Connect with us

Connecticut

Four female athletes challenge state policy in fight to save women’s sports

Published

on

Four female athletes challenge state policy in fight to save women’s sports


“Particularly on the time, these state championships meant quite a bit to me. To coach and work that arduous to be within the competition for a state championship and lose due to organic males in my race was actually disheartening and irritating.”

The ACLU of Connecticut, which represented CIAC and its member faculties within the go well with — together with Miller and Yearwood who joined as defendants — didn’t reply to CNA’s request for remark. 

A CIAC spokesman instructed CNA the convention had no remark.

Due to the CIAC coverage, Smith walked away from a regional New England meet with a bronze medal as a substitute of a silver as a result of a male took first place. 

Advertisement

“All the opposite feminine athletes weren’t capable of advance to the state open or the New England Regional meet as a result of the spots have been taken by organic males,” Smith mentioned. 

Soule misplaced the chance to qualify for the meet and the 55-meter sprint, which she had beforehand certified for, for a similar cause.

“I used to be pressured to look at my very own occasion from the sidelines,” Soule added.

ADF senior counsel Christiana Kiefer mentioned that on common, males have a 10-15% larger efficiency common than females.

“Why ought to women even attempt?” Kiefer requested. “The entire cause we even have girls’s sports activities as a separate class is as a result of we acknowledge these actual bodily variations.”

Advertisement

Uphill battle forward for future of ladies’ sports activities 

The ladies’ case was dismissed earlier final 12 months by a Connecticut district courtroom decide when it was submitted. ADF then appealed the ruling to the 2nd Court docket of Appeals.

(Story continues under)

“What the district courtroom did in dismissing the women’ lawsuit is actually [say] that their inaccurate information, their misplaced alternatives did not matter. And that is merely incorrect underneath Title IX,” Kiefer mentioned. 

Advertisement

“Information do matter to athletes,” Kiefer added. “Chelsea Mitchell misplaced 4 state championship titles. She was 4 instances the quickest woman in a state championship race, and but the report books do not replicate her accomplishments. That is one thing that must be fastened.”

The grievance requests that CIAC grant the plaintiffs financial aid, replace the district’s information to take away males from the scores and strike down the coverage. 

Kiefer mentioned that ADF was “optimistic” the courtroom of appeals will rule of their favor as a result of the Title IX violation was so “clear.”

She added that they hope it received’t be essential to deliver the case to the Supreme Court docket, “but when essential, we’ll take this case so far as it must go.”

Biden’s Title IX coverage muddies the waters





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Connecticut

Flying Bed Cover Causes Crash On Highway In Northern Connecticut

Published

on

Flying Bed Cover Causes Crash On Highway In Northern Connecticut


UNION, CT — A flying piece of bed linen made for a restless night for one driver on a stretch of highway in northern Connecticut over the weekend.

According to a state police crash report, a 2003 Toyota Camry with a 54-year-old Lowell, MA, man behind the wheel was headed east near Exit 72 in Vernon at 12:18 p.m.Saturday. What was described by troopers as a “bed cover” flew off a pickup truck just ahead of the Camry and landed on it, according to a crash report.

It blocked the driver’s view and the car crashed, state police said.

No injuries were reported.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: CT has stupid high property taxes; a case for regional government

Published

on

Opinion: CT has stupid high property taxes; a case for regional government


Each year, towns in Connecticut go through the painful budget process, and my town of South Windsor is no different. What is different is how politically charged this has become.

The basis of the politicalization seems to be rooted in “the tax issue.” This past year South Windsor went through the real estate re-evaluation process required by law every five years. With the rise in real estate values, those evaluations increased dramatically.

The good news; your house is worth more. The bad news; your tax burden is going up.

This did not sit well with many residents. So, in November, the town voted out our super-majority Democrat Party Town Council and voted in a super-majority Republican Party Town Council. The Republicans had campaigned on a platform of cutting taxes, which obviously appealed to many voters.

Advertisement

It waits to be seen whether new town leadership can hold the line on taxes without negatively impacting our schools, town services, head count, and more. This is not a partisan issue. The dread of higher taxes is not a Republican or a Democratic thing. I view it as a practical thing.

Let me explain. I moved to Connecticut in 2002 having lived most of my life in Maryland and Pennsylvania. I learned quickly after moving here that property taxes in Connecticut were not just high, they’re stupid high. And on top of that I had to pay a tax because I own a car. I’ve never paid a personal property tax in my life previously.

Why is this? It’s simple math – towns need revenue to support expenditures. The revenue side is static. Connecticut does not have a prolific tax base. There is no Boston generating billions in tax revenue. Our statewide population is that of a Minneapolis or Tampa. We are not getting a windfall. So practically speaking, the only place to adjust is on the expense side. And here we have a wonderful opportunity.

That opportunity is called, regional government. It is a state-wide solution. This state is a victim of an incredibly inefficient provincial system of government that goes back to colonial days. We have 169 little kingdoms each duplicating the costs of each other. This creates an insane level of cost redundancy. We operate in fiscal silos with few or no economies of scale.

And you know who agrees with this? Forty-eight other states, none of whom do government this way; only Connecticut and Rhode Island operate in this manner. Think about that enormous duplication of costs across; parks and rec, public works, elderly services, tax collection, legal advisers, economic development, health services, IT infrastructure and education, just to name a few budget line items that could be streamlined.

Advertisement

Back in the 60s and 70s there was an attempt to move to regional government but it was so poorly executed that it failed. The infrastructure already exists as we have counties and planning groups called Regional Councils of Government. For this massive change to occur we need the will of leaders. But the grassroots level is where it needs to start as elected officials will not want to cede power.

Voters have to assert their will.

This is not a solution for today. It would take years if not decades to get to regional government. But 48 states have proven it works. If we’re serious about reducing taxes this is one big swing of the bat can get us there. For young families planning a long-term future in Connecticut, this would benefit kitchen table issues. If we start now, maybe your kids won’t have to pay a tax to own a car.

Paul Bernstein is a retired marketing executive who lives in South Windsor.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

CT train hits ATV on railroad tracks; incident under investigation by multiple agencies

Published

on

CT train hits ATV on railroad tracks; incident under investigation by multiple agencies


A Connecticut rail train hit an ATV that was left on tracks near Berlin early Sunday, forcing about 20 passengers to have to change trains so the incident could be investigated, a Department of Transportation spokesman said.

The incident occurred a little before 11 a.m. on the tracks about three miles south of the Berlin Train Station, according to DOT spokesman Josh Morgan.

Morgan said no injuries were reported.

The ATV did not have a rider when the train hit it, but it had been left on tracks, Morgan said.

Advertisement

The tracks are owned by Amtrak but the train is owned by the state of Connecticut. The rail line runs between New Haven and Springfield.

Morgan said the train was northbound when it hit the unoccupied ATV. The passengers transferred to another train so they could reach their destinations, he said.

Morgan noted that no access is allowed to tracks and that any access to tracks is considered trespassing.

“It is incredibly dangerous to be anywhere near an active rail line,” he said.

Morgan said the ATV was removed and the train is out of service so it can be be inspected at the New Haven station. Other trains are running.

Advertisement

Morgan said as of Sunday “we do not really know” why the ATV was on the tracks. He said it remains under investigation by railroad officials, state and local police.

“They are trying to figure what it was doing there,” Morgan said, noting that officials also are seeking witnesses.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending