon hand him his own lifetime hack sinecure.

Advertisement

The lesson here is, the corruption in Norfolk County doesn’t just involve trying to frame innocent women and covering up brutal murders committed by crooked pedophile cops.

The hackerama in Norfolk is not just tragedy, it’s farce, to paraphrase Marx (Karl, not Groucho).

Meanwhile, the State Ethics Commission must now hold a hearing on Tom Brady’s misdeeds within 90 days. I would implore them not to schedule anything until after Feb. 9.

That’s Super Bowl Sunday, and seriously, how can you expect anyone named Tom Brady to concentrate on anything until after the big game?

Even if this other Tom Brady from Norwood is a different kind of GOAT — the Greediest of All Time.

Advertisement

Order Howie’s new tee shirt, “Proud to Be Garbage,” at howiecarrshow.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Obituary for Peter J. Grudzien at Daniel T. Morrill Funeral Home

Published

on

Obituary for Peter J. Grudzien at Daniel T. Morrill Funeral Home


North Brookfield / Sturbridge Peter J. Grudzien, 85, formerly a longtime resident of Sturbridge, passed away on Friday, Sept. 19th, in the UMass Memorial Health Harrington, Southbridge, after a long illness. He leaves his wife of 66 years, Willa A. Power Grudzien his son, Bill Grudzien and his wife Denise



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

N.H. leads 25 states in seeking Supreme Court review of ‘unconstitutional’ Mass. gun law

Published

on

N.H. leads 25 states in seeking Supreme Court review of ‘unconstitutional’ Mass. gun law


Local News

The effort calls into question whether or not Massachusetts’ firearm regulations for out-of-state visitors are unconstitutional.

The attorneys general of 25 Republican-led states say that Massachusetts’ gun regulations pose a constitutional problem. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

New Hampshire is leading an effort from 25 states to challenge a Massachusetts gun law, and this month, they’re taking it to the Supreme Court.

The centerpiece of the argument is the Pheasant Lane Mall in Nashua, N.H., which reaches across state lines into Tyngsborough. If shoppers park on the south side of the mall’s parking lot, they might end up crossing state lines during a visit.

Advertisement

The attorneys general of New Hampshire and 24 other Republican-led states say this poses a potential problem for firearm holders. A New Hampshire resident who is legally carrying a firearm on their home state’s side of the parking lot may inadvertently be breaking the law when they cross the lot into Massachusetts, where it is illegal to carry without a permit.

Joining New Hampshire are the attorneys general of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming, who are calling the arrangement unconstitutional. The states have rallied behind Phillip Marquis of Rochester, N.H., to ask the Supreme Court to protect out-of-state residents from Massachusetts’ firearms regulations.

“The geography of the mall is such that a New Hampshire resident might find themselves in Massachusetts if she parks on the south side of the parking lot or visits Buffalo Wild Wings,” reads a brief from the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office to the Supreme Court. “If that person is carrying a firearm without a Massachusetts license — which would be constitutionally protected activity in most of the mall—that person risks being charged as a felon and facing mandatory incarceration in Massachusetts.”

The trouble began for Marquis in 2022 when he was in a car accident in Massachusetts, according to the brief. When police arrived, he informed them that he had a pistol on him and was subsequently charged with carrying a firearm without a license.

Marquis previously sued the Commonwealth for the burdens that Massachusetts’ firearms permit law creates on out-of-state visitors, but the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court denied his claims. They ruled in March that the state’s nonresident firearms licensing laws were constitutional, according to court documents.

Advertisement

Claiming that the Massachusetts court denied him his Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights, Marquis has petitioned the Supreme Court to federally overrule that court’s decision. In his petition, Marquis invoked New York State Rifle & Police Association, Inc. v. Bruen, where the court established that state firearms restrictions must be covered by the Second Amendment or adhere to historical firearms regulations.

Using Bruen, Marquis and the Republican attorneys general supporting him are aiming to prove that there is no justification for applying Massachusetts’ firearms restrictions to out-of-state residents and that to do so would be unconstitutional. However, the state’s Supreme Judicial Court found the law constitutional even under Bruen because it intends to prevent dangerous people from obtaining firearms, just as historical regulations have done.

“To the extent that the Commonwealth restricts the ability of law-abiding citizens to carry firearms within its borders, the justification for so doing is credible, individualized evidence that the person in question would pose a danger if armed,” the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision read. “Both case law and the historical record unequivocally indicate that this justification is consistent with ‘the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation.’”

It’s not immediately clear if the Supreme Court will respond to Marquis’ appeal or when it will make any kind of decision, but lower courts are at something of a crossroads with how and when to apply Bruen to gun possession cases. As such, they are looking to the Supreme Court for a more definitive answer.

Since the proof of historical context that Bruen requires has led to some uncertainty, any ruling that these lower courts make is likely to amount to a partisan decision. However, if the Supreme Court provides more substantive clarity in a response to Marquis, these lower courts just might find the answer they are seeking.

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. State Lottery winner: 2 $100,000 Mass Cash prizes won Friday

Published

on

Mass. State Lottery winner: 2 0,000 Mass Cash prizes won Friday


Massachusetts State Lottery players won two $100,000 prizes Friday from the day’s “Mass Cash” drawings.

The winning tickets were sold at the Roslindale Food Mart on Washington Street and McSheffrey’s of the South End convenience store (with Mobil gas) on Main Street in Woburn.

Mass Cash drawings happen twice daily, at 2 p.m. and at 9 p.m. It costs just $1 to play.

Overall, at least 625 prizes worth $600 or more were won or claimed in Massachusetts on Monday, including 6 in Springfield, 22 in Worcester and 14 in Boston.

Advertisement

The Massachusetts State Lottery releases a full list of winning tickets every day. The list only includes winning tickets worth more than $600.

The two largest lottery prizes won so far in 2025 were each worth $15 million. One of the prizes was from a winning “Diamond Deluxe” scratch ticket sold in Holyoke, and the other was from a “300X” scratch ticket sold on Cape Cod.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending