Connecticut
Connecticut Sun make first WNBA free agency moves, but future remains uncertain
The Connecticut Sun have officially cored 11-year veteran Alyssa Thomas, per the WNBA transactions page. That means that the 5-time All-Star will be offered a one-year contract at the WNBA’s highest possible salary ($249,244) — and that she’s unable to negotiate with other teams as a free agent this offseason. In the past, however, WNBA players have requested trades after receiving the core designation, so the move does not necessarily mean that Thomas will stay in Connecticut.
Thomas is the sixth WNBA star to be cored this winter, joining Gabby Williams (Seattle Storm), Kelsey Plum (Las Vegas Aces), Kelsey Mitchell (Indiana Fever), Breanna Stewart (New York Liberty), and Satou Sabally (Dallas Wings).
Thomas was one of the top free agents on the market this winter — she was named to the First Team All-WNBA in each of the last two seasons, averaging 10.6 points, 8.4 rebounds, 7.9 assists, and 1.6 steals per game last year. She’s also the league’s all-time leader in triple-doubles and one of its most impactful defenders.
Last season, the Sun finished with a 28-12 record and lost to the Minnesota Lynx in five games in the WNBA semi-finals. Four of their five starters — Thomas, DeWanna Bonner, Brionna Jones, and DiJonai Carrington — were all free agents entering the offseason, with Carrington being the only restricted of the bunch.
In addition to coring Thomas, the Sun offered Carrington a qualifying offer. Carrington, the WNBA’s Most Improved Player in 2024, was an integral part of the team’s success last season, typically guarding the opposing teams’ top guards and averaging 12.7 points, 5 rebounds, and 1.6 steals per night. The Sun also offered reserved player Caitlin Bickle a qualifying offer.
It’s an uncertain offseason for the Connecticut Sun, who hired Rachid Meziane, a French professional coach, as their new head coach following the departure of Stephanie White to the Indiana Fever. General manager Morgan Tuck told SB Nation last month that the team had an “open-minded” approach to the offseason.
“We’ve had a lot of change within the last couple of months, and more change to come, obviously,” Tuck said. “But, we’re a Connecticut team, and Connecticut is known for having really competitive teams and really good teams — so I don’t think we can shy away from that and the expectations around how good we need to be. But it takes time — and you have to have change, and get things set up.”
Will Alyssa Thomas return to Connecticut?
Whether the core designation means the Sun intends to keep together their Big 3 of Thomas, DeWanna Bonner, and Brionna Jones for another season. At 29 years old, Jones has never played for another organization — and she’s coming off a fully healthy season in which she averaged 13.7 points and 5.5 rebounds per game.
At 37 years old, Bonner — Thomas’s fiance — appears to have plenty left in the tank and could be a high-level contributor on several championship teams. Bonner was named an All-Star for the sixth time in her career last season after averaging 15 points, 6 rebounds, and 2 assists per game. Unlike Thomas and Jones, she already has a WNBA championship under her belt.
Both Bonner and Jones may choose to go elsewhere this offseason, and Tuck acknowledged that some free agency decisions are out of the Suns’ control.
“There are some players that we have a little bit more pull [with], and some where, ‘hey, they get to choose where they go,” Tuck said.
Thomas has spent her entire career with the Sun but has also voiced her displeasure with the team’s lack of amenities on numerous occasions; Connecticut is one of just a handful of teams that don’t have their own practice facility, nor plans to build one.
The Sun practices at the Tribal Practice Facility, which is a part of the Mohegan Community and Government Center in Uncasville, Connecticut. The team doesn’t have exclusive access to the facility, and last Spring, in the playoffs, Thomas described the fact the team had to share the court with a toddler’s birthday as “the ultimate disrespect.”
It’s not clear if Thomas’s issues with the team’s limited amenities will prevent her from wanting to stay with the organization. She may also want a change of pace after spending her entire WNBA career to date in Uncasville. But, it’s also very possible that the team will try to run it back with a similar core to last year. Guards Ty Harris and Marina Mabrey are both back with the team next season.
“You just have to look at the full picture and see what makes the most sense,” Tuck said. “What’s going to help you to remain competitive, but then also set us up for the future as well.”
Connecticut
Connecticut Deserves Better than the Housing Bill That Arrived Overnight
Last week’s special session was supposed to be simple, a short return to Hartford to make sure families relying on SNAP and essential programs could continue putting food on their tables. Our food banks are now reporting levels of demand higher than at any time in recent memory, which should have been the primary focus of the session. But as often happens, something else was slipped into the spotlight. Gov. Ned Lamont reintroduced a housing bill he had already vetoed once, and in the span of three rushed days, from Wednesday to Friday, HB 8002 was pushed through with almost no time for the public or legislators to meaningfully digest what was inside.
The bill is being presented as a solution to Connecticut’s housing crisis, homelessness, and affordability collapse. But let us say what so many residents, advocates, and even legislators know but hesitate to say publicly. This is not a homelessness bill. This is not an affordability bill. This is, once again, a development and zoning bill that continues the same pattern we have seen for years in Connecticut, a pattern where developers walk away smiling while our seniors, working class families, and lower income communities continue to fall into homelessness or displacement.
Months ago, I wrote about the Fair Share and Transit Oriented Development agenda and why it was being misrepresented as a form of housing justice. HB 8002 recycles many of the same concepts, just under new headings. Yes, some pieces of the bill include positive ideas. But the core structure is still a one size fits all approach that weakens public process, expands “as of right” zoning, ties municipal funding to compliance with state preferred planning models, and does very little to create truly affordable housing for those who need it most.
A bill built for suburbs, not cities
Let us be real. HB 8002 is aimed squarely at smaller towns. It creates penalties for municipalities that refuse to opt into regional housing plans or fail to submit required housing growth frameworks. It ties access to state grants to adherence with zoning models that many suburban towns have resisted for decades. The intention is to push “exclusive” municipalities to participate in housing growth, which is a fair goal in principle.
But the mechanism matters. And here, the mechanism is coercion through funding, the weakening of protest petitions, and the removal of public process in key zoning decisions. “As of right” development in transit areas, summary review for certain middle housing types, and restrictions on who can object to zoning changes combine to silence residents, especially those in communities vulnerable to displacement.
The impact of these reforms is wildly different in a town that builds one multifamily project per decade compared to a city like Stamford that has undergone one of the fastest and most aggressive building booms in the state. Stamford does not need this bill. Stamford is not a town refusing to build. Stamford has been flooded with development for fifteen years. We have built to the point of destabilizing entire neighborhoods, especially in the South End and West Side.
Families were pushed out by property taxes inflated by surrounding “luxury” buildings. Developers bought affordable homes, let them rot for years, then declared them blight to replace them with high priced rentals. Our seniors were priced out, our retirees pushed to Bridgeport, and our working class made invisible by glossy marketing brochures calling $2,500 one bedrooms “attainable.”
When the Fair Share and TOD lobbyists told us that Stamford was not building enough, many of us laughed at the absurdity. Stamford already exceeds the numbers they spent years waving in our faces. What we lack is not units. What we lack is affordability, stability, and protections for the people most at risk of becoming homeless.
Yet none of that is the focus of HB 8002.
What Is good in the bill
To be fair and honest, the bill does contain provisions worth supporting. We can acknowledge them without pretending the overall direction is right.
First, the ban on hostile architecture is long overdue. Spikes, anti-sleeping benches, aggressive landscaping to keep people away, these tools dehumanize the unhoused and create a culture of cruelty. Banning them is a moral victory.
Second, the portable shower and laundry pilot for people experiencing homelessness is a humane step forward, though still too small for the need.
Third, Section 32 prohibits the use of revenue management software that manipulates rental prices. Companies like RealPage artificially inflate rents statewide through algorithmic collusion. This measure is genuinely important.
Fourth, the bill expands Fair Rent Commissions to every municipality with at least 15,000 residents, which is crucial for tenant protection, although municipal enforcement without state oversight remains inconsistent.
Fifth, landlords can no longer evict tenants for late payment if their online rent payment system malfunctions, a small but meaningful safeguard that prevents avoidable homelessness.
Sixth, Section 43 allows housing authorities and nonprofits to purchase existing buildings and deed restrict them as affordable. This could help preserve affordability in places where speculation has turned housing into a casino.
Seventh, new safety requirements like annual elevator inspections and mobile home park fire hydrant reporting help protect elderly tenants and low income families living in neglected complexes.
All of these are good steps. But we cannot confuse these elements with the bill’s central function.
The problem at the center
Once again, the bill’s heart is a planning and zoning framework meant to accelerate development, expand “as of right” approvals, and reduce the public’s ability to contest projects that may not serve their communities.
Section 24, which weakens protest petitions, is clearly aimed at places like Stamford. Paired with “as of right” language in transit districts, it effectively removes one of the strongest tools residents have to slow or challenge harmful development. And when you combine that with the influence of groups like People Friendly Stamford, whose leadership has been tied to developer law firms that spent years suing the Board of Representatives and losing, it becomes impossible to ignore what is happening. These groups claim to care about trees and sidewalks while supporting the eminent domain taking of a Haitian family’s home after forty years of paying taxes.
Now, the state has handed these same interests a stronger legal framework and stripped residents of procedural tools that were essential in protecting neighborhoods for decades.
The Housing Crisis is not a zoning issue it’s a housing issue
If the Governor and leadership were serious about addressing homelessness, this bill would have included policies that actually prevent homelessness.
Where is the cap on rent increases, the single most effective way to prevent displacement?
Where is Just Cause eviction, which stops landlords from evicting tenants for profit.
Where is the mandate that all new construction include deeply affordable units at meaningful percentages?
Where is state-funded support for seniors and retirees on fixed incomes?
Where are anti-displacement protections for long time residents in gentrifying neighborhoods?
Where is the requirement to use vacant state-owned or city-owned buildings for housing?
Where is a statewide homelessness prevention fund?
Where is the restructuring of affordability requirements to begin with the lowest income tiers?
Where is the real commitment to ending family homelessness?
And perhaps most importantly, where is statewide funding for the Homeless to Housing (H2H) model, a pilot program under DMHAS that has shown remarkable success. H2H recognizes that anyone who has been homeless for six months has endured trauma that traditional shelter based pathways only worsen. Instead of forcing people through the shelter pipeline and then into a multi year-wait for Section 8, followed by an additional wait to find vacancy to use it, H2H places people directly into housing with supportive services. This approach bypasses bureaucratic delays, stabilizes individuals more quickly, and treats homelessness as the trauma crisis it is. HB 8002 should have funded H2H statewide. It did not.
Development over people, again
The bill creates grants, loans, and financial incentives for municipalities, but only if they play by the state’s zoning and planning rules. This is not collaboration. This is coercion. And it is not designed to help cities like Stamford that have already built more than our share. It is aimed at the suburbs, but in doing so, it strips urban residents of public process and hands developers a smoother, faster path to approval.
It is no wonder that lobbyists showed up this session with renewed energy. It is no wonder that what failed repeatedly in full sessions suddenly sailed through in a special session when legislators received the bill the day before voting. There was no deep caucus discussion, no chance to bring concerns forward, no opportunity for public testimony to shape the outcome.
This should concern every resident of Connecticut. The process was rushed, opaque, and tilted toward special interests, not toward public good.
Where do we go from here
We can no longer pretend that this pattern is accidental. Connecticut has allowed development interests to shape policy for nearly four decades, and the cost has been the slow erasure of working class communities, Black and Brown neighborhoods, and the elderly who built our cities long before developers discovered them. HB 8002 continues this trend. It gives more leverage to those who already dominate planning decisions and further marginalizes the residents who live with the consequences.
Housing justice is not achieved by fast tracking luxury apartments near train stations and calling them progress. It is not achieved by weakening public process. It is not achieved by handing out grants to municipalities only if they deregulate their zoning codes. And it is certainly not achieved by passing a one hundred page bill in a special session with less than twenty four hours for legislators to review it.
Connecticut’s housing crisis is not a crisis of zoning. It is a crisis born of political decisions that prioritize developers over people, revenue over human dignity, and “units produced” over stability and belonging. We can build all the transit adjacent towers we want, but if our seniors are still getting evicted, if our families are still being priced out, if our retirees are still sleeping in cars, then we have failed. Period.
Real leadership means confronting the interests that have captured our housing policy. It means capping rents, protecting tenants, funding H2H statewide, and mandating deeply affordable units in every major development. It means putting the lives of our most vulnerable residents ahead of the profit margins of the most powerful players in the room.
Connecticut stands at a crossroads. We can continue down the path of developer driven policy dressed up as equity, or we can finally choose the harder, more honest path, the one that puts people before profit and communities before speculation. HB 8002 chose the wrong path. It is now up to the rest of us to demand better.
Because if we do not fight for real housing justice, no one else will.
—
David Michel was a state representative for the 146th district from 2019 to 2025, a part of Stamford that includes the South End, Downtown, and Shippan.
Connecticut
Five Guys shutters Orange location
A popular fast food restaurant has closed the doors of one of its Connecticut locations.
The Five Guys location on Boston Post Road in Orange posted an announcement of the closure on its front door.
While there aren’t any other Five Guys locations in the town of Orange, other nearby Five Guys restaurants include the locations on Amity Road in New Haven and Bridgeport Avenue in Shelton.
NBC Connecticut has reached out to Five Guys and the town of Orange, but they have not responded to our request for comment.
It is unclear how many employees were impacted by the closure and if they were offered any opportunities to work at nearby locations.
Connecticut
Crews battle barn fire in East Windsor
Multiple roads in East Windsor were closed for several hours as crews fought an early morning barn fire.
According to the Broad Brook Fire Department, a large barn fire broke out a 365 North Road around 1:30 Friday morning.
Mutual aid from multiple towns are assisting at the scene.
The fire department had route 140 shut down between Harrington Rd and the old Herb Holden Trucking on Broad Brook Rd. closed due to hydrant lines across the street. Main St at Wesley Rd was also blocked.
The fire was knocked down and roads reopened around 5 a.m.
-
Business6 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
World5 days agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
News5 days agoCourt documents shed light on Indiana shooting that sparked stand-your-ground debate
-
World1 week ago2% of Russian global oil supply affected following Ukrainian attack
-
World5 days agoCalls for answers grow over Canada’s interrogation of Israel critic
-
World5 days agoSinclair Snaps Up 8% Stake in Scripps in Advance of Potential Merger
-
Business5 days ago
Amazon’s Zoox offers free robotaxi rides in San Francisco
-
Politics5 days agoDuckworth fires staffer who claimed to be attorney for detained illegal immigrant with criminal history