Nick Cimadon was living in Guam and transitioning out of the Navy when he was able to obtain a Connecticut cannabis food and beverage license. He enjoyed the Navy, but both he and his wife are Connecticut natives, and it offered a chance to build a business back home.
Connecticut
THC seltzers have become popular in Connecticut, but a federal law could affect their future
Stew Leonard’s Wines and Spirits of Norwalk, Danbury and Newington started stocking their shelves with THC beverages in September 2023. The CANN THC tonics pictured above at the Norwalk location come in flavors like lemon lavender, grapefruit rosemary, and blood orange cardamom.
Four years later, Cimadon’s business, SoundView, is divided in two. He produces cannabis edibles like gummies and chocolate bars using cannabis sourced from Connecticut. The other aspect of his business? THC seltzers using hemp from out of state.
Article continues below this ad
Now, with federal law governing hemp likely to change, the future of his business is in question.
“This is uncharted territory,” he said. “This was out of left field. No one saw this coming.”
Nearly 2 million THC seltzers were sold in a four-month span this year in Connecticut. But included in the federal bill that has led to the reopening of the federal government is a measure that closes a loophole that allowed hemp-derived THC products, such as infused seltzers, to be sold across the country.
What it will mean on a state-by-state basis is not yet fully understood. But there are fears that it could have a major impact or even lead to the disallowance of selling the beverages here.
Article continues below this ad
“Our early analysis is this may not be all that impactful on the Connecticut market,” said state Rep. Roland Lemar, D-New Haven, who chairs the legislative General Law Committee. “We’re going to need the attorney general’s office, Department of Consumer Protection, governor’s office and our team at House Dems to evaluate it over the coming weeks to see what that impact really is.”
When it comes specifically to THC-laden beverages, Connecticut marketers may be able to continue operations if the products are grown, processed and sold within the state’s borders.
“That is the important distinction – if you are sourcing it in Connecticut, producing it in Connecticut and selling it in Connecticut,” Lemar said. “I think it needs to be all three of those things. If you’re not transporting it across state lines in any of its forms, we think our marketplace protections would make it so that you are OK.”
That provision would, among other things, reduce the amount of allowable THC in products derived from legal hemp to trace amounts, effectively dooming the hemp cultivation and processing industry, said Mike Goodenough, a Connecticut-based hemp grower and manufacturer.
Article continues below this ad
“This is horrendous to so many businesses. This cripples us, hands down,” Goodenough claimed.
The bill as written maintains the status quo for a full year, giving states and manufacturers time to reconfigure statutes and operations, if needed.
Kaitlyn Krasselt, spokeswoman for the state Department of Consumer Protection, noted 1.988 million THC seltzers were sold in Connecticut in the four months between May and September.
“If the (federal) law passes in its current form, we are reviewing the potential impact to Connecticut’s industry and working with the legislature to determine what changes they may want to make in Connecticut,” she said.
Article continues below this ad
The seltzer exception
The compound in cannabis that creates the effect of a “high,” THC, exists only in small amounts in hemp, but the plant can be processed to isolate THC and infuse it into edible substances such as candies and seltzers.
The 2018 federal Farm Bill that legalized hemp made no provision for that process, which allowed products containing large amounts of THC to be sold legally in gas stations, smokeshops and elsewhere, said Larry Cafero, executive director of Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of Connecticut.
“These THC hemp-derived seltzers, which had no regulation when they initially came out, had 25 milligrams, in some cases, of THC in a 12-ounce can. They were being sold in convenience stores and bodegas, and these little gas station markets, and there was no age limit,” Cafero said. “A 12-year-old could go buy it as if he or she would be buying a soda.”
Article continues below this ad
Connecticut legislators sought to close that loophole and last year carved out an exception for beverages infused with hemp-derived THC, allowing beverages with low levels of hemp-derived THC to be sold in Connecticut package stores and cannabis dispensaries.
Cannabis business analyst Whitney Economics wrote in September that the total potential THC seltzer market in the United States “is valued, conservatively, at between $9.9 billion and $14.9 billion.”
Cafero said the legal sale of THC seltzers was important for his members and their customers because of a continued decrease in alcohol sales. Whitney’s report echoed similar sentiments, citing a 10% drop in alcohol consumption since 2021.
“It’s so popular because people, in many cases, are choosing that as a beverage, as opposed to an alcohol-based beverage,” Cafero said of THC seltzers.
Article continues below this ad
Supply chains
There are several Connecticut-based THC seltzer manufacturers, sold legally both in package stores and cannabis dispensaries.
“Lighthouse is made in Connecticut. Float House is made in Connecticut. Muze is made in Connecticut. Hi People is made in Connecticut. SoundView is made in Connecticut,” said Ben Zachs, who runs cannabis retailer Fine Fettle.
But many of those seltzer manufacturers may not obtain the THC from Connecticut-grown hemp, and many transport their finished products to other states.
Article continues below this ad
“A lot of them would say, ‘Well, we’re selling a lot of drinks outside the state, and this really lowers our captured market,’” Zachs said.
Lemar said, “I think a number of Connecticut-based businesses were looking at business opportunities outside of the state that they’re now being precluded from. I don’t think there’s much interest in just watching these Connecticut businesses just go under because of this new federal restriction.”
Cimadon suggested the easiest solution may be to “collapse it into cannabis,” putting hemp and cannabis into the same program, regulated by the state. But that could create additional problems. Cannabis edibles in Connecticut are subject to different rules than those with THC derived from hemp, including around packaging and potency, which could mean a huge shift for the entire industry.
Article continues below this ad
Connecticut hemp producers would need to get new state licenses and, unlike cannabis, which is illegal federally but legal in Connecticut, hemp growers are required to be federally licensed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Connecticut has a hemp plan filed with the USDA, and a provision in Connecticut’s hemp laws requires state statutes to mirror federal laws.
Lemar said there will be discussions in the coming months about “what do we need to do in Connecticut to ensure that our regulations and our authorizations are consistent with federal law?”
Connecticut
The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery
The Westport Weston Chamber of Commerce held a kick-off event at Old Mill Grocery on Monday for The Great Westport Sandwich Contest.
The contest runs throughout March with 21 restaurants, delis and markets competing in 10 categories to be crowned the best sandwich maker.
Residents can vote in the following categories: Best chicken, best steak, best vegetarian, best combo, best club, best NY deli, best pressed sandwich, best breakfast sandwich, best wrap, and best fish/seafood sandwich.
After people sample sandwiches, they can vote for their favorites in each category on the chamber’s website. They will also be placed into a drawing to win a free sandwich from one of the 10 winners.
“Of course, the goal is to have people come to Westport and check out restaurants, our markets and our delis. This is a great promotion. I mean it is a competition, but mostly it’s to bring people to the restaurants. It also gives a great community activity because they are the ones who get to vote who makes the best one,” says Matthew Mandell, the chamber’s executive director.
Winners will be announced in April and receive a plaque.
The chamber has held similar contests to determine what establishment has the best pizza, burger, soup and salad.
Connecticut
Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels
Connecticut lawmakers are again looking to restore Shore Line East rail service to its pre‑pandemic levels, a proposal that could add about 90 more trains per week.
Lawmakers are also weighing a separate cost‑saving proposal to shift the line from electric rail cars back to diesel.
The plan comes as ridership remains well below 2019 numbers, though state data shows those numbers have begun to climb.
The Department of Transportation provided the General Assembly’s transportation committee with the following data:
- 132 trains per week today versus 222 trains per week in 2019, according to the CTDOT commissioner.
- In 2019, most weekday SLE trains traveled between New Haven Union Station and Old Saybrook. This allowed SLE to operate with only five train sets in the morning and four train sets in the afternoon.
- It should be noted that 2019 SLE service levels were very different due to constrained infrastructure; 2019 service levels had a reduced number of SLE trains serving New London (13 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today), while other stations had increased service (36 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today).
“2019 levels beyond Old Saybrook to New London would require more crews and more train sets than were used in 2019, requiring significantly more financial resources,” the department wrote in its written testimony.
The department said the governor’s FY2027 budget does not include funding for a full restoration. In other words, even if the legislature requires additional trains, the funds are not included in the current financial plan.
Governor Lamont said on Monday to remember that the state subsidizes the line more than any other rail right now.
“There’s not as much demand as there are for some of the other rail services in other parts of the state, so that’s the balance we’re trying to get right,” Lamont said.
At a public hearing on Monday, concerns about the line’s reliability and schedule were a central focus in the testimony.
“We’re making the line less attractive, some would say. The schedules are very, very difficult to manage,” said Sen. Christine Cohen of Guilford, the co-chair of the committee.
The current schedule for eastbound morning commuters is difficult. The train either arrives in New London just after 7 a.m. or after 9 a.m.
“So obviously not really … conducive to a typical workday,” Cohen said.
Cohen, who represents communities along the line, said she continues to reintroduce the bill to expand service year after year, pushing the state to do more with the line.
She thanked the department for the work it was able to do with the recent funding to establish a through train to Stamford.
“What do we need to do, and what are the challenges that you face in terms of expansion at this time?” Cohen asked.
Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto responded that the biggest hurdle is the cost of labor and access fees to Amtrak, which owns the territory.
“The cost to provide rail service is very expensive,” Eucalitto said.
He said CTDOT knows the current schedule is “not ideal,” but the economics of a work-from-home society are difficult.
“People expect 100% of the trains that they had in 2019, but they only want to take it two days a week,” Eucalitto said.
Asked about the eastbound schedule, the commissioner explained Shore Line East still operates on a model that sends trains toward New Haven in the morning rather than toward New London.
Changing that would require more equipment, more crews, and a second morning operations base, as well as negotiations with Amtrak, which owns the tracks.
Amtrak is “protecting their slots to be able to run increased Northeast Regional service as well as increased Acela service,” Eucallito said. “They’re going to look at us and question, ‘Well, how does that impact our need for Amtrak services?’ They’ll never give you an answer upfront, it’s always: ‘show us a proposal and then they’ll respond to it.’”
Cohen, who chairs the Transportation Committee, touted how a successful Shoreline East benefits the environment, development along the line, and reduces I-95 congestion.
“We need to start talking about how much money this costs us and think about all of the ancillary benefits,” Cohen said during the hearing.
Cohen said there is multi-state support for extending the line into Rhode Island.
“We will need some federal dollars. But as you say, there are other businesses up the line in New London,” Cohen said. “We’ve got Electric Boat. We’ve got Pfizer up that way. If we can get those employees on the transit line, we’re all the better for it.”
Rider advocates said the issue is familiar.
“I’d rather see solutions, and not things that are holding it back,” said Susan Feaster, founder of the Shore Line East Riders’ Advocacy Group.
She said she worries the line is facing a transit death spiral, with reduced service leading to lower ridership and falling fare revenue.
“They have to give us the money,” Feaster said. “It shouldn’t have to be profitable.”
Like other train lines across the country, Shore Line East relies on subsidies.
“We’re not asking for everything to be done overnight, but just incrementally,” Feaster said.
The line received $5 million two years ago, which increased service levels.
The proposal comes as the state reviews whether to return to diesel rail cars that are more than 30 years old.
The state says the switch would save about $9 million, but riders have said it would worsen the passenger experience.
NBC Connecticut asked Cohen whether she’ll ask DOT to reverse that proposal.
“I really want to,” Cohen said. “I appreciate what CTDOT was trying to do in terms of not cutting service as a result of trying to find savings elsewhere. This isn’t the way to do it.”
Connecticut
Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections
HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – Thousands of Connecticut families with ties to Iran are watching and waiting as their home country undergoes a historic change.
Among them is Ramin Ahmadi, a Yale doctor, human rights activist and founder of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. He has spent decades advocating for freedom in Iran from his home in Connecticut.
Ahmadi moved to the United States when he was 18. On Saturday morning, he learned of military strikes in Iran and the death of the country’s supreme leader.
Ahmadi said protests for democracy and human rights in Iran intensified in December, drawing millions of participants — including his own family and friends.
“The situation in Iran was a humanitarian emergency and it needed an intervention,” Ahmadi said.
He said he celebrated when he heard the news Saturday morning.
“I was celebrating along with all other Iranians inside and outside the country,” Ahmadi said. “I do regret that we cannot bring him to a trial for crimes that he has committed against humanity.”
Ahmadi said he spoke with his sister in Iran after she celebrated in the streets. She was later told to return home for her safety.
He shared a message she relayed from those around her.
“They said do not let our death be exploited because worse than that is having to live with the criminals who have done this to us for the rest of our lives,” Ahmadi said. “We do not want to do that.”
For those questioning whether the conflict was America’s to engage in, Ahmadi offered a direct response.
“We will all be affected,” he said. “And to those that tell you that the U.S. and Israel are beating the drums of war in Iran, one has to remind them that it was not like before this Iranian people were listening to Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 in D minor. We had a war already declared on us by this regime. We were being slaughtered on a daily basis.”
Ahmadi said he believes the path forward begins with young military officers forcing out what remains of the regime, followed by free elections.
“Everyone’s life will be safer in the future and not just Iranians,” Ahmadi said.
Connecticut lawmakers are also responding to the U.S. strikes on Iran.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
-
World5 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts6 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO6 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Politics1 week agoOpenAI didn’t contact police despite employees flagging mass shooter’s concerning chatbot interactions: REPORT
-
Technology1 week agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making
-
Oregon4 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Technology1 week agoArturia’s FX Collection 6 adds two new effects and a $99 intro version


