Connect with us

Maine

Bill to halt natural gas expansion in Maine prompts energy and climate debate

Published

on

Bill to halt natural gas expansion in Maine prompts energy and climate debate


A bill that seeks to slow down expansion of natural gas infrastructure in Maine has sparked a robust debate over the energy and climate policy within the State House.

While environmentalists insist the bill is a critical step toward a cleaner future that would not affect existing natural gas customers. But in the latest example of partisan divides over energy policy, Republicans dismiss the measure as government overreach that will only harm Maine residents and businesses.

“This bill is about limiting choice,” Sen. Matt Harrington, R-Sanford, said during a press conference before Tuesday’s committee hearing. “This bill seeks to limit the cheapest form of heat, according to the Governor’s Energy Office. And it’s deplorable to me that Democrats in this state would seek to do that.”

For years, natural gas was touted as a cleaner and oftentimes cheaper alternative to oil when it came to generating electricity, heating homes and even powering public transit buses. The process of fracking, which involves fracturing underground bedrock to enable the extraction of natural gas, opened up vast domestic sources. And a handful of natural gas companies responded by building new pipelines in southern and central Maine.

Advertisement

But natural gas is still a fossil fuel that pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when burned.

Bill Harwood, who heads Maine’s Office of the Public Advocate, told members of the Legislature’s Energy, Utilities and Technology Committee that it’s time to start looking beyond natural gas as Maine tries meet ambitious targets for reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

“If we’re serious about meeting our climate goals, we must begin the discussion of phasing out our reliance on all fossil fuels, including natural gas,” Harwood said. “This bill basically proposes a pause in the expansion of natural gas while we study the future of it.”

Harwood is the lead proponent of a bill that would prohibit natural gas utilities from expanding into new communities starting next year. The measure, known as LD 2077, would also prohibit gas companies from offering promotions to entice new customers. And it would direct the state to study the potential health impacts of natural gas combustion and leakage indoors.

Harwood and other supporters said the measure would not prevent Maine’s roughly 50,000 gas customers from continuing to use gas. Gas companies have laid pipelines to several major businesses and offered residential customers along their routes to connect.

Advertisement

The Governor’s Energy Office currently ranks natural gas as the cheapest heating fuel source in Maine followed by firewood and heat pumps. But global natural gas prices have fluctuated wildly in recent years because of the war in Ukraine and other international factors. Harwood’s office fought a proposed 200% rate increase sought by Summit Natural Gas of Maine in 2022.

“I think we all agree that natural gas has a role in play in getting us where we want to be,” Harwood said. “The question is how short is that bridge. I think you will here a lot of testimony today conceding that gas in not a permanent solution to our energy needs.”

The proposal has strong backing from environmental groups such as the Conservation Law Foundation, whose attorney, Emily Green, picked up on Harwood’s description of natural gas as a bridge between dirtier fossil fuels like coal and oil and renewable energy.

“The bridge — if ever there were a bridge — can only be more and more condensed and clearly the alternative that is rising to the top is electrification in terms of costs and emissions,” said Emily Green, senior attorney with the Conservation Law Foundation.

Jeff Shapiro with Natural Resources Council of Mainepointed to the severe storms that caused massive flooding and damage to coastal and riverside towns in Maine over the past month as evidence for the need for prompt, decisive action on climate.

Advertisement

“While oil heating is the big kahuna in terms of reducing emissions, we need to make sure we are not growing a different problem as we are trying to solve another,” Shapiro said. “Time is short and we just saw last week record tides as we’ve seen these storms over the past few weeks.”

But the bill has encountered strong pushback from the gas industry, some town officials and Republican lawmakers. More than a dozen Republicans attended Tuesday’s press conference opposing the bill.

“There’s nothing better than diversifying your energy resources,” said Sen. James Libby, R-Standish. “And we know that natural gas burns more cleanly and has been effective deterrent to building CO2 across the world, not just the United States or Maine.”

Some Democrats are also opposed, as was clear Tuesday when Senate President Troy Jackson of Allagash told committees that the bill feels anti-Northern Maine because it would shut the region off from natural gas.

“The idea that we would take away any heating source in a state like Maine, where people have real, real concerns about heating their homes, concerns me greatly,” Jackson said.

Advertisement

Kurt Adams with Summit Utilities, which owns one of Maine’s major natural gas companies, warned that the bill would stop investments in climate technology. Adams said his company has invested $25 million into a renewable fuel digester at a Maine dairy farm in Clinton that produces the equivalent of 45 percent of the gas that Summit Natural Gas provides to residential customers. And Adams disputed suggestions that Summit is responsible to gas leaks that add to climate change.

“This bill reflects a national conversation that people are trying to import to Maine’s problems,” Adams said. “And when you do that, you miss the facts on the ground.”

The committee has not yet scheduled a work session on the bill.





Source link

Advertisement

Maine

Maine Commission releases first recommendations to combat growing deed fraud threat

Published

on

Maine Commission releases first recommendations to combat growing deed fraud threat


PORTLAND (WGME) — Maine has spent the past two years grappling with a rise in deed fraud schemes.

The CBS13 I-Team first began investigating after an elderly man didn’t receive his tax bill and learned someone had transferred his property without his knowledge.

Since then, multiple landowners have come forward saying something similar almost happened to them. Our reporting has uncovered for-sale signs posted on land, fake driver’s licenses and signed agreements to transfer deeds; all tied to scam attempts.

Maine has spent the past two years grappling with a rise in deed fraud schemes. (The Nathanson family)

Advertisement

The growing pattern prompted a state commission to issue new recommendations aimed at stopping the fraud.

Landowners say scam nearly cost them their property

Two summers ago, Cheryl and Ralph Nathanson learned their land on Little Sebago Lake had been put up for sale online.

“We could have lost our property,” Cheryl Nathanson said.

The Nathansons, who live in Connecticut, were stunned when they discovered a fraudulent listing for their Maine plot.

“We notified the police and they said they can take a report on it but that there’s nothing they could really do,” Ralph Nathanson said.

Advertisement

Police told them it was a classic case of deed fraud: scammers posing as property owners, listing land they don’t own and disappearing with the cash.

The couple was advised to sign up for property alerts through the Cumberland County Registry of Deeds, but quickly learned those alerts offered little protection.

“You can register for the deed fraud but it only informs you, by email, after the deed has been transferred. So it’s basically worthless,” Ralph Nathanson said.

A realtor lists their property…. Again

The following summer, the Nathansons discovered a real estate sign had been placed on their land.

“I was notified by a neighbor that there was a for-sale sign, a realtor for-sale sign, on our land,” Ralph Nathanson said.

Advertisement

A realtor from Old Orchard Beach had unknowingly entered into an agreement with someone impersonating the couple.

“Some of the information was correct, some of it wasn’t. You can get anything off of Google,” Cheryl Nathanson said.

Ralph Nathanson remembers confronting the agent.

“You are selling my property and I’m not selling the property,” Ralph Nathanson said. “The phone went silent.”

Despite the ordeal, the couple believes they were lucky to have seen the sign, knowing how bad these schemes can get.

Advertisement

State commission concludes work on deed fraud

“Currently, you all might be landowners and your land might be at risk, and you might not know right now that somebody has sold your land,” Jane Towle with the Real Estate Commission said, during the final meeting of the Deed Fraud Commission.

This fall, a state commission of stakeholders convened to examine ways to prevent deed fraud in Maine.

The Nathansons urged the commission to go beyond awareness campaigns.

CBS13 I-Team Reporter Stephanie Grindley: “You think the state should act beyond just awareness?”

Cheryl Nathanson: “100%.”

Ralph Nathanson: “Absolutely. I think the state of Maine has a responsibility to protect landowners.

But not everyone in the meeting agreed on the scope of the problem.

Attorney General calls deed fraud a low-priority scam

In the final meeting, Attorney General Aaron Frey remained staunch in his skepticism, saying complaints of deed fraud are still relatively rare.

Advertisement

“What we’re seeing for people getting hurt and losing money, this would probably not be the thing I want to highlight over other scams that are happening right now that are actually costing people their retirement savings,” Frey said.

Sen. Henry Ingwersen of York, who spearheaded the commission, sat down with the I-Team following the final meeting.

Grindley: “During the meeting, I did hear the Attorney General essentially call this a non-issue. His office isn’t getting complaints. He doesn’t see a bunch of consumers loosing money to this. Has that changed your stance?”

Ingwersen: “We’ve had three that have really been highlighted just in southern Maine. We haven’t heard a lot from around the rest of the state, but there has been some, so I think that even though it’s rare, we really need to address it.”

“I was pleased that we did come up with a couple of recommendations that we’re going to put in the report,” Ingwersen said.

Key Recommendation: Verify the seller’s identity

The first area of agreement among most, not all, stakeholders would legally require listing agents to verify a seller’s identity.

“The way it is now, it’s best practice. And a lot of professionals are doing best practice,” Ingwersen said. “The red flags in deed fraud are cash sale, land only, a quick sale at below-market value If we had realtors really paying attention to those red flags but also a policy that would require them to check the identity of the fraudulent seller, or of the seller, thoroughly, I think it would prevent, even if it prevented one instance of deed fraud, I think it would be very helpful.”

Advertisement

The commission did not outline exactly how identification should be verified.

“We didn’t really specify what that identification process was going to be. We’re leaving that up to rule making,” Ingwersen said.

Second Recommendation: Easier path to undo a fraudulent deed

Currently, the only way to reverse a fraudulent deed in Maine is to go to court.

The commission proposes allowing an attorney to file an affidavit with the registry.

“Allow an attorney to file an affidavit with the deed recorder that would allow the deed to be, the fraudulent deed, to be nullified in a way that is a little bit quicker than we currently have,” Ingwersen said.

Advertisement

The recommendations will now head to the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee. Any legislative change likely wouldn’t take effect until 2027, if the proposals make it into a bill and then survive a vote.

“I think we made some good progress, but I don’t think this is going to go away. I think this will continue,” Ingwersen said.

Landowners fear fraud will try until it succeeds

“We were thinking, do we take a loan out on it just to secure it?” Ralph Nathanson said.

As the legislative process begins, the Nathansons say Maine cannot wait. They fear it’s only a matter of time before a sale of their land goes through.

“To lose land like this or to find out that their land is now gone, I just can’t imagine that,” Ralph Nathanson said.

Advertisement

Ideas Left on the Table: Title Freeze and National Guidance

Several proposals failed to gain traction, including a “title freeze.” a concept similar to a credit freeze that would allow a landowner to lock their deed from unauthorized transfers. Maine could have been the first state to pilot it, but members said they lacked enough information.

Instead, they pointed to national group studying deed fraud. The Uniform Law Commission is drafting model legislation that states, including Maine, could adopt to better protect landowners.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Charter Communications lays off 176 Maine employees

Published

on

Charter Communications lays off 176 Maine employees


PORTLAND, Maine (WGME) — Charter Communications, which owns Spectrum, is laying off 176 workers in Maine.

A company spokesperson said 176 employees were informed on Wednesday about the layoffs.

Charter Communications said it is transitioning the work done at the Portland call center to other U.S.-based centers effective immediately.

“Employees may relocate in their current role to select customer service locations and are eligible for relocation benefits. They will continue to receive regular pay for 90 days; severance and eligible benefits will begin afterward for those who do not relocate. Impacted employees may also apply for any open role for which they are qualified,” a company spokesperson said.

According to the Press Herald, the layoff is about a quarter of their Maine workforce.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Recently Elected 26-Year-Old Wilton School-Board Member Dies Unexpectedly

Published

on

Recently Elected 26-Year-Old Wilton School-Board Member Dies Unexpectedly


Regional School Unit (RSU) 9 school board member Griffin Mayhew, 26, representing Wilton, died unexpectedly on Monday, just months after he first took office in June.

[ Community Split Over Mt. Blue Principal’s Halloween Costume, But RSU 9 Confirms Black is Back on the Job…]

“Griffin was an exemplary young man whose commitment, kindness, and thoughtfulness were evident throughout his service on the Board along with his support of student activities at Mt. Blue Campus.

RSU 9, also known as the Mt. Blue Regional School, serves Chesterville, Farmington, Industry, New Sharon, New Vineyard, Starks, Temple, Vienna, Weld, and Wilton. Griffin became one of Wilton’s three RSU 9 Board of Directors members after defeating opponent Douglas Hiltz in a 209-146 vote.

Advertisement

The incumbent board member did not run for reelection.

Out of respect for Mayhew’s memory, the school district postponed the meeting scheduled for Tuesday.

“I don’t have many details or any information about services yet, but you should know that he was a thoughtful and decent member of the board. While his tenure on the board was short, it was clear to me that Griffin would become one of our best board members. He was exactly the sort of person you would want to see representing you in local government, and we will miss him,” said the Franklin County Democrats on Facebook.

Mayhew’s cause of death has not been released.

2025 Image of Mayhew from his Facebook Account



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending