Maine
Availability of Maine defense lawyers reaches all-time low
The supply of legal protection attorneys is at an all-time low in Maine for defendants who can not afford to rent their very own lawyer.
There are 224 attorneys presently accepting court-appointments to legal or little one safety instances statewide, which is down from 410 attorneys in Might 2019, in response to the Maine Fee on Indigent Authorized Companies, or MCILS.
The lower of accessible attorneys coincides with a rise in instances the place the defendant wants a lawyer appointed on the state’s expense. Attorneys contracted to offer indigent authorized companies had opened a file 31,257 instances by the previous few days of the fiscal yr, which exceeds the annual common of roughly 26,500 instances.
The state company stated it has been capable of assign an lawyer to each case that requires one, however the scarcity of eligible attorneys will increase the danger that there ultimately can be a case that it can not discover counsel for a defendant who’s entitled to 1, stated MCILS Govt Director Justin Andrus.
“The primary particular person who doesn’t get an lawyer, or doesn’t well timed get an lawyer, goes to be harmed — maybe irrevocably,” Andrus stated. “And whereas there is likely to be a temptation by some individuals to have a look at that and say, ‘Properly, it’s just one out of 31,000 instances.’ It’s that individual’s one case. It’s their every part.”
Low pay, excessive caseloads
The scarcity of accessible attorneys has change into an acute situation in a few of Maine’s rural areas, together with Somerset, Washington and Piscataquis counties.
“224 shouldn’t be sufficient. Now we have attorneys which might be certified however not taking instances,” stated Commissioner Donald Alexander, who’s a retired choose.
Some attorneys have stopped accepting instances as a result of the courts are assigning them too many instances directly, he stated. There’s a statewide backlog of unresolved instances and a few courts aren’t accommodating attorneys’ schedules, which is resulting in conflicts, he stated. The result’s much less attorneys to unfold the file caseload amongst.
The variety of unresolved felony and misdemeanor instances has elevated in practically each courtroom in Maine in comparison with earlier than the pandemic, in response to Judicial Department knowledge from June 2019 to June 2022.
Commissioner Matthew Morgan, an Augusta-based lawyer who’s eligible for court-appointed instances, stated the backlog and compensation are driving attorneys away.
“Based mostly on my private expertise receiving appointed instances and my conversations with different rostered attorneys there are lots of causes for not taking new appointments, however the low hourly price and having too many present appointments — typically unresolved resulting from pandemic associated delays — are in all probability the 2 largest causes.”
State lawmakers raised the hourly reimbursement price for court-appointed attorneys from $60 to $80 an hour in 2021. However they rejected a proposal to boost attorneys’ compensation once more to $100 an hour earlier this yr.
The vast majority of commissioners by a voice vote on Tuesday supported proposing a $150 an hour reimbursement price in 2023 to draw and retain protection attorneys. That proposal would go to the state Legislature through the price range discussions for 2023 and 2024.
Allegation of misconduct result in suspension
Even with a brief provide of accessible attorneys, allegations {of professional} misconduct have required MCILS to quietly make cuts to guard purchasers.
Dan Umphrey, an lawyer in Caribou, can not settle for new instances to characterize the state’s indigent in gentle of a suggestion in June that his license to follow legislation be suspended.
A 3-person grievance panel of the Board of Overseers of the Bar — a quasi-judicial company that screens lawyer conduct in Maine — beneficial that the state search to droop Umphrey’s license following an investigation of a criticism from a former consumer about his dealing with of a privately retained case. Bar counsel agreed to pursue the suspension in courtroom following a listening to on June 14.
Umphrey didn’t attend his listening to and didn’t reply to the board of overseers’ investigation.
Andrus, as the top of Maine’s public protection company, additionally suspended Umphrey on June 23.
“Legal professional Umphrey has been decided by the Board of Overseers of the Bar, no less than in the intervening time, to have engaged in conduct that from the attitude of the grievance fee that warrants suspension. That’s not my determination, that’s their determination. The place I’ve an lawyer that’s been topic to these findings, then due to the danger to indigent defendants and their incapability to decide on their very own counsel I wanted to do what I did,” stated Andrus, who beforehand labored as an lawyer for the board of overseers.
Umphrey didn’t reply a name to the cellphone quantity he registered with MCILS and an automatic message stated the voicemail field had not been arrange. Umphrey additionally didn’t reply to an emailed request for remark.
Umphrey was beforehand eligible to characterize defendants on the state’s behalf in felony and misdemeanor instances and to work because the “lawyer of the day” to offer authorized recommendation to defendants throughout their first look in courtroom, in response to MCILS data.
With Umphrey not capable of work on court-appointed instances, there are simply 15 attorneys who’re actively accepting new felony and misdemeanor assignments from the Aroostook County courts, Andrus stated. (Although extra attorneys primarily based in Aroostook and different counties are accepting assignments to some specialised case varieties, corresponding to homicides and intercourse offenses, in Aroostook County).
The restricted pool of attorneys in Aroostook County is a priority, Andrus stated.
A latest evaluation by MCILS discovered that 22 defendants had collectively spent in extra of 1,300 days with out counsel, together with a few of who had been incarcerated on the Aroostook County Jail with out an lawyer assigned to characterize them and advocate on their behalf.
Court docket clerks had been generally delayed find an out there lawyer even after a choose granted a defendant’s request to be appointed an lawyer by the state. MCILS additionally discovered that clerks in Aroostook County had been appointing some attorneys who weren’t eligible for sure case varieties. Andrus stated attorneys had been requested to withdraw or discover certified co-counsel in every of these instances.
Umphrey labored with the legislation agency Solman & Hunter in Caribou, Maine on the time of the criticism. The legislation agency declined to right away remark and didn’t return a reporter’s message.
Umphrey’s identical consumer was awarded an undisclosed sum of cash by the board of overseers’ charge arbitration panel in March.
Assist is much away
Maine officers have few choices to bolster the inventory of attorneys working in rural Maine and long-term options are a number of months away from placing attorneys on the bottom.
MCILS has the authority to rent 5 public defenders with the beginning of the brand new fiscal yr on July 1. The brand new positions had been accredited as a part of a bipartisan price range settlement by state lawmakers earlier this yr, however the hiring course of will doubtless take a number of months.
The College of Maine College of Regulation can also be in ongoing discussions about opening a authorized assist clinic in Fort Kent — a group in Aroostook County on the Canadian border — for college kids to work on instances, Andrus stated. Provisionally licensed “scholar attorneys” would work on instances just like the Cumberland Authorized Help Clinic, which has served the southern Maine counties of Cumberland, York, Sagadahoc and Androscoggin for greater than 50 years. The northern clinic shouldn’t be but open.
Neither of those plans will instantly add extra attorneys on the bottom to work on instances in Maine’s rural counties, Andrus concedes.
The options that lawmakers ought to contemplate are elevated pay for court-appointed attorneys to allow them to afford paralegal and billing help, stated Commissioner Alexander. The state additionally wants to have a look at using extra full-time public defenders to immediately work on instances the place there are shortages, he stated.
“A number of attorneys are mainly doing their follow with a pc and a mobile phone,” stated Alexander, who warned that’s not sufficient assist.
MCILS can also be talking with skilled organizations for Maine attorneys about the right way to get their members to coach and apply to be court-appointed attorneys. A small variety of skilled attorneys primarily based in Portland and southern Maine have not too long ago joined the record of eligible attorneys, Andrus stated.
However Andrus stated he’s reluctant to ship attorneys from southern Maine to Aroostook County, due to the gap the attorneys would wish to journey to fulfill with their purchasers. A Portland lawyer would wish to journey greater than 300 miles to attend a courtroom listening to in Fort Kent or 250 miles to see a consumer within the Aroostook County Jail.
“We’re staffing instances, however it continues to get tougher,” Andrus stated. “And it will get tougher as a result of we don’t have sufficient attorneys that need to be in this system.”
Samantha Hogan covers authorities accountability for The Maine Monitor. Attain her at samantha@themainemonitor.org.
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has proposed new rules governing judicial conduct complaints that would keep members of the high court from having to discipline their peers.
The proposed rules would establish a panel of eight judges — the four most senior active Superior Court justices and the four most senior active District Court judges who are available to serve — to weigh complaints against a justice of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. Members of the high court would not participate.
The rule changes come just weeks after the Committee on Judicial Conduct recommended the first sanction against a justice on the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in state history.
The committee said Justice Catherine Connors should be publicly reprimanded, the lowest level of sanction, for failing to recuse herself in two foreclosure cases last year that weakened protections for homeowners in Maine, despite a history of representing banks that created a possible conflict of interest. Connors represented or filed on behalf of banks in two precedent-setting cases that were overturned by the 2024 decisions.
In Maine, it’s up to the Supreme Judicial Court to decide the outcome of judicial disciplinary cases. But because in this case one of the high court’s justices is accused of wrongdoing, the committee recommended following the lead of several other states by bringing in a panel of outside judges, either from other levels of the court or from out of state.
Connors, however, believes the case should be heard by her colleagues on the court, according to a response filed late last month by her attorney, James Bowie.
Bowie argued that the outcome of the case will ultimately provide guidance for the lower courts — a power that belongs exclusively to the state supreme court.
It should not, he wrote, be delegated “to some other ad hoc grouping of inferior judicial officers.”
The court is accepting comments on the proposal until Jan. 23. The changes, if adopted, would be effective immediately and would apply to pending matters, including the Connors complaint.
Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.
The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.
It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.
“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.
After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.
“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.
“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.
Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.
“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.
Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.
Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.
The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”
Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com
Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.
This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.
Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.
The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.
The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.
But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.
Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.
Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.
All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.
This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.
Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.
Flo Rida joined by Flavor Flav, White Boy Rick in a different sort of Detroit Auto Show gala
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle visit Southern California to support wildfire victims, recovery efforts
How a San Francisco program helped a new mom turn around her life
Dallas faces conference rival Denver
Carson Beck, gf Hanna Cavinder do Miami ‘U’ dance to celebrate transfer from Georgia
Colorado Rockies game no. 116 thread: Zac Gallen vs José Ureña
Why Marjorie Taylor Greene was ‘kicked out’ of the Freedom Caucus according to Rep. Buck
See it: Tesla crashes into Columbus convention center at 70 mph
Fox News Politics: Georgia the whole day through
Death of missing Oregon girl found in stream ruled homicide
Trump Blames L.A. Wildfires on Newsom Using Familiar Tactics
'Deeply disgusted': GOP senator shreds Biden admin in scathing letter on new immigrant deportation shield
US Supreme Court critical of TikTok arguments against looming ban
Tiktok’s Final Appeal to the Supreme Court Didn’t Go Too Well
Drone Collision Grounds Firefighting Plane in Los Angeles
-
Business1 week agoThese are the top 7 issues facing the struggling restaurant industry in 2025
-
Culture1 week agoThe 25 worst losses in college football history, including Baylor’s 2024 entry at Colorado
-
Sports1 week agoThe top out-of-contract players available as free transfers: Kimmich, De Bruyne, Van Dijk…
-
Politics1 week agoNew Orleans attacker had 'remote detonator' for explosives in French Quarter, Biden says
-
Politics1 week agoCarter's judicial picks reshaped the federal bench across the country
-
Politics6 days agoWho Are the Recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
-
Health5 days agoOzempic ‘microdosing’ is the new weight-loss trend: Should you try it?
-
World1 week agoIvory Coast says French troops to leave country after decades