Connect with us

Pennsylvania

Half of child deaths left unreviewed in Pa. since 2020 as counties struggle with ‘unfunded mandate’

Published

on

Half of child deaths left unreviewed in Pa. since 2020 as counties struggle with ‘unfunded mandate’


Many Pennsylvania counties are failing to review the death of every child in their area, despite a 2008 state law that requires them to do so.

The problem, advocates and program participants say, is a lack of both state assistance in collecting data and time for volunteers to run the local panels.

Gov. Josh Shapiro wants the legislature to approve $2.5 million to improve this work, but it’s unclear if the request will be considered a priority this year.

The effort to study the deaths of Pennsylvania children dates back about two decades, when the state passed a law mandating counties host a local board of healthcare professionals, law enforcement officials, child protective service providers, and a coroner or medical examiner to review the deaths of every resident under the age of 21. The law was one of several initiatives spurred by the murder of Berks County toddler Maxwell Fisher in 1996.

Advertisement

Based on the information county boards gather, members are charged with creating strategies for local and state policymakers to prevent similar deaths.

But reports shared with Spotlight PA by the Pennsylvania Department of Health show that since 2020, roughly half of childhood deaths statewide have not been reviewed. Those lapses are especially prominent in rural counties, where local teams are more likely to falter or not exist.

Policymakers have known about the program’s issues for years.

A multiyear East Stroudsburg University evaluation of the program commissioned by the state Department of Health concluded in 2024 that the Child Death Review program is “an unfunded mandate.” It issued a long list of recommendations to rectify the program’s shortcomings, including creating regional teams for rural areas.

“Staffing turnovers and pandemic disruptions were detrimental to maintaining complete teams in many regions of Pennsylvania,” researchers wrote. “Some have since begun to rebuild while other teams have yet to meaningfully reengage in (Child Death Review).”

Advertisement

Still, lawmakers have failed to adopt legislation — or even introduce any, according to a search of the state General Assembly’s website — to address the issues facing the 2008 law.

The status quo could change this year.

Steven Shapiro, a pediatrician and longtime member of the Montgomery County review team, told Spotlight PA that he and fellow pediatrician Erich Batra, of Lebanon County’s review board, have been urging state officials to improve the “flawed” Child Death Review system. They want a coordinated effort to improve data collection and remove some burdens from counties’ responsibilities.

“If you just unpack how the child succumbed, then you begin to learn about how you can protect other children from enduring the same fate and parents enduring the same fate,” Shapiro said.

Shapiro’s son, Gov. Josh Shapiro, happens to be in a position to help get the program some state funding. Though the elder Shapiro said he does not “try to influence” policy when speaking with his son, some topics come up “over table talk at dinner sometimes.”

Advertisement

Earlier this year, for the first time, the governor proposed using a new $2.5 million from the state’s general fund to support the program. The Department of Health said in an emailed April statement that the money would be used to adopt some of the report’s recommendations. Those include adding health department staff to assist county teams with data collection and prevention strategies, creating a grant that counties could use to “enhance local CDR operations,” and expanding public education campaigns geared toward preventing child deaths.

The Department of Health’s statement did not specify how many positions would be added to improve the program’s organization.

Steven Shapiro said he and Batra are also working on a “cogent, complete and cost-effective” proposal to “redo” how the state is involved in Child Death Review data collection that would not require new legislation. He wouldn’t share details on how that new system might work, but said some funding from the state is essential.

Batra told Spotlight PA the $2.5 million in state funding the governor is proposing would be a good starting point. He envisions it helping counties with data collection and funding local prevention efforts, which can include things like adding signs at dangerous intersections, leading a smoke detector campaign in neighborhoods experiencing fires, or holding fundraisers for a local Cribs for Kids branch.

“A lot of the way Child Death Review works is what I call the intangibles,” Batra said. “It’s the community coming together and working together in a way that they might not always do on a day-to-day basis.”

Advertisement

But Cathleen Palm, founder of the Center for Children’s Justice and a longtime advocate for improving Child Death Review, told Spotlight PA she’s not convinced Gov. Shapiro’s funding pitch alone is a game-changer.

She said that if improving Child Death Review were truly a priority for policymakers, there would be more fanfare around the funding proposal from the Shapiro administration.

Palm also criticized lawmakers for their inaction on addressing issues within the program that have been known for years.

“Why do we create a law if we don’t want to follow it?” Palm said.

In a year where so many competing interests are fighting over a limited amount of state funds, Palm worries Shapiro’s proposal may go overlooked by lawmakers.

Advertisement

“Investing in improvements to the CDR process will further allow the Administration to expand public education and outreach, with a focus on preventable causes of child death,” Rosie Lapowsky, Gov. Shapiro’s spokesperson, said in a statement. “The Governor is hopeful the General Assembly shares that mission of protecting children and ensuring their safety.”

The annual proportion of reviewed child deaths plummeted during COVID-19 and has not fully rebounded, even though there has also been a reduction in the total number of deaths, according to annual reports from the Department of Health.

In the history of the review requirement, county boards have never succeeded in studying every death. The closest they got was in 2013 — statewide, about three-quarters of the 1,931 child deaths that happened that year were reviewed.

That rate dropped to an all-time low in 2019, when 43% of that year’s 1,907 child deaths were reviewed. The drop is often associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, because deaths tend to get reviewed many months after the fact.

The review rate climbed back to nearly 60% in 2023 (of 1,551 deaths), the most recent year for which data are available.

Advertisement

However, local teams across the state left more than 600 deaths unreviewed in 2023.

Unreviewed deaths stem directly from members being “stretched thin with resources” and being “pulled in so many different directions,” according to Christina Phillips, who organized the Child Death Review program from 2018 until her retirement earlier this year.

Phillips said she worked as a “one-person project” at the state level to coordinate with counties about which deaths to review. Part of the reason the Department of Health commissioned East Stroudsburg University to do its 2022-24 study of the program is because Phillips raised concerns, she told Spotlight PA.

Most of the people who serve on local review teams are volunteers who do this work alongside their regular paid positions. Phillips said many rural counties meet as little as once or twice a year.

What they need, she said, is help from state staff to request medical records, synthesize findings into data entry, and translate any patterns they find into prevention strategies.

Advertisement

Phillips said she was unsure why lawmakers have not tried to address advocates’ concerns, given they have received an annual report that highlights those problems for multiple years.

“Preventing kids from dying is never a partisan issue,” Phillips said. “Preventing kids from dying is possible if there are more resources for Child Death Review.”

East Stroudsburg University researchers sorted counties into categories: ones that already have strong review programs; ones that could improve in various ways; and ones that need to be redeveloped.

They identified 20 rural counties that should at least consider organizing under regional offices to maximize their resources, and 22 counties — 6 urban and 16 rural — that must regroup because although they experienced “sufficient deaths to justify a local team,” they saw inconsistent participation from members.

The 15 “strong” counties were a mix of urban and rural, from Philadelphia to a regional operation between Susquehanna and Wyoming Counties, according to researchers. They suggested that 10 other counties, including Allegheny, build on their current processes.

Advertisement

Many of the program’s issues stem from data collection. Researchers at East Stroudsburg found that facilitating data collection falls onto volunteer team chairs. In other states, like Maryland and Delaware, there are paid staff at the state level who coordinate data collection efforts prior to meetings, according to researchers.

Roy Hoffman, medical director of Philadelphia’s Fatality Review Program, told Spotlight PA that even for his team of roughly 15 city employees working on death review, data collection is “a pain” and “time-consuming.”

Philadelphia has operated its own death review group since the 1990s, Hoffman said, and saw few differences following the 2008 law.

“I can imagine for some of these smaller counties with coroners, with not having done this, this must be a big pull and hard to do,” Hoffman said.

The most recent state Child Death Review annual report, analyzing 2023 data, found that Black or African American children died at twice the rate of white children — a statistic in line with national trends.

Advertisement

Roughly 47% of the reviewed deaths in 2023 were caused by medical conditions, including prematurity. “External causes,” including bodily force or a weapon, accounted for about 45% of deaths that year.

Palm pointed to the Department of Health’s finding that roughly one-third of child deaths in 2023 were flagged by local teams as “preventable.”

“All of us as a society want to keep our kids alive and healthy and well,” Palm said. “In order to do that, we have to study the kids who died to figure out how we prevent the next child from dying.”

Palm wants the state to foster the same level of research toward preventing gun safety, motor vehicle crashes, drowning, accidental overdoses, and abuse or violence against kids as it and other institutions direct toward studying youth cancer rates.

Researchers at East Stroudsburg recommended that lawmakers amend current law to require a minimum number of quarterly meetings for each local team, boost training for local and state team members, mandate a specific timeframe for a death review to be completed, and require local teams to include representatives from school districts and “underrepresented community groups.”

Advertisement

They also urged lawmakers to reduce the age cap to trigger a mandated review, from 21 to 18, and to include an “enforcement provision” to encourage counties to participate in the program.

None of the researchers’ suggested changes to Child Death Review have been proposed in the General Assembly, according to a review of introduced bills on the legislature’s website.

The original bill establishing the program was sponsored by Republican state Sen. Lisa Baker. She told Spotlight PA in response to emailed questions that it’s likely time to reevaluate the system with input from state and local stakeholders to “address evolving needs.”

“Given children are potentially falling through the cracks, a closer examination and review of the program is certainly warranted,” Baker said.

Beth Rementer, a spokesperson for Democratic state House Majority Leader Matt Bradford, noted that the chamber passed Shapiro’s budget proposal in April, which included the $2.5 million for Child Death Review.

Advertisement

“We are open to discussions with the administration and stakeholders about improving the program to ensure all children are safe,” she said.

A spokesperson for Republican state Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman did not respond to questions regarding potential changes this year to Child Death Review.

___

This story was originally published by Spotlight PA and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Advertisement



Source link

Pennsylvania

Trump admin rule puts reproductive health care for 160K Pa. patients at risk, lawsuit says

Published

on

Trump admin rule puts reproductive health care for 160K Pa. patients at risk, lawsuit says


Family planning and health organizations that serve tens of thousands of people across Pennsylvania could see federal funding delayed or denied by a new Trump administration policy, a new lawsuit alleges.

The suit, which includes the Cumberland County-based Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania as a plaintiff, takes aim at a step added this year by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to applications for Title X grants, which provide local agencies with funds to aid low-income and uninsured patients with family planning and related health services.

That new process is detailed in the Title X 2027 Notice of Funding Opportunity published in April. It states that before applicants are assessed on their merits, a group of presidential appointees will conduct an “alignment review” to determine whether each application matches the agency’s “priorities.” The plan offers no opportunity to appeal the group’s decision.

To the plaintiffs in the suit, that sounded like code for evaluating applicants based on politics.

Advertisement

“The Trump administration’s attempt to condition Title X funding on political allegiance is a grave threat to public health,” Sara Rose, deputy legal director at ACLU of Pennsylvania and attorney on the case, said in a statement. “Grant decisions must be guided by objective standards to ensure that taxpayer money is spent fairly and efficiently without regard to the ideology of its recipients.”

Created during the Nixon administration to help low-income people prevent unwanted pregnancies, Title X funding has long drawn opposition from anti-abortion activists.

The Trump administration has also attempted to shift the focus of the program toward promoting more pregnancies. Officials tried and failed earlier this year to block Title X funding from reaching Planned Parenthood facilities.

The suit is filed in the federal Middle District of Pennsylvania. It names HHS, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and other agency staff as defendants.

There are four Title X grantees in the commonwealth, each serving a specific region: The Family Health Council in central Pennsylvania, AccessMatters in Philadelphia, Adagio Health in the west, and Maternal and Family Health Services in the northeast.

Advertisement

Combined, they receive more than $12.6 million in Title X funds annually to serve more than 160,000 patients in Pennsylvania, according to their grant details listed on HHS’ website. (AccessMatters is by far the largest, working with more than 90,000 people.)

These organizations offer everything from fertility care and access to contraception to screenings for cancers and sexually transmitted infections.

Nationwide, the most recent data from HHS shows Title X grantees served nearly 2.8 million people.

Also at issue in the lawsuit is that HHS already has a set of regulations, put in place during President Joe Biden’s administration, that govern Title X applications — and many of them directly conflict with stated Trump administration priorities.

The suit highlights, for instance, that the HHS website currently states that ending “ideologically-laden concepts like health equity” is a priority, while Title X rules simultaneously require grantees to “advance health equity.”

Advertisement

Another alleged conflict stems from the Trump administration’s opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, especially for transgender people. Current Title X regulations mandate that grantees ensure transgender people have access to their programming.

Brigitte Amiri, deputy director at the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project, told Spotlight PA that the Trump administration could overturn the Biden-era regulations by undertaking a public notice and comment rulemaking process.

“But you can’t just do it by a funding announcement,” she said.

The new review step “subverts the integrity” of the Title X grant application process, the lawsuit argues, and enables HHS “to hijack” the Title X program to fund organizations furthering the agency’s “political agenda.”

The lawsuit also notes that Title X funds are prohibited from being used for abortions.

Advertisement

Federal Judge Jennifer Wilson, who was nominated to the bench by Trump in 2019, will hear the case.

Spotlight PA sought a comment on the lawsuit from HHS, but did not receive a response.

The Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania was selected to join the lawsuit because it has received Title X funding since the establishment of the program in 1970, and it serves a large area, the chief executive of the National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association told Stateline.

Patricia Fonzi, president and CEO of the Family Health Council, said in a statement that her organization serves more than 31,000 people across a 24-county region.

“We welcome a competitive grant process and believe every applicant should be evaluated on its ability to effectively serve communities, responsibly steward federal resources, and demonstrate the experience and capacity necessary to carry out the Title X statute,” Fonzi said.

Advertisement

“At the end of the day, the success of Title X is measured by whether people can access the care they need in their own communities — and that depends on funding decisions grounded in experience, proven performance, and the ability to deliver comprehensive care where it is needed most.”

The plaintiffs are urging the court to vacate the Trump administration’s new Title X rule and declare it “unlawful.”

Title X funds are issued to agencies on a five-year basis, with annual renewal requirements. The new rule at issue was included in the process for grants under fiscal year 2027, which will begin a new five-year cycle.

___

This story was originally published by Spotlight PA and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Federal government sues Pennsylvania, others over SNAP data

Published

on

Federal government sues Pennsylvania, others over SNAP data


(WHTM) — Pennsylvania is one of four states facing a lawsuit from the federal government over SNAP applicant data.

The U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Michigan, and Minnesota. They are seeking the last five years of SNAP applicant data in the respective states.

The DOJ alleges that the four states refused to turn over data to the U.S. Department of Agriculture “so that USDA could ensure that states are properly administering and enforcing their determinations of residents’ eligibility.”

“The American people deserve a government that is transparent about how it spends their hard-earned tax dollars,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “These four states are thwarting USDA’s efforts to ensure that the billions of dollars in SNAP benefits they distribute every year are not lost to fraud.”

Advertisement

“Stopping the rampant theft of taxpayer money demands a whole-of-government response, including strong participation at the state level,” said Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald of the Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division. “These states are happy to take hundreds of millions of federal tax dollars—much of which is exploited by fraudsters—but want zero transparency over how those tax dollars are spent.”

Get the latest Pennsylvania politics and election news with abc27 newsletters!

The Department of Justice said 28 states promptly provided data and such indicated “there are billions of dollars per year in SNAP funds going to overpayments and fraud.”

The USDA has been seeking data for the past year or so, leading to a legal battle over concerns about how the data would be used.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

House Republicans stall activity, Pennsylvania Rep. Meuser calls tactics ‘foolish’ | Fox Business Video

Published

on

House Republicans stall activity, Pennsylvania Rep. Meuser calls tactics ‘foolish’ | Fox Business Video


House Speaker Mike Johnson sent representatives home early as hardline Republicans stalled floor activities, demanding action on the SAVE America Act. President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social, urging House Republicans to unify and avoid giving power to Democrats. Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA) labels the stalling tactics ‘foolish,’ emphasizing the need for legislative progress and appropriations.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending