Connect with us

Maine

Donald Trump is expected to appeal the Colorado and Maine rulings banning him from primary ballots

Published

on

Donald Trump is expected to appeal the Colorado and Maine rulings banning him from primary ballots


DENVER — Former President Donald Trump on Tuesday is expected to appeal rulings from Colorado and Maine that ban him from the states’ ballots, setting up a high-stakes showdown over a 155-year-old addition to the Constitution that bars from office those who “engaged in insurrection.”

Trump would appeal the Colorado Supreme Court ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court and the decision by Maine’s Democratic secretary of state to that state’s Superior Court.

It would mark the first time the nation’s highest court could rule on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, two sentences added to the Constitution after the Civil War to prevent Confederates from returning to their former government offices. The clause says that anyone who swore an oath to support the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection” against it is no longer eligible.

The appeals come as tensions mount over rulings that could keep the 2024 Republican presidential front-runner off ballots, though both the Maine and Colorado rulings are on hold until the appeals end, and Trump technically remains on the primary ballots in both states.

Advertisement

On Tuesday morning, Denver police arrested a man who fled a car crash and ran into the Colorado Supreme Court building. Police said he pointed a gun at an unarmed security officer, getting the guard’s keys and access to the whole building, and fired his gun several times. No one was injured.

A motive wasn’t immediately clear, but the Colorado State Patrol said the shooting didn’t appear to be related to previous threats to the justices, all of whom were appointed by Democratic governors.

Dozens of lawsuits citing the constitutional provision were filed against Trump last year in a bid to end his presidential campaign, contending he disqualified himself by inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol to stop Democrat Joe Biden from replacing him as president.

None of the lawsuits succeeded until the Colorado court’s ruling last month. Activists similarly asked dozens of top election officials to not place Trump on the ballot due to his alleged violation of Section 3. None acted until Maine’s Shenna Bellows barred him a week after the Colorado ruling.

If the Supreme Court does not rule on the merits of the cases, legal experts say, states could face the legal chaos that the high court is supposed to dispel.

Advertisement

Advocates of disqualifying Trump argue the matter is simple — Section 3 makes him no longer eligible for the presidency, just as if he somehow didn’t meet other constitutional requirements, such as being a natural-born citizen at least 35 years old.

Trump’s attorneys contend that’s a wild misreading of a vague clause that was rarely used after the 1870s. They contend that Jan. 6 was not legally an insurrection, that the provision doesn’t apply to the president and that whether Trump qualifies for the ballot is not a decision for unelected state judges to make.



Source link

Maine

Platner replacement should support single-sex private spaces and sports at school | Opinion

Published

on

Platner replacement should support single-sex private spaces and sports at school | Opinion


Leyland Streiff is the principal officer of the Protect Girls’ Sports in Maine ballot committee and leader of the Maine Girl Dads, a coalition of fathers whose mission is to restore single-sex competitive sports and private spaces in schools.

We — the Maine Girl Dads, a nonpartisan coalition of 8,000-plus dads united by a mission to protect the sex-based rights of our daughters — believe that Graham Platner has created a significant opportunity for the Democratic Party. Will any candidate take it?

It’s an opportunity to challenge establishment thinking, to reclaim common sense and to reassure females of all ages that their personal boundaries — and their sex-based rights — actually matter (and aren’t just a talking point on the campaign trail).

This is an opportunity to listen to the dozens of women and girls who have come forward to say the current system is broken. That any policies prioritizing gender identity over biological sex are inequitable. That they are sexist, regressive and an affront to their federal civil rights (specifically Title IX, which was a civil right hard-won by women 54 years ago). Rights that the U.S. Supreme Court just affirmed 9-0 are sex-based rights as it relates to competitive sport.

Advertisement

This is an opportunity to believe the young girls and women who have risked everything to courageously come forward and testify on April 14 in Augusta, detailing how current school and Maine Human Rights Act policies have resulted in exposure to voyeurism, masturbation, violence and mental trauma from males in their private spaces and on their sports podiums in our public schools. This should shock and shame us all and spur our leaders into action.

This is an opportunity to restore equality, inclusivity and progressive thinking in school and in sport, as everyone has a sex. Sex is not gender, and there is no right or wrong way to be a male or female (dress, feel, present, identify however you want). Sex is big enough for everyone. It always has been, and always will be. It’s the common, innate and immutable trait that every human shares. Recognizing biological fact doesn’t mean disrespecting personal identity.

This is an opportunity to restore and rebuild the growing fragmentation of the Democratic Party, driven by a voting base that does not carry the radical views of the elected elite. A voting base that increasingly wants progress, not regress, of sex-based rights. A voting base of girls and women that simply want single-sex private spaces and sports (both in our schools and in our jails). And a rapidly growing base of fathers that are no longer willing to watch the political establishment strip away their daughters’ civil rights and dignity for campaign funding.

This is an opportunity to end the sex-based discrimination that happens every day in Maine’s schools, and even in our jails. If a female wants a female-only space or sport (or jail cell), they are owed that legally and morally. We should listen to these girls and women. Believe them. Stop gaslighting them (as so many of our “progressive” institutions like the Maine Women’s Lobby chooses to do). We should honor them. Encourage them. Respect them. Protect them. Seek their consent. Not force them to undress or compete next to a male after they’ve told us they don’t want that.

This is an opportunity to stand up for the sex-based rights of all kids and — in doing so — stand out from the other candidates who will surely continue touting the regressive idea that females are undeserving of private spaces or competitive sports free of males.

Advertisement

Democrat Mainers want a hero. Platner just created an opportunity. Will anyone take it?

Which candidate will step up and meet the moment? Who will believe women and girls? Who will respect their personal boundaries and protect their sex-based rights? Who will stand against the sex-based discrimination that’s currently aimed at our state’s most vulnerable population: our schoolchildren?

We’re rooting for common sense. We’re rooting for candidates of all parties to stand up for every child’s right to single-sex sports and private spaces in our public schools.

We hope they all stand with us and stand with our girls.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Trust announces 2 hires in Augusta, Waterville

Published

on

Maine Trust announces 2 hires in Augusta, Waterville


The Maine Trust for Local News has hired two reporters to cover key areas in central Maine.

Abigail Pritchard

Abigail Pritchard earned her master’s in journalism from Boston University and was formerly the editor-in-chief of American University’s student newspaper, The Eagle. Her work has appeared in various Massachusetts-based publications and she previously worked as the Statehouse correspondent for The New Bedford Light.

Pritchard covers the Waterville area and writes the weekly Kennebec Beat North newsletter.

When she’s not working, she enjoys cooking, reading and taking long drives.

Advertisement

Sara Coughlin earned a degree in English and government with a concentration in creative writing from Bowdoin College, where she served as an editor for the student newspaper, the Bowdoin Orient, and wrote for Bowdoin Communications.

Sara Coughlin

Originally from Brunswick, she previously interned for the Portland Press Herald and the Harpswell Anchor.

Couglin covers the Augusta area and writes the weekly Kennebec Beat South newsletter.

Outside of work, you may find her doing yoga — she’s training to become a yoga teacher —or crocheting a hat.

The Maine Trust for Local News, a subsidiary of the National Trust for Local News, is the parent company of the Kennebec Journal in Augusta, Morning Sentinel in Waterville, Portland Press Herald, and Sun Journal in Lewiston, as well as a host of weekly print and online publications.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democrats must show moral courage on Palestine | Opinion

Published

on

Maine Democrats must show moral courage on Palestine | Opinion


Alex Smith, from Holden, attended Brewer High School and Hampshire College, and earned a law degree from Northeastern University and a master’s degree in public health from Tufts. He has worked for UNHCR, UN Women and the International Criminal Court in The Hague. He lives in London.

To win the progressive vote and have any chance of beating Susan Collins, Democratic candidates must speak with conviction and moral clarity about the defining human rights violations of our time: Israel’s genocide, apartheid, systemic torture, occupation and other crimes against Palestinians. Those who don’t need not apply.

I grew up on Holbrook Pond off Route 1A near Bangor. Today, I’m a lawyer and global health specialist with more than 25 years of experience. In 2024, I resigned from my senior advisor role with USAID in protest of the Biden administration’s Gaza policies.

Since then, I’ve joined a legal team investigating Israel’s crimes in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and have continued my advocacy through research, media appearances (e.g., CNN ,  Al Jazeera English, Al Jazeera Arabic, AJ+  and TRT World ), lecturing and publishing with  Cambridge University (UK), DAWN and other universities and think tanks.

Advertisement

I’ve traveled to the West Bank twice in the last year, investigating ongoing sexual violence and other human rights abuses in Gaza and the West Bank and coordinating legal research with human rights organizations, lawyers and survivors of torture.

With the rise and fall of the Platner campaign, I was encouraged to see my fellow Mainers elevating human rights in Palestine to a major concern and not a fringe issue. This concern mirrors broader national trends.

Among voters who supported Joe Biden in 2020 but did not vote for Kamala Harris in 2024, the single most important issue was ending Israel’s violence in Gaza (29% ), surpassing even inflation and the economy (24%), Medicare and Social Security (12%) and immigration (11%). Nationwide, a majority of Democrats have correctly identified that Israel is committing genocide, with 83% supporting a permanent stop to the killing and 75% opposing U.S. military aid to Israel (compared to just 18% in favor).

Taking a moral stand is clearly popular with Democratic voters, as we’ve seen in New York and Colorado, where voters treated opposition to Israeli crimes like a basic moral litmus test. The saying goes: “If you won’t stand against genocide, why would I trust you to stand up for universal healthcare?”

Condemnation of Israel’s crimes comfortably puts candidates on the right side of history and in good company with the U.N. Commission of Inquiry, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Save the Children, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, the International Court of Justice, Nick Kristof and Israeli genocide scholars and organizations, including Omar Bartov, B’Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel .

Advertisement

With voters showing such moral clarity and focus on this issue, it is striking that so few candidates have spoken clearly about it. To date, Jordan Wood , Shenna Bellows and Nirav Shah have publicly stated that they believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and have called for ending U.S. support for Israel’s military campaign.

The remaining potential Democratic nominees, including Troy Jackson, Dan Kleban, Paige Loud, David Costello and Andrea LaFlamme, have either taken more limited positions or have not publicly condemned what many international organizations, legal experts and human rights groups have described as genocide, nor have they called for ending U.S. arms transfers to Israel.

When Gov. Janet Mills was asked about the Gaza genocide, she gave an incoherent answer, deflecting to other humanitarian crises, listing Sudan, Somalia and the Rwandan genocide, which was over 30 years ago. Instead of naming specific actions to stop genocide and other crimes, she said vaguely, “There’s a lot we have to be concerned about.” She went on to lose the primary battle. That kind of wavering on an issue as serious as genocide won’t cut it.

Graham Platner, who openly opposed Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank, received more than 150,000 votes, the highest total ever won by a Democratic U.S. Senate primary candidate in Maine. Those voters weren’t simply looking for another Democrat. They wanted someone willing to challenge corruption and the bipartisan abandonment of principle on important issues, including Gaza.

The last thing voters want is more invertebrates in Congress. Anyone not taking a moral stand should therefore stand aside.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending