Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: Pride is more than a month. In CT, it’s a mandate

Published

on

Opinion: Pride is more than a month. In CT, it’s a mandate


When I first ran for office, I was one of only two openly gay members of the Connecticut General Assembly. Today, I’m proud to serve as co-chair of a growing LGBTQ+ Caucus, one that’s not only increasing in number but in impact.

That growth matters. Because while we gather this June to mark Pride Month, we do so at a time when LGBTQ+ rights, especially the rights of trans people, are under coordinated attack across the country. Under the current federal administration, we’ve seen efforts to erase LGBTQ+ history from classrooms, target trans youth in healthcare and sports, and target our identities to distract from real issues.

State Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan

Connecticut has chosen a different path. We’re showing what it looks like when a state leads with dignity and action, not division.

This year, we passed bipartisan legislation that prohibits discrimination against LGBTQ+ residents in long-term care facilities, ensuring our elders can live openly and receive the care they deserve without hiding who they are. No one should be forced back into the closet just to access basic services.

Advertisement

We also protected funding for the LGBTQ+ Justice and Opportunity Network, which provides grants to LGBTQ+ nonprofit, healthcare, and advocacy organizations across the state. The network collaborates with local affinity groups and advocates to inform the legislature on the evolving needs of our community. I’m especially proud of this program, because it was the first bill I introduced and took to the House floor back in 2019.

But we didn’t stop there. In a year when states are criminalizing gender-affirming care and restricting access to abortion, we passed legislation to shield providers in Connecticut who offer this care. This sends a clear message: if you’re under attack in your home state, Connecticut will stand with you.

And while other states are banning books and threatening librarians, we’re doing the opposite. We advanced legislation to protect public libraries, librarians, and the freedom to access information without intimidation or censorship. We did this because defending free expression and the right to learn is foundational to a healthy democracy and to a truly inclusive society.

For me, Pride is deeply personal. I spent 18 years in the closet, raised by an immigrant father and an Irish Catholic mother. That combination came with its own set of challenges, but today, after many difficult conversations and a lot of growth, they’re two of my biggest supporters. I’m grateful for that, and I know not everyone is so fortunate.

And even within our own community, we don’t always get it right. I’m a gay man, I don’t know what it’s like to be trans or nonbinary, and sometimes I get it wrong. We all do. But we’ve got to give each other the space and grace to keep learning, and to keep showing up.

Advertisement

That’s true for allies, too. Allyship isn’t seasonal. It doesn’t stop at a pin, a post, or a parade. It’s about using your voice when it matters, especially when it’s uncomfortable. It’s about backing up your values with real action, not just words.

To every LGBTQ+ person across Connecticut and beyond, especially those feeling exhausted, afraid, or unseen right now, I want you to know: you’re not alone. We’re here. We’re fighting for you. And we’re not going anywhere.

We’ve come too far, and the stakes are too high, to go quiet now.

State Rep. Raghib Allie-Brennan is the Democratic Chief Majority Whip. He represents the 2nd District (Danbury) in the Connecticut House of Representatives.

 

Advertisement

 



Source link

Connecticut

Connecticut wins antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation upon New York court ruling

Published

on

Connecticut wins antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation upon New York court ruling


HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A massive jury decision in New York this week is sending shockwaves through the entertainment industry, a decision that Connecticut has historically encouraged.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and a coalition of 33 other attorneys general won their lawsuit against Live Nation when the Manhattan court ruled Wednesday that Live Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster, violated federal and state antitrust laws.

The decision from the court is to be met with appeals from Live Nation. One thing is for sure in the rest of the case; it is monumental, and it will be lengthy.

The lawsuits filed by dozens of states accused Live Nation of smothering competition and driving up prices for ticket buyers, resulting in the jury’s decision that Live Nation should be held liable for illegally maintaining monopoly power over the ticket industry.

Advertisement

“The fact that the states went ahead and litigated this case and won before a jury is really a remarkable, historical development,” legal expert Bob Langer said.

If the verdict holds, Langer says Live Nation could be facing strict penalties, including being forced to split from Ticketmaster, which would affect the entire industry.

“Eventually prices will go down, but we are a long, long way from that,” Langer said.

Langer told News 8 that appeals could reach the Supreme Court and take years. One New Haven event venue said it is too early to tell how the case will affect their ticketing practices.

Live Nation insists they are not a monopoly, but a successful company built by excellence and effort. The company said that it can and will appeal any unfavorable rulings.

Advertisement

Those who may be affected most are the buyers.

“We probably are being taken advantage of, but if there are people like me that have a crazy willingness to pay, the prices might increase at the end of the day,” Aaron Abrams, a fan of Peter Cat Recordings Co., said.

“I do see the monopoly, absolutely,” Laura, who buys her tickets off a site for military families, said. “I am very grateful that I don’t have to be a part of that. I will enjoy any ticket and any concert I can go to.”

Overall, music fans have shared a general consensus that they will follow the case, but will still be attending concerts either way.

“I would love to see the prices go back down,” Laura said. “I would love for everyone to have access to different events and concerts and be able to afford it.”

Advertisement

The case against Live Nation comes after the company agreed to a settlement with the federal government, but more than 30 states pressed on with the trial, saying not enough concessions were made by Live Nation.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

New Britain cyberattack may have exposed personal information, officials say

Published

on

New Britain cyberattack may have exposed personal information, officials say


Officials in New Britain are still assessing the damage more than two months after a cyberattack hit city systems, potentially exposing some personal information.

A spokesperson for Mayor Bobby Sanchez said recently that there’s no indication of widespread exposure of resident data. However, hackers may have gained access to some sensitive records during the Jan. 28 incident, including names, dates of birth, government-issued identification numbers and financial account and health-related information, according to the city.

Officials have released few details about what occurred, citing the ongoing investigation.

“Investigations of this nature are complex and must be handled carefully to protect the integrity of the review, support any potential law enforcement activity, and ensure accurate information is shared,” said Alisha Rayner, the mayor’s spokesperson.

Advertisement

The city detected the attack after an employee spotted unusual activity on a workstation. Several municipal systems “experienced disruption” during the incident, though an investigation found the “unauthorized activity was more limited in scope,” according to the city.

Cyberattacks on cities and towns have grown more common. Hackers breach or damage computer systems to steal sensitive data or hold systems for ransom — a scenario officials in New Britain faced, according to Evan Allard, the director of the Connecticut Intelligence Center, which is a part of the state Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.

“Any organization that has sensitive or private data that you know they want to keep within their own systems, these ransomware actors are targeting them because it creates a sense of urgency towards paying it back,” Allard said.

New Britain consulted with a team of response experts at Cowbell Resiliency Services to determine the best course of action. It’s unclear whether the city paid a ransom. Responding by email to questions from Connecticut Public, Rayner said the city evaluated multiple response options, including restoring from backups.

“Based on that assessment, including operational impact, recovery timelines, and overall cost considerations, a course of action was taken to resolve the incident as quickly and securely as possible,” Rayner wrote.

Advertisement

Rayner said the financial hit to the city was limited because New Britain carries cybersecurity insurance. It has a $25,000 deductible under the policy, she said.

New Britain is providing credit monitoring and identity protection services to people who were potentially impacted.

While the investigation continues, the Common Council voted to replace New Britain’s existing cybersecurity system. The city executed a three-year contract with Cowbell Resiliency Services that includes round-the-clock security monitoring for a cost of $66,000 per year.

“It’s a full-on platform that is a little bit more enhanced and at a larger cost,” Jonathan Delgadillo, the city’s director of support services, said at a recent meeting. “But again, I think it’s the best thing for the city,”

New Britain Alderman John McNamara said he’s satisfied with the city’s handling of the cyberattack.

Advertisement

“I believe the city is taking appropriate steps and is advising city employees and taxpayers on what’s going on with it,” McNamara said. “I’m looking for additional reports and to take action in terms of anything that has to be improved upon.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Coventry state rep. files paperwork to run for lt. gov.

Published

on

Coventry state rep. files paperwork to run for lt. gov.


HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) – A state representative from Coventry has filed paperwork to run for lieutenant governor of Connecticut.

Republican Rep. Timothy Ackert, who represents Connecticut 8th Assembly District, had his paperwork received by state election officials on April 9.

Rep. Tim Ackert announced that he filed paper work to run as a Republican candidate for lt. gov. of Connecticut in the Nov. 3, 2026 general election. This photo is from opening day of the state legislative session in Feb. 2026.(State Representative Tim Ackert / Facebook)

The paperwork showed that he formed a candidate committee called “Ackert for Connecticut.”

As of Wednesday morning, Matthew Corey was the only Republican candidate in the primary for lieutenant governor.

Advertisement

The primary election is Aug. 11, 2026.

The general election is Nov. 3, 2026.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending