Connect with us

Maine

As the state looks to harness Gulf of Maine winds, a big question looms: How much will utility customers pay?

Published

on

As the state looks to harness Gulf of Maine winds, a big question looms: How much will utility customers pay?


Offshore Wind First Power

The first operating South Fork Wind farm turbine stands east of Montauk Point, N.Y., in Dec. 2023. It is the first commercial-scale offshore wind farm in the country. Wind energy in the U.S. has grown significantly since 2000, to about 434 billion kilowatt-hours in 2022 from 6 billion kWh, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Julia Nikhinson/Associated Press

Maine’s offshore wind research project in the Gulf of Maine is the subject of negotiations that are picking up speed among state regulators, the project’s developers and the Public Advocate, who are trying to determine how much the zero-carbon energy will ultimately cost utility customers.

The PUC on July 11 ordered that the price – or how it’s structured for the project in a contract between the developer, Pine Tree Offshore Wind, and CMP or Versant – should be “sufficiently defined and certain” to allow regulators to determine whether the cost to ratepayers is the lowest reasonable amount to finance, build and operate the project. The low-cost provision is required by state law, which mandated that the PUC execute a long-term offshore wind contract between a utility of no less than 20 years.

The project is “intended to be a ‘kick-starter’ for an offshore wind industry in the Gulf of Maine,” regulators said. But it’s still years away from going online.

Advertisement

Jack Shapiro, climate and clean energy director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine, called the research project the “tip of the spear,” helping developers of future commercial wind power determine pricing and other factors.

Federal officials in May offered Maine a lease to research offshore wind turbines in the Gulf of Maine. The site is 15.2 square miles, a fraction of the 2 million-acre location selected in March for a commercial floating offshore wind project. That site is off the coasts of Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

Up to 12 wind turbines in the Maine Research Array in the Gulf of Maine would generate 144 megawatts of electricity, enough to power more than 100,000 homes. Among the areas being researched, according to Pine Tree Offshore Wind, is how to reduce conflict with other ocean uses, such as fisheries; support education and the development of a workforce and supply chain; maintain coastal community culture and heritage; monitor changes in the ecosystem; and advance floating wind technology and reduce the cost of offshore wind energy.

Power from the research array would not flow for at least another six or seven years, and talks that began in May 2023, a year after Pine Tree Offshore Wind filed its case to the PUC, have been slow, said Tony Buxton, the lawyer for Pine Tree Offshore Wind.

He said his client will put up $1.5 billion to build and deploy wind turbines 40 miles from Maine if it has a power contract with Central Maine Power and Versant Power.

Advertisement

“What we’re doing is a lot more difficult than sticking poles in the ground. We’re sticking poles into the water,” Buxton said.

“We certainly could have been doing more negotiations prior to this time,” he said. “It appears the (Public Utilities Commission) is intent on completing our negotiations now. It’s now proceeding more intently.”

Details being negotiated are confidential, Public Advocate William Harwood said. “Numbers are being floated around with caps and formulas,” he said.

The price and terms for what is reasonable will be based on the PUC’s analysis of the economics of developing an offshore wind project in a “fluctuating financial market” and based on meeting public policy goals, the Office of the Public Advocate told regulators.

ADVOCATE: ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ALSO COUNT 

Advertisement

Shapiro said that as the PUC considers the project’s cost to ratepayers, it should not lose sight of the project’s environmental benefits. State law requires greenhouse gas emissions to be cut at least 45% from 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% by 2050, and advocates of wind power say it’s among the most effective tools to achieve those goals.

The Maine Research Array says the project would remove about 978 million pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year, the equivalent of taking about 105,000 gas-powered cars off the road. The project also would spur job creation in construction, manufacturing and transportation, according to a June report prepared for Pine Tree Offshore Wind.

In a filing with regulators, CMP said negotiations in December, January, February and March generally reached agreement on non-pricing terms. But the utility reported a ” lack of agreement” on pricing terms and a pricing framework. PUC staff and Pine Tree Offshore Wind exchanged additional proposed pricing terms and frameworks, but the issues remain unresolved, CMP said. The utility would not provide details in its documents.

CMP and Versant are at the table as Pine Tree Power and state regulators negotiate a deal. The utilities will ultimately pass on to ratepayers the costs of wind power determined by the PUC.

PUC Chairman Philip Bartlett said at a recent meeting with Harwood and representatives of the Governor’s Energy Office, CMP and Versant that participants “seem like we’re a long way from having any real certainty” on determining the project’s costs.

Advertisement

But Dan Burgess, director of the Governor’s Energy Office, said at the PUC meeting that “significant progress has been made over the last year and a half, two years.” He cited the offer in late May by federal officials for a lease to research offshore wind turbines in the Gulf of Maine. He and Buxton believe the parties will agree on key terms of a contract by the end of the year.

Harwood said in an interview his office is in a “tough spot.”

“I’m not sure we can afford offshore wind,” he said. “I’m not sure we can afford not to with our climate goals.”

“The simple fact that these things float miles offshore and somehow electrons get back to the mainland has never been done in this part of the world,” he said. “What do you do with that uncertainty?”

“One of the things we’re trying to figure out is how to end up with an agreement with enough certainty . . . (that) ratepayers are not paying through the nose, but gives developers enough flexibility.”

Advertisement

WIND TURBINES OR A PORT: WHAT COMES FIRST?

One potential problem is balancing a timeline for wind turbine assembly and installation with construction of a wind energy port. The administration of Gov. Janet Mills is seeking $456 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation to build a port on Sears Island. Which comes first – an agreement on the cost of selling wind power or construction of a wind port – is among the unknowns, Harwood said.

“It’s a classic chicken and egg problem,” Harwood said. “If we don’t have a project, why stir up everyone at Sears Island? If we don’t have Sears Island, why set up turbines in the Gulf of Maine?”

The selection of Sears Island as the state’s preferred site for a terminal to accept and dispatch ships with wind turbine components that are assembled on site has divided environmentalists. They support wind power, but disagree on siting the terminal on Sears Island; many instead urge that it be built at nearby Mack Point. 

A beach on the northwestern side of Sears Island shows the proximity to Mack Point, right, on May 2. The selection of Sears Island as the state’s preferred site for a terminal to accept and dispatch ships with wind turbine components that are assembled on site has divided environmentalists. Ben McCanna/Staff Photographer

Advertisement

Buxton said Pine Tree Offshore Wind expects it would not make a profit on 80% of the project that is competitively bid, such as construction of the offshore platforms, the towers and turbines. Where it would make a profit is on the rate of return for the project’s operation. That must be negotiated with the PUC.

In addition, the developer can save money by selling tax credits, such as energy investment tax credits available in the federal Inflation Reduction Act that has made available hundreds of billions of dollars for clean energy programs, Buxton said.

Wind energy has grown significantly since 2000, to about 434 billion kilowatt-hours in 2022 from 6 billion kWh, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Wind turbines were the source of about 10.3% of U.S. utility-scale electricity generation in 2022, the government said.

Still, wind power projects are buffeted by economic factors that blow hot and cold. The first commercial-scale offshore wind farm in the U.S. opened in March with Danish wind energy developer Ørsted and Eversource building a 12-turbine wind farm, South Fork Wind, 35 miles east of New York’s Long Island. A month later, New York state officials announced that final agreements could not be reached with three other projects that had received provisional awards in October 2023.

Shapiro warned that in Maine, the “downside of a contract falling apart is significant.” He cited the collapse last December of a proposed transmission line that would have brought wind power from northern Maine to the New England grid.

Advertisement

“If this falls apart, it will send a message that Maine is not the place you want to invest,” he said.

« Previous

People on the move



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Kentucky woman sentenced in Maine court for obtaining fraudulent visas for Ukrainian orphans

Published

on

Kentucky woman sentenced in Maine court for obtaining fraudulent visas for Ukrainian orphans


A Kentucky woman was sentenced Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Portland to three years probation and ordered to pay more than $170,000 in restitution for tax evasion and conspiracy to commit visa fraud.

Colleen Holt-Thompson, 58, founded the Kentucky-based nonprofit Host Ukraine in 2015, the district court said in a statement Wednesday. The organization brought children living in Ukrainian orphanages to the United States to live with temporary host families over the summer and winter holidays.

But the children’s visas were granted based on fraudulent applications, the court said. In order to apply for the visas and transport the children, Holt-Thompson had to first request permission from the Ukrainian Ministry of Social Policy, which required host families’ names and addresses.

“To obtain the visas, Holt-Thompson would provide placeholder names – names and addresses of American families who had not actually agreed to serve as hosts – when she submitted names of Ukrainian children to the Ministry,” the court said. “Before the children traveled to the U.S., she would find actual host families for each child.”

Advertisement

Holt-Thompson worked with an unnamed co-conspirator in Maine to identify placeholder families, the court said. That co-conspirator also served as Host Ukraine’s Northeastern contact.

A representative of the court did not respond to messages Wednesday night about the co-conspirator’s identity and whether they face charges.

Court records show that David Beneman, a federal public defender, represented Holt-Thompson in the trial. In an email Wednesday night, Beneman said that he couldn’t comment on the case.

In addition to drafting fraudulent visa applications, Holt-Thompson was charged with diverting more than $127,000 from the organization to pay personal expenses and credit card bills in 2016. She claimed only $47,226 in income that year and failed to file a tax return for Host Ukraine. She pleaded guilty in January.

The organization collected donations, and host families were charged $3,000 to participate in the program.

Advertisement

Holt-Thompson obtained hosting permission for 828 children between 2015 and 2019, the court said. It’s not clear whether any of those visas were legitimate.

« Previous

Woman driving on 2 blown tires crashes car in Burlington



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine CDC finds 6 cases of West Nile virus in birds; 1 in a human

Published

on

Maine CDC finds 6 cases of West Nile virus in birds; 1 in a human


The Maine Center for Disease Control is reporting six cases of West Nile virus in birds, and is investigating one case of the mosquito-borne disease in a person.

The virus was detected in crows from Bangor, Bridgton, Fryeburg, Parsonsfield and Sidney. West Nile virus was also found in a hawk in Yarmouth. The Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife collected the birds for routine surveillance.

The Maine CDC is also investigating “one case of West Nile virus in a Waldo County resident that was not acquired in Maine, but during travel outside of the state.” The last known human case of West Nile in Maine was in 2018.

Many people who contract West Nile virus do not experience symptoms, but some infected with the virus will experience mild symptoms such as fever, aches, weakness and vomiting. In rare cases, people can experience severe symptoms such as high fevers, neck stiffness, confusion, coma, paralysis and even death.

Advertisement

Maine has already doubled the amount of animals tested positive for West Nile virus, with three animals testing positive in 2023. No mosquito pools have tested positive for West Nile Virus yet this year, and there was one mosquito pool that tested positive in 2023.

“While West Nile and other viruses carried by mosquitoes are rare, they can cause serious illness,” said Dr. Puthiery Va, Maine CDC director. “It’s important that Maine people and visitors take precautions against bites, especially as these viruses are appearing earlier than usual this year. As you enjoy the Maine outdoors, protect yourself with simple steps and speak to your health provider promptly if you experience any symptoms.”

To help protect against mosquito-borne diseases, the Maine CDC recommends draining sources of standing water where mosquitos lay their eggs, cover exposed skin outdoors by wearing long-sleeved shirts and pants, use EPV-approved repellants, use screens on doors and windows and avoid being outside at dusk and dawn, when mosquitos are most active

This story will be updated

Advertisement

« Previous

Portland Adult Education to expand heat pump apprenticeship program



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Climate-smart forestry can grow Maine’s bioeconomy

Published

on

Opinion: Climate-smart forestry can grow Maine’s bioeconomy


U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack visit to Maine last week came at a critical time for the future of our forests, our climate and our local bioeconomy.

Looking to build markets and supply chains for climate-friendly forest products, the Biden administration just announced $418,420 for Maine’s Timber HP GO Lab to produce sustainable wood insulation. And the USDA’s Partnership for Climate Smart Commodities is aiming even higher, working with the New England Forestry Foundation to help the first commercial landowners pilot climate-smart forestry management on their working lands.

Six landowners – Robbins Lumber Company, Maine Bureau of Parks and Lands, The Baskahegan Company, Fallen Timber, Clayton Lake Woodlands and Seven Islands Land Company – will receive incentives that support a range of climate-smart forestry practices designed to increase carbon in the forest and in resulting wood products. Our goal is to show how owners of working lands can increase carbon storage while continuing to harvest climate-smart wood products and maintain revenues.

We estimate that the acres enrolled in the first round of the Commercial Landowner Incentive Program have the potential to store an additional 250,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent as compared to current practices. These results will be tested and determined based on modeling that will be a key part of the project. This initial directional estimate shows that, over the coming decades, this additional carbon storage could offset the amount of carbon emitted from the energy used annually to heat and cool 23,000 homes.

Advertisement

Unleashing the massive powerhouse of natural carbon storage via climate-smart forest management holds enormous potential across New England. If we manage our forests to climate and ecological standards, our research shows forests could deliver 30% of the carbon emissions reductions we need to meet our region’s net-zero goals and be a key input to a growing, sustainable bioeconomy.

This effort must be comprehensive and it must be region-wide. Realizing the carbon benefits of forests requires a systems approach, combining ecological and climate objectives. We need to stop net loss of forests, conserve important wildlands and wilderness areas, spread the adoption of climate-smart forestry and expand our bioeconomy by using wood and other natural materials to replace carbon-intensive steel and concrete. All told, NEFF’s analysis shows these steps could pull more than 646 million metric tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere over the next 30 years, nearly one-third of the total energy-related carbon emissions we need to eliminate to meet 2050 climate goals.

A key part of this transition will be growing the market for low-carbon wood products in the building and construction sector, which accounts for 37% of global emissions. Today, we build most of our multifamily homes and office buildings with steel and concrete, two carbon-intensive products. But development of new wood-based mass timber technologies has made it possible to build new tall wood buildings that use less carbon to build and can actually store the carbon in wood products for as long as they stand.

We can produce climate-smart wood to maximize carbon sequestration and storage, protect biodiversity and produce climate-smart wood products. Climate-smart forest management can help our forests grow more valuable trees which store more carbon while being more resilient to the impacts of climate change. And, by sourcing our wood locally, we can grow our local bioeconomy to benefit our local communities.

If we manage our forests with an eye to climate as well as biodiversity, we can unleash powerful natural climate solutions right here in Maine that help our rural communities, our forests and our global climate.

Advertisement

« Previous

Opinion: A creative solution for Portland Museum of Art

Next »

Clarence Page: This young GI met Donald Sutherland in a bygone era. RIP to an original



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending