Connect with us

Northeast

Judge quickly denies request to discard $38 million verdict in New Hampshire youth center abuse case

Published

on

Judge quickly denies request to discard  million verdict in New Hampshire youth center abuse case

The judge who oversaw a landmark trial about New Hampshire’s youth detention center has refused to discard the $38 million verdict, saying the facility’s leadership “either knew and didn’t care or didn’t care to learn the truth” about endemic physical and sexual abuse.

A jury earlier this month sided with David Meehan, who alleged he was repeatedly raped, beaten and held in solitary confinement at the Youth Development Center in the 1990s. The attorney general’s office is seeking to drastically reduce the award. While that issue remains unsettled, the state also asked Judge Andrew Schulman to nullify the verdict and issue a judgment in its favor.

CLOSING ARGUMENTS HEARD IN NH YOUTH DETENTION CENTER ABUSE SUIT

In a motion filed Monday, attorneys for the state again argued that Meehan waited too long to sue and that he failed to prove that the state’s negligence led to abuse. Schulman swiftly denied the motion, ruling in less than 24 hours that Meehan’s claims were timely under an exception to the statute of limitations, and that Meehan had proven “beyond doubt” that the state breached its duty of care with respect to staff training, supervision and discipline.

The Sununu Youth Services Center in Manchester, N.H., stands among trees, Jan. 28, 2020. A New Hampshire jury awarded $38 million to the man who blew the lid off abuse allegations at the state’s youth detention center Friday, May 3, 2024, in a landmark case finding the state’s negligence allowed him to be beaten, raped and held in solitary confinement as a teen.  (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)

Advertisement

According to Schulman, a jury could easily have found that the facility’s leadership “was, at best, willfully blind to entrenched and endemic customs and practices” that included frequent sexual and physical assaults as well as “constant emotional abuse of residents.”

“Maybe there is more to the story, but based on the trial record liability for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty was proven to a geometric certainty,” he wrote.

Meehan, 42, went to police in 2017 and sued the state three years later. Since then, 11 former state workers have been arrested and more than 1,100 other former residents of what is now called the Sununu Youth Services Center have filed lawsuits alleging physical, sexual and emotional abuse spanning six decades. Charges against one former worker, Frank Davis, were dropped earlier this month after the 82-year-old was found incompetent to stand trial.

Meehan’s lawsuit was the first to go to trial. Over four weeks, his attorneys contended that the state encouraged a culture of abuse marked by pervasive brutality, corruption and a code of silence. The state portrayed Meehan as a violent child, troublemaking teenager and delusional adult lying to get money.

Jurors awarded him $18 million in compensatory damages and $20 million in enhanced damages, but when asked the number of incidents for which the state was liable, they wrote “one.” That trigged the state’s request to reduce the award under a state law that allows claimants against the state to get a maximum of $475,000 per incident.

Advertisement

Meehan’s lawyers say multiple emails they’ve received from distraught jurors showed the jury misunderstood that question on the jury form. They filed a motion Monday asking Schulman to set aside just the portion of the verdict where jurors wrote “one” incident, allowing the $38 million to stand. As an alternative, the judge could order a new trial only on the number of incidents, or could offer the state the option of agreeing to an increase in the number of incidents, they wrote.

Last week, Schulman denied a request from Meehan’s lawyers to reconvene and poll the jury, but said he was open to other options to address the disputed verdict. A hearing is scheduled for June 24.

Read the full article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Letter to the Editor: A different path for Vermont’s environmental future

Published

on

Letter to the Editor: A different path for Vermont’s environmental future


To the Editor: Vermonters care deeply about the land.

We care about clean water, healthy soil, and food we can trust. We care about the forests, the farms, and the communities that make this state what it is. On that, there is broad agreement.

Where we are increasingly divided is not on the goal — but on the method.

Advertisement

Much of today’s environmental effort relies on legislation: restrictions, mandates, and regulatory controls over how people live, build, grow, and consume. While often well-intentioned, this approach is meeting growing resistance. Many Vermonters feel overregulated, constrained, or financially burdened, and that tension is beginning to undermine unity around environmental goals.

At the same time, there is a quiet but powerful truth emerging: people are not the problem.

In fact, people are the solution.

Across Vermont, individuals and communities are actively seeking ways to live more in harmony with the land — to grow clean food, reduce toxins, and restore natural systems. The desire is there. The will is there.

What is often missing is a business structure that makes those choices easier, more connected, and economically rewarding, where resource sharing is a multigenerational objective.

Advertisement

What if, instead of relying primarily on mandates, we focused on rewarding and empowering regenerative economic action? What if we made it easy, fun and inclusive for Vermonters to engage in environmental restoration?

Vermont has long been a leader in local food, land stewardship, and community-scale innovation. We are well positioned to lead again — this time by aligning our economic activity with regeneration of our environmental values.

A new model is emerging through EdensBay, a Vermont-seeded marketplace and membership framework designed to support regenerative products, services, and practices. Its aim is simple: to help people invest in one another and participate in rebuilding local ecosystems and economies — together.

This is not about abandoning policy. It is about complementing it with something equally powerful: participation. Because in the end, people are far more likely to engage when they are invited, supported, and rewarded — rather than restricted.

If we want lasting change, we must build with the people, not against them.

Advertisement

Vermonters are ready.

The question is whether you are willing to meet that readiness with a model that trusts it.

Emily Peyton

Putney, April 20

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New York

Mamdani Considers Delaying Pension-Fund Payments to Ease Budget Gap

Published

on

Mamdani Considers Delaying Pension-Fund Payments to Ease Budget Gap

Mayor Zohran Mamdani is floating a plan to delay payments into New York City’s municipal pension funds — his latest effort to stave off service cuts and a property tax increase as he grapples with a multibillion-dollar budget gap.

The plan, which the mayor’s team has presented to the administration of Gov. Kathy Hochul, could save the city at least $1 billion in the upcoming fiscal year, according to a person familiar with the discussions, and would be unlikely to affect pension payments for current retirees.

Mr. Mamdani’s team said it has yet to iron out the details. Any cost-cutting plan would most likely involve extending the deadline for the city to meet its long-term pension obligations beyond 2032, when it is scheduled to be up-to-date on its payments.

“While our administration has not yet put forward a specific proposal, we are actively assessing options for pension amortization,” Mr. Mamdani’s spokesman, Joe Calvello, said.

Similar proposals have drawn opposition from unions and fiscal watchdogs, with one leading budget expert warning they merely delay the city’s fiscal responsibility to avoid meaningful reductions in spending.

Advertisement

“The city is on a path to correct past fiscal mistakes and properly fund its pension obligations,” said Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, a watchdog group. “It shouldn’t reverse course and stretch this out and make our children pay even more of our bills.”

One iteration of this proposal, presented this month by Julie Menin, speaker of the City Council, projected more than $1.2 billion in savings annually. An effort pushed unsuccessfully by former Mayor Eric Adams last year would have reduced costs by an estimated $1.3 billion in its first year.

Any delay to pension payments would need the approval of Ms. Hochul, who declined to comment.

Pension payments present a continuing liability for the city, which has a large unionized work force that has historically negotiated attractive retirement packages. The city’s total obligation to the five municipal pension systems for existing benefits, through 2032, amounts to $38.9 billion, according to data from the Citizens Budget Commission.

In 2013, under then-Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, the city reformed its mandated pension payments following a drop in the assumed rate of return to 7 percent from 8 percent. That reduction meant the city had to pay more money upfront, creating a roughly $60 billion unfunded mandate. To address that, city and state leaders agreed to stretch out payments for future bills through 2032, at which point the added obligation was expected to be paid off.

Advertisement

The costs related to that change account for more than half of the city’s $10.5 billion pension expense this year, according to Ms. Menin’s office — a liability that is likely to grow.

Further delaying pension payments would significantly help Mr. Mamdani as he grapples with a $5.4 billion deficit through June 2027, which he has sought to reverse with risky and unpopular proposals, like raiding the city’s reserves and raising property taxes. He is also pushing Ms. Hochul to increase income taxes on wealthy residents, a proposal that is popular among Democratic state lawmakers but unlikely to get her backing. And he is asking her for more state aid to plug the hole as he navigates his first budget as mayor.

He is expecting to cut $1.3 billion from the current deficit by not expanding a housing voucher program and delaying, with Ms. Hochul’s blessing, a requirement to reduce school class sizes.

The plan backed by Mr. Adams, which Ms. Hochul tried to advance last year, ran into opposition from unions. Officials representing the pension fund for the United Federation of Teachers specifically raised flags about the Adams administration’s ability to carry out the plan, given concerns about the competency of the mayor, who was then under indictment, according to someone familiar with the matter.

Mr. Calvello said that the options being discussed were “distinct from the approach previously advanced by the Adams administration.”

Advertisement

Presidents of the city’s largest public-sector unions, Henry Garrido of District Council 37 and Michael Mulgrew of the teachers’ union, declined to comment on this development.

Mr. Rein urged city officials to consider other approaches to addressing the budget crisis.

“The city’s fiscal problem is a self-inflicted spending affordability crisis,” he said. “The best way to deal with that is to increase spending that works but eliminate spending that doesn’t improve New Yorkers’ life.”

A spokesman for Ms. Menin said she would review the mayor’s proposal when it reaches her desk. She is responsible for negotiating the city’s $127 billion budget with the mayor before it takes effect on July 1.

Mark Levine, the city’s comptroller, called Mr. Mamdani’s nascent proposal “a prudent step.”

Advertisement

“But the once-in-a-generation short-term savings this generates must be used wisely,” Mr. Levine added, “both to support the civil servants who pay into the system and to strengthen the city’s resilience against future fiscal and economic shocks, not as a way to avoid addressing our structural budget challenges.”

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston has one of the best public markets in the country, says USA TODAY

Published

on

Boston has one of the best public markets in the country, says USA TODAY


play

Looking for a new marketplace to shop at this spring? You’re in luck – Boston is home to one of the best public markets in the country, according to USA TODAY 10BEST Readers’ Choice Awards.

The annual 10BEST awards highlight the best in travel, food and lifestyle, and winners are chosen by a public voting poll after being nominated by industry experts. In the 2026 food awards, highlighting the top food tours, food cruises, farmers markets and more from across the country, Boston Public Market ranked third in the best public market category.

Advertisement

Here’s what to know before you go to Boston’s top-ranked public market.

Why Boston Public Market ranked third

A year-round indoor marketplace in Downtown Boston, Boston Public Market celebrates the bounty New England has to offer with fresh groceries, prepared meals, crafts and specialty items from over 30 local artisans and food producers, with a focus on seasonal items.

Along with browsing through groceries and goods, guests are invited to join the public market for a variety of special events, including trivia, live music, magic shows and face painting.

Boston Public Market is located at 100 Hanover St. on the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway, directly above the Haymarket MBTA station. Hours are 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Sunday, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday and Tuesday or 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Wednesday through Saturday.

Advertisement

What other markets made the list?

Here is USA TODAY’s full ranking of the top 10 public markets in the country:

  1. Reading Terminal Market – Philadelphia, PA
  2. Milwaukee Public Market – Milwaukee, WI
  3. Boston Public Market – Boston, MA
  4. Eastern Market – Detroit, MI
  5. West Side Market – Cleveland, OH
  6. Essex Market – New York City, NY
  7. Lancaster Central Market – Lancaster, PA
  8. Midtown Global Market – Minneapolis, MN
  9. Grand Central Market – Los Angeles, CA
  10. North Market Downtown – Columbus, OH



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending