NEW CANAAN, Conn. (WTNH) — A New Haven teen suffered life-threatening injuries after being thrown from a moped on Route 15 Monday afternoon, according to Connecticut State Police.

State police said the 16-year-old girl was a passenger on a black moped being driven by a 17-year-old boy, also from New Haven.

They were driving southbound on Route 15 when the driver lost control of the moped while moving into a lane for the Exit 13 off ramp.

As a result of the collision, the 16-year-old passenger was thrown from the moped.

She was transported to Norwalk Hospital first, then Yale New Haven Hospital for a higher level of care, state police said.

The driver had no apparent injury, according to a report from state police.

Route 15 South was closed for more than three hours as the incident was investigated. The collision remains under investigation.

Last week, the Connecticut Office of Legislative Research published a report about the hurdles to expanding natural gas use in Connecticut.

“There are obstacles to increasing Connecticut’s natural gas supply at each stage of the supply chain,” the report, which is authored by Senior Legislative Attorney Jessica Schaeffer-Helmecki, states. “The largest obstacle to increasing natural gas production is the fact that, due to Connecticut’s geology, it has minimal natural gas resources that are highly unlikely to be developed. The New England region is also geologically unable to store natural gas underground for use during periods of peak demand.”

Schaeffer-Helmecki found that, because of the limited natural gas resources in Connecticut, the state would have to rely on interstate pipelines to expand its natural gas use. This would require navigating multiple federal and state agencies, which is difficult, both because of the bureaucratic process and changing regulations. It also might require seizing land through eminent domain, which is another protracted process that would have to go through courts. Finally, Schaeffer-Helmecki predicts both public pushback and difficulty securing a customer base, meaning future projects may not be financially viable.  

There are currently three pipelines that carry natural gas to Connecticut: the Algonquin Gas Transmission, which originates in New Jersey, the Iroquois Gas Transmission System, which originates in northern New York, and the Tennessee Gas Transmission, which draws natural gas from multiple places in the Gulf of America. Additionally, there is a proposed pipeline called the Constitution, which would run 125 miles from New York to Pennsylvania.

“Local distribution company (LDC; e.g., CT Natural Gas or Eversource) demand can be difficult to predict,” Schaeffer-Helmecki’s report states. “The largest natural gas takers (electric generators) typically do not enter into long term capacity agreements.”

Despite this, demand for natural gas in Connecticut is growing, especially in the winter, according to an S&P Global study that was published earlier this month.

This study identified some of the same obstacles that Schaeffer-Helmecki’s report did, including limited resources in the region and minimal construction.

“In the past, Connecticut created an initiative aimed at encouraging natural gas transmission pipeline companies to increase their capacity into the state and region by limiting some of the financial risk of the expansion,” Schaeffer-Helmecki’s report states. “However, the multi-state procurement process did not occur once a court overruled Massachusetts’ participation in it, and the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) cancelled the customer conversion program in 2022 finding, among other things, an insufficient number of new customers enrolled in the program to justify the level of ratepayer subsidies that were needed to continue it.”

This S&P Global study found that, if the barriers to constructing the Constitution can be overcome, the pipeline would save ratepayers in the region a net $8.5 billion in its first 15 years of use. It would also generate an additional $8.5 billion in revenue for businesses in Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, and Massachusetts during that time period.  

As some states, including Connecticut, are issuing full SNAP benefits to recipients, the Trump administration is now saying those efforts need to be rolled back.

That’s according to a Department of Agriculture memo during the ongoing government shutdown.

As the government shutdown continues to drag on, the court battle over the lapse in federal funding of SNAP benefits remains front and center.

“There has been no other time in which SNAP benefits have been suspended due to government shutdown,” Brian Marks, a University of New Haven business professor, said.

As it plays out, Connecticut is among the few states moving ahead with using state funds to give full SNAP payments to recipients for November. Marks says the move by Governor Ned Lamont is notable, as he’s seen as a fiscal moderate.

“Governor Lamont is being thoughtful and considerate about those who need and trying to transfer funds where he can and where he has the authority,” he said.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture says that needs to stop after the Supreme Court issued a pause on a federal district court order telling the Trump administration to fully fund SNAP.

In a memo issued late Saturday, the USDA says the extent states had sent full SNAP payments for this month was “unauthorized” and says they must “immediately undo” those steps. It says failure to comply could result in actions such as the USDA holding states financially responsible over sending the full payments and cancelling federal cost-sharing of SNAP with them.

Governor Lamont responded to the memo saying the state didn’t need to take back SNAP funds saying in a statement:

“No, Connecticut does not need to take back SNAP benefits already sent to the 360,000 people who depend on them for food and who should have never been caught in the middle of this political fight. We continue to assess what impact this memo may have, but those who received their benefits should not worry about losing them. We have their back.”

Connecticut Republican Party chairman Ben Proto released a statement pushing for the government to reopen saying in part:

“It’s time for the Democrats to come to their senses, including Ned Lamont and other Democrat governors and to push their Democrat senators to vote for the continuing resolution and fund the government and SNAP & WIC and then sit down and negotiate a new budget. To paraphrase President Obama, it is irresponsible for the Democrats to threaten default, to threaten an economic shutdown, to suggest America not pay its bills to keep struggling families from being able to purchase groceries just to try to blackmail a president into giving them some concessions. The financial and economic problems the people of CT face are from the failed economic policies of CT Democrats and Senators Blumenthal and Murphy’s total failure to protect their constituents.”

Professor Marks says as the debate continues, SNAP recipients will remain caught in the middle.

“It’s clear our elective federal representatives need to come forward and figure out a way to eliminate the shutdown and get this government moving again,” he said.