Connect with us

Maine

Four key environmental bills from Maine’s 130th Legislature you probably don’t know about

Published

on

Four key environmental bills from Maine’s 130th Legislature you probably don’t know about


Editor’s Observe: The next story first appeared in The Maine Monitor’s free environmental publication, Local weather Monitor, that’s delivered to inboxes totally free each Friday morning. Obtain the publication so you possibly can learn tales like this sooner by registering right here.

Sure, the legislative session ended awhile in the past, and maybe you’ve all moved on and are already looking forward to November elections and subsequent session.

We at The Monitor are nonetheless wading by means of the 969 payments (!!) that grew to become regulation final session, and thought this might be a superb time, now that the mud has settled, to focus on just a few you might have missed. (That determine doesn’t embrace the 27 payments that have been vetoed, by the way in which.)

As a result of my makes an attempt to plod by means of all 996 items of laws failed miserably (I by no means did grasp these velocity studying methods my dad tried to show me), I turned as a substitute to Kathleen Meil, director of coverage & partnerships at Maine Conservation Voters, to get her tackle a number of the laws they have been watching this yr.

Advertisement

There have been a variety of vital payments that handed, together with these geared toward limiting the unfold of PFAS and bettering grid planning. However these bought plenty of press, so I assumed I’d ask Meil about a number of the laws we didn’t hear as a lot about. Listed below are some highlights from what we mentioned:

LD 489: Decision, Proposing an Modification to the Structure of Maine To Set up a Proper to a Wholesome Setting

This invoice, which in the end didn’t go, was a proposal for a constitutional modification that will have enshrined a proper to a “clear and wholesome atmosphere and to the preservation of the pure, cultural and healthful qualities of the atmosphere.”

It required the state to “preserve, shield and keep the State’s pure sources, together with, however not restricted to, its air, water, land and ecosystems for the advantage of all of the individuals, together with generations but to come back.”

Though it did not garner the required 2/3 help from the Home, this invoice is value noting as a result of it’s emblematic of a rising motion all over the world in search of to codify the appropriate to a clear and wholesome atmosphere in regulation. A minimum of six states, together with New York, Montana, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Massachusetts and Hawaii, have such protections, and advocates say it’s doubtless this may return in Maine within the close to future.

Pennsylvania adopted a constitutional Environmental Rights Modification much like that being proposed in Maine method again in 1971. “They then used that constitutional proper as the idea for authorized motion when clear water, air, wholesome atmosphere was being violated,” mentioned Meil.

Advertisement

Many who opposed the Maine invoice, nonetheless, frightened a couple of cascade of unintended penalties, given the proposal’s broad language. Wouldn’t it forestall housing from being constructed? Wastewater infrastructure? Renewable vitality initiatives?

Commissioner Melanie Loyzim of the Maine Division of Environmental Safety known as the invoice’s language “excessive,” with “monumental” potential ramifications for state businesses.

Loyzim supplied a hypothetical: if the Division requires householders to deal with wastewater discharge at a stage of 99% management effectiveness for hormones earlier than permitting it to be discharged into groundwater (like a house septic system), one other resident utilizing that similar aquifer or bedrock fracture might declare the company violated their constitutional proper to wash groundwater by means of inaction.

How the courts would deal with claims like that is anybody’s guess, mentioned Loyzim, however they should be thought of.

Maine Conservation Voters’ 39 member organizations supported the invoice, however Meil acknowledged there have been plenty of unanswered questions.

Advertisement

“I do assume we now have a accountability to ask how might this be utilized in a method that’s counter to our objectives. There are a ton of tensions we’re going to be navigating for fairly a while about what a local weather resilient future appears to be like like,” she mentioned, including that that is doubtless not the final we’ll see of payments like this.

“There’ll proceed to be conflicts between conservation and clear vitality,” mentioned Meil. “It’s going to be a wild trip.”

LD 736: An Act To Improve the Ecological Reserve System

Talking of conservation: this invoice, which did go, was an try to permit the Bureau of Parks and Lands to accumulate further parcels as Ecological Reserves, a designation enabled by the Legislature in 2000. These reserves are public lands put aside to function benchmarks in opposition to which organic and environmental change may be measured.

The ultimate regulation raised the cap on whole land acreage that may be designated as Ecological Reserve from 100,000 to 115,000 acres, put in place guidelines for eradicating greater than 10 acres from the reserve designation, and added language permitting tribal members to collect supplies on Ecological Reserve land that will likely be used for cultural or conventional actions.

The Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands manages 96,000 acres of Ecological Reserves, ranging in dimension from 775 acres at Wassataquoik Stream in T3 R7 WELS to greater than 11,000 acres at Nahmakanta in Rainbow Township. Elements of the Cutler Coast are designated as reserves. That feels like loads, however Ecological Reserves cowl lower than 1% of the state.

Advertisement

They’re locations for scientific monitoring, schooling and analysis, in addition to some low-impact recreation, like mountain climbing, looking, fishing, cross-country snowboarding and primitive tenting. Timber harvesting isn’t allowed, giving timber an opportunity to develop huge and outdated, and giving us an opportunity to see what occurs once we don’t intervene with a panorama.

“A lot of the gaps [in conservation] are in southern Maine,” mentioned Meil. “There’s an ideal alternative to preserve extra land within the locations that the most individuals in Maine dwell.”

LD 1964: An Act To Replace Sure Water High quality Requirements and To Reclassify Sure Waters of the State

This upgraded the water classifications for greater than 800 miles of rivers and streams, acknowledged water our bodies throughout the Katahdin Woods and Waters Nationwide Monument as excellent nationwide useful resource waters, and up to date the pH vary for wholesome waters, which Jeff Reardon of Trout Limitless testified “responds to steering from the US [Environmental Protection Agency] and displays rising understanding of the lingering and ongoing impacts of acid rain in some Maine streams.” Advocates say it can additionally shield habitat necessary for the restoration of Atlantic salmon.

Maine’s water classification system is above and past the minimal fishable-swimmable requirements established within the federal Clear Water Act, which was signed into regulation 50 years in the past this October (championed by Maine’s personal Senator Edmund Muskie).

The system has eight classifications: 4 for freshwater rivers (AA, A, B, C), three for marine and estuarine waters (SA, SB, SC), and one for lakes and ponds (GPA). The Maine Division of Environmental Safety describes the system as “as a hierarchy of threat, multiple of use or high quality.”

Advertisement

The standard of the water is definitely not that a lot totally different between the water our bodies, in response to the Division. However decrease classification water our bodies are uncovered to extra threat, “the chance being the opportunity of a breakdown of the ecosystem and lack of use because of both pure or human-caused occasions.” Actions that might doubtlessly alter the ecosystem (damming, waste discharge) are allowed solely in decrease classification water our bodies. There may be little threat in school AA rivers, as an illustration, as a result of that classification doesn’t enable for these actions.

This regulation was the fruits of a three-year evaluate course of by the Division and now goes to the federal Environmental Safety Company for approval.

“It’s an acknowledgement that that physique of water is cleaner than it was three years in the past and should be protected,” mentioned Meil. Throughout testimony on the invoice, she added, a number of lawmakers recalled that many of those water our bodies have been as soon as so polluted “You couldn’t go to those rivers, you couldn’t fish in these rivers, you couldn’t swim in these rivers. That is the feel-good story of the session.”

LD 1979: An Act Relating to the Growth of Complete River Useful resource Administration Plans

Maine Conservation Voters’ 39 organizations didn’t help the early model of this invoice, mentioned Meil. The primary draft, which Meil mentioned was developed with intensive enter from Brookfield Renewable, a Canadian conglomerate that owns a variety of hydroelectric amenities in Maine, added language that will have required state businesses to think about “current makes use of” when growing complete river useful resource administration plans on watersheds which have a licensed hydropower challenge.

“The unique invoice was designed to privilege the pursuits of the dam house owners over to science and river restoration efforts,” mentioned Meil.

Advertisement

The regulation in the end didn’t embrace the “current makes use of” however did add language stating that complete river useful resource administration plans are a “main substantive rule,” which requires them to be introduced to the Legislature earlier than they will take impact. It additionally requires the Division “to take a look at how are we fascinated with river useful resource administration,” mentioned Meil. “Do we’d like a greater or totally different course of?”

 

We received’t get into the weeds on all the legal guidelines that handed this session, as a result of it’s doubtless you’ve heard fairly a bit about them at this level. However many have been vital, together with:

a regulation that prohibits the spreading of sludge and sludge-based compost

$60 million for farmers impacted by PFAS contamination

Advertisement

a regulation implementing company suggestions associated to sea stage rise and local weather resilience

a pilot program centered on local weather schooling in Maine colleges

the institution of the Maine Local weather Corps

a regulation closing a loophole permitting out-of-state waste into state-owned landfills

a regulation that may change the way in which utility firms plan grid upgrades.

Advertisement

“We’ve actually been form of increasing and revisioning what it means to have a wholesome atmosphere,” mentioned Meil, including that the group additionally supported laws associated to environmental justice and entry to wash ingesting water for Passamaquoddy tribal members dwelling at Nice Level. “We’re actually fascinated with wholesome environments in a brand new method.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen

Published

on

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen


Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.

The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.

It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.

“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.

Advertisement

After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.

“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.

“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.

Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.

“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.

Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.

The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”

Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending