Connect with us

Maine

Vegan Kitchen: ‘Ghost’ gear haunts Maine waters, threatening wildlife

Published

on

Vegan Kitchen: ‘Ghost’ gear haunts Maine waters, threatening wildlife


When diver Lana Smithson, who splits her time between Gorham and North Palm Seaside, Florida, is below the waves she is all the time eradicating a hidden risk to animals: Misplaced and deserted fishing gear. Her efforts to take away this unseen trash are motivated by the front-row seat diving provides her to the risks of derelict fishing gear. She shares these worrisome elements of the aquatic world, together with its wonders, on social media.

After Smithson returned to Maine this spring, I reached her by cellphone and she or he instructed me a couple of current dive in tropical waters when a porcupine fish swam unusually shut. It was trailing plastic monofilament fishing line and had a steel hook embedded in its face.

“The fish saved circling me and getting nearer and nearer,” Smithson mentioned. “I attempted a number of instances to seize the road with out luck.”

Lastly, she caught the road and slowly eliminated the hook.

Advertisement

“I used to be fortunate and the hook wasn’t very deep, and I used to be in a position to get it out,” Smithson mentioned. “Porcupine fish when pressured, they puff up and have quite a lot of spines. I’m positive whoever hooked the animal didn’t need to deal with it and simply lower the road and threw it again in.”

Sadly, Smithson mentioned, her porcupine fish rescue is the exception moderately than the rule. For example, whereas diving in Lake Winnipesaukee in New Hampshire, Smithson had a extra typical encounter with an animal trailing plastic fishing line.

Diver Lana Smithson in full dive gear at Trundy Level in Cape Elizabeth. Lana Smithson picture

“The hook was so deep down its throat, I knew I wouldn’t be capable of get it out,” Smithson mentioned. “The one factor I might do is lower the road. I doubt the fish might survive with a hook means down its digestive tract. After I lower the road, I might inform the animal was fully exhausted and respiration onerous. It went and sat on the underside. I used to be heartbroken that I couldn’t assist this animal.”

Smithson has been diving since 1986, and in the previous couple of years she’s made trash removing the main focus of her dives.

Advertisement

A research revealed final yr within the journal Fish and Fisheries estimated that industrial fishing vessels across the globe pollute the oceans with 100 million tons of misplaced plastic fishing gear every year. This estimate doesn’t embrace nearshore fisheries, lobster and crab traps and intentional dumping of worn fishing gear. The hazardous particles lurks beneath the ocean’s floor, trapping, maiming and killing sea creatures yr after yr.

As well as, plastic fishing strains, nets and ropes will be mistaken for meals and ingested by fish, turtles and birds, all of the whereas breaking down over time to create microplastic air pollution. Microplastics, which regularly appeal to toxins, enter the meals chain and accumulate in marine animals’ our bodies and probably any people who eat the fish, too.

SOURCES OF PLASTICS POLLUTION

In Maine, the Division of Marine Sources permits for a ten % loss every year of tags required to be connected to every lobster lure. In 2021, when 2,861,000 million lobster traps have been positioned in Maine waters, 286,100 traps might qualify for substitute tags. A major share of these misplaced tags sit on the ocean flooring connected to misplaced traps. The Gulf of Maine Lobster Basis in Kennebunk factors to estimates that 175,000 lobster traps are misplaced within the Gulf of Maine every year. Maine requires all lobster and crab traps be geared up with a biodegradable escape hatch to reduce the variety of lobsters killed by ghost traps; nonetheless the panels take time to biodegrade.

The Blue Ocean Society for Marine Conservation, based mostly in Portsmouth and headed by Jen Kennedy of Eliot, Maine, conducts common seashore cleanups on the shoreline between Boston and Ogunquit. In 2021, Blue Ocean volunteers collected 72,565 items of trash. The most typical merchandise they eliminated have been cigarette butts, however there was loads of fishing-related particles, too, together with 7,091 items of plastic rope, 1,597 lobster bands, 949 items of traps, 369 items of fishing line, 322 nets and 154 items of buoys.

Advertisement

To stem the tide of ghost gear, the Gulf of Maine Lobster Basis launched a Gear Seize program about 13 years in the past, which encompasses seashore cleanups, the location of dumpsters on fishing boat docks that permit house owners eliminate worn or damaged gear with out cost, and ocean-based restoration journeys. On one such restoration journey, in Harpswell in April, the group eliminated greater than six tons of ropes, buoys and different fishing particles and 14 tons of plastic-coated lobster traps, based on Erin Pelletier, government director of the Gulf of Maine Lobster Basis.

“I do actually need to spotlight that the fishermen are very supportive of serving to retrieve gear and infrequently ask how they may help,” Pelletier mentioned. “I do know that fishing gear is a contributor to marine particles, nevertheless it’s part of the chance of offering seafood to the world. Similar to individuals who need to commute to work, they’ve a carbon footprint bigger than somebody who works at house. It’s a price to all of us with the intention to maintain the economic system and meals provide going.”

Angela Might Bell, board member for the Maine Animal Coalition in Portland, disagrees. Bell stories that in common seashore cleanups in Casco Bay, the commonest items of trash she finds are sections of plastic rope and plastic bands used to immobilize lobster claws. She mentioned the trash solely seems inevitable when individuals ignore the connection “between their plate and ocean air pollution.”

Folks usually ask what they will do about ocean air pollution, Bell mentioned. “A good way to make a distinction is to eradicate fish and seafood out of your eating regimen. Decreasing the demand will scale back the air pollution.

“In Maine, we romanticize the lobstering and fishing industries,” she continued, “however the fact is, the trade is liable for a lot of the ocean air pollution and there must be accountability for these actions.”

Advertisement

In line with Carla Guenther, workers scientist on the Maine Heart for Coastal Fisheries in Stonington, one coverage transfer that has helped make a small dent in ocean plastic air pollution is Maine’s ban on single-use plastic luggage, which additionally outlawed plastic-wrapped bait containers. 

Ben Martens, government director of the Maine Coast Fishermen’s Affiliation in Brunswick, acknowledges that derelict fishing gear is a major and troubling worldwide drawback. However he questions whether or not Maine vessels generate as a lot derelict gear as do fishing boats in different geographic areas.

“Fishermen in South America used to simply dump their nets within the ocean,” Martens mentioned. “That’s not one thing we do within the Northeast. We have now fishermen who mend their nets. (The nets) price tens of hundreds of {dollars}. Quite a lot of care is put into fishing gear within the Northeast.”

Vegan Kitchen: ‘Ghost’ gear haunts Maine waters, threatening wildlife

This crab was considered one of many tangled in plastic fishing line within the Saco River that Smithson and her dive companion freed final summer season throughout a cleanup dive. She describes the positioning as “simply layered” with fishing gear particles. Lana Smithson picture

SPORTS FISHING DETRITUS

Advertisement

Estimates of derelict gear fail to seize one other supply of air pollution, specifically the plastic strains, steel hooks, plastic lures and lead sinkers misplaced by individuals who fish for sport. Close to the shoreline, the place Smithson does most of her dives, that’s the majority of what she finds.

“In Florida, there are lots of people sport fishing over the reefs and wrecks, and so they’re simply draped in fishing gear,” she mentioned. “These delicate coral reefs and there’s monofilament line throughout it. In Maine, I additionally see bits and items of lobster traps and bits and items of ropes.”

Final summer season, for the primary time she dove with a good friend on the Saco River in Biddeford close to the boat launch.

“It’s an online of fishing gear down there,” Smithson mentioned. “It’s simply layered. We needed to maintain untangling and releasing crabs. There was a lot line, there was no means they have been getting out of it. There are such a lot of submerged sticks and rocks that catch fishing gear, I don’t know why they even hassle fishing there. It’s horrid.”

Smithson and her good friend saved many crabs that day and plan to return this summer season for an additional cleanup dive, this time with a shore crew to allow them to hand up buckets of trash to be disposed of.

Advertisement

“Our cleanup was a drop within the bucket as a result of the positioning has a lot fishing gear,” Smithson mentioned.

Mama octopus together with her eggs Lana Smithson picture

Smithson, who has labored for greater than a decade because the New England group outreach coordinator for the nationwide nonprofit Vegan Outreach, is profoundly moved by all her shut encounters with aquatic animals, but one current sighting stands out. In early March, she encountered an octopus with a clutch of eggs within the waters close to the Blue Heron Bridge on Florida’s East Coast, a preferred fishing spot.

“I couldn’t imagine my eyes,” Smithson recalled. “That kind of factor is so uncommon to see within the wild and superb. They have been model new white eggs.”

She took just a few images, posted an image on Fb and was deluged with photographers asking the place she’d shot the images. Although she tried to maintain the placement a secret, it was found and the mom octopus was swarmed by divers.

Advertisement

“She turned a celeb,” Smithson mentioned of the mom, who stayed together with her eggs, defending and aerating them regardless of the eye.

Smithson adopted their growth, posting footage of the tiny octopuses creating contained in the egg sacks, altering from elongated white sacs to see-through pods holding miniature black octopus infants.

“The octopus was very close to the a part of the bridge the place individuals fish daily,” Smithson mentioned. “Their strains go straight over the construction with the octopus den.”

Like a lot of what Smithson sees whereas diving, the expertise was sophisticated: “Good as a result of it was a such a uncommon expertise for divers to see the eggs develop from starting to finish,” Smithson mentioned. “And unhealthy as a result of some photographers overdid it.

“One good factor is that with all this publicity she obtained, I’ve seen numerous feedback on social media from individuals saying they might by no means eat an octopus once more,” Smithson mentioned. “That made me actually completely happy.”

Advertisement

For the virtually two months she tended her eggs, the mom octopus by no means ate or left her den. Then, like all feminine octopuses, after her youngsters hatched, she died.

Derelict fishing gear continues to pollute the waters round her former den, whereas the awe and compassion the mom octopus impressed lives on in those that linked together with her by Smithson’s underwater lens.

Avery Yale Kamila is a meals author who lives in Portland. She will be reached at [email protected]
Social: AveryYaleKamila


Use the shape beneath to reset your password. Whenever you’ve submitted your account e mail, we are going to ship an e mail with a reset code.

« Earlier



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Shenna Bellows sworn in for third term as Maine Secretary of State

Published

on

Shenna Bellows sworn in for third term as Maine Secretary of State


AUGUSTA, Maine — Secretary of State Shenna Bellows was sworn into office for her third term Wednesday.  Governor Janet Mills conducted the formal swearing-in of all the constitutional officers, which includes Bellows, State Treasurer Joseph Perry, Attorney General Aaron Frey and State Auditor Matthew Dunlap. In her remarks following the swearing-in, Bellows shared a message of transparency and accessibility in continuing to serve the people of Maine. “It is incumbent upon us as elected officials to make government work for the people of Maine,” Bellows said. “We must reduce bureaucracy, improve efficiency, modernize our systems, and above all, bring people together in community to make life better for the people of Maine.”

The Department of the Secretary of State includes three bureaus: The Maine State Archives, the Bureau of Motor Vehicles and the Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions.

Advertisement

Bellows emphasized her commitment to ensuring free, safe, and secure elections, modernizing government services, and preserving Maine’s history through the State Archives. She highlighted the importance of standing up for the rule of law and democracy, referring to the legacy of Civil War General Joshua Chamberlain and referencing the events at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. “This is our Chamberlain moment. We must stand up for the rule of law and do the right thing even when it is hard. As your Secretary of State, I pledge to always ensure that we have free, safe and secure elections and that we adhere to the Constitution and the rule of law in every aspect of everything that we do,” said Bellows. Bellows, Maine’s 50th Secretary of State, previously served two terms in the Maine Senate from 2016-2020 and was the executive director of the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine before her election in 2021.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending