Connect with us

Maine

The Maine Millennial: U.S. health care coverage is a battle of the robots

Published

on

The Maine Millennial: U.S. health care coverage is a battle of the robots


I’ve come to the conclusion that for-profit medical insurance corporations are morally evil and mustn’t exist. Sadly for us normies, they do, principally as a result of they’ve grown up over time in our society and are so ingrained it’s tough for us to think about a special manner of paying for well being care. However when you concentrate on it, it’s absurd. Insurance coverage corporations make more cash after they refuse to pay for sufferers’ well being care. Subsequently, they are going to refuse to pay for as a lot well being care as they probably can. Anybody who thinks in any other case is, sadly, kidding themselves. In our capitalist financial system, companies will take no matter plan of action maximizes their earnings. Keep in mind when chemical corporations dumped their waste into all types of waterways as a result of it was low-cost and straightforward, till authorities laws – together with vital fines – made it unprofitable to take action?

Getting prior authorizations from insurance coverage corporations is, no doubt, the worst a part of my job. On the floor, prior authorizations sound completely cheap – it’s a must to get approval from the insurance coverage firm earlier than they are going to pay for a take a look at or process that the physician has ordered. They are saying it’s to stop waste and fraud. Unfaithful. The aim of acquiring a previous authorization is to interrupt the spirit and willpower of no matter unfortunate soul is attempting to get the insurance coverage firm to pay for one thing.

To acquire a previous authorization, step one is normally to name the quantity on the again of an insurance coverage card. Some insurance coverage corporations outsource their prior authorization departments to a 3rd firm. Some do it in home. Both manner, the expertise on my finish is equally horrible. You start with an interminable automated cellphone tree maze. The labyrinth is haunted not by a minotaur however by a smug robotic voice asking you to key in or verbally say the affected person’s identify, date of beginning and member ID quantity in numerous combos. “Sorry, I didn’t get that,” you’ll hear the auto-voice say again and again as you are feeling your blood stress rising.

I’ve discovered one of the best ways to take care of it’s to make my very own voice as robotic as potential. I take deep breaths and empty my thoughts. I faux that I, too, am a robotic. Robots don’t care about being on maintain for 25 minutes. Robots don’t take into consideration how horrible our well being care system is. Robotic secretary has one objective: Retrieve numerical code that may allow affected person to acquire very important take a look at.

Advertisement

I don’t know if the businesses intentionally purchased the worst cellphone software program ever made or in the event that they purchased the most affordable one they may discover, and it simply so occurred to be the worst cellphone software program system on the earth. Getting via the automated system will take no fewer than 10 minutes. Normally extra. Then you definately get placed on maintain. Your time on maintain will usually differ, but it surely’s normally loads of time to take a toilet break. I do know as a result of I’ve timed and examined it. Typically the connection cuts out and also you get hung up on for no good purpose. At that time, it would take all of your appreciable willpower to not scream and trigger a panic within the workplace. However you’ll need to scream. Oh, it would be best to.

After you scythe your manner via the bushes of the cellphone tree, you get a reside individual on the cellphone. A few of them deserve the title of “customer support agent.” Many don’t. Usually, the individual you find yourself speaking to is clearly in an abroad name middle, and judging from the standard of the connection, probably speaking via a tin can on the tip of a string. What I do know is, at this level within the course of, they don’t seem to be a medical skilled. They’re just a little customer support robotic similar to me. They ask for the CPT code for the take a look at or process. I inform them. They ask for the ICD-10 prognosis code. I give it to them. Then they – properly, I don’t know what they do at this level, precisely. I assume they use some kind of pc program to inform me whether or not or not the corporate is approving regardless of the physician ordered, however I don’t know precisely. It’s opaque. For all we all know they could possibly be flipping a coin. Typically the decision is sweet, and I get the code that signifies an authorization. (This code doesn’t point out that the insurance coverage firm can pay the invoice in full as soon as they get it, however that’s one other bucket of worms.)

In the event that they deny the authorization, then I ask if there’s another person I can communicate to. Typically they switch me to the on-duty nurse individual, who’s at all times very good and goes over the affected person’s data – what the physician ordered, why, signs, beforehand achieved checks. Largely, although, the subsequent step is a “peer to see.” That’s when the physician who has ordered the take a look at talks to a health care provider employed by the insurance coverage firm and persuades them, utilizing their most charming medical lingo, that the take a look at is critical for the well being of their affected person. Peer-to-peers are the second worst end result of the prior auth course of (the worst being, after all, the insurance coverage firm denies authorization with no recourse in any respect). It’s because our docs are extremely busy and scheduled to the gills, and asking them to take time away from actually saving lives to attempt to persuade a bureaucrat that what they ordered is critical is a waste of time and an insult to their medical schooling besides.

You recognize what insurance coverage program doesn’t usually require prior authorizations? Medicare.

Victoria Hugo-Vidal is a Maine millennial. She might be contacted at:
[email protected]
Twitter: @mainemillennial

Advertisement

Use the shape beneath to reset your password. Whenever you’ve submitted your account electronic mail, we’ll ship an electronic mail with a reset code.

« Earlier

Subsequent »

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine electricity bills increased again this month

Published

on

Maine electricity bills increased again this month


Central Maine Power Co. customers began paying 7% more in their monthly bills Jan. 1 to help fund $3.3 billion of upgrades to transmission lines, poles and other equipment in New England. Versant Power ratepayers can also expect increases, though smaller, later this year.

Federal regulators are apportioning about $280 million of the region’s costs to Maine’s two major utilities, with the remainder assigned to utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Vermont. The costs are divided based on load, or how much electricity each service area uses.

Consumer advocates in the region have criticized the practice of assigning transmission costs to ratepayers, saying upgrades proposed by utilities are often unnecessary, insufficiently regulated and enhance the value of assets for shareholders at the expense of customers.

“The ratepayers are the only wallets in the room,” said Donald M. Kreis, New Hampshire’s consumer advocate who says poles, wires and other components of transmission are overbuilt.

Advertisement

As an example, one energy company proposed rebuilding a 49-mile transmission line in New Hampshire for $384 million, when less than 8% of it needed to be replaced, according to consumer advocates.

Versant said transmission rates are set by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “using a preset formula and cover needed investments” in local transmission and regional investments.

“Most of the transmission rate increase is due to Versant paying our share to support regional transmission projects as part of our ISO-New England membership,” it said in an emailed statement.

CMP spokesman Jon Breed said ratepayer-funded spending authorized by FERC “will help reduce outages and protect our system from the threats of extreme weather in Maine.” New England’s transmission is a nearly 9,000-mile system, he said.

How the money in its entirety will eventually be spent is unclear. Eversource Energy, the parent company of utilities in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, has plans for numerous projects, such as a partial line rebuild and other work totaling nearly $80 million in Connecticut, and a $7.4 million rebuild of a substation in Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“We’re responsible for maintaining just under half of the regional transmission system in New England and are constantly working to upgrade and modernize the transmission system, making the electric grid more resilient to increasing extreme weather caused by climate change and improving reliability for customers across New England,” Eversource spokeswoman Jamie Ratliff said in an email.

A representative of National Grid, parent company of New England Power Co., which said its revenue requirement is $485.4 million this year, did not respond to an emailed request for information about its projects.

CMP customers who use an average of 550 kilowatt-hours of electricity a month are paying $149.83, up from $139.62 in 2024, according to the Maine Office of the Public Advocate. Versant customers in the Bangor Hydro District who use the same amount of power pay $155.80, up from $148.09, a 5.2% increase, the utility said. Customers in Versant’s Maine Public District in the northern reaches of the state pay $146.37, an increase from $144.35.

Utilities in New England say “revenue requirements” of $3.3 billion are needed for 2025, up more than 16% from last year, according to the New England Power Pool, or NEPOOL, an advisory group of utilities, consumer advocates, consumers and others.  

Together, CMP and Versant account for 8.4% of the revenue needed in the region for the transmission upgrades, as identified by the utilities. In contrast, subsidiaries of Eversource Energy account for nearly 59%, or about $1.9 billion.

Advertisement

Increased rates for consumers are not due solely to transmission costs. Utilities also are collecting more than $254 million, including interest, to compensate for previous under-collecting of revenue based on the difference between cost forecasts and actual costs last year.

Ratiliff said the rate change is “largely the result” of utilities recovering less of their 2023 transmission costs.

Still, the largest driver of higher rates that took effect Wednesday is significant construction by utilities and replacing older transmission equipment, Landry said.

“They figured out they can build stuff and send the bills and everyone has to pay them,” he said.

The transmission costs will overwhelm a slight decline in electricity bills approved by Maine regulators in November. A lower 2025 standard offer rate — the default supply price for most home and small-business customers who don’t buy electricity with competitive energy providers – reflects stable natural gas prices, the main driver of power generation in New England.

Advertisement

Seth Berry, a former state legislator who chaired the Legislature’s Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee and is critical of the performance of investor-owned utilities, said scrutiny by state regulators could uncover weaknesses in the argument for transmission upgrades and force utilities to scale back their plans.

The lure of profitability is difficult for utilities to resist and the result, he said, is “a race to a very expensive and overbuilt transmission network.”

Utilities should instead focus on repairing and upgrading “very creaky” distribution systems, he said. The networks of roadside power lines is most vulnerable to storms and potential damage that knocks out power.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Pistons to sign Maine Celtics forward to two-way deal (report)

Published

on

Pistons to sign Maine Celtics forward to two-way deal (report)


The Pistons have plucked some depth away from the Maine Celtics, agreeing to a two-way deal with Rob Harper Jr. according to a report from ESPN’s Tim Bontemps.

Harper Jr. played for the Celtics in the Summer League and signed an Exhibit 10 deal with the team before being waived at the end of training camp. He earned a bonus after suiting up for the Maine Celtics where he had been a standout in recent weeks. Harper Jr. played the entirely of the G-League Showcase Cup with Maine and had put together a terrific stretch in recent days up North.

Over the past four regular season games, he was averaging 22 points per game off the bench while shooting 42.5 percent from 3-point range, playing alongside JD Davison, Baylor Scheierman, Drew Peterson and Anton Watson in Maine.

The 24-year-old wing went undrafted out of Rutgers in 2022 but played the first two years of his career with the Raptors. He was waived by Toronto after suffering a season-ending injury last December before catching on with the Celtics this summer when he was recovered.

Advertisement

The 6-foot-4 wing still has two years left of two-way eligibility, making him an appealing prospect to Detroit likely after they lost a key guard in Jaden Ivey last week to a season-ending knee injury. The Pistons will need to release one of their two-way players in order to make room to sign Harper Jr. officially.

The Celtics filled all of their own three two-way spots with Davison, Peterson and Watson, so the team had no way of retaining Harper Jr. without offering him a spot on the 15-man roster.

  • BETTING: Check out our MA sports betting guide, where you can learn basic terminology, definitions and how to read odds for those interested in learning how to bet in Massachusetts.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Missing Maine teen found safe, police say

Published

on

Missing Maine teen found safe, police say


Police in Maine say an at-risk teen from Limerick who was reported missing Saturday night has been found.

Maine State Police said 13-year-old Madelyn “Ash” Fogg had last been seen on Central Avenue in Limerick around 8 p.m.

In an update shortly before 1 p.m. Sunday, they said the teen had been found safe.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending