Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: Can Biden's infrastructure law build a more equitable Connecticut?

Published

on

Opinion: Can Biden's infrastructure law build a more equitable Connecticut?


Connecticut’s public transportation system is currently on the brink of a transformative revival, with all signs, literally, pointing to President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This legislation allocates approximately $1.3 billion over five years to elevate Connecticut’s public transportation options, marking a 39% increase over 2021 FAST Act formula funding levels. This investment promises to reshape Connecticut’s public transit system, fostering a more connected, sustainable, and equitable community for Connecticut and Hartford residents.

In my hometown of Syracuse, NY, I first heard about the I-81 viaduct project, a plan to redesign the city’s main highway plan, in my high school religion class, “Morality and Social Justice.” When discussing some of the most pressing issues within minority communities in Syracuse, it all came back to how this viaduct has physically and socially broken apart communities and deprived them of basic resources. At the time, the redesign project seemed far-fetched.

Then, almost four years later, as a student at Trinity College, I found myself as an intern in Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s Central New York office, attending the ground breaking of the I-81 Viaduct Project. That summer I got to dive into President Biden’s Bipartisan Infrastructure Law where I learned firsthand how our overburdened and underfunded infrastructure systems struggle to meet the needs of visitors and residents alike. With the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law focusing on public transit and already impacting cities such as Syracuse, there is a great opportunity for Trinity students, the Hartford community, and future Connecticut residents to benefit from a reimagined transportation network.

Melina Korfonta

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s commitment to public transportation is a game-changer for Connecticut’s public transportation commuters, who currently spend an extra 130.4% of their time commuting compared to those who take personal vehicles, with non-White households being 2.1 times more likely to rely on public transportation. In addition, 18.8% of transit vehicles in the state are past their life. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law aims to address these challenges and revolutionize sustainable transportation options for millions of Americans, including the residents of Connecticut.

The law’s impact on Connecticut’s public transit system is threefold: first, it will significantly improve the state’s public transportation infrastructure; second, it will enhance the state’s sustainability efforts; and third, it will contribute to Connecticut’s economic revitalization. By embracing these changes, the state of Connecticut can work together to create a more sustainable and equitable environment, especially in urban areas such as Hartford.

Advertisement

President Biden’s legislation also includes $102 billion to eliminate the Amtrak maintenance backlog, modernize the Northeast Corridor, and bring rail service to areas outside the Northeast and mid-Atlantic. This investment in rail infrastructure can have a significant impact on connectivity to other parts of the state and region, making it easier for residents to travel to and from towns and cities.

Within the Connecticut bus system, The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law allocates $8.8 million to four Connecticut school districts for the Clean Bus Program, which will replace diesel buses with zero-emission buses. Additionally, $26.4 million is granted to the State of Connecticut Department of Transportation to modernize CTtransit Stamford Division Depot and purchase battery-electric buses. These improvements will not only ensure continued service reliability and maintain a state of good repair but also improve air quality and advance environmental justice in Stamford, CT. The hope is that other plans can be made to extend throughout the state to further improve other urban areas.

Hartford’s public transit system, specifically, faces numerous challenges, including unreliable schedules, limited routes, and outdated infrastructure. These issues hinder students and residents from fully experiencing the city without relying on personal vehicles or ride-sharing services. The current initiatives of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, however, presents a solution to these problems, offering a chance to revolutionize Hartford’s public transit and elevate the city to new heights. There is, however, more that can be done.

The I-84 Hartford Project, originally considered four alternatives to repair the two miles of deteriorating bridges between the Flatbush Avenue ramps and the I-91 interchange, but the Elevated Highway and Tunnel Alternatives were eliminated due to various issues. The remaining options are the No-Build Alternative and the Lowered Highway Alternative. In 2019, the project expanded into the Greater Hartford Mobility Study, incorporating other transportation needs and related projects in the region. As road repairs began in November 2024, there may be more benefit in considering larger projects like Syracuse’s I-81 Viaduct Project. A project similar to the project taking down I-81 would bring isolated communities together, allowing them to escape food deserts, access easier commuting routes, and even make their quality of life better overall; not having to live underneath a highway.

While the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will undoubtedly bring positive changes to Connecticut’s public transit, there may be some challenges. The transition to new technologies might cause temporary disruptions, and the initial costs of implementing these changes could be high. The long-term benefits, however, such as reduced emissions, improved air quality, and a more reliable and accessible transportation system will hopefully prove to outweigh these challenges.

Advertisement

As the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law helps Connecticut and other states improve their public transit systems, it also sets a precedent for future infrastructure investments in Connecticut. Overall, the Act offers a golden opportunity to transform both Connecticut’s and Hartford’s public transit systems. In the long term, reduced emissions, improved air quality, and a more reliable transportation system will contribute to a better quality of life for residents and visitors alike. These changes, when implemented, will benefit anyone who interacts with these cities, especially underserved households, who are more likely to rely on public transportation, and communities currently facing infrastructure issues. This law will provide safer, more accessible commuting options and promote economic growth.

By embracing these changes, Connecticut and the Hartford community can work together to create a more sustainable and equitable urban environment, setting a shining example for other cities across the nation. Together, we can build a brighter future for Connecticut, its residents, and generations to come.

Melina Korfonta is a Senior at Trinity College, majoring in Public Policy & Law.

 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connecticut

The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery

Published

on

The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery


People in Westport have the chance to pick the best thing between sliced bread.

The Westport Weston Chamber of Commerce held a kick-off event at Old Mill Grocery on Monday for The Great Westport Sandwich Contest.

The contest runs throughout March with 21 restaurants, delis and markets competing in 10 categories to be crowned the best sandwich maker.

Residents can vote in the following categories: Best chicken, best steak, best vegetarian, best combo, best club, best NY deli, best pressed sandwich, best breakfast sandwich, best wrap, and best fish/seafood sandwich.

Advertisement

After people sample sandwiches, they can vote for their favorites in each category on the chamber’s website. They will also be placed into a drawing to win a free sandwich from one of the 10 winners.

“Of course, the goal is to have people come to Westport and check out restaurants, our markets and our delis. This is a great promotion. I mean it is a competition, but mostly it’s to bring people to the restaurants. It also gives a great community activity because they are the ones who get to vote who makes the best one,” says Matthew Mandell, the chamber’s executive director.

Winners will be announced in April and receive a plaque.

The chamber has held similar contests to determine what establishment has the best pizza, burger, soup and salad.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels

Published

on

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels


Connecticut lawmakers are again looking to restore Shore Line East rail service to its pre‑pandemic levels, a proposal that could add about 90 more trains per week.

Lawmakers are also weighing a separate cost‑saving proposal to shift the line from electric rail cars back to diesel.

The plan comes as ridership remains well below 2019 numbers, though state data shows those numbers have begun to climb.

The Department of Transportation provided the General Assembly’s transportation committee with the following data:

Advertisement
  • 132 trains per week today versus 222 trains per week in 2019, according to the CTDOT commissioner.
  • In 2019, most weekday SLE trains traveled between New Haven Union Station and Old Saybrook. This allowed SLE to operate with only five train sets in the morning and four train sets in the afternoon.
  • It should be noted that 2019 SLE service levels were very different due to constrained infrastructure; 2019 service levels had a reduced number of SLE trains serving New London (13 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today), while other stations had increased service (36 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today).

“2019 levels beyond Old Saybrook to New London would require more crews and more train sets than were used in 2019, requiring significantly more financial resources,” the department wrote in its written testimony.

The department said the governor’s FY2027 budget does not include funding for a full restoration. In other words, even if the legislature requires additional trains, the funds are not included in the current financial plan.

Governor Lamont said on Monday to remember that the state subsidizes the line more than any other rail right now.

“There’s not as much demand as there are for some of the other rail services in other parts of the state, so that’s the balance we’re trying to get right,” Lamont said.

At a public hearing on Monday, concerns about the line’s reliability and schedule were a central focus in the testimony.

“We’re making the line less attractive, some would say. The schedules are very, very difficult to manage,” said Sen. Christine Cohen of Guilford, the co-chair of the committee.

Advertisement

The current schedule for eastbound morning commuters is difficult. The train either arrives in New London just after 7 a.m. or after 9 a.m.

“So obviously not really … conducive to a typical workday,” Cohen said.

Cohen, who represents communities along the line, said she continues to reintroduce the bill to expand service year after year, pushing the state to do more with the line.

She thanked the department for the work it was able to do with the recent funding to establish a through train to Stamford.

“What do we need to do, and what are the challenges that you face in terms of expansion at this time?” Cohen asked.

Advertisement

Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto responded that the biggest hurdle is the cost of labor and access fees to Amtrak, which owns the territory.

“The cost to provide rail service is very expensive,” Eucalitto said.

He said CTDOT knows the current schedule is “not ideal,” but the economics of a work-from-home society are difficult.

“People expect 100% of the trains that they had in 2019, but they only want to take it two days a week,” Eucalitto said.

Asked about the eastbound schedule, the commissioner explained Shore Line East still operates on a model that sends trains toward New Haven in the morning rather than toward New London.

Advertisement

Changing that would require more equipment, more crews, and a second morning operations base, as well as negotiations with Amtrak, which owns the tracks.

Amtrak is “protecting their slots to be able to run increased Northeast Regional service as well as increased Acela service,” Eucallito said. “They’re going to look at us and question, ‘Well, how does that impact our need for Amtrak services?’ They’ll never give you an answer upfront, it’s always: ‘show us a proposal and then they’ll respond to it.’”

Cohen, who chairs the Transportation Committee, touted how a successful Shoreline East benefits the environment, development along the line, and reduces I-95 congestion.

“We need to start talking about how much money this costs us and think about all of the ancillary benefits,” Cohen said during the hearing.

Cohen said there is multi-state support for extending the line into Rhode Island.

Advertisement

“We will need some federal dollars. But as you say, there are other businesses up the line in New London,” Cohen said. “We’ve got Electric Boat. We’ve got Pfizer up that way. If we can get those employees on the transit line, we’re all the better for it.”

Rider advocates said the issue is familiar.

“I’d rather see solutions, and not things that are holding it back,” said Susan Feaster, founder of the Shore Line East Riders’ Advocacy Group.

She said she worries the line is facing a transit death spiral, with reduced service leading to lower ridership and falling fare revenue.

“They have to give us the money,” Feaster said. “It shouldn’t have to be profitable.”

Advertisement

Like other train lines across the country, Shore Line East relies on subsidies.

“We’re not asking for everything to be done overnight, but just incrementally,” Feaster said.

The line received $5 million two years ago, which increased service levels.

The proposal comes as the state reviews whether to return to diesel rail cars that are more than 30 years old.

The state says the switch would save about $9 million, but riders have said it would worsen the passenger experience.

Advertisement

NBC Connecticut asked Cohen whether she’ll ask DOT to reverse that proposal.

“I really want to,” Cohen said. “I appreciate what CTDOT was trying to do in terms of not cutting service as a result of trying to find savings elsewhere. This isn’t the way to do it.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections

Published

on

Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – Thousands of Connecticut families with ties to Iran are watching and waiting as their home country undergoes a historic change.

Among them is Ramin Ahmadi, a Yale doctor, human rights activist and founder of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. He has spent decades advocating for freedom in Iran from his home in Connecticut.

Ahmadi moved to the United States when he was 18. On Saturday morning, he learned of military strikes in Iran and the death of the country’s supreme leader.

Ahmadi said protests for democracy and human rights in Iran intensified in December, drawing millions of participants — including his own family and friends.

Advertisement

“The situation in Iran was a humanitarian emergency and it needed an intervention,” Ahmadi said.

He said he celebrated when he heard the news Saturday morning.

“I was celebrating along with all other Iranians inside and outside the country,” Ahmadi said. “I do regret that we cannot bring him to a trial for crimes that he has committed against humanity.”

Ahmadi said he spoke with his sister in Iran after she celebrated in the streets. She was later told to return home for her safety.

He shared a message she relayed from those around her.

Advertisement

“They said do not let our death be exploited because worse than that is having to live with the criminals who have done this to us for the rest of our lives,” Ahmadi said. “We do not want to do that.”

For those questioning whether the conflict was America’s to engage in, Ahmadi offered a direct response.

“We will all be affected,” he said. “And to those that tell you that the U.S. and Israel are beating the drums of war in Iran, one has to remind them that it was not like before this Iranian people were listening to Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 in D minor. We had a war already declared on us by this regime. We were being slaughtered on a daily basis.”

Ahmadi said he believes the path forward begins with young military officers forcing out what remains of the regime, followed by free elections.

“Everyone’s life will be safer in the future and not just Iranians,” Ahmadi said.

Advertisement

Connecticut lawmakers are also responding to the U.S. strikes on Iran.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending