Connect with us

Maine

Opinion: Government mandates to blame for continuing decline of Maine education

Published

on

Opinion: Government mandates to blame for continuing decline of Maine education


Following the release of Maine Policy Institute’s new report on the decline of Maine K-12 education earlier this week, the Maine Department of Education responded by trying to discredit both the report and the National Assessment of Educational Progress, an important piece of data used in the analysis.

The report itself is not an attack on Maine’s current DOE. Rather, it tells a story of decadeslong decline in Maine classrooms due to mandates that disrupt learning, for which prominent politicians at all levels of government – on both sides of the aisle – are responsible.

The NAEP, or the “Nation’s Report Card,” as it is often called, is a congressionally mandated test administered by the National Center for Education Statistics. It involves a representative sample of students in each state taking the test every two to four years. MPI’s report provides evidence that Maine fell in the NAEP rankings from consistently scoring first and second in math and reading in the early 1990s to an average of 36th by 2022.

In public comments this week, the DOE said that the NAEP “is used to identify national trends and was never designed to measure individual states.” The comments further claim that the test “provides a limited and narrow snapshot of the academic performance” of a small group of fourth and eighth graders and has proven “not to be a valid or reliable measure of individual states’ performance.”

Advertisement

It is dishonest that the DOE would say the NAEP was never designed to measure student performance in individual states. The NAEP itself has said its two major goals are to compare results between states and across time.

If the assessment itself was not representative, the federal government’s statisticians would not let it be used for comparisons between states. In fact, the National Center for Education Statistics works hard to ensure there are representative subgroups to analyze in each state, accounting for demographics such as race, gender and socioeconomic status.

It is also worth noting that while the DOE criticizes the use of the NAEP, Maine’s NAEP results are publicly available on the DOE website going all the way back to 2003. Users can compare Maine’s results to other states and see its performance over time. The department provides no disclaimer about utilizing the test in the way I did.

The NAEP was selected for this report because it is a rigorous and reliable test that provides data going all the way back to the 1990s. It is used by policy scholars across the ideological spectrum, from the American Enterprise Institute to the Brookings Institution. As one leading education scholar said, “When it comes to education, no facts are as reliable or respected as those produced by the (NAEP).”

To me, it seems the DOE does not care about data and is working to obscure the obvious: Maine test scores have been falling, students are not learning as much as they should be, and teachers and administrators are burning out and leaving their professions in droves. The DOE knows the report is right on those key findings, and that is why it must resort to attacking the use of this assessment.

Advertisement

Far more important than these test scores is the reality that Maine has seen a recent exodus of teachers and is facing one of the most staggering teacher shortages nationwide.

Experimental top-down mandates, pushed on Maine schools by the state and federal government over many decades, have forced teachers to change the way they teach, test, grade and manage students. What used to be valuable instruction time is now being dedicated to paperwork, data collection, social-emotional learning and other tasks. This steals valuable classroom time from students, and teachers do not like it either.

If Maine wants its test scores and student achievement to improve, local parents, teachers, administrators and school boards should be empowered to make the important decisions regarding their children’s education. Now is not the time to ignore evidence. Now is the time to learn from past mistakes and deliver Maine students the education they deserve.


Use the form below to reset your password. When you’ve submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

Advertisement

« Previous

Opinion: To improve Maine students’ health and academics, start in the cafeteria

Next »

Opinion: What if Portland became a bike town?



Source link

Advertisement

Maine

Citizen’s initiative wants to roll back recreational cannabis use in Maine

Published

on

Citizen’s initiative wants to roll back recreational cannabis use in Maine


A new citizen’s initiative is looking to roll back recreational cannabis use in Maine.  Maine has allowed for prescribing and limited possession of medical marijuana since 1999, and a successful 2009 referendum established licensed and regulated medical dispensaries. Then, in 2016, Maine voters approved recreational use, retail sale and taxation of cannabis, which the state […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Commission releases first recommendations to combat growing deed fraud threat

Published

on

Maine Commission releases first recommendations to combat growing deed fraud threat


PORTLAND (WGME) — Maine has spent the past two years grappling with a rise in deed fraud schemes.

The CBS13 I-Team first began investigating after an elderly man didn’t receive his tax bill and learned someone had transferred his property without his knowledge.

Since then, multiple landowners have come forward saying something similar almost happened to them. Our reporting has uncovered for-sale signs posted on land, fake driver’s licenses and signed agreements to transfer deeds; all tied to scam attempts.

Maine has spent the past two years grappling with a rise in deed fraud schemes. (The Nathanson family)

Advertisement

The growing pattern prompted a state commission to issue new recommendations aimed at stopping the fraud.

Landowners say scam nearly cost them their property

Two summers ago, Cheryl and Ralph Nathanson learned their land on Little Sebago Lake had been put up for sale online.

“We could have lost our property,” Cheryl Nathanson said.

The Nathansons, who live in Connecticut, were stunned when they discovered a fraudulent listing for their Maine plot.

“We notified the police and they said they can take a report on it but that there’s nothing they could really do,” Ralph Nathanson said.

Advertisement

Police told them it was a classic case of deed fraud: scammers posing as property owners, listing land they don’t own and disappearing with the cash.

The couple was advised to sign up for property alerts through the Cumberland County Registry of Deeds, but quickly learned those alerts offered little protection.

“You can register for the deed fraud but it only informs you, by email, after the deed has been transferred. So it’s basically worthless,” Ralph Nathanson said.

A realtor lists their property…. Again

The following summer, the Nathansons discovered a real estate sign had been placed on their land.

“I was notified by a neighbor that there was a for-sale sign, a realtor for-sale sign, on our land,” Ralph Nathanson said.

Advertisement

A realtor from Old Orchard Beach had unknowingly entered into an agreement with someone impersonating the couple.

“Some of the information was correct, some of it wasn’t. You can get anything off of Google,” Cheryl Nathanson said.

Ralph Nathanson remembers confronting the agent.

“You are selling my property and I’m not selling the property,” Ralph Nathanson said. “The phone went silent.”

Despite the ordeal, the couple believes they were lucky to have seen the sign, knowing how bad these schemes can get.

Advertisement

State commission concludes work on deed fraud

“Currently, you all might be landowners and your land might be at risk, and you might not know right now that somebody has sold your land,” Jane Towle with the Real Estate Commission said, during the final meeting of the Deed Fraud Commission.

This fall, a state commission of stakeholders convened to examine ways to prevent deed fraud in Maine.

The Nathansons urged the commission to go beyond awareness campaigns.

CBS13 I-Team Reporter Stephanie Grindley: “You think the state should act beyond just awareness?”

Cheryl Nathanson: “100%.”

Ralph Nathanson: “Absolutely. I think the state of Maine has a responsibility to protect landowners.

But not everyone in the meeting agreed on the scope of the problem.

Attorney General calls deed fraud a low-priority scam

In the final meeting, Attorney General Aaron Frey remained staunch in his skepticism, saying complaints of deed fraud are still relatively rare.

Advertisement

“What we’re seeing for people getting hurt and losing money, this would probably not be the thing I want to highlight over other scams that are happening right now that are actually costing people their retirement savings,” Frey said.

Sen. Henry Ingwersen of York, who spearheaded the commission, sat down with the I-Team following the final meeting.

Grindley: “During the meeting, I did hear the Attorney General essentially call this a non-issue. His office isn’t getting complaints. He doesn’t see a bunch of consumers loosing money to this. Has that changed your stance?”

Ingwersen: “We’ve had three that have really been highlighted just in southern Maine. We haven’t heard a lot from around the rest of the state, but there has been some, so I think that even though it’s rare, we really need to address it.”

“I was pleased that we did come up with a couple of recommendations that we’re going to put in the report,” Ingwersen said.

Key Recommendation: Verify the seller’s identity

The first area of agreement among most, not all, stakeholders would legally require listing agents to verify a seller’s identity.

“The way it is now, it’s best practice. And a lot of professionals are doing best practice,” Ingwersen said. “The red flags in deed fraud are cash sale, land only, a quick sale at below-market value If we had realtors really paying attention to those red flags but also a policy that would require them to check the identity of the fraudulent seller, or of the seller, thoroughly, I think it would prevent, even if it prevented one instance of deed fraud, I think it would be very helpful.”

Advertisement

The commission did not outline exactly how identification should be verified.

“We didn’t really specify what that identification process was going to be. We’re leaving that up to rule making,” Ingwersen said.

Second Recommendation: Easier path to undo a fraudulent deed

Currently, the only way to reverse a fraudulent deed in Maine is to go to court.

The commission proposes allowing an attorney to file an affidavit with the registry.

“Allow an attorney to file an affidavit with the deed recorder that would allow the deed to be, the fraudulent deed, to be nullified in a way that is a little bit quicker than we currently have,” Ingwersen said.

Advertisement

The recommendations will now head to the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee. Any legislative change likely wouldn’t take effect until 2027, if the proposals make it into a bill and then survive a vote.

“I think we made some good progress, but I don’t think this is going to go away. I think this will continue,” Ingwersen said.

Landowners fear fraud will try until it succeeds

“We were thinking, do we take a loan out on it just to secure it?” Ralph Nathanson said.

As the legislative process begins, the Nathansons say Maine cannot wait. They fear it’s only a matter of time before a sale of their land goes through.

“To lose land like this or to find out that their land is now gone, I just can’t imagine that,” Ralph Nathanson said.

Advertisement

Ideas Left on the Table: Title Freeze and National Guidance

Several proposals failed to gain traction, including a “title freeze.” a concept similar to a credit freeze that would allow a landowner to lock their deed from unauthorized transfers. Maine could have been the first state to pilot it, but members said they lacked enough information.

Instead, they pointed to national group studying deed fraud. The Uniform Law Commission is drafting model legislation that states, including Maine, could adopt to better protect landowners.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Charter Communications lays off 176 Maine employees

Published

on

Charter Communications lays off 176 Maine employees


PORTLAND, Maine (WGME) — Charter Communications, which owns Spectrum, is laying off 176 workers in Maine.

A company spokesperson said 176 employees were informed on Wednesday about the layoffs.

Charter Communications said it is transitioning the work done at the Portland call center to other U.S.-based centers effective immediately.

“Employees may relocate in their current role to select customer service locations and are eligible for relocation benefits. They will continue to receive regular pay for 90 days; severance and eligible benefits will begin afterward for those who do not relocate. Impacted employees may also apply for any open role for which they are qualified,” a company spokesperson said.

According to the Press Herald, the layoff is about a quarter of their Maine workforce.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending