Connect with us

Northeast

Boston cop would have 'taken a bullet' for Karen Read's officer boyfriend found dead on his property

Published

on

Boston cop would have 'taken a bullet' for Karen Read's officer boyfriend found dead on his property

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Boston police officer who owned the property where John O’Keefe was found dead during a blizzard in January 2022 said he would have “taken a bullet” for his former colleague in a televised interview just days after jurors found the suspected killer, Karen Read, not guilty.

Advertisement

Brian Albert’s sister-in-law, Jennifer McCabe, woke him up after she, Read and another woman found O’Keefe unresponsive in the yard around 6 a.m. on Jan. 29, 2022.

“By the time I came downstairs, the police were already in my house, John was already gone, [and] there was nobody to save,” Albert told ABC News Friday. “I would’ve taken a bullet for John O’Keefe.”

CLEARED OF MURDER HARGES, KAREN READ COULD EYE LEGAL PAYBACK AGAINST INVESTIGATORS WHO COST HER

WATCH: Karen Read’s message for John O’Keefe’s family

Outside a celebratory post-verdict dinner, Read was asked if she had any words for O’Keefe’s family.

“I fought for John O’Keefe, harder than anyone,” she said. “Harder than anyone.”

Advertisement

Karen A. Read,  girlfriend of the late Boston Police officer John OKeefe, was arraigned in Norfolk Superior Court on charges of second degree murder in his death in Dedham, MA on June 10, 2022.  A photo of the couple together was presented by the defense to the prosecution.  (John Tlumacki/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

Read’s supporters have painted Albert and his family as villains, although he was not called to the stand in her second trial, her defense insinuated that O’Keefe’s fatal injuries had something to do with his dog, Chloe, and possibly a friend who was also at the house party.

Police never identified anyone but Read as a suspect, and no one else faced charges in connection with O’Keefe’s death.

WATCH: Karen Read’s attorneys weigh in on John O’Keefe’s death: ‘Somebody is still out there’

VINDICATED KAREN READ THANKS ‘GREATEST’ LEGAL TEAM AS JURORS DELIVER NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN BOYFRIEND’S DEATH

FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X

Advertisement

Read, O’Keefe and a group of other people had been invited back to Albert’s home just after midnight when the local bars closed.

Karen Read exits Norfolk County Superior Court in Dedham, MA, Wednesday, June 18, 2025. Read was found to be not guilty of the murder of her boyfriend, John O’Keefe. (Richard Beetham for Fox News Digital)

Six hours later, O’Keefe was found dead under a layer of snow on the front lawn. Prosecutors alleged that Read hit him with her Lexus SUV and left the scene, but jurors didn’t buy the story.

GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB

SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

After a trial that stretched on for more than 30 days, and four days of deliberation, jurors found Read not guilty of all homicide-related charges. They convicted her only of drunken driving, for which she will serve a year on probation.

Brian Albert testifies during Karen Read’s first trial at Norfolk County Superior Court, Friday, May 10, 2024, in Dedham, Mass. That trial ended with a deadlocked jury. She was found not guilty of murder after her second trial, which ended this week. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa, Pool)

After the trial, her defense hinted that whoever did O’Keefe has eluded investigators, who were faulted for a sloppy investigation and missed protocols at trial, in an audit, and through internal reviews.

“Somebody is still out there, and it’s a shame that this investigation was not done in the proper way so that they could have gotten to the truth,” David Yannetti, one of her defense attorneys, told reporters Thursday.

Advertisement



Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pennsylvania

Inside the legislative effort to expel cellphones from Pa.’s K-12 schools

Published

on

Inside the legislative effort to expel cellphones from Pa.’s K-12 schools


The case against a complete ban

There’s limited research available to date regarding the efficacy of school cellphone bans. Some studies, like one from 2024 at Auburn University, suggest such a policy could improve student engagement and social interactions with some limitations.

However, researchers at the University of Birmingham could not find much of a difference in academic and social outcomes between students who attended schools with cellphone bans and those who attended schools that did not.

School District of Philadelphia Superintendent Dr. Tony Watlington said in an interview with Philadelphia Magazine in August that he believes the decision is best made by each school.

“There are parents who feel very strongly that they need to be able to reach their children at all times, and there are others who feel the complete opposite,” Watlington told the magazine. “Cellphones can certainly be a distraction, but they can also be a walking library in the classroom.”

Advertisement

Some parents critical of legislative-level cellphone bans also highlight the need to reach their children in an era of school shootings and mass violence.

Santarsiero argued that cellphones, in those instances, may do more harm than good. Some school safety experts might agree.

Santarsiero recalled a time when he was a teacher where an armed robbery several blocks away prompted a lockdown at the school. Unaware of the robbery, he locked the classroom door, gathered his students to the corner of the room, away from the windows, and waited for instructions.

“We did that, and for the next hour and a half, before the incident was resolved, the kids started going on their phones, and they were texting home and really spreading a lot of rumors that turned out not to be true: that there was an armed shooter roaming the halls, that we were in imminent danger. And this was now filtering out to parents,” he said. “It was filtering out to other students, and it was creating a level of anxiety that was not helpful to trying to manage the situation.”

Pennsylvania School Boards Association, or PSBA, opposes Senate Bill 1014.

Advertisement

“While PSBA supports the goal of fostering learning-focused environments, the proposed legislation imposes a statewide, mandatory bell-to-bell ban on student cell phone use—stripping locally elected school boards of the ability to make decisions that best serve their communities,” the association wrote in a statement. “PSBA believes that locally elected school directors are in the best position to make decisions for their school communities concerning the use and possession of cell phones and other electronic devices in schools.”

According to PSBA, the bill “usurps local control.”

“PSBA also has some concerns with the wording of SB 1014, specifically the language regarding restriction of device possession and with the language regarding public comment,” PSBA wrote. “The bill would require schools to establish the manner in which a student’s possession of a device is to be restricted. It is unclear whether this language would require schools to take some sort of action to separate a student from their phone at the start of each school day (such as by purchasing and using lockable cell phone bags).”

Hughes said that officials must acknowledge the “good” that comes with the advancements in communication technology. However, he said the harm cannot be ignored.

“We need to have thoughtful conversations to come up with thoughtful policies that advantages the best of this technology, and minimizes the pain and the hurt that the technology can have on people — especially our children,” Hughes said.

Advertisement

The Senate is scheduled to return to session in January.



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Brown University shooting: Who is RI Attorney General Peter Neronha?

Published

on

Brown University shooting: Who is RI Attorney General Peter Neronha?


play

  • Neronha is Rhode Island’s 74th attorney general. He was sworn in on Nov. 6, 2018.
  • During President Donald Trump’s second term, Neronha has sued the president and his administration over 30 times.

Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha, along with Providence Mayor Brett Smiley and others, announced Dec. 14 that they were releasing the person of interest originally detained for the mass shooting at Brown University.

Neronha said that tips “led to us detaining a person of interest,” but that the evidence “now points in a different direction.”

Advertisement

“We have a murderer out there, frankly,” Neronha said. 

As attorney general, Neronha and his office will play a large role in the investigation over the shooting. Here’s what to know about the top legal official in Rhode Island.

Who is Peter Neronha?

Neronha is Rhode Island’s 74th attorney general. He was sworn in on Nov. 6, 2018.

As attorney general, Neronha leads an office that “prosecutes criminal cases; represents state agencies, departments and commissions in litigation; initiates legal action when necessary to protect the interests of Rhode Islanders; and oversees the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation,” according to his office.

Advertisement

Previously, Neronha was the United States Attorney for the District of Rhode Island from 2009 to 2017. He was appointed by former President Barack Obama.

He began his career in public service as a Rhode Island Special Assistant Attorney General in 1996. He was later appointed Assisted Attorney General, and then joined United States Attorney’s Office as an Assistant United States Attorney in 2002.

Neronha is a fourth generation native of Jamestown, Rhode Island. He has undergraduate and law degrees from Boston College.

Advertisement

Neronha’s relationship to Trump

During President Donald Trump’s second term, Neronha has sued the president and his administration over 40 times.

Some of the lawsuits that he has co-led include ones over withheld education funds and the dismantling of federal agencies like Health and Human Services and those that support public libraries and museums.

Neronha often criticizes the president in his lawsuits. In a press release announcing a lawsuit filed against the Trump administration Nov. 25 for reducing grant funds for projects that could help people experiencing homelessness, Neronha said that the administration continues to “punch down” on vulnerable Americans.

“The President and his Administration don’t care about making life easier or better for Americans; they only care about political capitulation, consolidating power, and further enriching the wealthy,” he said.

Advertisement

In a press conference earlier this year, Neronha said that he sues the Trump administration when the president has broken the law, when Americans have been harmed and when they have the legal standing to bring an action against the administration.

While it’s unclear if Trump has ever commented on Neronha specifically, he has often attacked judges who have tried to block his policies.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

‘Wreaths Across America’ observed at Vermont Veterans’ Home

Published

on

‘Wreaths Across America’ observed at Vermont Veterans’ Home


BENNINGTON — Holiday commemorations extended to the Vermont Veterans’ Home cemetery on Saturday, where community members gathered to honor the service men and women interred there through Wreaths Across America. Among those participating were members of Bennington’s own Civil Air Patrol.

The wreath-laying included an official ceremony, as well as laying wreaths at veteran graves and saying the veterans’ names out loud.

“So many Vermonters have sacrificed to serve in our Armed Forces. Sponsoring a wreath is a sign of gratitude to our veterans – both those who are living and to those who have departed,” said Susan Sweetser, the founder of the Vermont Veteran Moms group for Wreath Across America. “The first year after my daughter, Sgt. Virginia L. Sweetser, passed away and was buried at the Vermont Veterans Cemetery in Randolph, I participated in the Wreaths Across America event in Randolph. I was so discouraged to see that only 250 wreaths had been sponsored for the over 4,000 graves at VVMC. I vowed that I would work to change that. We have come a long way and I am praying that this will be the year that we see all the participating veteran graves covered.”

Advertisement

Wreaths Across America provides wreaths for Veteran graves all over the U.S., including the graves at Arlington National Cemetery.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending