Sign up for Celtics updates🏀
Get breaking news and analysis delivered to your inbox during basketball season.
In the NBA, the offseason begins in a hurry.
Just three days after the Oklahoma City Thunder’s Game 7 triumph over the Indiana Pacers, the league will gather at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn for the opening night of the 2025 NBA Draft.
For the Celtics, the draft will be their first chance to add to a roster that could look substantially different when the 2025-26 season tips off in October. As president of basketball operations Brad Stevens and his staff wind down their draft prep, here’s what you need to know about Boston’s picks and how they might use them:
The NBA made its draft a two-day affair for the first time last year, and it’s sticking with that format, which was popular among many front office shot-callers. Round 1 will be Wednesday, with Round 2 following on Thursday.
In a change from the 2024 setup, the entire draft will air in primetime, with both rounds set to begin at 8 p.m. ET.
Boston currently owns one first-round selection (No. 28) and one early second-rounder (No. 32), with the latter originally belonging to Washington (the Celtics acquired it from Detroit in 2023). The Celtics traded their own second-round pick in this draft (No. 57) to Orlando in 2021 as part of the return for Evan Fournier.
In his end-of-season news conference last month, Stevens said the Celtics were open to trading up, trading back or sticking and picking at those spots.
“We’ll evaluate who we think will be available at 28 and 32,” Stevens said. “… We’ll have plenty of time to thoroughly evaluate who we think those people might be, and if we want to try to move up, try to move back, whatever, we’ll see how it all goes. But I think when you’re at 28 and 32, you’re not exactly able to pinpoint exactly how that night’s going to go.”
First-round draft picks sign rookie wage-scale contracts that are guaranteed for the first two years. If the Celtics take a player at No. 28, his 2025-26 salary will be between $1.9 million and $2.8 million. Second-round picks often sign non-guaranteed or two-way contracts.
That’s hard to say. The odds of landing an impact player outside of the lottery – or, in some years, anywhere beyond the top five picks – are admittedly slim.
Of the 20 players selected in Boston’s two slots over the last 10 drafts, just three became long-term starters: Jaden McDaniels, Jordan Poole and Ivica Zubac. Those proved to be great value picks (though Zubac didn’t break through until he was traded from the Lakers to the Clippers).
Other hits in that vicinity over the past decade include Pascal Siakam (No. 27, 2016), Dejounte Murray (No. 29, 2016), Derrick White (No. 29, 2017), Josh Hart (No. 30, 2017), Jalen Brunson (No. 33, 2018), Payton Pritchard (No. 26, 2020), Desmond Bane (No. 30, 2020) and Andrew Nembhard (No. 31, 2022).
So, it is possible to find quality NBA players in the late first and early second rounds. But the vast majority of those picks turn out to be middling backups at best. Set your expectations accordingly.
Overall, pretty strong. Every year from 2014 to 2020, they drafted at least one player who went on to see prominent minutes on Boston teams that reached the Eastern Conference finals or beyond. Most of those players are either still with the Celtics (Jaylen Brown, Jayson Tatum, Pritchard) or were eventually used as trade chips to acquire current starters (Marcus Smart in the Kristaps Porzingis deal; Robert Williams III as part of the package for Jrue Holiday).
The Celtics didn’t make a first-round pick in 2021, ’22 and ’23, and their second-rounders in those drafts (JD Davison, Jordan Walsh) haven’t carved out rotation roles. The jury’s still out on last year’s first-round choice, Baylor Scheierman, but the energetic wing showed potential in his handful of late-season opportunities and could see increased minutes in Year 2, depending on how Boston structures its roster this offseason.
Stevens, who ascended to his current role in 2021, strayed from his previous draft playbook last summer, taking two players in Scheierman and second-round pick Anton Watson (who was later cut) who turned 24 before their rookie season began. His prior picks all were teenage projects with far less collegiate experience.
That also depends on said roster plans. The Celtics are expected to trade at least one member of their championship-winning core in an effort to shed salary and avoid the most prohibitive luxury tax penalties, but it remains unclear which player(s) they’ll attempt to move.
If it’s Holiday, then targeting a guard prospect would make a lot of sense, as White and Pritchard are Boston’s only other proven backcourt options. The Celtics could use additional wing depth regardless with Tatum set to miss at least a significant chunk of the upcoming season following Achilles surgery, and that need would be heightened if they also ship out Sam Hauser (or, in what would be a much more transformative move, Brown). The makeup of Boston’s frontcourt is a major question mark, too, with Al Horford and Luke Kornet both set to hit free agency and Porzingis another logical trade candidate.
But, again, the Celtics can’t bank on finding a solution to any of those potential roster holes this late in the draft. It will be interesting to see whether Stevens aims for a more polished and experienced prospect who could play right away or prioritizes long-term upside.
Prospects of note who could be available in the Celtics’ range include Florida point guard Walter Clayton Jr., the undersized ace shot-maker who starred during the Gators’ run to the national championship, and Creighton center Ryan Kalkbrenner, a former teammate of Scheierman’s who offers elite shot-blocking ability and was a four-time Big East Defensive Player of the Year.
Other possible targets: Stanford big man Maxime Reynaud, a 7-footer with intriguing offensive versatility; French wing Noah Penda, a 6-foot-8 20-year-old who plays like a veteran; Arkansas wing Adou Thiero, an uber-athletic ball hawk with an underdeveloped shot; and North Carolina wing Drake Powell, who impressed evaluators with his high motor and defensive versatility during his lone season in Chapel Hill.
Originally Published:
A man accused of abusing a dog in Boston’s Dorchester neighborhood over the summer has a history of mental health and other health issues, his attorney said.
Akeem Pierre was arraigned Thursday in Dorchester District Court on animal cruelty charges, where he pleaded not guilty.
Back in June, Assistant District Attorney Nadia Eldemery said Pierre was seen walking a dog named Pluto in Dorchester. A witness told police they saw Pierre whip Pluto with the leash several times on the face and body, along with yelling at the dog and threatening him. The witness, who filmed the incident, also said Pierre lifted Pluto up off the ground by the leash and tugged him down the street. The dog allegedly seemed hesitant to walk with Pierre and appeared anxious.
Eldemery said the witness filmed the incident and sent the video to the MSPCA and police. The video was also posted on social media.
When police spoke with Pierre, he told them he was pet-sitting Pluto and “training” him by tapping him on the nose whenever he did something deemed inappropriate. Police said Pierre did not dispute or deny what he did in the video and did not show any remorse.
Pierre’s defense, attorney Elizabeth Pardy, said he has a long history of medical and mental health issues, which is why he was also in default on an OUI case from 2021. She said he’s bipolar, schizophrenic and has sickle cell anemia, along with other issues. She said he underwent a competency evaluation and the doctor determined that he’s not competent to stand trial.
Judge Thomas Kaplanes released Pierre on his own recognizance, despite the prosecution requesting $2,000 bail. He was ordered to have no interaction with Pluto, surrender any animals in his custody, report to probation weekly and remain drug and alcohol free. The judge also ordered him to undergo a mental health evaluation.
Pluto was taken to a veterinarian and was found to have no injuries. He was then brought to the MSPCA, who confirmed that he’s been adopted and is doing well.
“We’re grateful to the public for bringing this to our attention, which allowed our officers to quickly start a swift investigation that brought Pluto safely into our care and also secured charges, which are now pending before the courts,” said the MSPCA in a statement.
Boston Celtics
The Celtics showed flashes of what they can be at their best this season, but the 76ers got a historic rookie performance from VJ Edgecombe and a huge game from Tyrese Maxey to take the season opener.
Here are the takeaways.
Rookie wing VJ Edgecombe looked more than worth the Sixers’ robust tanking efforts last season in his regular-season debut. Edgecombe broke the NBA record for most points in the first quarter by a rookie with 14, surpassing LeBron James’ record of 12, and he broke the Sixers’ record for points in a rookie debut of 30 set by Allen Iverson, pouring in 34 on 13-for-26 shooting, including several earth-shaking dunks.
“For a rookie to come in, first game and put up (those numbers), it was impressive,” Derrick White said. “I don’t know if I’ve ever seen somebody have that in his debut, but he had a really good game.”
Point guard Tyrese Maxey, meanwhile, looked every bit up to the task of being the Sixers’ primary superstar this season, pushing the Sixers out to a halftime lead and pulling them back from the brink when Boston threatened to pull away in the fourth. Maxey finished with a massive 40-point outing, running rampant through a Celtics’ defense that struggled to get back and defend him whenever they missed shots.
The Sixers are far from a perfect roster, but tanking last season appears to have worked wonders for them, and as The Process Pt. 1 appears to be coming to a close (more on that in a minute), they appear very well set up to begin The Process Pt. 2.
After letting a double-digit lead slip away, the Celtics looked like they were done, but Edgecombe missed two late free throws that gifted them a final chance.
With eight seconds left, Derrick White struggled to inbound the ball before finally dishing to Payton Pritchard. Pritchard drove into the paint and had his shot blocked out of bounds with just over a second remaining.
On their last, last chance, the Celtics once again passed to Pritchard, who created a little space but missed the potential game-winner.
According to Pritchard, the play was designed for Jaylen Brown.
“They kind of shadowed it,” Pritchard said. “I got it, attacked, probably just made the wrong read. Anfernee (Simons and Sam (Hauser) were open on the back side, so that’s just a pass I’ve got to make.”
For his part, Mazzulla said the goal was to get the ball to the Celtics’ ball-handlers.
“We got the ball into the paint, got a decent look,” Mazzulla said. “It’s all you can do is get it to those guys, and they gave us a chance to win.”
At the risk of sounding overly reductive, the Celtics really need to get wins this season when the opportunities presents themselves, and Wednesday’s game was a prime example.
On a night when the player best suited to hurt them looked like a shell of himself, and when they built a double-digit second-half lead against a shaky roster propped up by two superhuman performances, the Celtics couldn’t claim their first win of the season.
That puts them in a precarious position over their first seven games. Their next contest is on the road against the Knicks, who are widely considered a genuine championship contender this season. That’s the start of a three-games-in-four-night stretch, during which their most beatable opponent (the Pelicans) is the opponent they face last. They then take on the Cavaliers (another championship contender), this 76ers team again, and the Rockets (yet another championship contender, who looked like a heavyweight in their showdown against the Thunder on Tuesday).
When the dust settles, the Celtics could be in a tough position in the standings, and while it’s still clearly very early in the season, this is not last year’s roster – digging out of an early hole will be much more difficult.
Brown and White scored 25 points apiece in their debut as the new Celtics stars. Brown dished out four assists early and shot 9-for-18 from the floor, and he played the kind of patient floor game the Celtics need from him in the absence of Jayson Tatum.
Prior to the game, Brown was questionable with a hamstring injury suffered during preseason.
“It was fine. I thought it held up well,” Brown said. “Definitely got to do some recovery. Within the first two weeks coming back from a strain, you’ve got to make sure that you get your recovery in because that’s when the risk is at its highest.
So I’ve just got to make sure I’m focusing on my body, getting my rest, doing my recovery, and getting ready for the next game.”
White, meanwhile, went ice-cold with the rest of his teammates from three in the second quarter – at one point, the Celtics missed nine straight – but he came alive in the third, and he worked his way to the line seven times.
The Celtics reportedly spent the summer checking on what they could get for Simons on the trade market, and that option is still likely on the table – this is, after all, a team very much in flux – but the early returns are promising.
Simons was as advertised offensively. He hit multiple 3-pointers that barely disturbed the net on their way through, he attacked the basket in late-shot-clock situations and created offense out of nothing, and at one point in the fourth quarter, he exploded to the rim and elevated so quickly off the ground that Tyrese Maxey could only jump out of his way futilely as Simons thundered home a two-handed slam.
Defensively, Simons was clearly trying to make a good impression. He was consistently down in a stance guarding ball-handlers, he ripped Maxey in transition at one point as the Sixers’ speedy guard flew to the rim, and – perhaps most importantly – he battled his way over and around screens without getting stuck, which has been one of his biggest problems as a defender. He still is unlikely to be a positive on the defensive end, but he was undeniably a positive overall.
Simons finished with 13 points on 5-for-10 shooting. On a team that lost its primary bucket-getter last season, he could make up some of the difference.
The Celtics got the full range of the Neemias Queta experience in the fourth quarter – the very good, and the very bad.
Queta had a good game overall – 17 points on 7-for-8 shooting and eight rebounds, including two big offensive ones. In the fourth quarter, he scored on four out of five consecutive possessions including three in a row. The Celtics needed a big performance from a big man, and they got one.
“He’s got it in him to be good for us, and he did some really good things,” Joe Mazzulla said. “The standard’s high for him.”
On the other hand, Queta committed a bad offensive foul setting a moving screen at a critical moment with 2:45 remaining and the Celtics nursing a four-point lead, and he fouled out a minute later sending Maxey to the free-throw line. Down the stretch, the Celtics needed Queta, who probably wouldn’t have short-armed the crucial put-back attempt that Xavier Tillman missed.
The Celtics have a lot of flawed-but-useful big men who can each do a little bit of something, but not everything. Queta frequently shows flashes of brilliance followed by moments that will leave Celtics fans pulling at their hair.
The first indicator that the 76ers’ big man might not be entirely himself was that he didn’t jump the opening tip, leaving the job to 76ers starting forward Dominick Barlow, who also had the odd distinction of being an Opening Night starter on a two-way contract.
The second indicator that Embiid wasn’t himself was the first Celtics’ possession, on which Neemias Queta set a screen for Derrick White, and Embiid stayed so far back in the lane, it was a little confusing who he was actually supposed to guard. Eventually, White spotted the amount of space he would have any time Queta set a screen, and the Celtics started going directly at Embiid whenever possible.
On the other end, Embiid hoisted a few half-hearted jumpers and attempted one half-hearted post move against Xavier Tillman before bailing halfway through, and Tillman poked the ball away. When Embiid sat down halfway through the quarter, the Sixers looked more like a coherent basketball team.
Things went from bad to worse the rest of the way. At one point, Embiid tried to post up Sam Hauser and failed to do any damage. His presence in the game coincided with the best offensive moments by far for the Celtics, and he sat late with just four points on 1-for-9 shooting.
Embiid’s size and injury history always meant that his aging process was unlikely to be graceful, but it was still jarring to see him moving so poorly this early in the season. The Sixers have plenty of optimism on their roster, but the Joel Embiid era of The Process did not look like it was in a particularly good place on Opening Night.
The Celtics now hit the road on a somewhat nonsensical road trip: They will travel to Madison Square Garden to take on the Knicks on Friday before flying to Detroit for a matchup against the rising Pistons on Sunday. When that game wraps up, they’ll travel to New Orleans to face the Pelicans on Monday.
Get breaking news and analysis delivered to your inbox during basketball season.
Boston Zoning Commission Chair Michael Nichols, who heads a downtown advocacy group, said he plans to recuse himself from Wednesday’s vote on a contentious zoning plan that would clear the way for more skyscrapers downtown.
Nichols, president of the Downtown Boston Alliance, said that although he was cleared by the state Ethics Commission to take part in the vote, he ultimately opted not to weigh in on the zoning changes proposed in PLAN: Downtown in his official capacity as chair of the Zoning Commission.
“I was able to get a state ethics opinion that held that I do not actually have any conflicts tomorrow that run afoul of state law, but I nonetheless don’t want it to be a distraction — so I’m opting not to participate,” Nichols told the Herald Tuesday.
Nichols said he sought the ethics opinion based on a potential conflict of interest he may have in voting on the downtown zoning plan due to his advocacy group’s work to “analyze the plan for so long.”
He is the chair and president of the Downtown Boston Alliance, which represents commercial property owners in the city’s core.
Nichols said he is also planning to turn the gavel over to Commission Vice Chair Jill Hatton for the duration of the meeting that pertains to the downtown zoning plan. Ahead of the vote, a public hearing will be held.
The Downtown Boston Alliance submitted a letter in support of the plan — and its proposed creation of new skyline districts that would allow for 500-700 foot towers in parts of the historic downtown — to the Zoning Commission last Friday. It was sent by DBA Chief of Staff Kelsey Pramik.
“The plan’s passage today is critical for completing the neighborhood’s needed transformation such that it can align with a ‘new normal’ that requires a broader mix of uses, a modernized and more predictable zoning code, and a housing-first agenda to welcome a new generation of residents,” the DBA letter states.
The Alliance sent a similar letter of support to the Boston Planning and Development Agency Board last month, ahead of the board’s 4-1 vote in favor of the zoning plan.
If approved by the Zoning Commission, the Wu administration’s downtown plan would go into effect.
The plan would clear the way for new buildings to tower up to 700 feet over the historic downtown.
It has been a source of contention for other stakeholders, particularly the Downtown Boston Neighborhood Association, which has described the proposed changes as “destructive,” in that they would alter the character of the city’s core and turn it into Manhattan.
Critics have also flagged potential violations to the state’s shadow law, which was enacted in 1990 and restricts the creation of new shadows on the Boston Common and Public Garden at certain times of the day.
The Association supports additional towering in the Financial District east of Washington Street, where such heights have traditionally been allowed. It opposes new skyscrapers in the historic and increasingly residential Ladder Blocks and Park Plaza neighborhoods to the west of Washington Street and adjacent to the Boston Common.
Tony Ursillo, a downtown resident and member of the Association, said Tuesday that “there are glaring deficiencies in the current proposal’s attempt to achieve key goals” of the plan.
“By giving special treatment allowing 500-foot luxury towers to a few cherry-picked sites in the blocks next to Boston Common, the city will produce hardly any affordable housing, will disrupt a historic neighborhood, and will squeeze out opportunities for small businesses to get created and thrive,” Ursillo told the Herald.
He urged the Zoning Commission to allow time to consider potential changes, such as eliminating special exceptions and keeping lower height limits intact around the Boston Common.
Israel continues deadly Gaza truce breaches as US seeks to strengthen deal
AI girlfriend apps leak millions of private chats
Video: Federal Agents Detain Man During New York City Raid
Trump news at a glance: president can send national guard to Portland, for now
Unionized baristas want Olympics to drop Starbucks as its ‘official coffee partner’
Trump admin on pace to shatter deportation record by end of first year: ‘Just the beginning’
Books about race and gender to be returned to school libraries on some military bases
Peanut allergies in children drop following advice to feed the allergen to babies, study finds