Connect with us

Connecticut

Ballots in question in North Stonington due to missing signatures

Published

on

Ballots in question in North Stonington due to missing signatures


Hundreds of ballots that were cast in North Stonington in recent weeks may not count after local election officials instructed voters not to sign their names on ballot envelopes, a step that is required during early in-person voting.

North Stonington’s Republican and Democratic Registrars of Voters issued a press release on the town’s website on Saturday afternoon instructing voters who cast a ballot via early in-person voting between Oct. 21 and Oct. 31 to return to their voting location to “correct their ballot.”

“Through October 31, voters were inadvertently misinformed about the need to sign their early voting ballot envelope,” the release said. “As a result, it is believed that ballot envelopes submitted during this period went unsigned by voters, which is required by law.”

The release does not state how many voters in North Stonington failed to sign their ballot envelopes.

Advertisement

But in a phone interview, Connie Berardi, the town’s Democratic Registrar of Voters, said around 1,000 ballots lacked the required signature.

In this year’s election, the ballots in North Stonington include choices for president, U.S. Senate, U.S. House, two legislative seats and the local registrars of voters.

For perspective, a little over 3,000 voters in North Stonington cast a ballot during the last presidential election in 2020.

Berardi referred other questions about the ballot mistakes to the Connecticut Secretary of the State’s office, which is in charge of overseeing the state’s elections.

The Secretary of the State’s office did not immediately respond to questions for this story.

Advertisement

Connecticut’s new early voting law, which lawmakers passed in 2023, clearly states that voters casting a ballot during the 14-day early voting period need to sign the envelope that they receive with their ballot.

It’s unclear how voters will be able to “correct their ballot,” as the town’s release states.

Connecticut does not have a ballot curing process, which allows voters to fix signature issues and other mistakes after their ballot is received.

Sen. Heather Somers, who is running for reelection this year in the state Senate district that includes North Stonington, learned of the ballot errors late Saturday afternoon.

“I’m very upset,” Somers said.

Advertisement

Somers said she was told that any ballot that does not have a signature on the envelope may not be counted, and she said voters are being advised to return to the North Stonington Education Center, the town’s early voting location, to cast a brand new ballot.

With only a couple days remaining before election day, Somers said she is very concerned that some of the impacted voters may not be able to make it back to the polls to cast a new ballot.

“That’s a huge issue for me because people came in good faith to cast those votes,” said Somers, who is the Republican candidate in Senate District 18.

Her concern is that the people who cast those ballots won’t be available on Nov. 3 — the final day of early voting — or on Election Day itself.

“Some people may be out of town. Some people may be in surgery,” Somers said. “They early-voted for a reason.”

Advertisement

The mistake is the second to potentially disenfranchise voters in the 43rd House District of North Stonington and portions of Stonington and Ledyard.

“It’s frustrating,” said Rep. Greg Howard, R-Stonington, who is seeking reelection from the 43rd.

Roughly 519 ballots were previously sequestered in Stonington after officials learned that some voters had received the wrong ballot on Oct. 22, the second day of early voting. Stonington spans the 41st and 43rd House Districts.

The mistake in North Stonington involved each of the 1,100 ballots cast in 13 of the 14 days of early voting, he said.

“Now, you’re talking about 1,600 votes. They are both in places where I win by big numbers,” said Howard, a police officer who was elected in 2020 and reelected in 2022.

Advertisement

If the 1,100 early voters in North Stonington do not return to cast new ballots on Sunday, the last day of early voting, or on Election Day, those ballots will not be counted, Howard said.

Howard said the impact of the single-day, wrong-ballot problem is relatively limited. No one expects the majority of the sequestered ballots from Oct. 22 in Stonington were the wrong ones.

Voters who cast ballots that day have been urged to vote again. If they do, the original ballots, which are sealed in envelopes with the voters’ names, will be discarded. 

The other sequestered ballots will be opened and hand-counted on Election Day, with officials checking to ensure the voter had received the correct ballot.

Only the two House districts are affected, and only one is contested. Rep. Aundre Bumgardner, D-Groton, has no opponent in the 41st of Groton and Stonington. If a vote was cast for the wrong House contest, that vote will not be counted. But the votes cast for the other offices will be tallied.

Advertisement

“I don’t think anybody did anything malicious or on purpose,” Howard said. “I am trying to be reasonable. But at some point, you say, ‘Enough is enough.’”



Source link

Connecticut

CT, US offshore wind projects face second federal pause

Published

on

CT, US offshore wind projects face second federal pause


The federal government is again pausing offshore wind projects in Connecticut and along the East Coast. The Trump administration is citing national security risks the Defense Department found in classified reports. It is the second time the administration attempted to halt offshore wind developments, although the first attempt was blocked after a federal judge ruled the government’s actions were illegal. Connor Yakaitis, deputy director of the…



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

2025 statistics: Impaired driving increasing in Connecticut

Published

on

2025 statistics: Impaired driving increasing in Connecticut


MERIDEN, Conn. (WTNH) — For decades, police have been arresting drunk drivers and measuring their blood alcohol levels.

But in October, the Connecticut Forensic Lab started testing all impaired drivers for drugs, and even the experts were shocked by what they found.

“It’s not simply alcohol combined with one drug combined with alcohol,” Dr. Jessica Gleba, the director of Forensic Lab Operations, said. “We are seeing multiple drugs used together and often combined with alcohol.”

Fentanyl and carfentanyl use are on the rise and the data shows people are combining multiple drugs at an alarming rate.

Advertisement

“The data revealed, in 2025, 14% of cases analyzed had 10 or more drugs present, an increase compared to 2022, when the number was 6%,” Gleba said.

Approximately 50% of cases in 2025 had five or more drugs detected, according to the Connecticut Forensic Lab.

Not only is the state lab finding more and more combinations of drugs in impaired drivers, Connecticut is also seeing more fatal accidents caused by impaired drivers.

Across the country, around 30% of fatal crashes are caused by impaired drivers. Joe Cristalli, Jr., the CTDOT Highway Safety Office director, said Connecticut is well above that.

“The impaired rate is 40% – between 37% and 40% – and we’re one of the highest in the country,” Cristalli said.

Advertisement

It is the season for holiday parties, but it is also cold and flu season, and over the counter medicine can impair your driving, especially combined with alcohol.

The message from law enforcement is clear.

“If you are caught, you will be arrested, you will be presented for prosecution, which means you’re going to have to appear before a judge in the State of Connecticut,” commissioner Ronnell Higgins of the Deptartment of Emergency Services & Public Protection said. “I don’t know how clearer I can be.”

In other words, don’t drink or use drugs and get behind the wheel.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: Connecticut must plan for Medicaid cuts

Published

on

Opinion: Connecticut must plan for Medicaid cuts


Three hours and nine minutes. That’s how long the average Connecticut resident spends in the emergency department at any one visit. With cuts in Medicaid, that time will only get longer.

 On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump passed the Big Beautiful Bill, which includes major cuts to Medicaid funding. Out of nearly 926,700 CT residents who receive Medicaid, these cuts could remove coverage for up to 170,000 people, many of whom are children, seniors, people with disabilities, and working families already living paycheck-to-paycheck.

This is not a small policy change, but rather a shift with life-altering consequences.

 When people lose their only form of health insurance, they don’t stop needing medical care. They simply delay it. They wait until the infection spreads, the chest pain worsens, or the depression deepens. This is not out of choice, but because their immediate needs come first. Preventable conditions worsen, and what could have been treated quickly and affordably in a primary care office becomes an emergency medical crisis. 

Advertisement

That crisis typically lands in the emergency department: the single part of the healthcare system that is legally required to treat everyone, insured or not. However, ER care is the most expensive, least efficient form of healthcare. More ER use means longer wait times, more hospital crowding, and more delayed care for everyone. No one, not even those who can afford private insurance, is insulated from the consequence.

Not only are individual people impacted, but hospitals too. Medicaid provides significant reimbursements to hospitals and health systems like Yale New Haven and Hartford Healthcare, as well as smaller hospitals that serve rural and low-income regions. Connecticut’s hospitals are already strained and cuts will further threaten their operating budget, potentially leading to cuts in staffing, services, or both.

Vicky Wang

When there’s fewer staff in already short-staffed departments and fewer services, care becomes less available to those who need it the most.

This trend is not hypothetical. It is already happening. This past summer, when I had to schedule an appointment with my primary care practitioner, I was told that the earliest availability was in three months. When I called on September 5 for a specialty appointment at Yale New Haven, the first available date was September 9, 2026. If this is the system before thc cuts, what will it look like after?



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending