Connect with us

Northeast

DAVID MARCUS: New York Dems pull dirty districting trick as ‘aw shucks’ Indiana GOP folds

Published

on

DAVID MARCUS: New York Dems pull dirty districting trick as ‘aw shucks’ Indiana GOP folds

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

New York City has only one Republican member of Congress, Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents Staten Island, the city’s only red borough, and parts of South Brooklyn that are purple. An absurd and obviously partisan judicial ruling on Wednesday has put the seat at risk.

This isn’t just political hardball, it’s a fastball to the face. But too many Republicans are too “principled,” or too scared, to retaliate.

State Supreme Court Justice Jeffrey Pearlman, who was not only appointed by far-left Democrat Gov. Kathy Hochul, but once served as her chief of staff, found that the district map, which was signed into law in 2024 by Hochul herself, is suddenly unconstitutional.

Representative Nicole Malliotakis, a Republican from New York, on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., on Wednesday, June 18, 2025.  (Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Advertisement

Incredibly, Hochul agrees that she and the New York Democrats themselves signed into law an unconstitutional district just over a year ago, and her state government has refused to defend its own map in court.

TRUMP FORCES INDIANA GOP INTO REDISTRICTING REVERSAL IN RACE TO DRAW NEW MAGA MAP

The judge said there was strong evidence of a “racially polarized voting bloc,” as well as “a history of discrimination that impacts current day political participation and representation,” and “that racial appeals are still made in political campaigns today.”

Having lived from 2013 to 2023 in the district, I can tell you this argument is a bag of nonsense, set on fire and left on the doorstep of sanity. It does not remotely represent the reality on the ground, where there are no smoldering racial tensions.

The judge also finds, ludicrously, that residential Staten Island has more in common with the skyscraper-strewn Financial District of Lower Manhattan than the Brooklyn of homes and churches it is literally connected to by the Verrazano Bridge.

Advertisement

REPUBLICANS PUSH BACK OVER ‘FALSE ACCUSATIONS OF RACISM’ IN BLOCKBUSTER REDISTRICTING FIGHT

In reality, deceitful Democrats want to swap right-leaning White voters in Bay Ridge with left-leaning White voters in the ritzy FiDi.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks at a press conference, July 31, 2024, in the Bronx borough of New York.   (Julia Nikhinson/AP Photo)

This is as blatant as partisan gerrymandering gets, and in corrupt New York state, that is saying a lot.

Democrats will argue that they are just responding to redistricting efforts by the GOP, but the Texas Republicans only started engaging in what the Democrats have done forever.

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE SCORCHES DEMS FOR PANDERING TO LATINOS WITH CALIFORNIA MAP IN FIERY DISSENT

That’s why there are no GOP seats in all of New England composed of states where 45% voted for Trump. Likewise, Illinois, New Mexico and others have nearly no GOP districts.

The response by states like Texas has prompted the Democrats to see if they have left anything on the table anywhere, hence this New York duplicity along with similar plans in Virginia.

The problem for Republican voters, who would love a fair shake, is that states like Indiana still won’t respond. As usual, Dems are united and playing fast-break basketball, while the GOP is taking the “high road” and playing as the Washington Generals.

REAGAN-APPOINTED JUDGE TORCHES COLLEAGUES IN TEXAS MAP FIGHT: CALLS RULING ‘FICTION,’ ‘JUDICIAL ACTIVISM’

Advertisement

We see this as well with the blue slips in the Senate needed for judicial confirmations. Democrats abuse it, and now Trump has filled only 15 out of over 90 US attorney seats. He can’t get anyone confirmed if Democrats can block it.

It’s the same with the filibuster and government shutdowns. They left plays smashmouth, and the GOP just gets played.

Vice President JD Vance has been leading the charge to stiffen the spine of the soft GOP of yesteryear. He called out Indiana state Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray, and he wasn’t subtle.

MIKE DAVIS: SCOTUS MUST SAVE TEXAS FROM MEDDLING LIBERAL JUDGES

“I’d like to thank (Bray) for not even trying to fight back against this extraordinary Democrat abuse of power. Now the votes of Indiana Republicans will matter far less than the votes of Virginia Democrats. We told you it would happen, and you did nothing,” Vance wrote on X following Virginia’s plan to erase GOP seats.

Advertisement

Where is the lie in this?

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

What do Indiana Republicans think the “aw shucks, Mr. Smith Goes To Washington” routine is going to achieve? That they can hold their heads up high for two years as a Democrat-controlled House impeaches President Donald Trump two or three more times?

TRUMP RIPS INDIANA GOP LEADER OVER REDISTRICTING FIGHT, WARNS REPUBLICANS COULD FACE ‘MAGA PRIMARY’

From the very first time quill met cartography to carve out a Congressional district in the 1780s, the practice has been fraught with politics. It always will be.

Advertisement

But just because Democrats spent recent decades as the side abusing the system the most doesn’t mean Republicans must resign themselves to that stilted status quo.

If sanity prevails in the Empire State, admittedly a big ask, then a federal judge will squash Pearlman’s partisan, and frankly absurd, ruling, keeping the district intact.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Whether Malliotakis’ district survives as is or not, and don’t count her out either way, Republicans need to fight back with all guns blazing, not with one Hoosier hand tied behind its back.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Boston, MA

A federal judge in Boston has blocked parts of Trump’s order to limit voting by mail

Published

on

A federal judge in Boston has blocked parts of Trump’s order to limit voting by mail


President Trump holds up an executive order to limit mail-in voting as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick looks on in the White House’s Oval Office in March.

Alex Wong/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Alex Wong/Getty Images

President Trump’s executive order to limit voting by mail has hit a legal hurdle.

On Thursday, a Boston-based judge blocked parts of the order that, at least so far, has not directly affected mail-in voting for this year’s midterm primary elections.

Advertisement

The legal fight, however, is likely to continue. The order pushes the boundaries of Trump’s authority under the Constitution, which gives state legislatures and Congress — not the U.S. president — the power to set the rules for federal elections.

The Trump administration is expected to appeal the new ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, a nominee of former President Barack Obama, as a separate appeal of an earlier ruling by another federal judge moves forward in a similar set of lawsuits based in Washington, D.C.

Among other directives, Trump’s order from March calls for the Department of Homeland Security and the U.S. Postal Service to create lists of adult U.S. citizens or eligible voters in each state. It also calls for USPS, which is independent of a president’s administration, to deliver mail-in ballots only to people on those lists.

In response, USPS has proposed using information from state election officials to create voter lists. Postmaster General David Steiner told lawmakers Wednesday that under the proposal, the Postal Service would not deliver the mail ballots of any states that refuse to turn over their absentee voter lists to the federal government.

For the D.C.-based cases, the judge found in late May that it was too early for an emergency ruling that would block directives that the Trump administration has yet to carry out. Democrats are appealing that judge’s ruling to the U.S. Appeals Court for the District of Columbia.

Advertisement

Editor’s note: USPS is a financial supporter of NPR.

Edited by Benjamin Swasey



Source link

Continue Reading

Pittsburg, PA

Strong storms with a possible tornado threat expected on Thursday in Pittsburgh

Published

on

Strong storms with a possible tornado threat expected on Thursday in Pittsburgh


There’s a threat of tornadoes today as a cold front slowly works its way through our area.  The risk is low, with the Storm Prediction Center putting our chance at 2%. That’s the lowest chance (besides 0) on their daily risk map. We hardly ever reach the 5% threshold. 

The reason for our severe storm chance today is a cold front that will stall on top of us late this afternoon into the evening hours. We should have a couple of hours ahead of the storms with sunny skies that will allow potential energy to build. 

Severe weather outlook for our region – June 25, 2026

Advertisement

KDKA Weather Center


There looks to be just enough shear to mean we can’t rule out a quick spin up or two. Our tornado risk is low.

Looking at the overall severe weather chance, I open up the window for severe weather at around 2 p.m. and keep the window open through midnight. The front will arrive as what we call a short wave, which should arrive along I-80 at 2 p.m., and the line of storms will slowly work its way to the south. 

Storms that fire along the line, though, will be racing east. This means conditions can change rapidly. Any storm cells could have gusty winds and even some small hail. Frequent lightning should be expected with just how fast they’re going to be moving. Downpours should also be expected, but unless we see storms training over the same area, our flood risk looks fairly low today.

While we wait for the storms, the weather is going to be surprisingly comfortable. 

Advertisement

temp-2.png

Conditions in Pittsburgh – June 25, 2026

KDKA Weather Center


I have dew points in the low to moderate range all day long. It’ll be sunny heading into the afternoon. I have highs hitting the low 80s with comfortable weather in place through at least 3 p.m. in Pittsburgh. 

Morning temperatures dipped to the low 60s, with noon temperatures expected to be in the mid 70s.

Similar to today, most of Friday is expected to be dry. There will be another chance for rain on Friday, but rain doesn’t arrive until after 8 p.m. Friday highs should hit the upper 70s. Friday’s rain will stretch into Saturday morning, with rain continuing overnight and most rain ending before sunrise. 

Advertisement

I can’t rule out a scattered shower or two for the rest of the day on Saturday, but it’s looking pretty nice and dry. I have Saturday’s high hitting the low 80s, with highs going up to the mid-80s on Sunday. The area’s first heat wave of 2026 is now expected to arrive on Tuesday. 

I have highs in the 90s from Tuesday next week through at least Friday, with temperatures never dropping below 70° during that time period.

temp-1.png

7-day forecast: June 25, 2026

KDKA Weather Center


Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Connecticut man charged with murdering Duxbury woman is an

Published

on

Connecticut man charged with murdering Duxbury woman is an


A prosecutor said Cole Werhan, the man charged with murdering a Duxbury, Massachusetts woman inside a Connecticut home, has several open domestic violence cases.

Police say Werhan killed 26-year-old Janina Brooke Murphy inside the Burlington, Connecticut home where she was living. Murphy was found at the bottom of a staircase on March 29, but no charges were filed until Tuesday.

Werhan was arraigned Wednesday in Torrington Superior Court in Connecticut. The judge accepted the prosecution’s request to continue holding Werhan on $5 million bond.

Murphy and Werhan were dating, the woman’s mother said. Beth Murphy told WBZ-TV that a detective said her daughter had wounds “all over her” and police were investigating her death as suspicious.

Advertisement

“It’s just been the worst time of my life as you can imagine,” Beth Murphy said. “He killed my baby.”

In court Wednesday, the prosecutor said Werhan is an “extreme danger to the community.”

Cole Werhan appears in court on June 24, 2026.

CBS Boston

Advertisement


Werhan currently has four domestic violence cases with different victims in each, the prosecutor said.

On June 3, Werhan was arrested in one of those cases. He was able to post the $750,000 bail and was released with an electronic monitoring device. Werhan has not been convicted of any crimes.

One of the alleged victims told police in an interview that he hit her, strangler her, and threatened to kill her multiple times.

His defense attorney argued that the $5 million bond was “simply not affordable,” and asked instead for $1 million bond. The judge sided with the prosecution.

In arguing for lower bond, Werhan’s attorney argued that he has always appeared in court for each of his cases and should not be considered a flight risk.

Advertisement

Werhan is next due to appear in court on June 30.

Brooke Murphy

Janina Brooke Murphy

Family photo


Lindsay Bolduc was a close friend of Murphy’s. Bolduc said Werhan and Murphy met playing video games online, and later moved in together.

“Crazy to think about the pit in my stomach I had. I just knew something was wrong,” Bolduc said.

Advertisement

Bolduc said she doesn’t only want people to remember Murphy as a victim.

“I just want people to remember that Brooke was a person, you know? She was so much more than this. She wasn’t just a victim,” she said.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending