Connect with us

Northeast

Justice Department fights back after federal judge blocks Trump’s wind energy freeze

Published

on

Justice Department fights back after federal judge blocks Trump’s wind energy freeze

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Trump administration is appealing a federal judge’s order that voided Donald Trump’s day one memorandum pausing offshore wind energy projects, setting up a high-stakes court fight over green energy initiatives the president has long derided.

The Department of Justice gave notice of the appeal on Wednesday after Judge Patti Saris sided with 17 blue states and a slew of environmental groups in finding that Trump’s memorandum was unlawful. 

Trump has been skeptical of offshore wind energy because of concerns about how it jibes with affordability and about its supply chains and effects on wildlife. But Saris, a Clinton appointee, said delaying wind energy projects improperly affected states’ tax revenue.

EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP ADMIN NIXES GIANT WIND FARM APPROVED ‘LAST-MINUTE’ BY BIDEN TEAM

Advertisement

“The Commonwealth of Massachusetts alone invested millions of dollars into the wind industry in 2024; it is a ‘rational economic assumption that returns on those investments are imperiled by an indefinite suspension of wind permitting,” Saris wrote in December.

The appeal comes as Trump has routinely bashed wind farms, calling them the “SCAM OF THE CENTURY” in a Truth Social post last year and repeatedly raising worries about windmills’ effects on birds and other marine life.

Dominion Energy’s wind turbines located 27 miles off Virginia Beach in the Atlantic Ocean July 17, 2023. (Kendall Warner/The Virginian-Pilot/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

“You want to see a bird graveyard? … Go under a windmill someday. You’ll see more birds than you’ve ever seen ever in your life,” Trump said at a rally in 2019.

Trump has also alleged that states relying more heavily on wind and solar power are seeing electricity and energy costs go up.

Advertisement

On the first day of his second term in office, Trump signed a presidential memorandum temporarily blocking all coastal areas from taking on any new offshore wind energy leases. The memorandum ordered a government-wide review of federal wind leasing and permitting practices and instructed federal agencies to indefinitely stop issuing new or renewed permits or loans for wind projects pending an assessment by the Department of the Interior.

HOUSE GOP MOVES TO CEMENT TRUMP ENERGY AGENDA BY TAKING SLEDGEHAMMER TO BIDEN-ERA REGULATIONS

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks during a rally at Greenbrier Farms June 28, 2024, Chesapeake, Va. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The blue states and climate groups who sued argued that Trump’s memorandum flew in the face of his vows to prioritize domestic energy development.

“The Wind Directive has stopped most wind-energy development in its tracks, despite the fact that wind energy is a homegrown source of reliable, affordable energy that supports hundreds of thousands of jobs, creates billions of dollars in economic activity and tax payments, and supplies more than 10% of the country’s electricity,” the plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote.

Advertisement

DOJ lawyers argued in response that the states and climate groups made claims that amounted to “nothing more than a policy disagreement over preferences for wind versus fossil fuel energy development” and that the court did not have jurisdiction over the matter.

Climate activists attend a rally to end fossil fuels, in New York Sept. 17, 2023.  (AP Photo/Bryan Woolston)

The DOJ lawyers said with the emergence of artificial intelligence and “geopolitical uncertainty” in the energy sector, domestic energy production was crucial and that Trump had valid concerns with wind energy, in particular.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“To ensure federally permitted wind energy production may continue in a reliable, affordable, and environmentally responsible manner, President Trump directed federal agencies to temporarily refrain from issuing wind energy permitting authorizations while the Department of the Interior leads a review of federal wind energy permitting and development practices,” the lawyers said.

Advertisement

The appeal was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit. The next step in the process is for the appellate court to set deadlines for the administration and plaintiffs’ to submit arguments before deciding how to proceed.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement

New Hampshire

Let’s Talk Nature: The Value of Conserved Land

Published

on

Let’s Talk Nature: The Value of Conserved Land


Join us for a community conversation exploring how land conservation supports thriving communities, healthy ecosystems, and local economies. Recent research from Maine highlights the growing economic value of conserved lands — from supporting recreation, forestry, agriculture, and tourism to protecting clean water, storing carbon, and strengthening climate resilience. The findings reveal something important: protecting natural landscapes is not only good for the environment, but also for the people and communities that depend on them.

Together, we’ll explore what this research means both regionally and here at home. How do conserved lands shape our quality of life, local economy, and sense of place? How can communities balance growth, conservation, and long-term sustainability? And what role can each of us play in protecting the landscapes that support both nature and people?

At each “Let’s Talk Nature” gathering, we share a short article in advance and come together for an informal, welcoming discussion. Each session stands on its own, and everyone is welcome. No expertise needed. Bring your curiosity and a willingness to listen and share. Drinks and cookies provided.

Read this session’s article: Conserved Land in Maine has Growing Economic Power

Advertisement


Grey Rocks Conservation Center


10:30 AM – 11:30 AM on Wed, 1 Jul 2026

Event Supported By

Newfound Lake Region Association

603-744-8689

Advertisement

info@NewfoundLake.org





Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

Simon Nemec’s contract demand could ruin any return for New Jersey Devils

Published

on

Simon Nemec’s contract demand could ruin any return for New Jersey Devils


The New Jersey Devils are in a pickle coming into this offseason. It’s the same pickle they had last offseason, but in true Tom Fitzgerald fashion, the Devils sat on their issue and hoped they could address it during the season.

The issue is that they have seven NHL defensemen. Last year, that narrative changed drastically when Luke Hughes signed a seven-year deal worth $9 million per season. It’s really easy to play with seven high-upside defensemen when two are on their entry-level deal. Now, with two players making $9 million and five players making $4 million or more.

The Devils had one of the most expensive defensive units in the league. That could get a lot worse with Simon Nemec’s entry-level contract ending. He’s due a massive raise, and reports say he wants to squeeze as much money out of this negotiation as possible.

Advertisement

Nemec is technically the Devils’ seventh defenseman. Sunny Mehta is going to figure something out this offseason to rectify that situation. For some reason, Fitzgerald gave out multiple long-term contracts to veteran defensemen while also prioritizing defense in the draft. Since taking over as GM, and eventually President of Hockey Operations, Fitzgerald used four of his seven first-round picks on defensemen. Overall, he used 14 draft picks on defensemen, including one that played zero games the season before he was drafted. 

Advertisement

The Devils have more defensemen than they know what to do with, and Anton Silayev is expected to join the roster this offseason. Seamus Casey is close to NHL ready if he stays healthy. There are options for Mehta.

This is why Nemec, trade request or not, is expected to be on the move this offseason. It’s becoming a math equation.

Speaking of math, Nemec might be a former second-overall pick, and he’s had some success in the NHL, but many teams would be hesitant to give him the same contract Luke Hughes got. Of course, there was more to the Hughes situation, as they were not going to give him a deal that coincided with Jack Hughes’s deal. Nemec doesn’t have that type of leverage. 

Will this Simon Nemec contract “demand” hurt a potential return for the Devils?

Advertisement

Teams looking to upgrade their defense while also getting younger would be interested in Nemec. However, the most viable option many believe with Nemec is using him to get a star forward. Whether it’s a move to get Quinn Hughes on the roster or to get someone huge like Jason Robertson or Robert Thomas, Nemec would be the central piece to the trade.

These teams would be looking to save money. If Nemec is asking for that sizable salary, does it make sense for Dallas or St. Louis to do that?

If they do, it would make the deal less desirable than Nemec on an entry-level contract. Heck, even Nemec on a $5 million per year contract would make him really desirable, even if it was a bridge deal. 

At the end of it, teams are going to take a chance on Nemec, including the Devils, if it doesn’t hit the price Mehta is looking for. 

Advertisement

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania lawmakers introduce bills targeting data center development

Published

on

Pennsylvania lawmakers introduce bills targeting data center development


HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — A Luzerne County legislator introduced a bill this week intended to allow local governments to place a moratorium on data center applications.

Rep. Jamie Walsh (R-Luzerne) introduced House Bill 2533 on Wednesday.

“Our municipalities, which decide local land use policies, have struggled to understand the myriad environmental and community impacts of this new industry and to review and revise their zoning ordinances to keep up with the influx of interest from data center developers,” Walsh said in a co-sponsorship memorandum. “I am therefore proposing to give municipalities the option of placing a moratorium on data center applications so that, if they choose, they can revise their ordinances and establish conditional use policies addressing issues like power supply, water consumption, noise and setbacks which they determine protect the community’s interest.”

It is a companion bill, he said, to Senator Jarrett Coleman (R-Bucks/Lehigh)’s Senate Bill 1345.

Advertisement

They both would allow an 18-month moratorium on both unapproved and new data center applications.

The two legislators also introduced legislation they say would repeal the state Computer Data Center Equipment Exemption program enacted in 2021, which the legislators say incentivizes data centers to locate in Pennsylvania by exempting computer data center equipment from the Sales and Use Tax when it is sold to, used or consumed in a certified data center by an owner, operator or qualified tenant. This is in the form of House Bill 2532 and Senate Bill 1344 respectively.

“While we all appreciate the technological advances that are driving the development of new data centers, I am certain most Pennsylvanians want a more thoughtful approach to where and under what requirements they can operate and don’t want to subsidize them with tax incentives,” said Coleman. “The bills Rep. Walsh and I partnered on will do just that.”

Download the abc27 News+ app on your Roku, Amazon Fire TV Stick, Apple TV devices, and newer Samsung Smart TVs.

Data centers have been a hot topic issue across Pennsylvania as communities have rallied to oppose developments, including in Columbia and in the Annville area.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending