Jury finds that Ticketmaster and Live Nation had an anticompetitive monopoly over big concert venues
Connecticut
CT could use land trusts to increase affordable housing, report says
A new report suggests that Connecticut’s laws make the state well-suited to improve its housing affordability through a little-known but growing model: community land trusts.
A community land trust is a way to create and preserve affordable housing in which a nonprofit owns the land and develops housing. Sometimes, additional community gathering spaces such as gardens or shops can go on the land as well.
The housing has regulations regarding ownership and transfer of the property to new residents that keeps it affordable. Connecticut’s laws regarding land trusts include one that reduces property tax burdens on the land. The law helps make the state amenable to land trusts, according to the report released last month from the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Still, advocates say Connecticut can do more. They want to see more funding put toward the model as well as further tax reforms.
Kristin King-Ries, one of the report’s authors, said there has been a growing interest in community land trusts nationwide.
“There’s been a return to the idea of a full potential of community land trusts as a way to build the whole community up,” King-Ries said in an interview.
Connecticut is one of just six states that reduces property tax burdens only on community land trust-owned land. Land trusts can get property tax easements in the state. Eight others require local assessors to reduce the tax burden on land owned by a CLT and to take affordability restrictions on the homes themselves into account when calculating taxes on the homes, according to the report.
Taxes on the homes built on community land trust property have been an issue for homeowners on Southeastern Connecticut Community Land Trust property, executive director Mirna Martinez said.
Homes on community land trusts typically have certain restrictions around the sale that keep the homeowner from earning as much money as they might in a traditional private residence sale. The restrictions are meant to ensure the homes stay affordable in the long-term.
Martinez said Connecticut tax law doesn’t take this into account when assessors are evaluating the homes.
Connecticut was also one of the early adopters of a state law that had statutes that enabled community land trust development. In 2018, five had what the report defines as comprehensive community land trust legislation. These laws usually include measures that define a community land trust, have a state housing trust fund or other funding for land trusts, or taxation standards specialized to community land trusts, among other aspects, according to the report.
Earlier this year, that number was up to 20, according to the report.
“I see this as sort of brought up as an important tool for affordable housing,” said Alexander Kolokotronis, director of the Naugatuck Valley Project, which owns a land trust property in Waterbury. “It falls in this broader ecosystem of affordable housing. And so there is definitely more interest. I hear and see more talk of it in Connecticut.”
The Waterbury property operates as a co-op, a corporation that allows residents to buy shares in the housing development so they can take votes on how the property should be managed. The units were built on property owned by the land trust, in a unique partnership that means land costs can stay low.
Kolokotronis said in his experience, community land trusts work to preserve affordability. He compared it to methods such as the federal low-income housing tax credit program, which offers tax incentives to developers if they keep a set percentage of units in a development affordable for at least 30 years.
The program is one of the federal government’s primary ways of encouraging construction of affordable housing. But critics have pointed out that the affordability requirements don’t last forever.
Connecticut runs the risk of having about 5,000 units of affordable housing expiring in the next five years, according to a report from the National Housing Preservation Database.
Martinez said while she thinks momentum is growing for community land trusts there is still work to do.
Often, when she’s talking about her work, she said people don’t know what a community land trust is.
“I think we still have a long way to go in telling the story,” Martinez said.
Her organization, which operates primarily in New London, encourages homeownership and community gardens on their land. She said she’d like to see the state target down payment assistance to programs like community land trusts that guarantee affordability in perpetuity.
Kolokotronis agreed that more funding would help the model grow, particularly to help with staffing and technical assistance for the nonprofits.
King-Ries said in addition to gains in popularity, her review found that more community land trusts are working to encourage density.
“It was a single-family model … but in the last five to 10 years, the shift to multi-family, that’s really been where the focus has been,” King-Ries said.
It reflects a larger land use conversation that’s happening around the country, including in Connecticut. Affordable housing advocates have been pushing for more density because it allows more units to be built on existing land and makes it easier for more residents to use public transit.
As community land trusts grow denser and have more units, King-Ries said there’s a push-and-pull between a desire to build more and the community feel that’s traditionally part of community land trusts.
But, she said, it’s helped by a growing number of land trusts that are using the land for community spaces such as gardens and churches.
“There’s been a return to the idea of a full potential of community land trusts as a way to build the whole community up,” she said.
Connecticut
Connecticut wins antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation upon New York court ruling
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A massive jury decision in New York this week is sending shockwaves through the entertainment industry, a decision that Connecticut has historically encouraged.
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and a coalition of 33 other attorneys general won their lawsuit against Live Nation when the Manhattan court ruled Wednesday that Live Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster, violated federal and state antitrust laws.
The decision from the court is to be met with appeals from Live Nation. One thing is for sure in the rest of the case; it is monumental, and it will be lengthy.
The lawsuits filed by dozens of states accused Live Nation of smothering competition and driving up prices for ticket buyers, resulting in the jury’s decision that Live Nation should be held liable for illegally maintaining monopoly power over the ticket industry.
“The fact that the states went ahead and litigated this case and won before a jury is really a remarkable, historical development,” legal expert Bob Langer said.
If the verdict holds, Langer says Live Nation could be facing strict penalties, including being forced to split from Ticketmaster, which would affect the entire industry.
“Eventually prices will go down, but we are a long, long way from that,” Langer said.
Langer told News 8 that appeals could reach the Supreme Court and take years. One New Haven event venue said it is too early to tell how the case will affect their ticketing practices.
Live Nation insists they are not a monopoly, but a successful company built by excellence and effort. The company said that it can and will appeal any unfavorable rulings.
Those who may be affected most are the buyers.
“We probably are being taken advantage of, but if there are people like me that have a crazy willingness to pay, the prices might increase at the end of the day,” Aaron Abrams, a fan of Peter Cat Recordings Co., said.
“I do see the monopoly, absolutely,” Laura, who buys her tickets off a site for military families, said. “I am very grateful that I don’t have to be a part of that. I will enjoy any ticket and any concert I can go to.”
Overall, music fans have shared a general consensus that they will follow the case, but will still be attending concerts either way.
“I would love to see the prices go back down,” Laura said. “I would love for everyone to have access to different events and concerts and be able to afford it.”
The case against Live Nation comes after the company agreed to a settlement with the federal government, but more than 30 states pressed on with the trial, saying not enough concessions were made by Live Nation.
Connecticut
New Britain cyberattack may have exposed personal information, officials say
Officials in New Britain are still assessing the damage more than two months after a cyberattack hit city systems, potentially exposing some personal information.
A spokesperson for Mayor Bobby Sanchez said recently that there’s no indication of widespread exposure of resident data. However, hackers may have gained access to some sensitive records during the Jan. 28 incident, including names, dates of birth, government-issued identification numbers and financial account and health-related information, according to the city.
Officials have released few details about what occurred, citing the ongoing investigation.
“Investigations of this nature are complex and must be handled carefully to protect the integrity of the review, support any potential law enforcement activity, and ensure accurate information is shared,” said Alisha Rayner, the mayor’s spokesperson.
The city detected the attack after an employee spotted unusual activity on a workstation. Several municipal systems “experienced disruption” during the incident, though an investigation found the “unauthorized activity was more limited in scope,” according to the city.
Cyberattacks on cities and towns have grown more common. Hackers breach or damage computer systems to steal sensitive data or hold systems for ransom — a scenario officials in New Britain faced, according to Evan Allard, the director of the Connecticut Intelligence Center, which is a part of the state Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.
“Any organization that has sensitive or private data that you know they want to keep within their own systems, these ransomware actors are targeting them because it creates a sense of urgency towards paying it back,” Allard said.
New Britain consulted with a team of response experts at Cowbell Resiliency Services to determine the best course of action. It’s unclear whether the city paid a ransom. Responding by email to questions from Connecticut Public, Rayner said the city evaluated multiple response options, including restoring from backups.
“Based on that assessment, including operational impact, recovery timelines, and overall cost considerations, a course of action was taken to resolve the incident as quickly and securely as possible,” Rayner wrote.
Rayner said the financial hit to the city was limited because New Britain carries cybersecurity insurance. It has a $25,000 deductible under the policy, she said.
New Britain is providing credit monitoring and identity protection services to people who were potentially impacted.
While the investigation continues, the Common Council voted to replace New Britain’s existing cybersecurity system. The city executed a three-year contract with Cowbell Resiliency Services that includes round-the-clock security monitoring for a cost of $66,000 per year.
“It’s a full-on platform that is a little bit more enhanced and at a larger cost,” Jonathan Delgadillo, the city’s director of support services, said at a recent meeting. “But again, I think it’s the best thing for the city,”
New Britain Alderman John McNamara said he’s satisfied with the city’s handling of the cyberattack.
“I believe the city is taking appropriate steps and is advising city employees and taxpayers on what’s going on with it,” McNamara said. “I’m looking for additional reports and to take action in terms of anything that has to be improved upon.”
Connecticut
Coventry state rep. files paperwork to run for lt. gov.
HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) – A state representative from Coventry has filed paperwork to run for lieutenant governor of Connecticut.
Republican Rep. Timothy Ackert, who represents Connecticut 8th Assembly District, had his paperwork received by state election officials on April 9.
The paperwork showed that he formed a candidate committee called “Ackert for Connecticut.”
As of Wednesday morning, Matthew Corey was the only Republican candidate in the primary for lieutenant governor.
The primary election is Aug. 11, 2026.
The general election is Nov. 3, 2026.
Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.
-
Ohio3 days ago‘Little Rascals’ star Bug Hall arrested in Ohio
-
Georgia1 week agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Arkansas7 days agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Austin, TX1 week agoABC Kite Fest Returns to Austin for Annual Celebration – Austin Today
-
Politics3 days agoDem fundraising giant in the hot seat as GOP lawmakers demand answers over dodged subpoena
-
Politics6 days agoTrump blasts Spanberger ahead of Virginia meetings, says state faces tax base exodus like New York, California
-
Health1 week agoWoman discovers missing nose ring traveled to her lungs, causing month-long cough
-
San Francisco, CA5 days agoPresident Trump terminates Presidio Trust