Connect with us

Maine

Maine Voices: Mills has shown leadership on LGBTQ issues

Published

on

Maine Voices: Mills has shown leadership on LGBTQ issues


Delight Month is a time to have fun the progress now we have made on a extra simply, numerous and inclusive society. It’s a time to look again on the pioneers who broke new floor for freedom, love and acceptance. And it’s a time to look to the long run, put together for the work that should proceed and take a stand for what’s simply and proper.

As we sit up for November and the race for governor, the selection for Maine – and Maine’s LGBTQ group – is obvious.

Gov. Janet Mills has earned the EqualityMaine endorsement for re-election and stands in stark distinction to her opponent, former Gov. Paul LePage, as the correct selection for Maine. Mills is a robust, considerate and compassionate ally. Throughout her time as governor, she has delivered for Maine’s LGBTQ+ group, main the way in which on essential reforms and preventing for the flexibility of our group to stay our lives brazenly and as our true selves. Mills has earned re-election together with her regular management throughout difficult instances.

In simply 4 years as governor, Mills has constructed a powerful record of coverage accomplishments. On her first day in workplace, Mills expanded well being care to greater than 70,000 Mainers, serving to members of the LGBTQ group who too usually have issue accessing acceptable and well timed well being care. Mills can also be a staunch protector of entry to abortion care.

Advertisement

She led our state by way of the risks and financial hurt of the COVID-19 pandemic, placing her belief in science and listening to a refrain of voices from the well being care, enterprise, authorized and social justice communities. She put the well-being of Maine residents and companies first. Mills’ management in these areas has been important to each Mainer.

The governor has additionally set herself aside with insurance policies that immediately have an effect on our group. She signed into legislation a ban on the discredited and harmful observe of conversion remedy. She banned medical health insurance suppliers from excluding transgender folks and she or he restored advantages to navy veterans who had been discharged beneath the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Inform” coverage. Mills supported laws to require non-public medical health insurance insurance policies in Maine to develop entry to fertility care and eradicated outdated rules that required folks, together with transgender folks, to publish authorized notices to alter their identify.

Beneath her watch, the state has made it simpler for transgender Mainers to get identification paperwork that match their gender identification, and Mills has stood steadfast to guard transgender college students who wish to take part at school sports activities. Beneath her administration, transgender ladies can nonetheless obtain assist from homeless shelters, and the so-called “gay-panic” authorized protection – little greater than a defective justification for violence – has been eradicated from Maine’s courts.

Mills has a confirmed monitor report of working with Democrats, Republicans and independents for the good thing about all Maine folks, and she or he has proven unwavering assist for Maine’s LGBTQ+ group. Against this, LePage, who’s difficult Mills this election, has proven open hostility towards our group.

LePage vetoed laws that will have banned the dangerous observe of conversion remedy. He blocked the growth of Medicaid regardless of overwhelming assist from Maine voters, inappropriately denying well being care to hundreds of Maine folks. LePage joined anti-transgender lawsuits in different states, abusing his authority. He even joined a Virginia lawsuit in an try to dam a transgender pupil from utilizing the suitable restroom.

Advertisement

LePage has additionally opposed the legalization of same-sex marriage, used an anti-gay slur towards a Maine lawmaker, referred to folks of coloration as “the enemy” and used crass, sexualized language to assault the State Senate president.

The selection in November is obvious. Mills will assist lead our state to a stronger, extra affluent and extra numerous future. LePage would attempt to take us backwards, sinking our state once more into useless controversy, vitriol and regressive policymaking.

As we have fun Delight Month and all that has been achieved, we all know our progress is tentative and in danger. Mills is your best option for Maine.

— Particular to the Press Herald


Use the shape beneath to reset your password. If you’ve submitted your account e-mail, we’ll ship an e-mail with a reset code.

« Earlier

Subsequent »



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen

Published

on

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen


Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.

The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.

It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.

“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.

Advertisement

After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.

“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.

“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.

Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.

“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.

Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.

The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”

Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending